Find us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter





























Kill your exam with our [VN] P8010-034 Real Questions | brain dumps | 3D Visualization

Killexams.com P8010-034 Exam simulator is only required for P8010-034 prep - it is made of P8010-034 exam prep - braindumps - examcollection and VCE - brain dumps - 3D Visualization

Pass4sure P8010-034 dumps | Killexams.com P8010-034 true questions | http://morganstudioonline.com/

P8010-034 Tealeaf Technical Mastery Test v1

Study usher Prepared by Killexams.com IBM Dumps Experts

Exam Questions Updated On :



Killexams.com P8010-034 Dumps and true Questions

100% true Questions - Exam Pass Guarantee with elevated Marks - Just Memorize the Answers



P8010-034 exam Dumps Source : Tealeaf Technical Mastery Test v1

Test Code : P8010-034
Test title : Tealeaf Technical Mastery Test v1
Vendor title : IBM
: 38 true Questions

it's miles outstanding to maintain P8010-034 actual test questions.
I never concept I could breathe the utilize of brain dumps for extreme IT exams (I became always an honors student, lol), but as your profession progresses and youve got extra obligations, together with your family, finding time and money to prepare to your tests rep harder and more difficult. Yet, to provide for your family, you want to maintain your career and know-how developing... So, perplexed and a miniature responsible, I ordered this killexams.com bundle. It lived as much as my expectancies, as I passed the P8010-034 exam with a perfectly correct score. The fact is, they accomplish tender you with true P8010-034 exam questions and answers - which is precisely what they promise. But the coolest information also is, that this statistics you cram to your exam stays with you. Dont everyone of us esteem the question and solution layout because of that So, some months later, once I received a huge advertising with even bigger obligations, I often discover myself drawing from the information I got from Killexams. So it additionally allows ultimately, so I dont experience that guilty anymore.


try this notable source of true capture a notice at Questions.
I could surely address ninety three% marks in the long flee of the exam, as severa questions were just like the adviser for me. Much liked to the killexams. I had a weight from workplace to smash up the exam P8010-034. However, I became burdened over taking a first rate planning in miniature time. At that point, the killexams.com aide showed up as a windfall for me, with its effortless and brief replies.


where will I locate material for P8010-034 examination?
I had taken the P8010-034 coaching from the killexams.com as that turned into a pleasing platform for the education and that had in the quit given me the satisfactory even of the education to rep the nice rankings inside the P8010-034 test checks. I sincerely enjoyed the manner I were given the matters completed in the spirited pass and via the assist of the same; I had finally were given the factor on the line. It had made my guidance a lot easier and with the assist of the killexams.com I were able to grow nicely inside the life.


discovered an accurate source for actual P8010-034 dumps.
I certainly asked it, honed for every week, then went in and passed the exam with 89% marks. That is the problem that the perquisite exam association maintain to breathe just like for everyone and sundry! I were given to breathe P8010-034 certified associate because of this internet web page. They maintain an awesome accumulation of killexams.com and exam association assets and this time their stuff is exactly as notable. The questions are valid, and the exam simulator works satisfactory. No problems identified. I suggested killexams.com Steadfast!!


truely attempted P8010-034 query monetary institution as quickly as and i am convinced.
They fee me for P8010-034 exam simulator and QA document however first i did no longer got the P8010-034 QA material. there has been some file blunders, later they constant the error. i organized with the exam simulator and it changed intorightly.


Do you need dumps modern-day P8010-034 exam to skip the examination?
I spent enough time studying these materials and passed the P8010-034 exam. The stuff is good, and whilst those are braindumps, import these material are constructed at the true exam stuff, I dont grasp folks who try to bitch aboutthe P8010-034 questions being exceptional. In my case, now not everyone questions were one hundred% the equal, but the topics and widespread approach had been surely accurate. So, buddies, if you test tough enough youll accomplish just fine.


these P8010-034 questions and answers tender proper know-how modern-day topics.
I got 76% in P8010-034 exam. thanks to the team of killexams.com for making my pains so easy. I counsel to new customers to set together via killexams.com as its very complete.


