Real 117-302 questions that appeared in test today
If you are searching for 117-302 Practice Test containing Real Test Questions, you are at correct place. Killexams.com have aggregated database of questions from Actual Exams keeping in mind the end goal to enable you to plan and pass your exam on the main endeavor. All preparation materials on the site are Up To Date and checked by our specialists.
Killexams.com give most recent and updated Pass4sure Practice Test with Actual Exam Questions and Answers for new syllabus of LPI 117-302 Exam. Practice our Real Questions and Answers to Improve your insight and pass your exam with High Marks. We guarantee your achievement in the Test Center, covering every one of the subjects of exam and fabricate your Knowledge of the 117-302 exam. Pass without any doubt with our exact questions.
Our 117-302 Exam PDF contains Complete Pool of Questions and Answers and Dumps checked and confirmed including references and clarifications (where material). Our objective to collect the Questions and Answers isn't just to pass the exam at first endeavor however Really Improve Your Knowledge about the 117-302 exam points.
117-302 exam Questions and Answers are Printable in High Quality Study Guide that you can download in your Computer or some other gadget and begin setting up your 117-302 exam. Print Complete 117-302 Study Guide, convey with you when you are at Vacations or Traveling and Enjoy your Exam Prep. You can get to updated 117-302 Exam Q&A from your online record whenever.
Killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for all exams on website
PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders
Download your LPI 302 Mixed Environment Study Guide promptly in the wake of purchasing and Start Preparing Your Exam Prep Right Now!
Observed these maximum 117-302 Questions in real test that I passed.
i was very disappointed once I failed my 117-302 exam. looking the internet informed me that there may be a internet site killexams.com that is the sources that I want to skip the 117-302 examination inside no time. I buy the 117-302 coaching percent containing questions solutions and exam simulator, prepared and sit down inside the exam and were given 98% marks. thanks to the killexams.com crew.
What are requirements to pass 117-302 examination in little attempt?
every unmarried morning i'd take out my jogging footwear and determine to go out going for walks to get a few clean air and feel energized. but, the day earlier than my 117-302 take a look at I didnt sense like jogging at all due to the fact i used to be so concerned i would lose time and fail my check. I got exactly the issue I needed to energize me and it wasnt going for walks, it became this Killexams.com that made a pool of educational records to be had to me which helped me in getting true rankings in the 117-302 check.
Proper knowledge and study with the 117-302 Q&A and Dumps! What a combination!
It became simply 12 days to strive for the 117-302 exam and i used to be loaded with a few points. i was looking for a easy and effective manual urgently. eventually, I got the Q&A of killexams. Its brief solutions have been no longer hard to complete in 15 days. in the real 117-302 examination, I scored 88%, noting all of the inquiries in due time and got 90% inquiries just like the pattern papers that they supplied. an awful lot obliged to killexams.
observed an accurate source for real 117-302 braindumps.
My exam readiness came about into 44 right replies of the aggregate 50 in the planned 75 minutes. It worked just simply the great. I got an attractive experience depending on the killexams.com dumps for the exam 117-302. The aide clarified with compact answers and reasonable cases.
Need something fast preparing for 117-302.
I spent enough time studying these materials and passed the 117-302 exam. The stuff is good, and whilst those are braindumps, meaning these substances are constructed at the real exam stuff, I dont apprehend folks who try to bitch aboutthe 117-302 questions being exceptional. In my case, now not all questions were one hundred% the equal, but the topics and widespread approach had been surely accurate. So, buddies, if you take a look at tough sufficient youll do just fine.
WTF! questions were exactly the same in exam that I prepared!
i've searched perfect cloth for this unique subject matter over on line. but I could not find an appropriate one that perfectly explains best the wanted and critical things. whilst i discovered killexams.com mind dump material i was genuinely amazed. It simply included the essential things and not anything crushed within the dumps. i am so excited to locate it and used it for my coaching.
Do a quick and smart pass, prepare those 117-302 Questions and answers.
I cleared 117-302 exam with high marks. Every time I had registered with killexams.com which helped me to score more marks. Its great to have help of killexams.com question bank for such type of exams. Thanks to all.
