Find us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter





























Smartest Killexams.com ST0-172 planning technique | brain dumps | 3D Visualization

Killexams.com ST0-172 Q & A - practice questions - VCE - examcollection - braindumps and exam prep are the best to prepare ST0-172 certification to get full marks - brain dumps - 3D Visualization

Pass4sure ST0-172 dumps | Killexams.com ST0-172 real questions | http://morganstudioonline.com/

ST0-172 Symantec NetBackup 7.5 for Windows(R) Technical Assessment

Study sheperd Prepared by Killexams.com Symantec Dumps Experts


Killexams.com ST0-172 Dumps and real Questions

100% real Questions - Exam Pass Guarantee with lofty Marks - Just Memorize the Answers



ST0-172 exam Dumps Source : Symantec NetBackup 7.5 for Windows(R) Technical Assessment

Test Code : ST0-172
Test appellation : Symantec NetBackup 7.5 for Windows(R) Technical Assessment
Vendor appellation : Symantec
: 108 real Questions

it's miles improbable to believe ST0-172 question financial institution and believe a view at manual.
My view of the ST0-172 test expense sheperd was negative as I always wanted to believe the preparation by a test routine in a class play and for that I joined two different classes but those outright seemed a fake thing for me and I quit them immediately. Then I did the search and ultimately changed my thinking about the ST0-172 test samples and I started with the same from killexams. It really gave me the fine scores in the exam and I am contented to believe that.


New Syllabus ST0-172 Exam prep study sheperd with questions are provided here.
The arrangement time for ST0-172 exam was truly a pleasant experience for me. Effectively passing, I believe figured out how to lucid outright the further levels. Because of killexams.com Questions & Answers for outright the assistance. I had constrained time for preparation yet killexams.com brain dumps turned out to be a back for me. It had significant question and answers that made me procedure in a short compass.


actual test ST0-172 Questions and solutions.
The short answers made my steerage more handy. I finished seventy five questions out off 80 nicely under the stipulated time and managed eighty%. My aspiration to be an authorized select the exam ST0-172. I were given the killexams.com sheperd definitely 2 weeks before the exam. Thank you.


i establish a exquisite supply for ST0-172 dumps
Thankyou killexams..I believe cleared my ST0-172 exam with 92%. Your Question Bank was very helpful. If anybody practices 100% truly from your question set and studies outright the questions rightly, then he will definately succeed. Till now I believe cleared 3 other exams outright with the back of your site. Thank you again.


Can i am getting brand original dumps with real Q & A of ST0-172 examination?
The excellent factor approximately your questions bank is the explanations provided with the solutions. It helps to understand the theme conceptually. I had subscribed for the ST0-172 questions and answers and had long gone thru it three-4 times. within the exam, I tried outright the questions under forty mins and scored 90 marks. thank you for making it antiseptic for us. Hearty pass to killexams.com crew, with the assist of your version questions.


were given maximum ST0-172 Quiz in real select a view at that I prepared.
The crew in the back of killexams.com exigency to severely pat their returned for a activity well achieved! I believe no doubts whilst pronouncing that with killexams.com, there is no threat which you dont gain to be a ST0-172. virtually recommending it to the others and outright of the top class for the future you guys! What a notable examine time has it been with the back for ST0-172 available at the internet site. You had been relish a chum, a real buddy indeed.


forget the entirety! just forcus on those ST0-172 questions.
A score of 86% changed into beyond my preference noting outright of the questions internal due time I got around 90% questions nearly equal to the killexams.com dumps. My preparation whirl out to be most extensively abominable with the intricate subjects i used to be looking down some solid smooth material for the exam ST0-172. I started perusing the Dumps and killexams.com repaired my troubles.


Take these ST0-172 questions and answers before you fade to vacations for test prep.
I could undoubtedly deal with 93% marks in the halt of the exam, as numerous questions were relish the adviser for me. Much appreciated to the killexams. I had a weight from office to split the exam ST0-172. However, I was stressed over taking a decent planning in microscopic time. At that point, the killexams.com aide showed up as a windfall for me, with its simple and short replies.


No source is more powerful than this ST0-172 source.
I might probably advocate it to my partners and accomplices. I were given 360 of imprints. I was enchanted with the effects I had been given with the assist test sheperd ST0-172 exam route dump. I commonly thought actual and tremendous researchwere the reaction to outright or any exams, until I took the assistance of killexams.com brain promote off to pass my exam ST0-172. Fantastically fulfill.


surprised to view ST0-172 actual test questions!
Ive renewed my membership this time for ST0-172 exam. I accept my involvement with killexams.com is so well-known it is not feasible capitulation thru no longer having a membership. I am capable of in reality accept as real with killexams.com tests for my exam. Simply this net web page can assist me gleam my ST0-172 accredition and assist me in getting above ninety 5% marks within the exam. You outright are truely making an noteworthy showing. Preserve it up!


Symantec Symantec NetBackup 7.5 for

Symantec Ships original NetBackup and Backup Exec | killexams.com real Questions and Pass4sure dumps

With the newly launched NetBackup 7.5 and Backup Exec 2012 utility, Symantec is hoping to entice IT execs with the swear of more advantageous efficiency, improved uphold for digital infrastructures and more cloud storage alternatives. possibly most compelling, to storage administrators at least, is the haphazard of streamlining their backup innovations.

"With Symantec options, backup has certainly not been less difficult," referred to Deepak Mohan, senior vice president of Symantec counsel administration neighborhood. "we are dedicated to featuring groups with the paraphernalia they should manage their tips now and because the explosion in statistics continues," he brought.

Symantec has antecedent to strive for a simplified, effortless-to-control backup ecosystem. a big number of storage directors are overwhelmed by means of their backup toolset, based on the company. Citing results from a corporation-run survey of 1,four hundred IT worker's, 28 p.c "have too many backup equipment."

In response, Backup Exec receives an up to date administration console facets a brand original design with a simplified view of physical and digital belongings. NetBackup 7.5 boasts simplified search and recovery features to back in the technique of prison holds.

IT admins would not intellect a microscopic more efficiency, both. and that they're willing to bounce ship to gain it. in keeping with Symantec, "72-p.c willingness to switch backup items if their hurry doubled."

In hopes that they will land in its ready hands, the business claims that it has re-tooled NetBackup to supply an up to 100-fold backup velocity increase. Cloud storage options include Amazon internet features (AWS), Rackspace and AT&T, in addition to previous aid for Nirvanix.

also on tap is NetApp Snapshots integration. Symantec's partnership with NetApp is getting cozier with the tidings that NetApp will resell NetBackup Replication to centralize administration over SnapVault and SnapMirror along with Symantec's backup platform.

in the meantime, Backup Exec is moreover broadening its VMware data coverage guide. original to the 2012 edition is VMware competent information protection certification for vSphere 5.0, that means that it complies with the Hardware version eight specification for vSphere Storage DRS, Storage vMotion and VMware digital machines.

On the cloud entrance, Symantec is gearing up for an upcoming Backup Exec Cloud DR alternative powered by recovery services issuer Doyenz. The function, according to Symantec, will "allow cloud-based application recovery in lower than 15 minutes." Nirvanix cloud backup remains an choice.

NetBackup 7.5 and Backup Exec 2012 can be establish now.

Pedro Hernandez is a contributor to the IT business facet community, the network for expertise authorities. prior to now, he served as a managing editor for the web.com network of IT-connected web sites and because the eco-friendly IT curator for GigaOM professional. comply with him on Twitter @ecoINSITE.

comply with InfoStor on Twitter


Symantec backup purposes gain makeovers for velocity, VMs | killexams.com real Questions and Pass4sure dumps

Symantec Corp. nowadays rolled out improvements to its backup functions, including a quicker backup routine and stronger view for NetBackup 7.5, as well as virtual computing device backup enhancements and a brand original interface for Backup Exec 2012.

Symantec claims it expanded the backup pace in its NetBackup enterprise backup software with the addition of a NetBackup Accelerator function. The accelerator role reduces traditional plenary backups to the pace of incremental backups for thousands and thousands of little files, in accordance with Symantec.

“they are aphorism the pace has been accelerated with the aid of one hundred X, which is a bold claim,” pointed out Jason Buffington, an analyst at business strategy community (ESG). “They built-in know-how from client-facet deduplication. First, data are recognized after which the constituents of the file that believe modified are deduped.”

Symantec streamlined its file gadget scanning, and uses exchange file tracking and deduplication to back up most efficacious the changed blocks or sub-file level changes.

“Deduplication is finished at the secrete stage so they don’t transmit the total file throughout,” mentioned Danny Milrad, Symantec’s director of product advertising. “here is an evolution of deduplication during which they eradicated the scan time.”

Symantec additionally formed a partnership with network paraphernalia to enhance a NetApp Replication Director feature within NetBackup 7.5, which now helps NetApp’s SnapMirror and SnapVault. Snapshots are pulled into NetBackup so administrators can control from the backup software and that they moreover can spend snapshots to recover information.

“that you would be able to restore from disk or tape and now you could restoration from NetApp snapshots,” mentioned Buffington.

NetBackup can moreover now Do greater granular searches, create an audit path and behavior federated searches throughout outright domains or simply search an remoted domain, referred to Milrad. prior to now, NetBackup had a remedial search capacity that turned into not designed for e-discovery. The business has constructed a brand original index technology in the backup utility it is similar to the one in its business Vault archiving application.

“When a backup is carried out, they Do a file paraphernalia scan to tune the metadata attributes for the backup files for more granular searches,” Milrad mentioned.

Backup Exec V-Ray

Symantec introduced V-Ray for virtual machines to its windows-primarily based Backup Exec software. The V-Ray edition includes a backup-to-digital role that makes it practicable for valued clientele to fix a production server from a VMware or Microsoft Hyper-V digital machine with the aid of treating the digital laptop as a backup goal. When data is backed up to a actual BackupExec server, a picture moreover is constructed.

“in case you lose an entire construction computing device, you could just spin up a virtual laptop,” ESG’s Buffington referred to. “that you may suppose of it as a pre-staged naked metal recovery.”

Backup Exec 2012 moreover includes a brand original wizard-primarily based user interface that reduces the multi-set backup process birthright down to three mouse clicks. The interface lets the backup administrator rapidly identify the server, information set and the insurance policy/retention policy when conducting backups.

“earlier than [the original process], it changed into about even if each and every project was achieved. They optimized the interface to disclose that the censorious workloads had been protected instead of the projects,” said Sean Regan, Symantec’s senior director of product advertising and marketing.

Symantec moreover made license alterations in BackupExec 2012. Backup Exec 2012 V-Ray edition lets valued clientele license on a per-socket basis. in the past, Syamntec’s licensing established on actual servers with an alternative so as to add virtual assist.

“It adjustments pricing so customers don’t ought to purchase a actual license,” Regan observed.

The Backup Exec 2012 little company edition makes it practicable for shoppers to protect a highest of three servers without dealing with assorted licenses and brokers. A unique license includes outright brokers and assist for Microsoft exchange, Sequel Server and Hyper-V. “This radically shrinks the variety of SKUs,” Buffington referred to.


Symantec's NetBackup help aims VM Backup and healing | killexams.com real Questions and Pass4sure dumps

Symantec's NetBackup upgrade aims VM Backup and recovery

Symantec ultimate week rolled out the first help to its NetBackup enterprise backup and healing carrier in two years. The business notable it gave NetBackup 7.6 a gargantuan performance enhance and tuned it up for environments using its replication engine for vSphere.

while Symantec is arguably the main company of business backup and restoration utility, a slew of challengers are focused on its dominance and believe concentrated on the proliferation of virtual datacenters. Many believe argued that NetBackup was now not maintaining with this trend.

although no longer pointing to any specific issues with NetBackup 7.5, Symantec Senior Product advertising manager Glen Simon talked about there is a companywide stress on improving Symantec's software. "across the board there may be an increased stress on best," Simon stated. "This release is getting ready shoppers for the subsequent technology of the contemporaneous datacenters."

On a lofty stage Symantec referred to NetBackup 7.6 is designed for businesses that are evolving their infrastructure to software-defined datacenters. the brand original free up is designed to automate tremendous-scale records protection even for those on the cusp of creating that transition. in line with the company's own research, the quantity of records groups are developing is expanding at as much as 70 p.c yearly, which the brand original unencumber is designed to tackle with the aid of providing greater automation and faster performance.

Simon emphasised that NetBackup 7.6 moreover addresses the shift to the augment of digital machines and goals VMware environments. especially it uses NetBackup Replication Director to protect VMware environments, according to Simon. it can moreover spend NetApp snapshots taken from its arrays to protect virtualized environments. the brand original release can recuperate VMware vSphere VMs four hundred times sooner than its predecessor, the enterprise claims.

VMware's dominance even if, or not it's no longer the only hypervisor agencies are the usage of. So what about Microsoft's Hyper-V? "Going forward probably the most essential makes a speciality of the subsequent unlock might be Hyper-V," Simon spoke of.

Given the competitive panorama and augment of Hyper-V, the enterprise would be perspicacious not to wait a further two years for that upgrade.

Posted by Jeffrey Schwartz on 01/27/2014 at 9:fifty four AM


Whilst it is very hard chore to select liable exam questions / answers resources regarding review, reputation and validity because people gain ripoff due to choosing incorrect service. Killexams. com develop it certain to provide its clients far better to their resources with respect to exam dumps update and validity. Most of other peoples ripoff report complaint clients foster to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams enjoyably and easily. They never compromise on their review, reputation and property because killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams client self assurance is well-known to outright of us. Specially they manage killexams.com review, killexams.com reputation, killexams.com ripoff report complaint, killexams.com trust, killexams.com validity, killexams.com report and killexams.com scam. If perhaps you espy any bogus report posted by their competitor with the appellation killexams ripoff report complaint internet, killexams.com ripoff report, killexams.com scam, killexams.com complaint or something relish this, just maintain in intellect that there are always disagreeable people damaging reputation of fine services due to their benefits. There are a big number of satisfied customers that pass their exams using killexams.com brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams exercise questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit Killexams.com, their test questions and sample brain dumps, their exam simulator and you will definitely know that killexams.com is the best brain dumps site.

Back to Braindumps Menu


HP2-E27 exercise test | 700-260 exercise test | 000-318 free pdf download | 1V0-603 exam prep | 650-251 study guide | HP0-781 sample test | 000-163 test questions | 70-549-CSharp cram | 000-731 exercise questions | HPE2-E55 real questions | CLO-001 real questions | HP0-262 cheat sheets | HP3-C30 questions and answers | P3OF braindumps | ICGB test prep | LOT-805 dumps questions | C2150-200 bootcamp | NS0-153 real questions | 000-911 test prep | 1Z0-327 questions and answers |


Exactly same ST0-172 questions as in real test, WTF!
At killexams.com, they convey completely tested Symantec ST0-172 actual Questions and Answers that are of late required for Passing ST0-172 exam. They beyond question empower people to prepare to prep the and guarantee. It is a superb option to accelerate your situation as a specialist inside the Industry.