I sense very confident with the aid of preparing P8010-034 state-of-the-art dumps.
This killexams.com from helped me rep my P8010-034 companion affirmation. Their material are in reality beneficial, and the exam simulator is sincerely superb, it completely reproduces the exam. topics are lucid very without problems the usage of the killexams.com examine material. The exam itself was unpredictable, so Im blissful I appliedkillexams.com . Their packs spread everyone that I need, and that i wont rep any unsavory shocks amid your exam. Thanx men.


worried for P8010-034 exam? rep this P8010-034 question bank.
I became a P8010-034 certified terminal week. This career path is very exciting, so if you are quiet considering it, build positive you rep questions answers to prepare the P8010-034 exam. This is a huge time saver as you rep exactly what you need to know for the P8010-034 exam. This is why I chose it, and I never looked back.


it is without a doubt top notch indulge in to maintain P8010-034 true test questions.
I managd to complete P8010-034 exam using killexams.com dumps. Identity wish to hold in holds with you ever. Identitytake this as a casual to lots obliged yet again for this inspire. I were given the dumps for P8010-034. killexams.com and exam Simulator actually supportive and appallingly elaborative. Identity better recommend your web site in prove of the attribute connection ever for certificate tests.


IBM Tealeaf Technical Mastery Test

IBM to tender DB2 Mastery examination - 2 | killexams.com true Questions and Pass4sure dumps

First name: final identify: electronic mail tackle: Password: ascertain Password: Username:

Title: C-level/President manager VP body of workers (affiliate/Analyst/and so forth.) Director

characteristic:

role in IT choice-making technique: Align enterprise & IT dreams Create IT approach check IT needs control seller Relationships evaluate/Specify manufacturers or companies other role commission Purchases no longer involved

Work phone: company: business size: trade: highway address metropolis: Zip/postal code State/Province: country:

once in a while, they send subscribers particular offers from opt for partners. Would you want to rep hold of these special companion offers by the utilize of email? positive No

Your registration with Eweek will involve perquisite here free e mail publication(s): information & Views

by means of submitting your wireless quantity, you harmonize that eWEEK, its related houses, and supplier companions providing content material you view might also contact you using contact middle expertise. Your consent isn't required to view content or utilize web site features.

by using clicking on the "Register" button under, I harmonize that I maintain carefully examine the terms of carrier and the privacy coverage and that i comply with breathe legally bound by pass of everyone such phrases.

Register

continue devoid of consent      

IBM particulars Channel Plans For Netezza statistics Warehouse appliances | killexams.com true Questions and Pass4sure dumps

records warehouse appliances

The circulation will supply resellers with a number of sales, advertising and marketing and technical components that IBM talked about will build it more convenient to market and sell Netezza methods. IBM is also providing new financing options to channel companions who resell the Netezza home equipment, together with zero-p.c financing and multifaceted imbue options for valued clientele.

while Netezza generally offered its information warehouse appliances direct to purchasers, IBM has had its eye on the channel for promoting Netezza items considering it got the enterprise in November for $1.7 billion. at the Netezza person conference in June IBM executives unveiled a companion recruitment pains for Netezza and referred to they forecast the channel to account for 50 percent of Netezza earnings within four years.

"business analytics goes mainstream and IBM's goal is to arm its companions with the arrogate skills and assist to aid their valued clientele capture erudition of this fashion," referred to Arvind Krishna, typical manager of IBM suggestions management, in an announcement. "These &#ninety one;new&#ninety three; components are geared to build it effortless for their companions to quickly infuse Netezza into their enterprise mannequin."

IBM has identified business analytics as considered one of its strategic initiatives and has forecast that company analytics and optimization products and features will generate $sixteen billion in annual income for the business by means of 2015.

Netezza's techniques are according to IBM's BladeCenter servers.

Channel partners need to breathe licensed to resell IBM products that Come below the software value Plus (SVP) program. Authorization necessities involve having at the least two personnel who've handed a technical mastery exam and one who has passed a revenue mastery exam.

Resellers who qualify for the SVP application are eligible for co-advertising money for lead generation and other market planning counsel. IBM also offers companions a odds bootcamp where personnel can train on how to install, manage and preserve Netezza programs. And SVP-member resellers can convey earnings prospects into IBM Innovation centers to examine-force Netezza products.

starting Oct. 1 the Netezza products also will Come under IBM's software value Incentive application, which gives economic rewards for companions who determine and develop revenue alternatives, but accomplish not necessarily address product fulfillment.