Take Advantage, Use Questions/Answers to ensure your success.
I handed 117-302 exam. way to Killexams. The exam could be very hard, and i dont know how long it would take me to put together on my own. Killexams questions are very easy to memorize, and the great part is that they are real and accurate. so you basically pass in understanding what youll see on your exam. as long as you skip this complicated exam and put your 117-302 certification in your resume.
All real test questions of 117-302 exam! Are you kidding?
Knowing very well about my time constraint, started searching for an easy way out before the 117-302 exam. After a long searh, found the question and answers by killexams.com which really made my day. Presenting all probable questions with their short and pointed answers helped grasp topics in a short time and felt happy to secure good marks in the exam. The materials are also easy to memorise. I am impressed and satiated with my results.
it's far high-quality ideal to put together 117-302 exam with dumps.
There is not a good deal 117-302 exam substances out there, so I went in advance and purchased those 117-302 questions and solutions. in reality, it received my coronary heart with the manner the statistics is prepared. And yeah, thats right: mostquestions I noticed on the exam have been exactly what turned into furnished by killexams.com. Im relieved to have exceeded 117-302 exam.
Which command will mount the accounting share hosted on the Windows server with the NetBIOS name joeserv.
mount -t smbfs -h joeserv \\accounting /mnt
mount -t smbfs -h joeserv //accounting /mnt
mount -t smbfs \\joeserv\accounting /mnt
mount -t smbfs //joeserv/accounting /mnt
After specifying wins server = 192.168.0.3 in smb.conf, the nmbd daemon now fails to start. This is probably because the setting = yes was also specified.
Which of the following are true of CIFS? (Choose TWO correct answers)
Filenames can be in any character set.
Filenames can have a maximum length of 127 characters.
Unlike SMB, CIFS is not optimized for slow network connections.
Opportunistic Locks are supported.
Answer: A, D
What is the most suitable procedure for accessing a Windows machine by its NetBIOS name from a Linux system?
Setup a dynamic DNS server to accept updated records from the Windows machine.
Run nmbd and winbindd on the Linux system and enable the WINS proxy.
Import the list of the NetBIOS names into a NIS server and enable a NIS client on the Linux system.
Install libnss_wins.so on the Linux system and configure the name service switch subsystem.
Which command CANNOT be used to mount a shared filesystem in your Linux environment?
mount.cifs //server/share /mnt -o user=user
mount -t cifs //server/share /mnt -o user=user
mount -t smbfs //server/share /mnt -o username=user
smbmount //server/share /mnt -o username=user
cifsmount //server/share /mnt -o username=user
What are the correct alternatives to the nmblookup command when performing NetBIOS lookups? (Select THREE correct answers.)
nmblookup "server#20" looks for an authetication server called server.
nmblookup -S name lists the recorded names by the NetBIOS machine called name.
nmblookup -A lists all recorded names in the local NetBIOS server.
nmblookup "testing#1d" looks for a Local Master Browser for the workgroup TESTING.
nmblookup "server#1D" looks for a Master Browser Server called server.
Answer: B, D, E
Which of the following are valid name resolution options for the name resolve order parameter in smb.conf? (Choose THREE correct answers)
Answer: A, D, E
In order to restrict access to the SMB (445/tcp) port and stop the use of NetBIOS (139/tcp), what parameter is required in smb.conf in Samba 3?
disable netbios = Yes
smb port = 445
disable directhosting = No
socket options = port:445
In order to successfully configure cross-subnet browsing for the replication of browse lists, every subnet must:
have one WINS server.
have one Local Master Browser.
have one Domain Master Browser
have a DHCP server capable of providing the WINS server's address to each client.
What is the lowest possible value for the os level parameter in smb.conf to ensure your Samba server will always win the election against any Microsoft server? (Enter only the number in numeric format)
Which smb.conf directive is required to configure a Samba server to act as a WINS server?
Nothing needs to be done. All Samba servers are automatically a WINS server.
command displays, along with other information, the computers in the
NetBIOS network working as a text mode equivalent to the Windows My Network Places feature.