If you are inquisitive about passing the Symantec ST0-172 exam to launch earning? killexams.com has forefront developed Symantec NetBackup 7.5 for Windows(R) Technical Assessment test questions that will develop sure you pass this ST0-172 exam! killexams.com delivers you the foremost correct, current and latest updated ST0-172 exam questions and out there with a 100 percent refund guarantee. There are several firms that offer ST0-172 brain dumps however those are not correct and latest ones. Preparation with killexams.com ST0-172 original questions will be a best thing to pass ST0-172 exam in straight forward means. We are outright cognizant that a significant drawback within the IT business is there's an absence of property study dumps. Their test preparation dumps provides you everything you will believe to be compelled to select a certification test. Their Symantec ST0-172 exam offers you with test questions with verified answers that replicate the actual test. These Questions and Answers offer you with the expertise of taking the particular exam. prime property and worth for the ST0-172 exam. 100% guarantee to pass your Symantec ST0-172 exam and acquire your Symantec certification. They believe a tenor at killexams.com are committed to assist you pass your ST0-172 exam with lofty scores. The probabilities of you failing your ST0-172 exam, once memorizing their comprehensive brain dumps are little. Symantec ST0-172 is rare outright round the globe, and moreover the business and programming arrangements gave by them are being grasped by each one of the organizations. They exigency back in driving an outsized scope of organizations on the far side any doubt. So much reaching learning of ST0-172 eam are viewed as a vital capability, and moreover the specialists certified by them are exceptionally prestigious altogether associations.

Quality and Value for the ST0-172 Exam: killexams.com exercise Exams for Symantec ST0-172 are made to the most raised standards of particular accuracy, using simply certified theme experts and dispersed makers for development.

100% Guarantee to Pass Your ST0-172 Exam: If you don't pass the Symantec ST0-172 exam using their killexams.com testing programming and PDF, they will give you a plenary REFUND of your purchasing charge.

Downloadable, Interactive ST0-172 Testing Software: Their Symantec ST0-172 Preparation Material gives you that you should select Symantec ST0-172 exam. Inconspicuous components are investigated and made by Symantec Certification Experts ceaselessly using industry experience to convey correct, and authentic.

- Comprehensive questions and answers about ST0-172 exam - ST0-172 exam questions joined by displays - Verified Answers by Experts and very nearly 100% right - ST0-172 exam questions updated on universal premise - ST0-172 exam planning is in various determination questions (MCQs). - Tested by different circumstances previously distributing - Try free ST0-172 exam demo before you select to gain it in killexams.com

killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017: 60% Discount Coupon for outright exams on website
PROF17: 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17: 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
DECSPECIAL: 10% Special Discount Coupon for outright Orders


ST0-172 Practice Test | ST0-172 examcollection | ST0-172 VCE | ST0-172 study guide | ST0-172 practice exam | ST0-172 cram


Killexams Praxis-Core pdf download | Killexams 310-400 study guide | Killexams 6402 exam prep | Killexams HP0-787 exercise test | Killexams 2B0-103 test prep | Killexams 640-803 dumps questions | Killexams 920-463 exercise test | Killexams 9A0-365 exam questions | Killexams 9L0-206 dumps | Killexams ISTQB-Level-1 braindumps | Killexams P2170-037 dump | Killexams 9A0-039 questions answers | Killexams FC0-U11 exercise questions | Killexams HP2-B119 test prep | Killexams HP2-B22 questions and answers | Killexams C9010-251 examcollection | Killexams C2090-424 sample test | Killexams AZ-300 free pdf | Killexams 650-157 test prep | Killexams 090-600 real questions |


killexams.com huge List of Exam Braindumps

View Complete list of Killexams.com Brain dumps


Killexams 1Z0-070 braindumps | Killexams 00M-602 dumps questions | Killexams 300-320 bootcamp | Killexams 920-462 free pdf | Killexams C2040-414 real questions | Killexams HP0-M21 pdf download | Killexams 70-464 sample test | Killexams 000-J02 study guide | Killexams 1Z0-053 cheat sheets | Killexams ST0-173 cram | Killexams 1Z0-820 exercise questions | Killexams 1Z0-457 test prep | Killexams DCAN-100 braindumps | Killexams DCAPE-100 real questions | Killexams CSSGB test questions | Killexams 3M0-250 questions and answers | Killexams LOT-952 VCE | Killexams 000-546 exercise test | Killexams JN0-331 real questions | Killexams C2010-506 examcollection |


Symantec NetBackup 7.5 for Windows(R) Technical Assessment

Pass 4 sure ST0-172 dumps | Killexams.com ST0-172 real questions | http://morganstudioonline.com/

Nokia Corporation Interim Report for Q3 2013 and January-September 2013 | killexams.com real questions and Pass4sure dumps

This is a summary of the third quarter 2013 and January - September 2013 interim report published today. The complete third quarter 2013 and January - September 2013 interim report with tables is available at http://www.results.nokia.com/results/Nokia_results2013Q3e.pdf. Investors should not rely on summaries of their interim reports only, but should review the complete interim reports with tables.

Third quarter 2013 highlights: Nokia Group non-IFRS EPS in Q3 2013 was EUR 0.01; reported EPS was EUR -0.02 - Nokia Group achieved underlying operating profitability for the fifth consecutive quarter, with a Q3 non-IFRS operating margin of 3.8%, driven by strong performances by Nokia Solutions and Networks (NSN) and HERE.- Nokia Group ended Q3 with a strong equilibrium sheet and solid cash position, with raw cash of EUR 9.1 billion and net cash of EUR 2.4 billion. Excluding the acquisition of Siemens` stake in NSN for EUR 1.7 billion, Nokia Group net cash was approximately flat sequentially. At the halt of Q3 NSN`s contribution to Nokia Group raw and net cash was EUR 2.7 billion and EUR 1.5 billion, respectively. - NSN achieved underlying profitability for the sixth consecutive quarter, with Q3 non-IFRS operating margin of 8.4%, reflecting strong raw margin and continued progress relative to its strategy in a seasonally weak quarter. - HERE achieved Q3 non-IFRS operating margin of 9.5%, reflecting solid raw margin and operational efficiency. - Devices & Services achieved Q3 non-IFRS operating margin of negative 1.6%.

Nokia Group net sales in Q3 2013 were EUR 5.7 billion, flat quarter-on-quarter - NSN Q3 net sales decreased 7% quarter-on-quarter to EUR 2.6 billion, primarily reflecting seasonality and NSN`s strategic focus.- HERE Q3 net sales decreased 9% quarter-on-quarter to EUR 0.2 billion, primarily due to lower seasonal sales to vehicle customers.- Devices & Services Q3 net sales increased 6% quarter-on-quarter to EUR 2.9 billion.

- Lumia Q3 volumes increased 19% quarter-on-quarter to 8.8 million units, reflecting their recently broadened Lumia product scope and strong customer demand, particularly for the Lumia 520.- Mobile Phones Q3 volumes increased 4% quarter-on-quarter to 55.8 million units, demonstrating solid performance across the majority of their portfolio due to recently launched devices, particularly the Nokia 105, the Asha 501, and the Nokia 210.

Additional information Commencing the fourth quarter 2013, and theme to shareholder approval of the sale of substantially outright of its Devices & Services business at their Extraordinary universal Meeting (EGM), Nokia expects to report substantially outright of its Devices & Services business as discontinued operations. If Nokia Group would believe reported substantially outright of its Devices & Services business as discontinued operations in the third quarter 2013 the net sales of its continuing operations would believe been EUR 2.9 billion, which is EUR 2.8 billion lower than Nokia Group net sales of EUR 5.7 billion.  However, Nokia Group`s non-IFRS operating margin of its continuing operations would believe been 11.5%, which is 7.7 percentage points higher than the third quarter 2013 non-IFRS operating margin of 3.8%.

January-September 2013 highlights: Nokia Group net sales in January-September 2013 were EUR 17.2 billion - Nokia Group net sales for the nine months ended September 2013 decreased 22% year-on-year.- Reported EPS for the nine months ended September 2013 was EUR -0.16, compared to EUR -0.89 in the nine months ended September 2012.

Risto Siilasmaa, Nokia Chairman and interim CEO commented on the company`s progress: "Subject to the planned completion of the Microsoft transaction, Nokia will believe three established businesses: NSN, HERE and Advanced Technologies.

Our strategy drudgery is making fine progress and it has already become lucid that there are meaningful opportunities for outright of their business areas: NSN, HERE and Advanced Technologies. In outright of these businesses, they believe strong assets that they continue to invest in for the long term benefit of their customers and shareholders."

Commenting on the third quarter results, Timo Ihamuotila, Nokia CFO and interim President, said: "The third quarter was among the most transformative in their company`s history. They became the plenary owner of NSN and they agreed on the sale of their handset operations to Microsoft, transactions which they believe will radically reshape the future of Nokia for the better. theme to the completion of the Microsoft transaction, Nokia will believe significantly improved earnings profile, strong financial position and a solid foundation from which to invest.

We are pleased that NSN and HERE both generated solid profitability in what was a seasonally weak third quarter and at a time when they continue to develop significant R&D investments into future growth opportunities."

SUMMARY financial INFORMATION

  Reported and Non-IFRSthird quarter 2013 results1,2,3 Reported and Non-IFRS January-September 2013 results1,2,3,4 EUR million Q3/13 Q3/12 YoYChange Q2/13 QoQChange Q1-Q3/13 Q1-Q3/12 YoY Change Nokia Net sales 5 662 7 239 -22 % 5 695 -1 % 17 209 22 135 -22 % Operating profit 118 -564 -115 -147 -2 726 Operating profit(non-IFRS) 215 90 139 % 303 -29 % 699 -493 EPS, EUR diluted  -0.02 -0.26 -0.06  -0.16 -0.89 EPS, EUR diluted(non-IFRS)5  0.01 -0.07 0.00  -0.01 -0.23 Net cash fromoperatingactivities 9 -429 -196 19 -917 Net cash andother liquidassets6 2 413 3 564 -32 % 4 067 -41 % 2 413 3 564 -32 % Devices &Services7 Net sales 2 898 3 563 -19 % 2 724 6 % 8 510 11 832 -28 % Smart Devicesnet sales 1 254 976 28 % 1 164 8 % 3 582 4 221 -15 % MobilePhonesnet sales 1 489 2 366 -37 % 1 405 6 % 4 484 6 968 -36 % Mobiledevicevolume(mn units) 64.6 82.9 -22 % 61.1 6 % 187.6 249.3 -25 % SmartDevicesvolume(mn units) 8.8 6.3 40 % 7.4 19 % 22.3 28.4 -21 % MobilePhonesvolume(mn units) 55.8 76.6 -27 % 53.7 4 % 165.3 220.9 -25 % MobiledeviceASP8 45 43 5 % 45 0 % 45 47 -4 % SmartDevicesASP8 143 155 -8 % 157 -9 % 161 149 8 % MobilePhonesASP8 27 31 -13 % 26 4 % 27 32 -16 % Operatingprofit -86 -672 -33 -161 -1 363 Operatingprofit(non-IFRS) -47 -252 -32 -75 -742 Operatingmargin % -3.0% -18.9% -1.2% -1.9% -11.5% Operatingmargin %(non-IFRS) -1.6% -7.1% -1.2% -0.9% -6.3% HERE7 Net sales 211 265 -20 % 233 -9 % 660 825 -20 % Operatingprofit 14 -56 -89 -172 -245 Operatingprofit(non-IFRS) 20 37 -46 % 8 150 % 23 114 -80 % Operatingmargin % 6.6% -21.1% -38.2% -26.1% -29.7% Operatingmargin %(non-IFRS) 9.5% 14.0% 3.4% 3.5% 13.8% NokiaSolutions andNetworks7 Net salesMobile 2 592 3 501 -26 % 2 781 -7 % 8 177 9 791 -16 % Broadbandnet salesGlobal 1 259  1 625 -23 % 1 281 -2 % 3 784  4 267 -11 % Services netsales 1 331  1 701 -22 % 1 459 -9 %  4 213 4 950 -15 % Operatingprofit 166 183 -9 % 8 177 -1 047 Operatingprofit(non-IFRS) 218 324 -33 % 328 -34 % 742 206 260 % Operatingmargin % 6.4% 5.2% 0.3% 2.2% -10.7% Operatingmargin %(non-IFRS) 8.4% 9.3% 11.8% 9.1% 2.1%

Note 1 relating to results information and non-IFRS (also referred to as "underlying") results: The results information in this interim report is unaudited.  In addition to information on their reported IFRS results, they provide certain information on a non-IFRS, or underlying business performance, basis. Non-IFRS results exclude outright material special items for outright periods. In addition, non-IFRS results exclude intangible asset amortization, other purchase expense accounting related items and inventory value adjustments arising from (i) the formation of NSN and (ii) outright business acquisitions completed after June 30, 2008. Nokia believes that their non-IFRS results provide meaningful supplemental information to both management and investors regarding Nokia`s underlying business performance by excluding the above-described items that may not be indicative of Nokia`s business operating results. These non-IFRS financial measures should not be viewed in isolation or as substitutes to the equivalent IFRS measure(s), but should be used in conjunction with the most directly comparable IFRS measure(s) in the reported results. espy note 2 below for information about the exclusions from their non-IFRS results. More information, including a reconciliation of their Q3 2013 and Q3 2012 non-IFRS results to their reported results, can be establish in their complete Q3 2013 and January-September 2013 interim report with tables on pages 24-25 and 27-32. A reconciliation of their Q2 2013 non-IFRS results to their reported results can be establish in their complete Q2 interim report with tables on pages 19 and 21-25 published on July 18, 2013.

Note 2 relating to non-IFRS exclusions:

Q3 2013 - EUR 97 million (net) consisting of:- EUR 39 million restructuring freight and other associated items in Nokia Solutions and Networks.- EUR 3 million restructuring freight in HERE- EUR 15 million restructuring freight in Devices & Services- EUR 5 million restructuring related impairments in Devices & Services- EUR 18 million of transaction costs related to the proposed sale of Devices & Services business to Microsoft.- EUR 13 million of intangible asset amortization and other purchase expense accounting related items arising from the acquisition of Motorola Solutions` networks assets- EUR 3 million of intangible asset amortization and other purchase expense accounting related items arising from the acquisition of NAVTEQ- EUR 1 million of intangible assets amortization and other purchase expense related items arising from the acquisition of Novarra, MetaCarta and Motally in Devices & Services

Q3 2013 taxes - EUR 33 million net tax expenses on prior year operations offset by certain tax benefits related to previous year`s earnings

Q2 2013 - EUR 418 million (net) consisting of:- EUR 157 million restructuring freight and other associated items in NSN.- EUR 151 million losses related to divestments of businesses in NSN.- EUR 10 million restructuring freight in HERE- EUR 12 million of intangible asset amortization and other purchase expense accounting related items arising from the acquisition of Motorola Solutions` networks assets- EUR 87 million of intangible asset amortization and other purchase expense accounting related items arising from the acquisition of NAVTEQ- EUR 1 million of intangible assets amortization and other purchase expense accounting related items arising from the acquisition of Novarra, MetaCarta and Motally in Devices & Services

Q3 2012 - EUR 654 million (net) consisting of:- EUR 74 million restructuring freight and other associated items in NSN, including EUR 3 million of net charges related to country and constrict exits based on original strategy that focuses on key markets and product segments.- EUR 2 million restructuring freight in HERE- EUR 454 million restructuring freight in Devices & Services- EUR 35 million positive particular from a cartel pretension settlement in Devices & Services- EUR 67 million of intangible asset amortization and other purchase expense accounting related items arising from the formation of NSN and the acquisition of Motorola Solutions` networks assets- EUR 91 million of intangible asset amortization and other purchase expense accounting related items arising from the acquisition of NAVTEQ- EUR 1 million of intangible assets amortization and other purchase expense related items arising from the acquisition of Novarra, MetaCarta and Motally in Devices & Services

Q3 2012 taxes - EUR 157 million non-cash deferred tax expense related to legal reorganizations arising from HERE business integration.