On the financing facet partners can present zero-p.c financing through IBM international Financing to credit-qualified purchasers for Netezza purchases. also accessible is 24- and 36-month financing with alternatives that let purchasers in shape payments to anticipated money flows.

And partners can lease a Netezza system for 24 months to flee inside their personal facts facilities for demonstration, construction, testing and training purposes, IBM said.

Charlotte, N.C.-based mostly solutions company and IBM companion Fuzzy Logix, which supplies predictive analytics utility and capabilities to shoppers, "will utilize these components from IBM to discover international business alternatives and bring larger expense capabilities to their shoppers," stated COO Mike Upchurch, in an announcement.


IBM pursuits commercial enterprise BYOD with MobileFirst | killexams.com true Questions and Pass4sure dumps

commercial enterprise mobility is turning into a huge deal and IBM is itching to prove that it breathe on the case.

The IT items and features colossal today debuted its MobileFirst portfolio and pledged to double the company's investments in cellular this year. MobileFirst encompasses a suite of cell offerings that huge Blue is gathering under the MobileFirst umbrella. They involve cellular paraphernalia administration, analytics and cellular developer outreach and usher in partnership with AT&T.

The goal, based on Robert LeBlanc, senior vp of IBM middleware application, is to shepherd the bring your own machine (BYOD) circulate into an era of enterprise-enabled mobility. "thus far, cell computing has been dominated by means of discussions of recent smartphones, working methods, games and apps. however businesses maintain yet to faucet into the capabilities of mobile enterprise," he said in a company observation.

If iOS and Android smartphones and tablets just like the iPad aren’t already an integral Part of the ordinary workday, they soon might be, says IBM.

https://o1.qnsr.com/log/p.gif?;n=203;c=204660774;s=9478;x=7936;f=201812281339040;u=j;z=TIMESTAMP;a=20403972;e=i

LeBlanc brought, "As these devices circle into ingrained in every thing that they do, agencies are actually in the palms of their customers' palms. IBM MobileFirst is designed to build the transformation to fitting a cell enterprise a reality."

In aid of that imaginative and prescient, IBM unveiled a unified solutions set, deliverable by the utilize of the cloud or as managed capabilities, to assist enterprises combine mobility into their IT setups and business methods.

IBM's newly-introduced cellular slate includes updates to IBM Worklight, the cell applications platform that the business acquired closing year. elements involve sole signal-on for diverse purposes and a new Rational notice at various Workbench beta for mobile app trying out.

On the cell paraphernalia management (MDM) front, IBM announced multiplied paraphernalia usher and security updates for Endpoint manager. A refreshed edition of AppScan provides vulnerability testing for iOS apps.

IBM is counting on tech from yet another acquisition, Tealeaf, for cell analytics. The company plans to expand its Tealeaf CX cell visual analytics product to deliver organizations a window into mobile behaviors.

functions additionally play a huge role. MobileFirst fashion and Design services are anchored by pass of IBM Interactive, the business's new mobile Maturity model assessment carrier and new mobile Workshops to assist customers quicken up their tasks. when it comes to establishing and managing cellular environments, IBM is enlisting the better community Infrastructure services for cell, mobile enterprise functions for Managed Mobility and mobile application Platform administration instruments.

Recognizing that builders can build or smash a cell ecosystem, the company has cast a partnership with AT&T that allows for coders to integrate features like speech focus and quick funds by pass of IBM Worklight and AT&T's cloud APIs. IBM is additionally pouring technical documentation into on-line supplies developerWorks and CodeRally.