You need to configure Roaming Profiles in a Samba server called TECH. You have to create the profile in a sub-directory called profiles inside of each user's home directory. What is the correct logon path setting? Please specify the full line with parameter and value.
LPI 117-302 Exam (LPI 302 Mixed Environment) Detailed Information
LPI is the global certification standard and career support organization for open source professionals. With more than 500,000 exams delivered, it's the world’s first and largest vendor-neutral Linux and open source certification body. LPI has certified professionals in 181 countries, delivers exams in 9 languages, and has over 200 training partners.
Recommended for professionals: LPIC-1, LPIC-2 and LPIC-3
For IT professionals who want their Linux and open source skills verified in order to boost their career momentum, why wait? According to the Foote Partners report, ‘IT Skills and Certification Index’, there’s double-digit growth in bonuses paid to LPI certified candidates.
According to CompTIA HR perceptions of IT Training and Certification study:
96% use IT certifications as screening or hiring criteria during recruitment.
90% agree IT certified individuals are more likely to be promoted than those without.
89% think IT certified individuals perform better than non certified individuals in similar job roles.
88% say IT certified employees are rewarded (bonus and pay increase) for obtaining IT certification.
94% expect IT certification to grow in importance over the next two years.
88% believe it’s important to test after training to confirm knowledge gains.
97% value certification enough to provide support for IT employees obtaining certification.
The open source Jobs Report says hiring managers are looking for open source professionals.
34% are willing to aid with the cost of an employee's open source certification
59% are looking to increase open source hiring
74% have a need for developers
58% are seeking DevOps professionals
65% report open source hiring will rise more than hiring in other departments
87% say it's hard to find open source talent
"ManpowerGroup recently found that 36% of employers globally reported talent shortages in 2014—the highest percentage in seven years. In the United States, more than half (54%) of employers currently have open positions for which they can’t find qualified candidates. Unemployment rates for highly skilled workers continue to fall, job openings are on the rise and companies are finding an increased need to focus their attention on finding staff with job-specific skills needed to meet rapidly changing technologies.”
— ITCC, 2016 white paper, ’The trends that will affect the IT certification industry by 2020’
How open source professionals keep their skills up to date:
open source Jobs Report 2016 open source Jobs Report 2016
LPI tops the list of Linux certs by population according to Certification Magazine
1. Linux Professional Institute LPIC-1 37.9%
2. Linux Foundation Certified Systems Administrator (LFCS) 36.0%
3. Red Hat Certified Engineer (RHCE) 24.2%
4. Red Hat Certified Systems Administrator (RHCSA) 22.2%
5. SUSE Certified Linux Administrator (CLA) 20.3%
6. CompTIA Linux+ Powered by LPI 18.3%
7. Linux Professional Institute LPIC-2 17.0%
8. Novell Certified Linux Professional 15.7%
9. Linux Foundation Certified Engineer 13.7%
10. Red Hat Certified Architect (RHCA) 8.5%
How we create our certifications
LPI is committed to providing the IT community with exams of the highest quality, relevance, and accuracy. This commitment requires that our exam development process is highly detailed, participatory, consultative and employs many of the proven techniques used by most other IT certification programs.
LPI’s exam development process is detailed, thorough, participatory, collaborative and employs many proven techniques used by the best IT certification programs.
Psychometrics, the study of testing and measuring mental capacity, is used throughout LPI certification development to ensure that our exams reflect the needs of the IT community and industry.
As a part of our ongoing certification development process we continually monitor the needs of the Linux and IT markets to ensure our exams effectively evaluate candidates on the most relevant skills.
When we began this process in the late 1990’s we initially launched a two-tiered certification track that became what is known as LPIC-1 and LPIC-2 today. Over the years we have expanded our offerings to include the third tier to the LPIC professional track with the three enterprise specialties of LPIC-3. We’ve also introduced an entry-level certificate program, Linux Essentials, for those seeking to add some Linux to their credentials.
Job Task Analysis
After development of a program structure and a job description for an exam or series, the next stage is to scientifically determine the skills, tasks and areas of knowledge needed for the job. The challenge: Anyone could come up with a list of tasks they think a Linux professional should be able to do. If you ask 10 Linux professionals what a “junior-level” professional should do, you might get 10 lists.