Note 3 relating to changes to historical comparative financials due to revised IFRS accounting standard, IAS19 Employee Benefits: The historical comparative financials presented in the interim report include certain changes to previously reported information. These changes result from the retrospective application of a revised IFRS accounting measure IAS19, Employee Benefits and mainly relate to consolidated statements of comprehensive income and financial position. For more information on the adjustments between the previously reported information and the adjusted information, tickle espy the related disclosure starting on page 39 of the complete Q1 2013 interim report with tables published on April 18, 2013.

Note 4 relating to January-September 2013 results: Further information about the results for the period from January 1 to September 30, 2013 can be establish on pages 22-23, 25, 33-34 and 37-38 of the complete Q3 2013 and January-September 2013 interim report with tables.

Note 5 relating to non-IFRS Nokia EPS: Nokia taxes were unfavorably impacted by Devices & Services taxes as no tax benefits are recognized for certain Devices & Services deferred tax items. If Nokia`s earlier estimated long-term tax rate of 26% had been applied, non-IFRS Nokia EPS would believe been approximately 2.2 Euro cent higher in Q3 2013. Going forward on a non-IFRS basis, until a pattern of tax profitability is reestablished in Finland, Nokia expects to record quarterly tax expense of approximately EUR 50 million related to its Devices & Services business and approximately EUR 50 million related to its NSN business. Nokia expects to continue to record taxes related to its HERE business at a 26% rate.

Note 6 relating to Nokia net cash and other liquid assets: Calculated as total cash and other liquid assets less interest-bearing liabilities. For selected information on Nokia Group interest-bearing liabilities, tickle espy the table on pages 46-47 of the complete Q3 2013 and January-September 2013 interim report with tables.

Note 7 relating to operational and reporting structure: They believe three businesses: Devices & Services, HERE and Nokia Solutions and Networks (formerly Nokia Siemens Networks), moreover known as NSN, and five operating and reportable segments: Smart Devices and Mobile Phones within Devices & Services;  HERE; Mobile Broadband and Global Services within NSN. Smart Devices focuses on smartphones and Mobile Phones focuses on mass market mobile devices, including Asha full-touch smartphones. Devices & Services moreover contains Devices & Services Other, which includes net sales of their frill phone business Vertu through October 12, 2012, spare parts and related cost of sales and operating expenses, as well as intellectual property (IPR) income and common research and evolution expenses. In October 2012, they completed the divestment of Vertu to EQT VI, a European private equity firm. Nokia has signed an agreement on September 2, 2013 to enter into a transaction whereby Nokia will sell substantially outright of its Devices & Services business to Microsoft. Starting with the fourth quarter of 2013, and theme to shareholder approval at their EGM, Nokia expects to report substantially outright of its Devices & Services business as discontinued operations. HERE focuses on the evolution of location-based services and local commerce. They introduced HERE as the original brand for their location and mapping service in November 2012. As of January 1, 2013, their Location & Commerce business and reportable segment was renamed HERE. NSN is one of the leading global providers of telecommunications infrastructure hardware, software and services, with the focus on the mobile broadband market. NSN includes two reportable segments, Mobile Broadband and Global Services. Mobile Broadband provides mobile operators with radio and core network software together with the hardware needed to deliver mobile voice and data services. Global Services provides mobile operators with a broad scope of services, including professional services, network implementation and customer freight services. NSN moreover contains NSN Other, which includes net sales and related cost of sales and operating expenses of Non-core businesses as well as Optical Networks through May 6, 2013 when its divestment was completed. On August 7, 2013, Nokia completed the acquisition of Siemens` stake in Nokia Siemens Networks. In accordance with this transaction, the Siemens appellation is being phased out from Nokia Siemens Networks` company appellation and branding. The original appellation and brand is Nokia Solutions and Networks, moreover referred to as NSN, which is being used moreover for financial reporting purposes. Until the halt of the second quarter 2013, NSN has been reported as a unique reportable segment for Nokia financial reporting purposes.

Note 8 relating to unprejudiced selling prices (ASP): Mobile device ASP represents total Devices & Services net sales (Smart Devices net sales, Mobile Phones net sales, and Devices & Services Other net sales) divided by total Devices & Services volumes. Devices & Services Other net sales includes net sales of Nokia`s frill phone business Vertu through October 12, 2012, spare parts, as well as intellectual property income. Smart Devices ASP represents Smart Devices net sales divided by Smart Devices volumes. Mobile Phones ASP represents Mobile Phones net sales divided by Mobile Phones volumes. As IPR income is included in Devices & Services Other net sales, they provide their total mobile device ASP both including and excluding IPR income. The mobile device ASP excluding IPR income in the third quarter 2013 was EUR 43, up 5% from EUR 41 in the third quarter 2012 and up 2% from EUR 42 in the second quarter 2013.

NOKIA OUTLOOK

- Nokia expects NSN`s non-IFRS operating margin in the fourth quarter 2013 to be approximately positive 12 percent, plus or minus four percentage points. This outlook is based on Nokia`s expectations regarding a number of factors, including:

- competitive industry dynamics;- product and regional mix;- industry seasonality;- the timing of major original network deployments; and- expected continued improvement under NSN`s restructuring and transformation programs.

- In the fourth quarter 2013, Nokia expects NSN to deliver solid net sales growth on a sequential basis, supported by strong industry seasonality.- Nokia continues to target to reduce NSN`s non-IFRS annualized operating expenses and production overheads by more than EUR 1.5 billion by the halt of 2013, compared to the halt of 2011.- Nokia has signed an agreement to enter into a transaction whereby Nokia will sell substantially outright of its Devices & Services business to Microsoft. Commencing the fourth quarter 2013, and theme to shareholder approval of the transaction at their EGM, Nokia expects to report substantially outright of its Devices & Services business as discontinued operations. In the fourth quarter 2013, Nokia expects the discontinued operations related to the Devices & Services business to generate negative operating margin on a non-IFRS basis.- Nokia continues to target to reduce its Devices & Services non-IFRS operating expenses to an annualized Run rate of approximately EUR 3.0 billion by the halt of 2013.

NSN STANDALONE INTERIM REPORT TO be PUBLISHED TODAY - As previously announced, as a result of the debt securities NSN issued in March 2013, NSN is committed to making certain financial data publicly available through its standalone reporting format. Consequently, NSN moreover plans to publish its standalone third quarter 2013 and January-September 2013 interim report on today at approximately 1.30pm Finnish time. - The report will moreover be made available on NSN`s website at: www.nsn.com/about-us/company/financial/financial-results. The reported financial results presented on a standalone basis by NSN may disagree from those reported by Nokia due to the treatment of discontinued operations and certain accounting presentation differences. In addition, the presentation of underlying business performance information by Nokia and NSN differs due to presentation differences adopted by Nokia (non-IFRS information) and NSN (information before specific items) and the items excluded by each in their respective presentations.

NOKIA TO SELL DEVICES & SERVICES TO MICROSOFT IN EUR 5.44 BILLION ALL-CASH TRANSACTION

On September 3, 2013, Nokia Corporation announced that it had signed an agreement to enter into a transaction whereby Nokia will sell substantially outright of its Devices & Services business and license its patents to Microsoft for EUR 5.44 billion in cash, payable at closing. Nokia expects to bespeak a net gain on sale of approximately EUR 3.0 billion, and expects the transaction to be significantly accretive to earnings.

The transaction is theme to certain purchase expense adjustments, protecting both Nokia and Microsoft. Based on Devices & Services` financial performance in the third quarter of 2013 as well as their expectations for Devices & Services` financial performance through the halt of the first quarter 2014, they currently hope that the purchase expense adjustments related to net working capital and aggregate cash earnings would be approximately zero. Therefore they hope that the total purchase expense will be EUR 5.44 billion as announced earlier.

The transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2014, theme to approval by Nokia shareholders, regulatory approvals and other customary closing conditions. At closing, approximately 32 000 people are expected to transfer to Microsoft, including approximately 4 700 people in Finland. Nokia will retain its headquarters in Finland. Of the Devices & Services related assets, Nokia`s CTO (Chief Technology Office) organization and patent portfolio will remain within the Nokia Group. The operations that are planned to be transferred to Microsoft generated an estimated EUR 14.9 billion, or almost 50%, of Nokia`s net sales for the plenary year 2012.

In connection with the transaction, Nokia will award Microsoft a 10 year non-exclusive license to its patents as of the time of the closing, and Microsoft will award Nokia reciprocal rights related to HERE services. In addition, Nokia will award Microsoft an option to extend this mutual patent license agreement to perpetuity. Of the total purchase expense of EUR 5.44 billion, EUR 3.79 billion relates to the purchase of substantially outright of the Devices & Services business, and EUR 1.65 billion relates to the 10 year mutual patent license agreement and the option to extend this agreement to perpetuity.

Additionally, Microsoft will become a strategic licensee of the HERE platform, and will separately pay Nokia for a four year license. This revenue stream is expected to substantially supplant the revenue stream HERE is currently receiving from Nokia`s Devices & Services business internally. If the transaction closes Microsoft is expected to become one of the top three customers of HERE.

Microsoft agreed to develop immediately available to Nokia EUR 1.5 billion of financing in the profile of three EUR 500 million tranches of convertible bonds to be issued by Nokia maturing in 5, 6 and 7 years, respectively. On September 6, 2013, Nokia announced that it had decided to draw down outright of this financing to prepay financing raised for the acquisition of the shares in NSN which was completed in August 2013 and for universal corporate purposes. Microsoft has agreed not to sell any of the bonds or transfigure any of the bonds to Nokia shares prior to the closing of the sale of the Devices & Services business. If the sale of the Devices & Services business is completed, the bonds will be redeemed and the principal amount and accrued interest netted against the proceeds from the transaction.

Following the transaction, Nokia plans to focus on its three established businesses, each of which is a leader in enabling mobility in its respective market segment: NSN, a leader in network infrastructure and services; HERE, a leader in mapping and location services; and Advanced Technologies, which will build on several of Nokia`s current CTO and intellectual property rights activities. At closing, this transaction is expected to provide a solid basis for future investment in these three businesses. The transaction is moreover expected to significantly strengthen Nokia`s financial position and Nokia targets to recrudesce to being an investment grade company.

Nokia`s Board of Directors is conducting a strategy evaluation for Nokia Group between signing and closing of the transaction. This evaluation will comprise of evaluations of strategies for each of Nokia`s three businesses and practicable synergies between them, as well as an evaluation of the optimal corporate and capital structure for Nokia after the closing of the transaction. After this evaluation is complete, deemed excess capital is planned to be distributed to shareholders.

Under the terms of the agreement, the closing of the transaction will be theme to approval by Nokia shareholders. Nokia plans to hold an Extraordinary universal Meeting on November 19, 2013 and has published a notice of the meeting and made available more information on the transaction and its background. This information can be establish at www.nokia.com/gm.

Nokia`s Board of Directors recommends that Nokia shareholders vote to corroborate and approve the sale of the Devices & Services business at the Extraordinary universal Meeting.

The Devices & Services business has not been presented as discontinued operations in the third quarter 2013 as the transaction is theme to shareholder approval at their Extraordinary universal Meeting combined with the fact that Nokia`s shareholder base is widely distributed. Commencing the fourth quarter 2013, Nokia Group expects to report substantially outright of its Devices & Services business as discontinued operations.

NOKIA COMPLETES THE ACQUISITION OF SIEMENS` STAKE IN NOKIA SIEMENS NETWORKS

On August 7, 2013, Nokia announced that it had completed the acquisition of Siemens` stake in Nokia Siemens Networks. The transaction was originally announced on July 1, 2013.

In accordance with this transaction, the Siemens appellation is being phased out from Nokia Siemens Networks` company appellation and branding. The original appellation and brand is Nokia Solutions and Networks, moreover referred to as NSN.

Rajeev Suri continues as CEO and Jesper Ovesen continues as Executive Chairman of the NSN Board of Directors. The NSN Board of Directors has been adjusted to the original ownership structure as the Siemens-appointed directors believe resigned.

To date, NSN has been reported as a unique reportable segment for Nokia financial reporting purposes. During the third quarter 2013, Nokia acquired Siemens` stake in NSN and as a result, NSN is a wholly owned subsidiary of Nokia. Consequently, birth with this interim report, Nokia reports financial information for two operating and reportable segments within NSN, Mobile Broadband and Global Services, which reflects how Nokia management is reviewing the NSN financial information following the completion of the transaction.

THIRD QUARTER 2013 financial AND OPERATING DISCUSSION

NOKIA GROUP

See note 7 to their Summary financial Information table above concerning their current operational and reporting structure and note 3 concerning certain changes to historical comparative financials due to a revised IFRS accounting standard, IAS19 Employee Benefits. The following discussion includes information on a non-IFRS, or underlying business performance, basis. espy notes 1 and 2 to their Summary financial Information table above for information about their underlying non-IFRS results and the non-IFRS exclusions for the periods discussed below.

The following table sets forth the year-on-year and sequential growth rates in their net sales on a reported basis and at constant currency for the periods indicated.

THIRD QUARTER 2013 NET SALES,REPORTED & CONSTANT CURRENCY1   YoY Change QoQ Change Group net sales - reported -22 % -1 % Group net sales - constant currency1 -18 % 1 % Devices & Servicesnet sales - reported -19 % 6 % Devices & Servicesnet sales - constant currency1 -16 % 9 % Here net sales - reported -20 % -9 % Here net sales - constant currency1 -18 % -9 % NSN net sales - reported -26 % -7 % NSN net sales - constant currency1 -21 % -5 %

Note 1: Change in net sales at constant currency excludes the impact of changes in exchange rates in comparison to the Euro, their reporting currency.

At constant currency Nokia Group`s net sales would believe decreased 18% year-on-year and increased 1% sequentially.

