|Exam Name||:||i5 iSeries WebSphere Technical Solutions V5R3|
|Questions and Answers||:||94 Q & A|
|Updated On||:||October 18, 2017|
|PDF Download Mirror||:||000-858 Dump|
|Get Full Version||:||Pass4sure 000-858 Full Version|
An iSeries development group with no Java programming skills has been asked to provide a web-based application for querying information from DB2 UDB for iSeries. There will be several categories of users, each with varying levels of access to the application. Which of the following minimizes the development effort?
Create iSeries Access for Web Database requests.
Generate a web application with the WDSc for iSeries SQL wizard.
Build a 5250 application and web-enable it via the IBM WebFacing Tool.
Use IBM Query for iSeries and web-enable it with the IBM WebFacing Tool.
A customer wants to utilize caching to minimize the overhead of serving common servlet output from WAS. How do they implement this?
Using cachespec.xml files in the Web application
Using the Fast Cache Response Accelerator
Using Java Servlet Version 2.3 filter code
Using the WDSc deployment descriptor editor
A new J2EE WAS-based application is being developed, which will require a high volume of DB2 UDB for iSeries reads on the same machine. Which of the following techniques should be utilized?
JDBC datasource using the IBM Toolbox for Java
JDBC datasource using the iSeries Native JDBC provider
JDBC datasource using the Enterprise JavaBean query language
JDBC datasource using the IBM Toolbox for Java record level access provider
A J2EE application developer would like to determine the overall application response time contribution by individual Java components and methods. Which of the following tools should be used?
iDoctor for iSeries
Tivoli Performance Viewer
OS/400 Collection Services
WDSc Profiling Perspective
An i825 customer requires separate WAS production, test, and development environments on their system. Their applications require JavaServer Pages and servlets plus read/write access to DB2 UDB for iSeries. Which of the following provides these capabilities at the lowest cost?
WAS - Express for iSeries
WAS Single Server Edition
WAS Network Deployment Edition
An independent software vendor (ISV) is developing a new WAS V5 ERP application. Which of the following WAS utility options should be investigated to streamline the installation and configuration tasks?
CONFIGWASSVR shell script
Administrative console command macros
A customer is running a new WAS-based application on their development iSeries. They are now ready to move this application into a production environment. Which tool should be used to determine what iSeries server resources are required?
iSeries Job Watcher
Patrol for iSeries - Predict
iSeries Performance Explorer
An existing customer's RPG development group is reluctant to move away from host tools such as PDM, SEU, and SDA. Which of the following benefits of the workstation based CODE tools should be emphasized to the customer?
CODE Program Generator produces more efficient compiled code.
CODE Designer and Editor can work disconnected from the host.
CODE Designer is the only tool that can specify screen colors.
CODE Editor has a text find and replace feature that complements SEU.
Which of the following communication protocols allows WebSphere Application Server
version 4.0 and later releases to communicate with a Web server?
HTTP and HTTPS
Remote OSE Transport
An i825 customer wants to build a new order entry Web application that avoids interactive workload and traditional 5250 screen-to-screen navigation. However, the customer would like to reuse the existing RPG-based business logic for calculating discounts, sales tax, and shipping costs. What is an appropriate strategy?
Rewrite the RPG business logic as callable ILE Service Programs.
Utilize the IBM WebFacing Tool.
Import the RPG business logic into VisualAge RPG and rewrite the application.
Use the XML Toolkit for iSeries product to Web-enable the RPG business logic.
A customer has an i820 FC #2437/1526 (two-way, 2350 CPW/1050 ICPW). Measurements show that after they have used the IBM WebFacing Tool to convert all their 5250 applications, they are using 1600 CPW. The customer is planning to double the capacity being used. Which of the following upgrades will meet their requirements and minimize the total upgrade cost?
eServer i5 520 Standard Edition
eServer i5 520 Enterprise Edition
eServer i5 520 Value Edition
eServer i5 550 Solution Edition
WAS-based applications running on OS/400 differ from traditional RPG and COBOL
based applications in which of the following ways?
Traditional applications use more memory.
WAS applications use less operating system services.
WAS applications require more system input/output services.
Traditional applications always provide the maximum performance.