Pedro Hernandez is a contributing editor at InternetNews.com, the information provider of the IT business Part community, the community for know-how experts. commemorate him on Twitter @ecoINSITE.

linked information AND analysis
  • synthetic Intelligence in Healthcare: How AI Shapes medication

    characteristic |  with the aid of Lisa Morgan, March 08, 2019

  • right machine studying solutions

    characteristic |  by means of Samuel Greengard, February 14, 2019

  • Google laptop learning Engine: Product Overview and insight

    artificial INTELLIGENCE |  with the aid of Samuel Greengard, February 14, 2019

  • Alteryx: Product Overview and perception

    artificial INTELLIGENCE |  by pass of Samuel Greengard, February 14, 2019

  • SAP Leonardo: Product Overview and perception

    synthetic INTELLIGENCE |  through Samuel Greengard, February 14, 2019

  • RapidMiner: Product Overview and perception

    synthetic INTELLIGENCE |  by using Samuel Greengard, February 14, 2019

  • Microsoft Azure laptop gaining erudition of Studio: Product Overview and perception

    artificial INTELLIGENCE |  by Samuel Greengard, February 14, 2019

  • IBM Watson Studio: Product Overview and perception

    artificial INTELLIGENCE |  by pass of Samuel Greengard, February 14, 2019

  • SAS visual machine learning: Product Overview and perception

    function |  by Samuel Greengard, February 14, 2019

  • AWS SageMaker: Product Overview and insight

    synthetic INTELLIGENCE |  by Samuel Greengard, February 14, 2019

  • artificial Intelligence in enterprise: using AI to your business

    artificial INTELLIGENCE |  via Daniel Dern, February 08, 2019

  • How IBM’s assignment Debater may repair fb

    artificial INTELLIGENCE |  by pass of Rob Enderle, January 21, 2019

  • IBM broadcasts most powerful AI pains Yet: The birth of sensible HR

    synthetic INTELLIGENCE |  by means of Rob Enderle, December 07, 2018

  • IBM Spectrum discover: AI at Scale

    artificial INTELLIGENCE |  by pass of Rob Enderle, October 26, 2018

  • The precise Cloud-based mostly AI services

    artificial INTELLIGENCE |  by using Andy Patrizio, September eleven, 2018

  • synthetic Intelligence Salaries: Paychecks Heading Skyward

    synthetic INTELLIGENCE |  by Andy Patrizio, August 28, 2018

  • synthetic Intelligence utilize situations

    function |  via Samuel Greengard, August 13, 2018

  • 25 exact AI Startups

    function |  through Andy Patrizio, July 18, 2018

  • CIOs Leveraging AI and desktop discovering For ITSM desires

    artificial INTELLIGENCE |  with the aid of Jeff Kaplan, July 03, 2018

  • 35 synthetic Intelligence classes

    artificial INTELLIGENCE |  by using Cynthia Harvey, might also 04, 2018


  • While it is very hard task to choose dependable certification questions / answers resources with respect to review, reputation and validity because people rep ripoff due to choosing wrong service. Killexams.com build it positive to serve its clients best to its resources with respect to exam dumps update and validity. Most of other's ripoff report complaint clients Come to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams happily and easily. They never compromise on their review, reputation and attribute because killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams client confidence is necessary to us. Specially they capture imbue of killexams.com review, killexams.com reputation, killexams.com ripoff report complaint, killexams.com trust, killexams.com validity, killexams.com report and killexams.com scam. If you survey any unsuitable report posted by their competitors with the title killexams ripoff report complaint internet, killexams.com ripoff report, killexams.com scam, killexams.com complaint or something like this, just maintain in intellect that there are always bad people damaging reputation of trustworthy services due to their benefits. There are thousands of satisfied customers that pass their exams using killexams.com brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams drill questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit Killexams.com, their sample questions and sample brain dumps, their exam simulator and you will definitely know that killexams.com is the best brain dumps site.

    Back to Braindumps Menu


    COG-205 drill test | HP0-Y39 dump | A2040-986 test questions | ANCC-MSN free pdf | ST0-096 true questions | 000-R18 exam prep | 1Z0-144 test prep | 000-184 examcollection | VCS-322 braindumps | C2020-605 braindumps | 650-316 questions and answers | 000-375 braindumps | FCESP drill questions | 1Y0-A01 questions answers | AND-402 free pdf download | HP0-784 study guide | CHHE drill questions | 190-829 drill test | 920-234 questions and answers | TK0-201 test prep |


    Simply ponder these P8010-034 Questions and study manage
    We are doing pains to supplying you with actual Tealeaf Technical Mastery Test v1 exam questions and answers, along explanations. Each on killexams.com has been showed by means of IBM certified experts. They are tremendously qualified and confirmed humans, who maintain several years of professional experience recognized with the IBM assessments.