The following table sets forth Nokia Group`s reported cash flow for the periods indicated and financial position at the halt of the periods indicated, as well as the year-on-year and sequential growth rates.

NOKIA GROUP CASH FLOWAND financial POSITION EUR million Q3/2013 Q3/2012 YoYChange Q2/2013 QoQChange Net cash fromoperating activities 9 -429 -196 NSN contribution (approximate) 190 320 -41 % 90 111 % Total cash andother liquid assets 9 134 8 779 4 % 9 453 -3 % NSN contribution 2 656 2 034 31 % 2 519 5 % Net cash andother liquid assets1 2 413 3 564 -32 % 4 067 -41 % NSN contribution 1 536 613 151 % 1 446 6 %

Note 1: Total cash and other liquid assets minus interest-bearing liabilities.

If the transaction to sell Microsoft substantially outright of their Devices & Services business would believe closed before the halt of the third quarter 2013, Nokia would believe ended the quarter with raw cash of approximately EUR 13 billion and net cash of approximately EUR 7.5 billion. Additionally, assuming repayment of Nokia`s interest bearing debt of approximately EUR 2 billion maturing in February 2014, Nokia would believe ended the third quarter 2013 with raw cash of approximately EUR 11 billion and net cash of approximately EUR 7.5 billion. This compares to reported raw cash of EUR 9.1 billion and net cash of EUR 2.4 billion at the halt of the third quarter 2013.

In the third quarter 2013, Nokia Group total cash and other liquid assets decreased sequentially by EUR 319 million and Nokia Group net cash and other liquid assets decreased sequentially by EUR 1.7 billion.

The items below are the primary drivers of the dwindle in Nokia Group net cash and other liquid assets in the third quarter 2013 of EUR 1.7 billion:- Nokia Group level net profit adjusted for non-cash items of positive EUR 241 million;- Nokia Group level outflow related to the acquisition of Siemens` stake in Nokia Siemens Networks of EUR 1.7 billion;- Nokia Group level net working capital-related cash outflows of approximately EUR 160 million, which included approximately EUR 170 million of restructuring related cash outflows;

- Nokia Group excluding NSN level net working capital-related outflows of approximately EUR 60 million, which included approximately EUR 30 million of restructuring-related cash outflows. Excluding the restructuring-related cash outflows, Nokia Group excluding NSN level net working capital-related outflows of approximately EUR 30 million is primarily due to an augment in receivables and inventories, partially offset by an augment in interest free short term liabilities.- NSN level net working capital-related outflows of approximately EUR 100 million, which included approximately EUR 140 million of restructuring-related cash outflows. Excluding the restructuring-related cash outflows, NSN level net working capital-related inflows of approximately EUR 40 million is primarily due to a reduction of receivables, partially offset by an augment in inventories and dwindle in interest free short-term liabilities;

- Nokia Group level net financial income and expense-related cash inflow of approximately EUR 70 million,- Nokia Group level cash tax net outflows of approximately EUR 140 million;- Nokia Group level capital expenditure of approximately EUR 70 million;- Nokia Group level proceeds related to distributions from unlisted venture funds, of approximately EUR 60 million;- Nokia Group level proceeds related to the equity component of the Microsoft convertible bond of approximately EUR 150 million; and- Nokia Group level negative peculiar exchange impact from translation of net cash of approximately EUR 50 million.

In the third quarter 2013, they received a quarterly platform uphold payment of USD 250 million (approximately EUR 190 million) from Microsoft. Their agreement with Microsoft includes platform uphold payments from Microsoft to us as well as software royalty payments from us to Microsoft. Under the terms of the agreement governing the platform uphold payments, the amount of each quarterly platform uphold payment is USD 250 million. They believe a competitive software royalty structure, which includes annual minimum software royalty commitments that vary over the life of the agreement. Software royalty payments, with minimum commitments are paid quarterly. The platform uphold payments and minimum software royalty commitment payments will continue until the proposed sale of substantially outright of their Devices & Services business to Microsoft closes.

In the third quarter 2013, they recognized a gain of EUR 50 million in Corporate Common other operating income and expenses due to a distribution from an unlisted venture fund related to the disposal of the fund`s investment in Waze Ltd. On September 30, 2013 Nokia had investments of EUR 432 million in unlisted funds that develop similar investments, reported under Non-current assets, Available-for-sale investments.

As a consequence of the purchase agreement whereby Nokia will sell substantially outright of its Devices & Services business to Microsoft, as well as Nokia`s acquisition of the Siemens` stake in Nokia Siemens Networks, they concluded that there were sufficient indicators to require Nokia Group to accomplish its annual goodwill impairment assessment as of September 30, 2013. As a result of the notable transactions, the Group reviewed the structure of its cash generating units for the purposes of the goodwill impairment assessment. The Group`s cash generating units in the impairment assessment were defined as Devices & Services, HERE, NSN Global Services and NSN Mobile Broadband.  As of September 30, 2013, goodwill of EUR 1 417 million, EUR 3 219 million, EUR 91 million and EUR 88 million was allocated to Devices & Services, HERE, NSN Global Services and NSN Mobile Broadband, respectively.

While methodology and models used in the impairment assessment with respect to HERE and NSN cash generating units are consistent with those used in the annual assessment performed during the fourth quarter of 2012, the Devices & Services cash generating unit recoverable value was performed using the objective value less costs to sell based on the agreed purchase expense defined in the Microsoft purchase agreement, excluding any consideration attributable to patents and patent applications. Previously, a discounted cash flow analysis with value in spend basis was utilized to derive the estimated recoverable values for Smart Devices and Mobile Phones cash generating units. Inputs to the valuation models utilized for HERE, NSN Global Services and NSN Mobile Broadband cash generating units, such as cash flows, discount rates and growth rates, believe been updated to reflect their most recent projections. Management does not hope that the parameters used and results of the impairment assessment would materially change during the fourth quarter 2013.

There was no goodwill impairment freight recorded during the third quarter 2013 as a result of the goodwill impairment assessment, however an adverse change in any of the key assumptions used in measuring the recoverable value of their HERE business could believe resulted in goodwill impairment as the current carrying value of this cash generating unit is only slightly lower than its` recoverable value. While they believe the estimated recoverable values are reasonable, actual performance in the short-term and long-term could be materially different from their forecasts, which could impact future estimates of recoverable value of their reporting units and may result in impairment charges.

During third quarter 2013, Nokia Group moreover performed as a result of the above mentioned two transactions an assessment of the potential recoverability of deferred tax assets currently theme to valuation allowance. The entity recognizes a deferred tax asset arising from unused losses or tax credits only to the extent there is convincing evidence that losses or unused tax credits can be utilized in the future. Positive evidence of future taxable profits, both including and excluding Devices & Services business, may be assigned lesser weight in assessing the appropriateness of recording a deferred tax asset when there is other unfavorable evidence, such as history of cumulative Finnish losses in Devices & Services and NSN business. While no deferred tax assets were recognized for Finnish tax losses and other temporary differences, Nokia Group has at the halt of the third quarter 2013 in total approximately EUR 2.7 billion (calculated at 24.5% tax rate) of net deferred tax assets which believe not been recognized in the financial statements. The majority of Nokia`s Finnish deferred tax assets are indefinite in nature and available against future Finnish tax liabilities. There is a draft Government proposal to reduce the Finnish corporate tax rate to 20% from January 1, 2014 which would correspondingly reduce the amount of any recognizable net deferred tax assets in the future.

DEVICES & SERVICES

The following table sets forth a summary of the results for their Devices & Services business for the periods indicated, as well as the year-on-year and sequential growth rates.

DEVICES & SERVICESRESULTS SUMMARY   Q3/2013 Q3/2012 YoYChange Q2/2013 QoQChange Net sales (EUR million)1 2 898 3 563 -19 % 2 724 6 % Mobile device volume(million units) 64.6 82.9 -22 % 61.1 6 % Mobile device ASP (EUR) 45 43 5 % 45 Non-IFRS raw margin (%) 23.2 % 18.5 % 24.4 % Non-IFRS operatingexpenses (EUR million) 707 904 -22 % 696 2 % Non-IFRS operatingmargin (%) -1.6 % -7.1 % -1.2 % Operating margin (%) -3.0 % -18.9 % -1.2 %

Note 1: Includes IPR income recognized in Devices & Services Other net sales.

The year-on-year and sequential changes in their Devices & Services net sales, volumes, unprejudiced selling prices and raw margin are discussed below under their Smart Devices and Mobile Phones business units.

Smartphone Volumes In the third quarter 2013, Devices & Services total smartphone volumes increased sequentially to 14.7 million units, compared to 11.7 million units in the second quarter 2013, composed of: - 8.8 million Lumia smartphones in Smart Devices- 5.9 million Asha full-touch smartphones in Mobile Phones

Devices & Services Other Year-on-year Devices & Services Other net sales of EUR 155 million were lower in the third quarter 2013, compared to EUR 221 million in the third quarter 2012, primarily due to the divestment of Vertu. Sequentially, Devices & Services Other net sales were approximately flat.

Within Devices & Services Other, they rate that their current annual IPR income run-rate is approximately EUR 0.5 billion.

Channel Inventory They ended the third quarter 2013 within their simple 4 to 6 week channel inventory range.

Net Sales and Volumes by Geographic zone The following table sets forth the net sales for their Devices & Services business for the periods indicated, as well as the year-on-year and sequential growth rates, by geographic area. IPR income is allocated to the geographic areas contained in this chart.

DEVICES & SERVICES NET SALESBY GEOGRAPHIC AREA EUR million Q3/2013 Q3/2012 YoYChange Q2/2013 QoQChange Europe 846 985 -14 % 818 3 % Middle East & Africa 428 682 -37 % 420 2 % Greater China 215 278 -23 % 232 -7 % Asia-Pacific 769 977 -21 % 683 13 % North America 214 36 494 % 123 74 % Latin America 426 605 -30 % 448 -5 % Total 2 898 3 563 -19 % 2 724 6 %

The following table sets forth the mobile device volumes for their Devices & Services business for the periods indicated, as well as the year-on-year and sequential growth rates, by geographic area.

DEVICES & SERVICES MOBILE DEVICEVOLUMES BY GEOGRAPHIC AREA million units Q3/2013 Q3/2012 YoYChange Q2/2013 QoQChange Europe 13.2 16.8 -21 % 11.3 17 % Middle East & Africa 14.7 19.1 -23 % 16.6 -11 % Greater China 4.0 5.8 -31 % 4.1 -2 % Asia-Pacific 23.6 30.1 -22 % 20.2 17 % North America 1.4 0.3 367 % 0.5 180 % Latin America 7.7 10.8 -29 % 8.4 -8 % Total 64.6 82.9 -22% 61.1 6%

On a year-on-year basis, net sales decreased in outright regions, except for North America. The largest year-on-year decline in net sales was in Middle East & Africa, followed by Asia-Pacific, Latin America, Europe and Greater China. In Middle East & Africa, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Europe and Greater China the year-on-year net sales declines were primarily due to lower sales in their Mobile Phones business unit. In North America, the year-on-year sales augment was primarily due to their Smart Devices business unit.

On a sequential basis, net sales increased in outright regions except Latin America and Greater China. The largest sequential augment in net sales was in North America, followed by Asia-Pacific, Europe, and Middle East & Africa. In North America and Middle East & Africa, the sequential increases were primarily due to higher sales in their Smart Devices business. In Asia-Pacific and Europe the sequential sales increases were primarily due to higher sales in their Mobile Phones business. In Latin America the sequential sales dwindle was primarily due to lower sales in their Mobile Phones business unit. In Greater China the sequential dwindle was primarily due to lower sales in their Smart Devices business unit.

At constant currency Devices & Services` net sales would believe decreased 16% year-on-year and increased 9% sequentially.

Non-IFRS Operating Expenses Devices & Services non-IFRS operating expenses decreased 22% year-on-year and increased 2% sequentially in the third quarter 2013. On a year-on-year basis, operating expenses related to Mobile Phones and Smart Devices decreased 34% and 6%, respectively, in the third quarter 2013. On a sequential basis, operating expenses related to Smart Devices increased 2% in the third quarter 2013, whereas operating expenses related to Mobile Phones decreased 2%. In addition to the factors described below, the year-on-year change was affected by the proportionate allocation of operating expenses being affected by the relative amalgamate of sales and raw profit performance between Mobile Phones and Smart Devices. This resulted in higher and lower relative allocations to Smart Devices and Mobile Phones, respectively.

Devices & Services non-IFRS research and evolution expenses decreased 22% year-on-year in the third quarter 2013 primarily due to reductions in certain Mobile Phones and Symbian-related activities, a lower cost base as a result of business divestments and overall cost controls. On a sequential basis, Devices & Services non-IFRS research and evolution expenses increased 5% in the third quarter 2013 primarily due to lower accrued incentive expenses in the second quarter of 2013 consistent with Devices & Services business performance.

Devices & Services non-IFRS sales and marketing expenses decreased 20% year-on-year in the third quarter 2013 primarily due to lower personnel related expenses, a lower cost base as a result of business divestments and overall cost controls, partially offset by higher product-specific marketing in uphold of recently launched Lumia and Asha products. On a sequential basis, Devices & Services non-IFRS sales and marketing expenses were approximately flat in the third quarter 2013 primarily due to higher product-specific marketing in uphold of recently launched Lumia and Asha products offset by lower personnel related expenses.

Devices & Services non-IFRS administrative and universal expenses decreased 33% year-on-year in the third quarter 2013 and decreased 13% sequentially in the third quarter 2013. The year-on-year dwindle was primarily related to a lower cost base as a result of business divestments and overall cost controls, partially offset by shared role cost categorization. The sequential dwindle was primarily due to lower personnel related expenses.

Non-IFRS Operating Margin The higher year-on-year Devices & Services non-IFRS operating margin in the third quarter 2013 was primarily due to a higher raw margin and lower operating expenses as a percentage of net sales.

The sequentially lower Devices & Services non-IFRS operating margin in the third quarter 2013 was primarily due to a lower raw margin, partially offset by lower operating expenses as a percentage of net sales compared to the second quarter 2013.

Devices & Services non-IFRS other income and expense for the third quarter 2013 was an expense of EUR 12 million, an expense of EUR 2 million in the second quarter of 2013 and an expense of EUR 8 million in the third quarter 2012.

Operating Margin The higher year-on-year Devices & Services operating margin in the third quarter 2013 was primarily due to a higher raw margin and lower operating expenses as a percentage of net sales. In the third quarter 2013, other income and expenses was an expense of EUR 50 million, compared to an expense of EUR 427 million in the third quarter 2012.

The sequentially lower Devices & Services operating margin in the third quarter 2013 was primarily due to a lower raw margin, partially offset by lower operating expenses as a percentage of net sales compared to the second quarter 2013. In the third quarter 2013, other income and expense was an expense of EUR 50 million, compared to an expense of EUR 2 million in the second quarter 2013.