Which list is correct?
Our solution: We ask a large number of Linux professionals for their lists of necessary job duties, and then compile the responses to find the common and most important tasks. The most important tasks show up on all lists.
This process is called job analysis study or job task analysis. LPI has completed extensive job analysis surveys of Linux professionals to help ensure exams are unbiased and constructed fairly.
How we do it:
First we work with a large pool of subject-matter experts to compile an exhaustive list of all the tasks that they think might be performed by the target audience of the certification.
Job Analysis Survey
Next, the tasks collected during the pre-survey go into a job analysis survey. This survey asks practicing Linux professionals to rate each task in several ways:
Frequency: How often they perform the task.
Importance: How important it is for an administrator to be able to perform the task.
Finally, we conduct statistical analysis of the survey responses. We compute statistics indicating, on average, how critical respondents rated each task. This analysis guides the determination of the final job task list.
The third major stage of development is converting the results from the Job Analysis Study to develop the actual objectives for the exam(s). Objectives express specific things that Linux professionals must be able to do. Each objective is assigned a weighting value indicating its importance relative to other objectives.
Initial Objective Drafting
First, a small group of people with knowledge of both Linux technical issues and psychometric principles drafted an initial set of test objectives, basing them upon the results of the job analysis study.
Objective Review and Revision
After the draft objectives are created, they are placed online in a web based system for public review and comment. This system organizes objectives by exam and content topic, displaying the objectives themselves, along with links to additional documentation about the objectives. Public comments about objectives are collected and then supervisors review the comments and revise the objectives as necessary. The most recent review and revision of the objectives is posted publicly on our LPI Exam Development wiki and we send them to our community and ExamDev mailing list for comments and input.
When the objectives are finalized, we post them to LPI.org and let our community as well as courseware and training providers know, so that the training materials can be updated to reflect the new exam material.
Once the objectives are finalized, we being the process of writing questions, called items, for exams. Security is a major concern in item development. All items are kept as confidential as possible by having those involved in the process sign non-disclosure agreements agreeing not to disclose item content to anyone. LPI also takes other undisclosed security precautions.
Historically, the process used to develop the items for most other IT certification exams was to fly a group of subject-matter experts into a location for a week or more, give them training in how to write items, and then have them work intensely to create the questions.
But this technique is expensive and exclusive. At LPI, during our initial exam development phase we leveraged the power of the community through the internet to encouraged everyone who was interested and knowledgeable to help with item writing.
Since then, LPI has developed new items for exam rotation in house by tapping the knowledge of subject matter experts, online volunteers and participants in item writing workshops.
Supervisors screened all submitted exam items, and accepted, rejected or reworded them. They focused on three criteria:
Redundancy: Items that are substantially identical to previously submitted items are rejected.
Phrasing and Clarity: Items phrased in confusing or otherwise inappropriate ways are rejected or reworded. Supervisors pay attention to ensure that questions can be understood by non-native English speakers.
Accuracy: Supervisors rejected or reworded items that are not technically accurate.
Item Technical Review
Next, LPI uses a group of Linux experts to put items through a technical review. Each item is reviewed by multiple experts. Each expert classifies items as approved, rejected or “other” for rewording or review by others.
The primary technical criteria:
Appropriateness of distractors (for multiple-choice items): Reviewers ensure that the distractor answer choices are incorrect but reasonably plausible.
Phrasing and clarity: Reviewers ensure items are worded in appropriate language.
Supervisors then collect the reviews to determine if each item was:
Accepted based on consensus
Rejected based on consensus
Accepted after further review: If reviewers did not agree, the supervisor might accept it, perhaps based on the opinion of another reviewer.
Rejected after further review: If reviewers did not agree, the supervisor might reject it, perhaps based on the opinion of another reviewer.
Accepted after revision: In some cases, reviewers might suggest rewording the item and the supervisor might accept the item after rewording it.
Live Form Creation
The next stage of development involves assembling items into exams for global deployment. Each test has multiple forms. If candidates fails one form and retake the exam, they receive the different form of the exam on retake attempt.