A customer is looking at options for web enabling their DB2 UDB for iSeries resources. Which of the following is a key advantage of using a WAS-based application over a Net.Data-based application?
WAS-based applications can utilize standard SQL syntax.
WAS-based applications can call iSeries program objects.
WAS-based applications can use database connection pooling.
WAS-based applications can access DB2 UDB on a local or remote iSeries.
we're all neatly conscious that a major difficulty within the IT industry is that there is a lack of great IBM 000-858 look at various Prep study 000-858 substances. Our Certification IBM 000-858 exam guidance substances supply you every little thing you're going to deserve to take a certification examination. particulars are researched and produced with the aid of Certification specialists who are perpetually the use of industry event to produce precise, logical and validated explanations for the answers. You may also get questions from distinct net sites or books, but common sense is the important thing. IBM 000-858 examination training from Testking encompass: finished 000-858 brain dumps questions with comprehensive particulars specific explanations of all the questions (when available) Questions accompanied through exhibits validated solutions Researched by using industry consultants Drag and Drop questions as skilled within the 000-858 study 000-858 courses and precise tests Questions updated on commonplace groundwork These questions and answers are backed by using our assure. Like exact certification exams our product is in diverse-alternative questions (MCQs). Our IBM 000-858 examine King examination will give you exam questions and proven answers that mirror the specific examination. These questions and answers come up with the event of taking the specific look at various. The apply exam isn't just questions and solutions. they're your access to excessive technical competencies and accelerated learning capacity. Our IBM 000-858 braindumps and questions have designated explanations for each reply and as a consequence ensures that you wholly bear in mind the questions and the conception behind the questions. Certification specialists, licensed computer Trainers, Technical Coworker and finished Language Masters, who've a great, validated and licensed background and excessive technical talents, have compiled these detailed explanations. Certification training Q and A offered by IBM 000-858 TestKing will make you think such as you are taking an exact examination at a Prometric or VUE middle.
we are all well conscious that an enormous problem in ... IBM 000-858 examination Simulator with Explainations and displays ...
ibm, exam, trade, test, questions
different utility of Testking.com
New training equipment application
December special! 30% Off
ExamCollection top class
Get limitless access to all ExamCollection's top rate information!
Enter Your electronic mail handle to receive Your 30% Off discount Code
Please enter a correct electronic mail to Get your discount Code
download Free Demo of VCEExam Simulator
adventure Avanset VCE exam Simulator for your self.
read 000-858ily submit your electronic mail handle beneath to get began with our interactive software demo of your free trial.
Unformatted text preview: ADMS 3330 assignment four answer issue 1 (60 marks) a) [15 pts] The choice variables: X: # of comedy advertisements Y: # of football commercials The purpose feature is: minimize 50 X + one hundred Y [They are actually 50K and 100K but does not make a difference.] The constraints are: 7X + 2Y >= 28 (attain to excessive-profits girls – advertising and marketing constraint) 2X + 12Y >= 24 (reach to high-profits men – marketing constrdaint) The system will also be written as: reduce 50 X + 100 Y field to 7X + 2Y >= 28 2X + 12Y >= 24 X, Y >= 0 As will also be from the graphical solution there are three severe points: (0,14), (three.6,1.4), and (12,0). The most excellent answer is (X*,Y*) = (three.6,1.four) for (three.6)(50,000) +(1.four)(one hundred,000) = 320.000. Y (0, 14) possible vicinity (3.6, 1.four) (12, 0) X 7X + 2Y = 28 Obj. func: 50X + 100 Y = 320 2X + 12Y = 24 b and c) [15 points] To compute the range of goal feature coefficients, where the existing basis continue to be top-rated, need to make sure the slope of the goal characteristic continues to be within the boundaries described with the aid of the. therefore, for part b) -7/2 <= - c1/100 <= -2/12, which ends up in 3.5 >= c1/a hundred >= 1/6, and then 350 > = c1 > = sixteen.67. in a similar fashion for part c) -7/2 < = -50/c2 <= -2/12, which then results in 300 >= c2 >= 14.28. d and e) [15 