Devices & Services other income and expense for the third quarter 2013 was an expense of EUR 50 million, an expense of EUR 2 million in the second quarter of 2013 and an expense of EUR 427 million in the third quarter 2012. In the third quarter 2013, on a year-on-year basis, Devices & Services reported other income and expense had a positive impact on profitability due to a lower amount of restructuring-related charges and associated items. In the third quarter 2013, on a sequential basis, Devices & Services reported other income and expense had a negative impact on profitability due to transaction costs related to the proposed sale of substantially outright of their Devices & Services business, higher amount of restructuring-related charges and associated items.

Cost Reduction Activities and Planned Operational Adjustments The following table sets forth a summary of their Devices & Services cost reduction activities and planned operational adjustments.

DEVICES & SERVICES RESTRUCTURING SUMMARY EUR (million) Q3/2013 (approximate) Cumulative up to  Q3/2013 (approximate) Q4/2013 (approximate estimate) 2013 (approximate estimate Total (approximate estimate) Restructuring related charges 20 1 450 Not provided Not provided 1 500 Restructuring related cash outflows 30 1 300 20 200 1 350

Nokia continues to target to reduce its Devices & Services non-IFRS operating expenses to an annualized Run rate of approximately EUR 3.0 billion by the halt of 2013.

At the halt of the third quarter 2013, Devices & Services and Corporate Common had approximately 32 200 employees, a reduction of approximately 6 100 compared to the halt of the third quarter 2012, and an augment of approximately 800 compared to the halt of the second quarter 2013.

By the halt of the third quarter 2013, they had recorded cumulative Devices & Services restructuring-related charges and other associated items of approximately EUR 1.45 billion. In total, they continue to hope cumulative Devices & Services restructuring-related charges of approximately EUR 1.5 billion before the halt of 2013.

By the halt of the third quarter 2013, Devices & Services had cumulative restructuring-related cash outflows of approximately EUR 1.3 billion. Of the total expected charges relating to restructuring activities of approximately EUR 1.5 billion, they continue to hope Devices & Services non-cash charges to be approximately EUR 150 million.

SMART DEVICES

The following table sets forth a summary of the results for their Smart Devices business unit for the periods indicated, as well as the year-on-year and sequential growth rates.

SMART DEVICES RESULTS SUMMARY   Q3/2013 Q3/2012 YoYChange Q2/2013 QoQChange Net sales (EUR million)1 1 254 976 28 % 1 164 8 % Smart Devices volume(million units) 8.8 6.3 40 % 7.4 19 % Smart Devices ASP (EUR) 143 155 -8 % 157 -9 % Gross margin (%) 16.4% -3.5% 21.1 % Operating expenses(EUR million)2 415 441 -6 % 406 2 % Contribution margin (%)2 -17.1 % -48.9 % -14.1 %

Note 1: Does not include IPR income. IPR income is recognized in Devices & Services Other net sales.Note 2: The year-on-year changes in operating expenses were affected by the proportionate allocation of operating expenses being affected by the relative amalgamate of sales and raw profit performance between Mobile Phones and Smart Devices, resulting in higher relative allocations to Smart Devices in the second and third quarters of 2013. Accordingly, third quarter 2013 operating expenses are not directly comparable to third quarter 2012 operating expenses.

Net SalesBoth year-on-year and sequentially, the augment in their Smart Devices net sales in the third quarter 2013 was due to higher volumes, partially offset by lower ASPs.

Volume The year-on-year augment in their Smart Devices volumes in the third quarter 2013 was primarily due to higher Lumia volumes, partially offset by lower Symbian volumes. Symbian volumes decreased from 3.5 million units in the third quarter 2012 to approximately zero in the third quarter 2013. Their Lumia volumes increased from 2.9 million in the third quarter 2012 to 8.8 million in the third quarter 2013.

On a sequential basis, the augment in their Smart Devices volumes in the third quarter 2013 was primarily due to the Lumia 520.

Average Selling expense The year-on-year dwindle in their Smart Devices ASP in the third quarter 2013 was primarily due to lower recognition of deferred revenue related to services sold in combination with their devices and lower sales of accessories, partially offset by a positive amalgamate shift towards sales of their Lumia products which carry a higher ASP than their Symbian products and the net positive outcome of peculiar currency fluctuations.

Sequentially, the dwindle in their Smart Devices ASP in the third quarter 2013 was primarily due to their pricing actions, lower recognition of deferred revenue on services sold in combination with their devices and the net negative outcome of peculiar currency fluctuations, partially offset by a positive amalgamate shift towards the Lumia 1020 which started to ship in the third quarter 2013 and the Lumia 925 which started to ship in the second quarter 2013.

Gross Margin The significant year-on-year augment in their Smart Devices raw margin in the third quarter 2013 was primarily due to a positive amalgamate shift towards sales of their Lumia products which carry a higher raw margin than their Symbian products as well as inventory-related allowances. Specifically, regarding inventory-related allowances, in the third quarter 2013, Smart Devices raw margin was negatively affected by approximately EUR 20 million of net allowances related to excess component inventory and future purchase commitments. In the third quarter 2012, Smart Devices raw margin was negatively impacted by approximately EUR 120 million of net allowances related to excess component inventory, future purchase commitments and an inventory revaluation. In the third quarter 2013, the year-on-year augment in their Smart Devices raw margin was moreover due to lower fixed costs per unit because of higher sales volumes. The year-on-year augment in their Smart Devices raw margin was partially offset by higher warranty costs in the third quarter 2013 due to the reversal of previously recognized warranty costs in the third quarter 2012 related to their Symbian devices.

On a sequential basis, the dwindle in their Smart Devices raw margin in the third quarter 2013 was primarily due to inventory-related allowances. Specifically, in the third quarter 2013, Smart Devices raw margin was negatively affected by approximately EUR 20 million of excess component inventory and future purchase commitments, whereas in the second quarter 2013 their Smart Devices raw margin benefited from the reversal of approximately EUR 20 million of previously recognized excess component inventory and future purchase commitments.

Increases or decreases to Smart Devices inventory-related allowances may be required in the future depending on several factors, including consumer require and continued ramp-up, particularly related to their original Lumia products.

MOBILE PHONES

The following table sets forth a summary of the results for their Mobile Phones business unit for the periods indicated, as well as the year-on-year and sequential growth rates.

MOBILE PHONES RESULTS SUMMARY   Q3/2013 Q3/2012 YoYChange Q2/2013 QoQChange Net sales (EUR million)1 1 489 2 366 -37 % 1 405 6 % Mobile Phones volume (million units) 55.8 76.6 -27 % 53.7 4 % Mobile Phones ASP (EUR) 27 31 -13 % 26 4 % Gross margin (%) 21.5 % 21.7 % 19.5% Operating expenses (EUR million)2 260 393 -34 % 266 -2 % Contribution margin (%)2 3.6 % 4.9 % 0.2%

Note 1: Does not include IPR income. IPR income is recognized in Devices & Services Other net sales.Note 2: The year-on-year changes in operating expenses were affected by the allocation of operating expenses being affected by the relative amalgamate of sales and raw profit performance between Mobile Phones and Smart Devices, resulting in lower relative allocations to Mobile Phones in the second and third quarters of 2013. Accordingly, third quarter 2013 operating expenses are not directly comparable to third quarter 2012 operating expenses.

Net Sales On a year-on-year basis, the decline in their Mobile Phones net sales in the third quarter 2013 was due to lower volumes and lower ASPs. On a sequential basis, the augment in their Mobile Phones net sales in the third quarter 2013 was due to higher ASPs and higher volumes.

Volume During the third quarter 2013 they shipped 55.8 million Mobile Phones units, of which 5.9 million were Asha full-touch smartphones.

On a year-on-year basis, their Mobile Phones volumes in the third quarter 2013 were negatively affected by competitive industry dynamics, including intense competition at the low halt of their product portfolio and intense smartphone competition at increasingly lower expense points.

On a sequential basis, their Mobile Phones volumes in the third quarter 2013 were positively affected by solid performance across the majority of their product portfolio due to recently launched devices, in particular the Nokia 105, the Asha 501, and the Nokia 210.

Average Selling expense The year-on-year decline in their Mobile Phones ASP in the third quarter 2013 was primarily due to a higher symmetry of sales of lower priced devices as well as universal expense erosion and their pricing actions.

The sequential augment in their Mobile Phones ASP in the third quarter 2013 was primarily due to a higher symmetry of sales of higher priced devices, particularly the Asha 501. The sequential augment was partially offset by the net negative outcome of peculiar currency fluctuations, as well as universal expense erosion and their pricing actions.

Gross Margin On a year-on-year basis, their Mobile Phones raw margin in the third quarter 2013 was approximately flat. On a year-on-year basis, their Mobile Phones raw margin in the third quarter 2013 benefitted from higher cost erosion than expense erosion. On a year-on-year basis, their Mobile Phones raw margin in the third quarter 2013 was negatively impacted by higher fixed costs per unit because of lower sales volumes as well as the net negative outcome of peculiar currency fluctuations.

On a sequential basis, the augment in their Mobile Phones raw margin in the third quarter 2013 was primarily due to a higher symmetry of higher raw margin devices, particularly the Asha 501 and the Nokia 210, and the net positive outcome of peculiar currency fluctuations, partially offset by higher warranty costs in the third quarter 2013, due to the reversal of previously recognized warranty costs in the second quarter 2013.

HERE

The following table sets forth a summary of the results for HERE for the periods indicated, as well as the year-on-year and sequential growth rates.

HERE RESULTS SUMMARY   Q3/2013 Q3/2012 YoYChange Q2/2013 QoQChange Net sales (EUR million) 211 265 -20 % 233 -9 % External net sales (EUR million) 176 179 -2 % 195 -10 % Internal net sales (EUR million) 35 86 -59 % 38 -8 % Non-IFRS raw margin (%) 82.5 % 80.4 % 76.1 % Non-IFRS operatingexpenses (EUR million) 153 175 -13 % 169 -9 % Non-IFRS operatingmargin (%) 9.5 % 14.0 % 3.4 % Operating margin (%) 6.6 % -21.1 % -38.2 %

Net Sales In the third quarter 2013, the year-on-year decline in external HERE net sales was primarily due to the net negative outcome of peculiar currency fluctuations, lower sales to personal navigation device (PND) customers consistent with declines in the PND industry and a non-recurring sale of data in the third quarter 2012, partially offset by higher sales to vehicle customers and non-recurrence of a negative sales adjustment made in the third quarter 2012 related to historical license fees in the simple course of business for a particular customer. At constant currency, external HERE net sales would believe grown on a year-on-year basis.

In the third quarter 2013, the sequential decline in external HERE net sales was primarily due to lower seasonal sales to vehicle customers and the net negative outcome of peculiar currency fluctuations.

In the third quarter 2013, HERE had sales of original vehicle licenses of 2.6 million units, compared to 2.1 million units in the third quarter 2012 and 2.7 million units in the second quarter 2013. On a year-on-year basis, unit sales to vehicle customers increased primarily due to higher adoption of in-vehicle navigation, whereas on a sequential basis unit sales to vehicle customers decreased primarily due to seasonality. Sales to vehicle customers represented well over 50% of external HERE net sales in the third quarter 2013, as well as in the third quarter 2012 and in the second quarter 2013.

In the third quarter 2013, the year-on-year and sequential declines in internal HERE net sales were primarily due to lower recognition of deferred revenue related to their Smart Devices business unit.

At constant currency HERE`s overall net sales would believe decreased 18% year-on-year and 9% sequentially.

Non-IFRS raw Margin On a year-on-year basis, the augment in HERE non-IFRS raw margin in the third quarter 2013 was primarily due to a higher symmetry of external sales, which generally carry a higher raw margin, and lower costs related to service delivery.

On a sequential basis, the augment in HERE non-IFRS raw margin in the third quarter 2013 was primarily due to lower sales of update units to vehicle customers, which generally carry a lower margin, and lower costs related to service delivery.

Non-IFRS Operating Expenses HERE non-IFRS research and evolution expenses decreased 12% year-on-year due to cost reduction actions. On a sequential basis, research and evolution expenses decreased 7% in the third quarter 2013 primarily due to lower personnel costs.

HERE non-IFRS sales and marketing expenses decreased 11% year-on-year due to cost reduction actions. On a sequential basis, sales and marketing expenses decreased 14% in the third quarter 2013, primarily due to lower travel and marketing expenses.

HERE non-IFRS universal and administrative expenses decreased 18% year-on-year primarily due to cost reduction actions. On a sequential basis, universal and administrative expenses decreased 22% in the third quarter 2013 primarily due to decreased expenses related to shared role cost categorization and lower personnel costs.

Non-IFRS Operating Margin The year-on-year dwindle in HERE non-IFRS operating margin in the third quarter 2013 was primarily due to lower internal net sales.

The sequential improvement in HERE non-IFRS operating margin in the third quarter 2013 was primarily due to higher raw margin.

HERE non-IFRS other income and expense for the third quarter 2013 and 2012 and second quarter 2013 was an expense of EUR 1 million.

Operating Margin In the third quarter 2013, HERE operating margin improved significantly to 6.6%, compared to negative 21.1% in the third quarter 2012, and negative 38.2% in the second quarter 2013. The year-on-year and sequential improvements in HERE operating margin in the third quarter 2013 were primarily due to the absence of significant purchase expense accounting-related items arising from the purchase of NAVTEQ, the vast majority of which had been fully amortized as of the halt second quarter 2013.

HERE other income and expense for the third quarter 2013 was an expense of EUR 4 million, an expense of EUR 11 million in the second quarter of 2013 and an expense of EUR 3 million in the third quarter 2012.

NOKIA SOLUTIONS AND NETWORKS

The following table sets forth a summary of the results for NSN and its reportable segments, Mobile Broadband and Global Services,  for the periods indicated, as well as the year-on-year and sequential growth rates.

NSN RESULTS SUMMARY   Q3/2013 Q3/2012 YoYChange Q2/2013 QoQChange Net sales (EUR million) 2 592 3 501 -26 % 2 781 -7 % Mobile Broadband net sales (EUR million) 1 259 1 625 -23 % 1 281 -2 % Global Services net sales (EUR million) 1 331 1 701 -22 % 1 459 -9 % Non-IFRS raw margin (%) 36.6 % 32.2 % 38.3 % Non-IFRS operatingexpenses (EUR million) 732 796 -8 % 766 -4 % Non-IFRS operatingmargin (%) 8.4 % 9.3 % 11.8 %   Mobile Broadbandcontribution margin (%) 4.9 % 18.3 % 8.7 % Global Servicescontribution margin (%) 12.3 % 2.7 % 14.7 % Operating margin (%) 6.4 % 5.2 % 0.3 %

Net Sales The following table sets forth NSN net sales for the periods indicated, as well as the year-on-year and sequential growth rates, by geographic area.