The Pearson VUE test engine randomly orders the questions of each form when someone takes the exam to ensure two candidates taking the same exam are not tested on the same questions in the same order.
Initial Exam Publishing
Once the LPI psychometric staff has determined the composition of forms, the exam must be converted from text-based items into the actual exam file format to deployed globally through LPI’s network of testing centers.
The exam enter a period of initial testing to determine if the questions are in fact measuring skills and competencies. In IT certification, this period is known as the beta testing period.
During the beta period, candidates can register for tests and complete them at local events. They receive credit, but candidates do not receive scores back immediately after the exam. Beta exams often involve extra questions with an extended-time format as well as additional survey and demographic questions. Several simultaneous processes determine the cut score, so that exams may be evaluated and scored.
Obtaining Enough Exams
Before the passing score can be set, LPI had to accumulate an adequate number of exams taken by people who are similar to the target job description. As our support has grown, our target data numbers continue to grow, helping to generate the most accurate results. As part of the beta exam process, demographic data is taken into account by psychometric staff when reviewing the validity of questions.
Reviewing the Questions
As tests results roll in, psychometric staff start to examine the data. Asking questions such as: Are there questions that everyone gets correct? Are there questions that everyone fails? to determine if there anything wrong with the questions. Exam comments collected during the process are reviewed and questions and concerns are addressed.
Modified Angoff Study
While psychometric staff review incoming data, a separate pool of subject-matter experts simultaneously participated in a modified Angoff study. Their goal, to provide the psychometric staff with additional data to validate questions and assist in setting the passing score.
During this process, the experts:
Receive copies of the exam questions on each form.
Look at each question independently and in consultation with each other and make judgments about how likely a minimally qualified person meeting the job requirements described in a specification sheet would be able to answer the question correctly. In other words, the experts consider the question from the perspective of someone who is at the bottom of the competence scale for job performance.
Rate each question with their estimate of what percentage of people will answer correctly, keeping in mind that on multiple choice questions, some people will get it right by virtue of guessing.
Ideally, the results from the Angoff study should parallel the actual results from the exams in the beta period. Beyond validating item performance, the results of the Angoff study are also used in helping to establish the passing score for exams.
Distributing Score Results
After all of the data collection, the analysis and the Angoff study, the psychometric staff set a passing score, and distribute scores to exam takers who participated in the beta.
Once the beta has been completed, the passing score has been set, and any bad items have been removed or fixed, the exam is ready to be re-published. This work involves significant review and can take a month or more to complete. Once this final review process is complete, we coordinate with Pearson VUE and our partner network to publish the finalized exams for all test takers worldwide.
Why Written Exams
Written exams are a global standard.
Multiple choice is a common standard for most certification and licensure exams. Whether you want to be a doctor, lawyer, or chartered accountant, most professions require that you pass a multiple-choice exam. The procedures for producing high-quality multiple choice exams are firmly established. No such standard exists for hands-on exams. Therefore they tend to be ad hoc and rarely include pilot testing, item analysis, formal standard setting, and equating.
Written exams are valid.
Written job knowledge exams have approximately the same levels of predictive validity as job simulations (Roth et al., 2005)
Written exams are more efficient.
Written exams with individual questions are more efficient than exams with more complex item types. For example, Jodoin (2003) examined innovative item types on an IT certification exam that required examinees to construct answers (e.g. draw a network diagram). He found that these constructed response items provided more information but also took additional time. As a result, he concluded that, “multiple-choice items provide more information per unit time.”
Written exams cover all objectives.
Certification exams (like LPI’s) cover a broad range of knowledge areas. Using individual items, written exams can easily ensure adequate coverage of all objectives. Because of practical constraints, hands-on testing must either sample narrowly from these objectives or cover a much smaller body of knowledge.
Written exams are more valuable.
Hands-on testing is typically more expensive in all phases, including item development, pilot testing, administration, and scoring. If hands-on testing is more expensive but not more reliable or valid, then it offers less value.
Written exams are more reliable and objective.
Scoring practices for open-ended exams vary considerably, but the literature on scoring constructed responses suggests that subjective scoring is often less reliable than the scoring of traditional items. The literature on job performance suggests that objective measures of performance are also unreliable.