pts] These components are not coated in all sections, and for this reason usually are not graded. each person may be awarded 15 facets. besides the fact that children, for the sake of completeness are offered. To compute these stages we need to examine how the objective solution basis adjustments when the appropriate-hand-aspect (r.h.s.) of the constraints adjustments. The subsequent determine indicates it for the constraint 7X + 2Y >= 28, which suggests that after the r.h.s. of the constraint can change between 7*0 + 2*2 = 4 t0 7*12 +2*0 = eighty four and the most efficient basis does not trade. The identical category of analysis finds the 2nd constraint’s r.h.s. range as 8 and 168. Y (0, 14) possible area (3.6, 1.four) (12, 0) X 7X + 2Y = 28 Obj. func: 50X + one hundred Y = 320 2X + 12Y = 24 f) [ 15 points] To compute the dual costs we should alternate the r.h.s of constraints for a unit (or any quantity provided that the greatest answer foundation doesn't change) and the compute the change within the objective function. because it can be viewed from the next graphic, if the r.h.s of the constraint changes from 24 to 25, the ideal foundation continue to be the same, but now the highest quality solution is (X, Y ) = (3.575, 1.4875), which results in an objective feature value of 327.5. therefore the twin fee is – 320 – 327.5 = 7.5. [Shown in the next figure.] If the same is repeated for the different constraint (i.e. 7X + 2Y = 29), the most fulfilling solution turns into, (X,Y) = (three.seventy five,1.375), for most efficient goal 325. Then the dual expense of the primary constraint is 320 – 325 = -5 Y (0, 14) possible place (three.575, 1.4875) (3.6, 1.four) (12, 0) X 7X + 2Y = 28 Obj. func: 50X + a hundred Y = 320 2X + 12Y = 24 issue 2 (40 marks) a) [20 points] The primary choice variables are how a lot long term borrowing to do initially and how a lot brief time period borrowing is performed in each and every length. [Note that it does not make sense to make borrowing in any other month other than July. Also it does not make sense to do short term borrowing in December.] Let, Y: volume of future borrowing Xi: volume of short time period borrowing performed in period i, i=1,2,..5 [July…Nov] furthermore, let Ii denote the money accessible on the conclusion of length I, where I0 = 1,000. The revenues and the bills in every length are denoted by Ri and Bi. The main goal here is to pay the entire expenses and debts the usage of revenues and other borrowing, whereas minimizing the can charge of borrowing. The leading constraint is that there ought to now not be terrible money accessible [that is the firm does not go bankrupt]. The objective function is: minimize Z = 0.06Y + 0.02X1 + 0.02X2 + 0.02X3 + 0.02X4 + 0.02X5 + 0.02X6 There are cash stability constraints for each and every length. they're: I1 = I0 + Y + X1 + R1 – B1 [Month 1] [Months 2-5] I2 = I1 + X2 –(1.02)X1 + R2 – B2 I3 = I2 + X3 –(1.02)X2 + R3 – B3 I4 = I3 + X4 –(1.02)X3 + R4 – B4 I5 = I4 + X5 –(1.02)X4 + R5 – B5 I6 = I5 –(1.02)X5 – (1.06)Y + R6 – B6 [Month 6] The constraints can even be written by using substituting parameters: I1 = Y + X1 -3,000 I2 = I1 + X2 – (1.02)X1 -3,000 I3 = I2 + X3 – (1.02)X2 – 4,000 I4 = I3 + X4 – (1.02)X3 +1,000 I5 = I4 + X5 – (1.02)X4 +four,000 I6 = I5 –(1.02)X5 – (1.06)Y +15,000 The formula will also be written as: cut Z = 0.06Y + 0.02X1 + 0.02X2 + 0.02X3 + 0.02X4 + 0.02X5 field to: I1 - Y - X1 = -three,000 I2 - I1 - X2 + (1.02)X1 = - three,000 I3 - I2 - X3 + (1.02)X2 = – four,000 I4- I3 - X4 + (1.02)X3 = 1,000 I5 - I4 - X5 + (1.02)X4 = four,000 I6 - I5 + (1.02)X5 + (1.06)Y = 15,000 Ii, Xi, Y >=0 b) [20 points] The critical a part of the administration Scientist is given under. therefore, the top-rated answer is to get a long-time period debt of 6,000 in July and brief term bills of four,000 and 3,080 within the months of October and November. the overall financing cost is $501.60. most efficient solution purpose characteristic cost = 501.600 Variable -------------I1 I2 I3 I4 I5 I6 Y X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 cost --------------3000.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 858.400 9498.400 6000.000 0.000 0.000 4000.000 3080.000 0.000 reduced costs -----------------0.000 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.021 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.020 Constraint -------------1 2 three four 5 6 Slack/Surplus --------------0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 dual fees ------------------0.060 -0.060 -0.040 0.020 0.000 0.000 ...View Full document
ITestEasy:IBM 000-858 i5 iSeries WebSphere Technical Solutio...