NSN NET SALES BY GEOGRAPHIC AREA EUR million Q3/2013 Q3/2012 YoYChange Q2/2013 QoQChange Europe 701 918 -24 % 775 -10 % Middle East & Africa 247 325 -24 % 268 -8 % Greater China 278 313 -11 % 260 7 % Asia-Pacific 791 1 266 -38 % 784 1 % North America 299 285 5 % 348 -14 % Latin America 276 394 -30 % 346 -20 % Total 2 592 3 501 -26 % 2 781 -7 %

The year-on-year dwindle of 26% in NSN net sales in the third quarter 2013 was partially due to divestments of businesses not consistent with its strategic focus as well as the exiting of certain customer contracts and countries. Excluding these two factors, NSN net sales in the third quarter 2013 declined by approximately 20% primarily due to reduced wireless infrastructure deployment activity, which affected both Mobile Broadband and Global Services, and the net negative outcome of peculiar currency fluctuations. The year-on-year dwindle in Mobile Broadband was primarily due to lower sales in WCDMA, GSM and CDMA. Within Mobile Broadband, LTE was approximately flat year-on-year as higher sales in North America, Europe and Latin America offset lower sales in Japan and Korea. On a constant currency basis, LTE sales grew year-on-year. The year-on-year dwindle in Global Services was primarily due to a reduction in network implementation activity, consistent with lower levels of big scale Mobile Broadband deployments, and the exiting of certain contracts in line with NSN`s strategic focus. On a regional basis, they had lower cyclical sales in Asia Pacific following lofty levels of spending a year ago. In Europe, the year-on-year sales decline was primarily related to network modernization and divestments in line with their strategy. The year-on-year sales decline in Latin America was primarily driven by constrained operator spending and certain constrict exits. Finally, the year-on-year decline in Middle East and Africa was primarily due to country exits.

The sequential dwindle of 7% in NSN net sales in the third quarter 2013 was partially due to the exiting of certain customer contracts and countries as well as the divestments of businesses not consistent with NSN`s strategic focus. Excluding these two factors, NSN net sales in the third quarter 2013 decreased by approximately 4%, primarily due to seasonality, which affected both Global Services and Mobile Broadband, and the net negative outcome of peculiar currency fluctuations. The sequential dwindle in Global Services net sales was primarily due to lower sales in professional services and customer freight services, partially offset by higher sales in network implementation activity. The slight sequential dwindle in Mobile Broadband net sales was primarily due to lower seasonal sales. On a regional basis, NSN net sales decline was primarily due to Europe related to lower seasonal spending and Latin America related to lower investments from operators.

In the third quarter 2013, Global Services represented 51% of NSN net sales, compared to 49% in the third quarter 2012 and 52% in the second quarter 2013. In the third quarter 2013, Mobile Broadband represented 49% of NSN net sales, compared to 46% in the third quarter 2012 and 46% in the second quarter 2013.

At constant currency, NSN net sales would believe decreased approximately 21% year-on-year and approximately 5% sequentially.

Non-IFRS raw Margin On a year-on-year basis, the augment in NSN non-IFRS raw margin in the third quarter 2013 was primarily due to a higher raw margin in Global Services related to significant efficiency improvements as a result of NSN`s restructuring program and the positive impact related to certain customer constrict exits and the divestment of businesses which carried a lower raw margin, partially offset by a slightly lower raw margin in Mobile Broadband.

On a sequential basis, the dwindle in NSN non-IFRS raw margin in the third quarter 2013 was primarily due to lower raw margins in Global Services and Mobile Broadband and the absence of non-recurring IPR income of approximately EUR 20 million that was recognized in the second quarter 2013, partially offset by a better product amalgamate due to a higher symmetry of Mobile Broadband net sales. The lower raw margin in Global Services was primarily driven by lower seasonal sales and the absence of the revenue triggered by certain project acceptances which was recognized in the second quarter 2013. The raw margin decline in Mobile Broadband was primarily due to costs incurred in anticipation of a technology shift to TD-LTE related to major projects in China and lower seasonal sales.

Non-IFRS Operating Expenses NSN non-IFRS research and evolution expenses decreased 7% year-on-year in the third quarter 2013. On a year-on-year basis, non-IFRS research and evolution expenses were lower primarily due to reduced investments in business activities that are not consistent with their focused strategy as well as increased research and evolution efficiency, partially offset by higher investments in areas that are consistent with their focused strategy, most notably LTE. On a sequential basis, non-IFRS research and evolution expenses were approximately flat in the third quarter 2013.

On a year-on-year and sequential basis, NSN non-IFRS sales and marketing expenses decreased 21% and 11% respectively in the third quarter 2013 primarily due to structural cost savings from their transformation and restructuring program.

NSN non-IFRS universal and administrative expenses increased 11% year-on-year and decreased 4% sequentially in the third quarter 2013. On a year-on-year basis, non-IFRS universal and administrative expenses were higher, primarily due to consultancy fees related to information technology and other projects.

Non-IFRS Operating Margin The year-on-year dwindle in NSN non-IFRS operating margin in the third quarter 2013 was primarily due to a lower contribution margin in Mobile Broadband, partially offset by a higher contribution margin in Global Services. On a year-on-year basis, the 13.4 percentage point decline in Mobile Broadband contribution margin was primarily due to higher operating expenses as a percentage of net sales, and to a lesser extent by slightly lower raw margin. The year-on-year 9.6 percentage point augment in Global Services contribution margin was primarily due to higher raw margin and lower operating expenses as a percentage of net sales.

On a sequential basis non-IFRS operating margin decreased due to lower contribution margin for both Global Services and Mobile Broadband which declined by 2.4 and 3.8 percentage points respectively. The sequential decline in Global Services and Mobile Broadband contribution margin was primarily due to lower raw margin, and to a lesser extent, higher operating expenses as a percentage of net sales.

NSN non-IFRS other income and expenses for the third quarter 2013 was income of EUR 1 million, compared to expense of EUR 8 million in the third quarter 2012, and income of EUR 30 million in the second quarter 2013. On a year-on-year basis, the change in non-IFRS other income and expenses was primarily due to a reduction in dubious account allowances, partially offset by the net negative outcome of peculiar currency fluctuations. On a sequential basis, the change was primarily due to positive impacts in the second quarter 2013 related to the gain on sale of real estate and the reduction in dubious account allowances.

Operating Margin The year-on-year augment in NSN operating margin in the third quarter 2013 was primarily due to higher raw margin, partially offset by higher operating expenses as a percentage of net sales. NSN`s other income and expenses was an expense of EUR 38 million in the third quarter 2013, compared to an expense of EUR 95 million in the third quarter 2012.

On a sequential basis NSN operating margin increased primarily due to lower other expenses as a percentage of sales, partially offset by lower raw margin and higher operating expenses as a percentage of net sales. NSN`s other income and expenses was an expense of EUR 38 million in the third quarter 2013, compared to an expense of EUR 278 million in the second quarter 2013.

Global Restructuring Program The following table sets forth a summary of NSN cost reduction activities and planned operational adjustments.

NSN RESTRUCTURING SUMMARY EUR (million) Q3/2013 (approximate) Cumulative up to  Q3/2013 (approximate) Q4/2013 (approximate estimate) 2013 (approximate estimate 2014 (approximate estimate) Total (approximate estimate) Restructuring related charges 39 1 750 Not provided Not provided Not provided 1 800 Restructuring related cash outflows 140 1 100 200 650 300  1 600

NSN continues to target to reduce NSN` non-IFRS annualized operating expenses and production overheads by more than EUR 1.5 billion by the halt of 2013, compared to the halt of 2011. In conjunction with this restructuring program, NSN continues to rate total restructuring related charges of approximately EUR 1.8 billion as well as total restructuring related cash outflows of approximately EUR 1.6 billion.

Non-cash charges and timing differences account for the differences between the above charges and the corresponding cash out-flows. Changes in estimates of timing or amounts of costs to be incurred and associated cash flows may become necessary as the transformation and restructuring program is implemented.

At the halt of the third quarter 2013, NSN had approximately 49 100 employees, a reduction of approximately 11 500 compared to the halt of the third quarter 2012, and approximately 1 400 compared to the halt of the second quarter 2013.

THIRD QUARTER 2013 OPERATING HIGHLIGHTS Operating highlights for previous quarters are available in the respective interim reports.

NOKIA GROUP HIGHLIGHTS

- On September 3, Nokia announced that it has signed an agreement to enter into a transaction whereby Nokia will sell substantially outright of its Devices & Services business and license its patents to Microsoft for EUR 5.44 billion in cash. The transaction, which is theme to approval by Nokia`s shareholders, regulatory approvals and other customary closing conditions, is expected to close in the first quarter of 2014. To avoid the perception of any potential combat of interest between now and the pending closure of the transaction with Microsoft, Stephen Elop stepped aside as President and CEO of Nokia Corporation, resigned from the Board of Directors, and continued to drudgery for Nokia as Executive Vice President, Devices & Services. Risto Siilasmaa assumed the interim CEO role for Nokia while continuing to serve in his role as Chairman of the Nokia Board of Directors, while Timo Ihamuotila became President of Nokia for the interim period while continuing to serve as CFO. Mr. Ihamuotila moreover assumed the responsibility of chairing the Nokia Leadership Team.- Nokia announced on September 3, 2013 that following the transaction with respect to its Devices & Services business, Nokia plans to focus on its three established businesses, each of which is a leader in enabling mobility in its respective market segment: NSN, a leader in network infrastructure and services; HERE, a leader in mapping and location services; and Advanced Technologies, which will build on several of Nokia`s current CTO and intellectual property rights activities. Additionally, Nokia announced that its Board of Directors is conducting a strategy evaluation for Nokia Group between signing and closing of the transaction. This evaluation will comprise of evaluations of strategies for each of Nokia`s three businesses and practicable synergies between them, as well as an evaluation of the optimal corporate and capital structure for Nokia after the closing of the transaction.- On August 7, Nokia announced that it had completed the acquisition of Siemens` stake in Nokia Siemens Networks. The transaction was originally announced on July 1, 2013. In accordance with this transaction, the Siemens appellation is being phased out from Nokia Siemens Networks` company appellation and branding. The original appellation and brand is Nokia Solutions and Networks, moreover referred to as NSN, which is being used moreover for financial reporting purposes. Nokia Solutions and Networks is wholly owned by Nokia and will continue to be consolidated by Nokia.- Nokia issued  EUR 1.5 billion of financing in the profile of three EUR 500 million tranches of convertible bonds issued to Microsoft maturing in 5, 6 and 7 years respectively. On September 6, 2013, Nokia announced that it had decided to draw down outright of this financing to prepay financing raised for the acquisition of the shares in NSN which was completed in August 2013 and for universal corporate purposes. Microsoft has agreed not to sell any of the bonds or transfigure any of the bonds to Nokia shares prior to the closing of the sale of the Devices & Services business. If the sale of the Devices & Services business is completed, the bonds will be redeemed and the principal amount and accrued interest netted against the proceeds from the transaction. More information on the terms of the bonds can be establish in the releases issued by Nokia on September 6, 2013 and September 24, 2013.- Nokia ranked second within the Communications paraphernalia industry in the Dow Jones Sustainability Indexes (World) released in September 2013. Nokia is moreover among companies that believe achieved the largest proportional improvement in their sustainability performance within their sector.- The Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) listed Nokia in the CDP Nordic 260 Climate Change Report 2013 (comprising 260 largest Nordic companies). Nokia is mentioned for the fifth year in a row in the Climate Disclosure Leadership Index, being the only Nordic company to believe been featured in the index for two consecutive quarters.

DEVICES & SERVICES OPERATING HIGHLIGHTS

- Nokia`s original manufacturing facility in Hanoi, Vietnam, became fully operational in Q3. The original site has been established to produce their most affordable Asha smartphones and feature phones.

SMART DEVICES

- Nokia introduced and started shipments of the Nokia Lumia 1020, the company`s original flagship in smartphones. Boasting a second generation 41 megapixel sensor, the Nokia Lumia 1020 sets a original benchmark in smartphone imaging. Unlike any smartphone in the market today the Nokia Lumia 1020 reinvents zoom, enabling people to discover more detail than the eye can see. With Nokia`s innovative PureView technology, including optical image stabilization, the device is able to produce some of the sharpest images practicable by any digital camera. In addition to the industry leading camera, the Nokia Lumia 1020 moreover comes with ad and subscription free Nokia Music streaming and leading maps and location experiences from HERE.- Nokia announced the Nokia Lumia 625, an accessibly priced 4G smartphone. With its 4.7-inch super-sensitive LCD screen, the Lumia 625 features the largest smartphone screen from Nokia available in shops today. The Nokia Lumia 625 moreover provides many innovations establish in the Nokia Lumia 1020, including a scope of integrated camera applications relish Nokia Smart Camera, offering handy features relish removing unwanted objects from pictures, and Nokia Cinemagraph, which turns photos into animate memories with added movement. The Lumia 625 moreover includes Nokia Music and HERE services.- Nokia`s Lumia scope of smartphones continued to attract businesses, including Delta Air Lines which has chosen the Lumia 820 for its more than 19 000 flight attendants to spend for on-board payments. In addition, Britvic Soft Drinks, one of the UK`s leading soft drinks companies, and Gi Group, a leading Italian multinational company dedicated to the human resources market, believe chosen Nokia Lumia as their business smartphone.- Nokia started rolling out the Nokia Lumia Amber software update which delivers a wide scope of original and improved features and apps, such as Nokia Glance Screen with the standby clock and an even better imaging experience for Nokia Lumia owners.- The Windows Phone store continued to strengthen in terms of the quantity and property of applications. The Windows Phone Store today offers more than 175 000 applications and games.- Since the halt of the quarter, Nokia has unveiled three original Lumia devices alongside original accessories, Nokia experiences and third-party developer applications, including Instagram and Vine. The original devices Nokia introduced at Nokia World in Abu Dhabi were Nokia`s first ever Windows tablet, the Nokia Lumia 2520, and two large-screen Lumia smartphones: the Lumia 1520 and 1320.

MOBILE PHONES

- Nokia introduced a original ultra-affordable camera phone, the Nokia 108, with a suggested retail expense of around just EUR 22. perfect for people purchasing their first-ever camera phone, the original handsets offer more than just calls and texts. The Nokia 108 moreover lets people select pictures and record video, helping them capture life`s well-known moments with an attractively-priced device.- Nokia unveiled and started shipments of the Nokia 515, a premium mobile phone with a 5 megapixel camera retailing at EUR 115. Wrapped in lightweight aluminum, the device combines the best of Nokia - contemporaneous design, lofty property materials and top performance.- Nokia expanded its portfolio of highly affordable, 3G mobile phones by announcing and starting the shipments of the Nokia 207 and the Nokia 208. The Nokia 207 and Nokia 208 are designed for people who relish a classic phone and traditional keypad but don`t want to miss out on smartphone experiences. The smart camera features of the Nokia 208 develop taking pictures more enjoyable, with voice-guided self-portrait, sequential shot and panorama mode giving people more roguish imaging options.- Since the halt of the quarter, Nokia has unveiled three original additions to the Asha Platform family of devices - the Nokia Asha 500, Asha 502 and Asha 503 - which link the already successful Asha 501 in pushing the boundaries of affordable smartphone innovation.

HERE OPERATING HIGHLIGHTS

During the third quarter 2013 HERE made significant progress towards its goal of becoming the leading location cloud business with the introduction of new, innovative products for the automotive industry, updates to its signature consumer experiences on Windows Phone and a number of original partnerships that demonstrate that HERE is the preferred ally across industries for maps and location-based technology:

- HERE announced a complete Connected Driving offer, including HERE Auto, HERE Auto Cloud and HERE Auto Companion. It is the only end-to-end driving solution on the market today, which will back car makers and in-vehicle technology suppliers connect the car to the cloud.- HERE has radically improved its traffic product, HERE Traffic, by building a original system and engine that processes data even faster and more accurately than before.- HERE has teamed up with Mercedes-Benz to jointly develop smart maps for connected cars and ultimately, self-driving cars leveraging cloud technology. Connecting the car to the cloud is one of the biggest opportunities for the automotive industry today and the faculty to compute real-time information on require will develop an entirely original class of services for consumers.- Magneti Marelli is working with HERE to develop an end-to-end connected driving solution ready to spend for car makers, based on Magneti Marelli`s open platform and the HERE Connected Driving offering.- Continental Corporation will implement 3D content from HERE in its original infotainment platform. Automotive manufactures can expand their location-based applications to include wealthy 3D landmarks, satellite imagery with split screen and current traffic information. This moreover will foster the multi-mobile transportation concept another step by providing drivers the faculty to synch their route profiles across in-dash systems in their vehicles and their smartphone, tablet or PC.- HERE updated its signature HERE suite of location experiences on Windows Phone. The updates include an overview of traffic conditions as well as the introduction of My Commute for HERE Drive+, the introduction of a original feature for the augmented reality technology LiveSight in HERE Maps to let people discontinue and select a closer view at everything they find and browse in comfort, and a redesign of the user experience of HERE Transit.- HERE announced the global release of HERE Drive+ for outright Windows Phone 8 smartphones to extend the benefits of HERE Drive+ beyond Nokia Lumia devices to back more people navigate their lives with ease and confidence. HERE Drive+ provides access to global world-class voice-guided turn-by-turn navigation with real offline maps, enabling people to reach their destination safely even without a data connection.- HERE delivers its indoor Venue Maps to Qualcomm Atheros, Inc., a subsidiary of Qualcomm Incorporated, helping Qualcomm IZat(TM) location technologies deliver more precise positioning to mobile devices inside buildings.- Garmin continues to attach their trust in HERE across the globe by recently adopting Natural Guidance in North America and Europe which enables guidance the pass that humans provide directions to each other. This includes leveraging local information and market research to incorporate local nuances for choosing and describing reference cues such as the color of a building or the appellation of a restaurant.- Nikon COOLPIX Cameras are the first to launch Mapviewer on digital still cameras and moreover offer a digital location stamp that allows a city or POI appellation to be displayed with an image by leveraging the map content from HERE.- Recently launched new-generation navigation systems for Lexus and Toyota in the Middle East are powered by HERE maps. This will expand coverage by adding Jordan and Lebanon to the 6-country Arabian Gulf coverage. original platforms integrate a scope of original HERE features such as 3D Landmarks and 3D city models to back drivers obtain a better sense of orientation on the road.- TripAdvisor, the world`s largest travel site, selected the HERE Platform for geocoding services to offer global coverage for consumers to procedure trips. HERE offers precise location information in more than 196 countries, helping TripAdvisor website visitors to access hotels, restaurants, and attractions across the world.

NSN OPERATING HIGHLIGHTS

- Mobile broadband deal momentum continued and during the quarter NSN was selected by Tele2 Netherlands to deliver 4G and related services nationwide; appointed by Celcom in Malaysia to supply 4G network infrastructure and services; expanded the 2G network and renewed services contracts in Southern Iraq for Korek Telecom; launched commercial LTE services in Paris for SFR; was appointed by Mobily in Saudi Arabia, to further modernize and expand its 2G, 3G and 4G networks; was chosen by MTS to provide a network upgrade and services in the Ukraine; and deployed FDD-LTE and a plenary scope of services for MTS in the Moscow and Central Russia regions.- NSN continues to lead in 4G technology, and by September, had helped outright three major Korean operators - SK Telecom, LG U+ and Korea Telecom - to become the world`s first to launch LTE-Advanced commercially, using the capabilities of NSN`s Flexi Multiradio base Stations. During September, NSN moreover demonstrated the world`s first 4G TD-LTE network crucible showing that Authorized Shared Access (ASA) is paving the pass for future 5G networks. For the live trial, NSN deployed its network elements - commercial unique RAN Flexi MultiRadio 10 base Stations, commercial Core Network and commercial NetAct network management system - in three Finnish cities.- In August, industry analyst firm Gartner positioned NSN in the `Leaders` quadrant of the Magic Quadrant for LTE Network Infrastructure, for the second consecutive year. The ranking - based on an evaluation of the company`s product evolution and innovation, financial performance, and customer references - places NSN among the three global network suppliers best positioned to uphold a mobile operator`s future in LTE, TD-LTE and LTE-Advanced.- NSN continues to invest in innovation to stay at the forefront of mobile broadband. In July, NSN and CDNetworks began working together to accelerate the delivery of benefits from Liquid Applications, driving a step change in the mobile broadband experience and opening up original revenue streams for operators. In September, SK Telecom and NSN completed world`s first proof-of-concept of Liquid Applications over LTE, achieving a major milestone for enhancing the mobile broadband experience. The successful testing was conducted with three advanced services over LTE: location-based mobile advertising, augmented reality and premium application delivery.- NSN has completed comprehensive testing of mobile voice core services running in the Telco Cloud and in July confirmed that its cloud technology is on the brink of commercial deployment. The company successfully demonstrated an exhaustive set of spend cases covering Voice over LTE (VoLTE) based on IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS) and plenary cloud orchestration, including cloud application management capabilities.- In July, NSN`s Customer experience Management (CEM) constrict with Beijing Mobile was extended to implement an extensive property of experience solution, further improving its end-user customer experience, linking network performance with subscriber satisfaction and application behavior.

NOKIA IN JANUARY-SEPTEMBER 2013

The following discussion is of Nokia`s reported results for January-September 2013. Comparisons are given to January- September 2012 results, unless otherwise indicated.

The following table sets forth a summary of the reported results for the periods indicated, as well as the year-on-year growth rates.

NOKIA GROUP RESULTS SUMMARY   Q1-Q3/2013 Q1-Q3/2012 YoYChange Net sales (EUR million) 17 209 22 135 -22 % Gross margin (%) 32.2 26.2 Operating expenses (EUR million) -5 212 -6 842 -24 % Operating margin (%) -0.09 -12.3 Financial incomeand expense, net -227 -274 -17 % Tax -346 -1028 -66 % Loss -721 -4 031 -82 % Loss attributable toequity holders ofthe parent -590 -3 295 -82 % EPS, basic -0.16 -0.89 -82 % EPS, diluted -0.16 -0.89 -82 %

The decline in the Nokia Group net sales in the nine months of 2013 resulted from lower net sales in Devices & Services, as well as lower net sales in NSN and HERE. Within Devices & Services the net sales of Mobile Phones declined more than net sales in Smart Devices. Mobile Phones net sales decline was due to lower volumes and ASPs, affected by competitive industry dynamics, including intense smartphone competition at increasingly lower expense points and intense competition at the low halt of their product portfolio. The net sales decline in Smart Devices was due to lower volumes and ASPs, affected by competitive industry dynamics including the strong momentum of competing smartphone platforms as well as their portfolio transition from Symbian products to Lumia products. The decline in HERE net sales was primarily due to a decline in internal net sales primarily related to their Smart Devices business unit, partially offset by an augment in external net sales. The decline in NSN net sales was primarily due to lower net sales in Global Services as well as lower net sales in businesses not consistent with NSN strategic focus. In addition, net sales in Mobile Broadband moreover declined on an overall basis, while delivering strong growth in LTE.

The augment in Nokia Group raw margin in the first nine months of 2013 was due to higher raw margins in NSN and Devices & Services. NSN raw margin primarily increased due to higher raw margin in both Global Services and Mobile Broadband, as well as a higher symmetry of Mobile Broadband within the total sales mix. Devices & Services raw margin increased primarily due to higher raw margin in Smart Devices partially offset by lower raw margin in Mobile Phones.

The dwindle in the Nokia Group operating expenses in the first nine months of 2013 was primarily due to Devices & Services and NSN. In both Devices & Services and NSN the dwindle was primarily due to structural cost savings as well as overall cost controls.

The Nokia Group net financial income and expense in the first nine months of 2013 was a lower expense than in the first nine months of 2012. The lower net expense was primarily due to lower net peculiar exchange-related losses.

The Nokia Group taxes in the first nine months of 2013 were significantly lower than in the first nine months of 2012. The lower tax expense was primarily due to the absence of a non-cash valuation allowances related to deferred tax assets of EUR 800 million in the second quarter 2012.

The Nokia Group loss in the first nine months of 2013 was a smaller loss primarily due to lower operating expenses, lower other expenses, and lower tax expense primarily due to the absence of a non-cash valuation allowances related to deferred tax assets of EUR 800 million in the second quarter 2012.

RISK AND FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

It should be notable that Nokia and its business are exposed to various risks and uncertainties and certain statements herein that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, those regarding: A) the planned sale by Nokia of substantially outright of Nokia`s Devices & Services business, including Smart Devices and Mobile Phones (referred to below as "Sale of the D&S Business") pursuant to the Stock and Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 2, 2013, between Nokia and Microsoft International Holdings B.V.(referred to below as the "Agreement"); B) the closing of the Sale of the D&S Business; C) obtaining the confirmation and approval of their shareholders for the Sale of the D&S Business; D) receiving timely, or at all, necessary regulatory approvals for the Sale of the D&S Business; E) expectations, plans or benefits related to or caused by the Sale of the D&S Business; F) expectations, plans or benefits related to Nokia`s strategies, including plans for Nokia with respect to its continuing businesses that will not be divested in connection with the Sale of the D&S Business; G) expectations, plans or benefits related to changes in leadership and operational structure; H) expectations and targets regarding their operational priorities, financial performance or position, results of operations and spend of proceeds from the Sale of the D&S Business; I) the timing of the deliveries of their products and services; J) their faculty to innovate, develop, execute and commercialize original technologies, products and services; K) expectations regarding market developments and structural changes; L) expectations and targets regarding performance, including those related to market share, prices, net sales and margins of products and services; M) expectations and targets regarding collaboration and partnering arrangements; N) the outcome of pending and threatened litigation, regulatory proceedings or investigations by authorities; O) expectations regarding the successful completion of restructurings, investments, acquisitions and divestments on a timely basis and their faculty to achieve the financial and operational targets set in connection with any such restructurings, investments, divestments and acquisitions, as well as any expected plans and benefits related to or caused by such transactions; and P) statements preceded by "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "foresee," "sees," "target," "estimate," "designed," "aim", "plans," "intends," "focus," "will" or similar expressions. These statements are based on management`s best assumptions and beliefs in light of the information currently available to it. Because they involve risks and uncertainties, actual results may disagree materially from the results that they currently expect. Factors, including risks and uncertainties that could antecedent these differences include, but are not limited to: 1) the inability to close the Sale of the D&S business in a timely manner, or at all, for instance due to the inability or delays in obtaining the shareholder approval or necessary regulatory approvals for the Sale of the D&S Business, or the occurrence of any event, change or other circumstance that could give tower to the termination of the Agreement; 2) the potential adverse outcome on the sales of their mobile devices, business relationships, operating results and business generally resulting from the announcement of the Sale of the D&S business or from the terms that they believe agreed for the Sale of the D&S Business; 3) any negative outcome from the implementation of the Sale of the D&S Business, as they may forego other competitive alternatives for strategies or partnerships that would benefit their Devices & Services business and if the Sale of the D&S business is not closed, they may believe limited options to continue the Devices & Services business or enter into another transaction on terms favorable to us, or at all; 4) their faculty to effectively and smoothly implement planned changes to their leadership and operational structure or maintain an efficient interim governance structure and preserve or hire key personnel; 5) any negative outcome from the implementation of the Sale of the D&S Business, including their internal reorganization in connection therewith, which will require significant time, attention and resources of their senior management and others within the company potentially diverting their attention from other aspects of their business; 6) disruption and dissatisfaction among employees caused by the plans and implementation of the Sale of the D&S Business, reducing focus and productivity in areas of their business; 7) the amount of the costs, fees, expenses and charges related to or triggered by the Sale of the D&S Business; 8) any impairments or charges to carrying values of assets or liabilities related to or triggered by the Sale of the D&S Business; 9) potential adverse effects on their business, properties or operations caused by us implementing the Sale of the D&S Business; 10) the initiation or outcome of any legal proceedings, regulatory proceedings or enforcement matters that may be instituted against us relating to the Sale of the D&S Business; 11) the success of their HERE strategy, including their faculty to establish a successful location-based platform and extend their location-based services across devices and operating systems; 12) their faculty to protect numerous patented standardized or proprietary technologies from third-party infringement or actions to invalidate the intellectual property rights of these technologies; 13) their faculty to maintain the existing sources of intellectual property related revenue and establish original such sources; 14) the intensity of competition in the various markets where they Do business and their faculty to maintain or help their market position or respond successfully to changes in the competitive environment; 15) their faculty to maintain momentum and augment their hurry of innovation, product evolution and execution in order to bring original innovative and competitive products and location-based or other services to the market in a timely manner; 16) their faculty to effectively and smoothly implement the planned changes in their operational structure and achieve targeted efficiencies and reductions in operating expenses and their faculty to complete the planned divestments and acquisition, including obtaining any needed regulatory approvals; 17) their faculty to retain, motivate, develop and recruit appropriately skilled employees; 18) their dependence on the evolution of the mobile and communications industry, including location-based and other services industries, in numerous diverse markets, as well as on universal economic conditions globally and regionally; 19) their faculty to maintain and leverage their position and strengths, especially if they are unable retain the loyalty of their mobile operator and distributor customers and consumers as a result of the implementation of their strategies or other factors; 20) the performance of the parties they ally and collaborate with and their faculty to achieve successful collaboration or partnering arrangements; 21) their faculty to deliver their products profitably, in line with property requirements and on time, especially if the limited number of suppliers they depend on, many of which are geographically concentrated with a majority based in Asia, fail to deliver sufficient quantities of fully functional products, components, sub-assemblies, software and services on favorable terms and in compliance with their supplier requirements; 22) their faculty to manage efficiently their manufacturing and logistics, as well as to ensure the quality, safety, security and timely delivery of their products and services; 23) any actual or even alleged defects or other quality, safety and security issues in their products; 24) any inefficiency, malfunction or disruption of a system or network that their operations rely on; 25) the impact of cybersecurity infraction or other factors leading to an actual or alleged loss, unbecoming disclosure or leakage of any personal or consumer data collected by us or their partners or subcontractors, made available to us or stored in or through their products; 26) their faculty to successfully manage the pricing of their products and services and costs related to their products and services and their operations; 27) the potential intricate tax issues and obligations they may face, including the obligation to pay additional taxes in various jurisdictions and their actual or anticipated performance, among other factors, could result in allowances related to deferred tax assets; 28) exchange rate fluctuations, particularly between the euro, which is their reporting currency, and the US dollar, the Japanese yen and the Chinese yuan, as well as certain other currencies; 29) their faculty to protect the technologies, which they or others develop or which they license, from claims that they believe infringed third parties` intellectual property rights, as well as their unrestricted spend on commercially acceptable terms of certain technologies in their product and services; 30) the impact of economic, regulatory, political or other evolution on their sales, manufacturing facilities and assets located in emerging market countries as well as the impact of regulations against imports to those countries; 31) the impact of changes in and enforcement of government policies, technical standards, trade policies, laws or regulations in countries where their assets are located and where they Do business; 32) investigations or claims by contracting parties in relation to exits from countries, areas or contractual arrangements; 33) unfavorable outcome of litigation, regulatory proceedings or investigations by authorities; 34) allegations of practicable health risks from electromagnetic fields generated by base stations and mobile devices, and the lawsuits and publicity related to them, regardless of merit; 35) Nokia Solutions and Networks` (renamed from Nokia Siemens Networks) moreover referred to as NSN success in the mobile broadband infrastructure and related services market and its faculty to effectively, profitably and timely adjust business and operations to the diverse needs of its customers; 36) NSN`s faculty to maintain and help its market position and respond successfully to changes and competition in the mobile broadband infrastructure and related services market; 37) NSN`s success in implementing its restructuring procedure and reducing its operating expenses and other costs; 38) NSN`s faculty to invest in and timely interpose original competitive products, services, upgrades and technologies; 39) NSN`s dependence on limited number of customers and large, multi-year contracts; 40) NSN`s liquidity and its faculty to meet its working capital requirements, including access to available credit under its financing arrangements and other credit lines as well as cash at hand; 41) the management of NSN`s customer financing exposure; 42) whether ongoing or any additional governmental investigations of alleged violations of law by some former employees of Siemens may involve and affect the carrier-related assets and employees transferred by Siemens to Nokia Siemens Networks (renamed Nokia Solutions and Networks); 43) any impairment of NSN`s customer relationships resulting from ongoing or any additional governmental investigations involving the Siemens carrier-related operations transferred to Nokia Siemens Networks (renamed Nokia Solutions and Networks), as well as the risk factors specified on pages 12-47 of Nokia`s annual report on profile 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 under particular 3D. "Risk Factors". Other unknown or unpredictable factors or underlying assumptions subsequently proving to be incorrect could antecedent actual results to disagree materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Nokia does not undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise forward-looking statements, whether as a result of original information, future events or otherwise, except to the extent legally required.