IBM 000-858 i5 iSeries WebSphere Technical options V5R3 ITestEasy: The top of the line IT certification practising tool for iPhone, with latest practicing...$19.ninety nine
writer: Your mobile Apps Downloads: 7
Frankel, E. (1965). A comparative examine of reaching and underachieveing boys of high intellec
tual capability. In M. Kornrich (Ed.), Underachievement (pp. 87-one zero one). Springfield, IL: Charles
Hattie, J. (1992). Self-thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical is
sue for the twenty first century. evaluation of educational research, 70, 151-179.
Holland, V. (1998). Underachieving boys: problems and options. guide for discovering, 13(four),
Lyon, M. A. (1993). academic self-idea and its relationship to achievement in a sample of ju
nior excessive college college students. academic and Psychological size, fifty three, 201-211.
Majoribanks, okay. (1992). The predictive validity of an attitudes in opposition t faculty scale in relation
to children’s tutorial achievement. tutorial and Psychological measurement,52,
Mandel, H. P., & Marcus, S. I. (1988). The psychology of underachievement. new york: John
Marsh, H. W., Chessor, D., Craven, R., & Roche, L. (1995). The outcomes of proficient and gifted
classes on educational self-concept: The large fish strikes again. American educational Re
search Journal, 32, 285-319.
McCall, R. B., Evahn, C., & Kratzer, L. (1992). excessive college underachievers: What do they
obtain as adults? Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
McCoach, D. B. (2002). A validation analyze of the school angle assessment Survey. Measure
ment and assessment in Counseling and building, 35, sixty six-seventy seven.
McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (in press). factors that differentiate underachieving gifted stu-
dents from high achieving talented students. talented newborn Quarterly.
Peters, W. A. M., Grager-Loidl, H., & Supplee, P. (2000). Underachievement in proficient and tal-
ented college students: theory and observe. In k. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F.
Subotnik (Eds.), international instruction manual of giftedness and ability(2nd ed., pp. 609-620).
Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
Peterson, J. S. (2000). A observe-up examine of 1 neighborhood of achievers and underachievers four
years after excessive college graduation. Roeper assessment, 22, 217-224.
Peterson, J. S., & Colangelo, N. (1996). gifted achievers and underachievers: A comparison of
patterns found in school files. Journal of Counseling and building, seventy four, 399-406.
Pintrich, P. R., & DeGroot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated researching add-ons of
classroom educational efficiency. Journal of academic Psychology, 82, 33-forty.
Reis, S. M., & McCoach, D. B. (2000). The underachievement of proficient students: What do we
be aware of and where do we go? talented baby Quarterly, 44, 152-a hundred and seventy.
Rimm, S. (1995). Why vivid children get negative grades and what which you can do about it. big apple:
Crown exchange Paperbacks.
Schiefele, U. (1991). interest, learning, and motivation. academic Psychologist, 26, 299-323.
Schunk, D. H. (1981). Modeling and attributional consequences on toddlers’s fulfillment: A self-
efficacy analysis. Journal of tutorial Psychology, 73, ninety three-one zero five.
Schunk, D. H. (1984). Self-efficacy perspective on success behavior. educational Psychol
ogist, 19, forty eight-58.
Schunk, D. H. (1998, November). Motivation and self-legislation among gifted learners.Pa
per offered on the annual assembly of the countrywide affiliation of proficient infants, Louis
Supplee, P. L. (1990). attaining the gifted underachiever. ny: lecturers school Press.
Weiner, J. B. (1992). Psychological disturbance in youth(2nd ed.). new york: John
Whitmore, J. R. (1980). Giftedness, conflict, and underachievement. Boston: Allyn & 1st Baron Beaverbrook.
428 educational AND PSYCHOLOGICAL dimension