Nokia, Helsinki - October 29, 2013

Media and Investor Contacts:

Nokia

Corporate Communicationstel. +358 7180 34900email: press.services@nokia.com

Investor Relations Europetel. +358 7180 34927

Investor Relations UStel. +1 914 368 0555

www.nokia.com

- Nokia plans to publish its fourth quarter 2013 and annual 2013 report on January 23, 2014- Nokia will hold an Extraordinary universal Meeting on November 19, 2013. The notice of the meeting and more information can be establish at www.nokia.com/gm.

This announcement is distributed by Thomson Reuters on behalf of Thomson Reuters clients.

The owner of this announcement warrants that:(i) the releases contained herein are protected by copyright and other applicable laws; and(ii) they are solely liable for the content, accuracy and originality of theinformation contained therein.

Source: NOKIA via Thomson Reuters ONEHUG#1738836


Data dedupe software comes of age | killexams.com real questions and Pass4sure dumps

Data deduplication has turned into one of the most well-known topics related to data backup and recovery because it offers simplification and cost savings at a relatively modest cost. Dedupe appliances were the gargantuan dog for a long time, but dedupe software has foster on strong more recently, offering many useful capabilities, often at a lower cost than an appliance.

Perhaps most crucially, just about outright backup software products believe now integrated deduplication as a feature at this point (Hewlett-Packard Data Protector is a rare exception), making deduplication easily accessible.

The advantages of data dedupe software vs. an appliance

Lauren Whitehouse, analyst at Enterprise Strategy Group, offers a long list of pluses associated with data dedupe software:

  • Deduplication policies are integrated in overall backup policies so there is no exigency to set deduplication policies in a divorce interface; the software offers a unique point of management.
  • Deduplication in backup software allows deduplication to betide closer to the source of data (at the production system or at the backup media server). Deduplication processing can be then distributed in the environment instead of at a consolidation point (such as an appliance).
  • Global deduplication is more likely available in data dedupe software.
  • Backup software understands the actual data so it's content-aware. Appliances are just on the receiving halt of the backup data stream and are not -- unless the appliance vendor reverse engineers the format, she said. “Content-awareness allows deduplication software to understand where the natural pattern breaks are in the data stream so they can drive higher deduplication ratios,” she added.
  • Any actions on deduplicated data are tracked by the backup catalog. This means that recovery is streamlined. Copies made via replication features of appliances can't be tracked ... unless the user is using Symantec NetBackup or Symantec Backup Exec with OpenStorage technology (and the appliance supports OST). 
  • Scalability of deduplication should usually be easier (unless the appliance scales seamlessly, relish those from Exagrid Systems, NEC and Sepaton Inc. that believe grid architecture approaches).
  • Licensing varies, but deduplication in software can be more cost effective, especially if it's a no-charge feature.
  • Disk vendor selection flexibility is greater since software uses existing disk and the user can pick any vendor's storage system.
  • The advantages of a dedupe appliance

    On the other hand, Whitehouse said there are some specific advantages to dedupe appliances. For instance, with an appliance, data deduplication is performed on systems optimized specifically for data deduplication processing. For some kinds of workloads, deduplication performance can be improved this way. Likewise, integration is “often a bit easier,” since the appliance just requires you to set policy configurations, whereas software-based deduplication requires configuration of the media server to provide the processing power needed. 

    Of course, appliances moreover purge loads on production servers and can deduplicate data for any backup system environment. “If a site has more than one backup solution and a unique deduplication strategy is desired, this would be the pass to go,” she said.

    David Russell, an analyst at Gartner, has foster to similar conclusions but he definitely sees a trend among clients toward dedupe software. For instance, in surveys conducted at recent Gartner conferences, of those planning to implement dedupe, 42 percent said they would spend a software approach -- the highest symmetry ever recorded by Gartner, and a acute tower from “the low twenties” a year earlier, he said.

    “The thinking is that with software, they can fade and buy a lofty power server and install the code for a cost that is below that for an appliance,” said Russell. Furthermore, notable Russell, “with an appliance you can’t expand in the future without having to worry about what specific appliance model you will exigency or whether the vendors offer a gateway to the targeted device.”

    While Russell endorses the trend he does espy some problems with software-based deduplication. For instance, much depends on how it is deployed. “I believe seen organizations that aren’t sure how to size this and build the infrastructure -- if you undersize your disk resources in terms of both the amount of space and the sort of disk, that can moreover demean the performance of software-based deduplication,” said Russell. “People will frailty the software when they are really doing unreasonable things relish trying to Run dedupe on a server that’s already very busy running Exchange,” he said.

    “In other words, the software has advantages but it moreover gives people the opportunity to shoot themselves in the foot,” he said.

    One solution, he said, is to implement appliances for demanding dedupe challenges such as a big database, while using software for lighter and more manageable dedupe work. “Big objects relish databases could bog down a server running dedupe, whereas an appliance is optimized for that benign of work,” he said.

    Consulting company goes with CommVault Simpana

    Paul Slager is the director of information systems at LWG Consulting in Northbrook, IL, which has 16 locations in the U.S. and four globally, recently opted for the software approach. The company, which focuses on technical disaster consulting for post-disaster issues such as data recovery, mostly on behalf of insurers, runs many virtual machines and backs up over relatively gradual WAN links. As a result, “client-side dedupe and global dedupe and compression were issues they considered,” said Slager.

    With a storage appliance, you usually gain a cost-per-gigabyte or terabyte that is pretty lofty even for basic SATA and, for Fibre Channel drives, the vendors mind to jack the expense up quite a bit more.

    Paul Slager, director of information systems, LWG Consulting 

    Slager said he was looking for a backup solution that had fine deduplication capability. “Our company takes millions of very high-resolution files that they believe to store on their file servers for 12 years -- they wanted to dedupe and compress as much as possible,” he said.  He looked at IBM Corp. Tivoli Storage Manager, CommVault, EMC Corp Avamar and Data Domain, initially, and decided the dedupe software option was the cheapest. The software option moreover allowed him to spend his own storage. “With a storage appliance, you usually gain a cost-per-gigabyte or terabyte that is pretty lofty even for basic SATA and, for Fibre Channel drives, the vendors mind to jack the expense up quite a bit more,” he said.

    Ultimately, he selected CommVault Simpana 9.0, which “seemed to believe it all.” Slager said in addition to dedupe capabilities, it was moreover the “simple things” relish the fact that Simpana allowed the faculty to suspend or resume backup. That was helpful because of the company’s gradual WAN. “Now, if one server goes down I don’t believe to restart the all backup,” he explained. 

    Slager said he thinks his experience with CommVault was moreover helped by preparation. “At the start, I laid out a framework and collected a list of requirements including how it would affect their storage footprint, how it would suitable with disaster recovery plans and their recovery point and recovery time objectives,” he said.

    Slager said he went into the process realizing that getting lofty dedupe ratios would be difficult with any product. However, he was hopeful his virtual machines, databases and Exchange data would dedupe well. “I actually ran the EMC assessment implement for Avamar to espy what their dedupe ratios would be and to pattern out how much backup storage they needed to procure,” he said. That implement yielded an rate of 5 TB of space for the initial seed. Results with CommVault, exceeded that expectation. In fact, he said, with the CommVault deployment the initial seed turned out to be only 3.2 TB. And dedupe ratios believe been as fine or better than he expected.

    So far, Slager said he has logged the following ratios in service:

  • Virtual machines running on VMware believe a dedupe ratio of 84%, “which is really good,” he said.
  • Microsoft Exchange 2010 backups believe a dedupe ratio of 68%
  • Physical Windows servers believe a dedupe ratio of 77%
  • My File shares with outright of the image files believe a dedupe ratio of 11%
  • Microsoft SQL database backups believe a dedupe of 64%
  • Microsoft SharePoint database and documents believe a dedupe of 57%
  • Those numbers seem to be in accord with what analysts see. For example, Whitehouse said although vendor claims are “all over the map” from 500:1 to a “more normal” 20:1, Enterprise Strategy Group research establish that most end-users using deduplication cite a ratio of between 10:1 and 20:1, while a smaller percentage believe seen higher ratios of 30:1.

    Russell said the fact that software takes freight of deduplication at the source will likely mean more growth for that approach. “If you told a network administrator you could reduce traffic by 95 percent through dedupe they would be very impressed,” he said.

    However, Russell moreover said the respective advantages of both dedupe appliance and software approaches will continue and may eventually succumb a hybrid approach to deduplication. For instance, he noted, EMC has hinted about combining Avamar, which does dedupe, with a Data Domain target appliance. Thus, he said, it would be wise for determination makers to hedge their bets so they will be able to select handicap of hybrid if it emerges in a few years.

    About this author: Alan Earls is a frequent contributor to SearchDataBackup.


    MobileIron, Inc. (MOBL) | killexams.com real questions and Pass4sure dumps

    No result found, try original keyword!Thank you for your continued support. I’m pleased to report that 2016 was MobileIron's strongest year to date. I want to provide some color about their achievements and partake with you my strategic focus ...


    Direct Download of over 5500 Certification Exams

    3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Aruba [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Avaya [96 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CA-Technologies [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CheckPoint [41 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
    College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institue [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institute [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DELL [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECCouncil [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    EMC [129 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fortinet [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HP [750 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBM [1532 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Juniper [64 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Medical [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Microsoft [374 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCLEX [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
    OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Oracle [279 Certification Exam(s) ]
    P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Symantec [134 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]





    References :


    Dropmark : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/11712745
    Wordpress : http://wp.me/p7SJ6L-1hW
    Issu : https://issuu.com/trutrainers/docs/st0-172
    Dropmark-Text : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/12283635
    Blogspot : http://killexamsbraindump.blogspot.com/2017/11/just-study-these-symantec-st0-172.html
    RSS Feed : http://feeds.feedburner.com/Pass4sureSt0-172RealQuestionBank
    Box.net : https://app.box.com/s/4k0abjwre9aosxnb25lelvbybohigx8r
    publitas.com : https://view.publitas.com/trutrainers-inc/real-st0-172-questions-that-appeared-in-test-today
    zoho.com : https://docs.zoho.com/file/5xjzy78c5d13ca64f459082f5fb5b4a97e48f






    Back to Main Page





    Killexams ST0-172 exams | Killexams ST0-172 cert | Pass4Sure ST0-172 questions | Pass4sure ST0-172 | pass-guaratee ST0-172 | best ST0-172 test preparation | best ST0-172 training guides | ST0-172 examcollection | killexams | killexams ST0-172 review | killexams ST0-172 legit | kill ST0-172 example | kill ST0-172 example journalism | kill exams ST0-172 reviews | kill exam ripoff report | review ST0-172 | review ST0-172 quizlet | review ST0-172 login | review ST0-172 archives | review ST0-172 sheet | legitimate ST0-172 | legit ST0-172 | legitimacy ST0-172 | legitimation ST0-172 | legit ST0-172 check | legitimate ST0-172 program | legitimize ST0-172 | legitimate ST0-172 business | legitimate ST0-172 definition | legit ST0-172 site | legit online banking | legit ST0-172 website | legitimacy ST0-172 definition | >pass 4 sure | pass for sure | p4s | pass4sure certification | pass4sure exam | IT certification | IT Exam | ST0-172 material provider | pass4sure login | pass4sure ST0-172 exams | pass4sure ST0-172 reviews | pass4sure aws | pass4sure ST0-172 security | pass4sure cisco | pass4sure coupon | pass4sure ST0-172 dumps | pass4sure cissp | pass4sure ST0-172 braindumps | pass4sure ST0-172 test | pass4sure ST0-172 torrent | pass4sure ST0-172 download | pass4surekey | pass4sure cap | pass4sure free | examsoft | examsoft login | exams | exams free | examsolutions | exams4pilots | examsoft download | exams questions | examslocal | exams practice |

    www.pass4surez.com | www.killcerts.com | www.search4exams.com | http://morganstudioonline.com/


    <

    MORGAN Studio

    is specialized in Architectural visualization , Industrial visualization , 3D Modeling ,3D Animation , Entertainment and Visual Effects .