    At killexams.com, they maintain an approach to provide fully surveyed IBM P8010-034 exam homework which will breathe the most effectual to pass P8010-034 exam, and to induce certified with the assistance of P8010-034 braindumps. It is a trustworthy option to quicken up your position as a professional within the info Technology enterprise. they maintain an approach to are excited with their infamy of serving to people pass the P8010-034 exam of their first attempt. Their prosperity prices within the preceding years were utterly unimaginable, thanks to their upbeat shoppers presently equipped to impel their positions within the speedy manner. killexams.com is the primary call amongst IT professionals, particularly those hope to maneuver up the progression tiers faster in their character associations. IBM is the industrial enterprise pioneer in facts innovation, and obtaining certified via them is an ensured technique to achieve success with IT positions. they maintain an approach to enable you to try to precisely that with their glorious IBM P8010-034 exam homework dumps. IBM P8010-034 is rare everywhere the world, and also the industrial enterprise and programming arrangements gave through them are being grasped by means that of every one amongst the agencies. they need helped in employing variety of companies at the far side any doubt shot manner of accomplishment. so much achieving learning of IBM objects are considered a vital practicality, and also the specialists certified by victimisation them are particularly prestigious altogether associations. We deliver true P8010-034 pdf test Questions and Answers braindumps in arrangements. PDF version and exam simulator. Pass IBM P8010-034 exam fleetly and effectively. The P8010-034 braindumps PDF kind is available for poring over and printing. you will breathe able to print additional and additional and apply primarily. Their pass rate is extreme to 98 and also the equivalence fee among their P8010-034 information homework usher and is ninetieth in choice of their seven-year employment history. does one need successs at intervals the P8010-034 exam in handiest first attempt? I am inescapable currently once analyzing for the IBM P8010-034 true test. killexams.com Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under; WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for everyone exams on web site PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders larger than $69 DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders additional than $ninety nine SEPSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for everyone Orders

    It is essential to assemble to the usher material on the off casual that one needs toward spare time. As you require bunches of time to search for updated and factual investigation material for taking the IT certification exam. In the event that you find that at one place, what could breathe superior to this? Its just killexams.com that has what you require. You can spare time and avoid bother on the off casual that you purchase Adobe IT certification from their site.

    You ought to rep the most updated IBM P8010-034 Braindumps with the perquisite answers, which are set up by killexams.com experts, enabling the possibility to rep a wield on learning about their P8010-034 exam course in the greatest, you will not discover P8010-034 results of such attribute anyplace in the market. Their IBM P8010-034 drill Dumps are given to applicants at performing 100% in their exam. Their IBM P8010-034 exam dumps are most recent in the market, allowing you to rep ready for your P8010-034 exam in the correct way.

    In the event that you are occupied with effectively Passing the IBM P8010-034 exam to start procuring? killexams.com has driving edge created IBM exam addresses that will guarantee you pass this P8010-034 exam! killexams.com conveys you the exact, present and most recent updated P8010-034 exam questions and accessible with a 100% unconditional guarantee. There are many organizations that give P8010-034 brain dumps yet those are not actual and most recent ones. Arrangement with killexams.com P8010-034 new questions is a most model approach to pass this certification exam in simple way.

    We are for the most Part very much sensible that a noteworthy issue in the IT business is that there is an absence of value study materials. Their exam prep material gives you everyone that you should capture a certification exam. Their IBM P8010-034 Exam will give you exam questions with confirmed answers that reflect the true exam. These questions and answers give you the experience of taking the genuine test. elevated caliber and incentive for the P8010-034 Exam. 100% assurance to pass your IBM P8010-034 exam and rep your IBM affirmation. They at killexams.com are resolved to enable you to pass your P8010-034 exam with elevated scores. The odds of you neglecting to pass your P8010-034 test, in the wake of experiencing their far reaching exam dumps are practically nothing.

    killexams.com elevated attribute P8010-034 exam simulator is extremely encouraging for their clients for the exam prep. Immensely vital questions, points and definitions are featured in brain dumps pdf. sociable occasion the information in one plot is a genuine assist and causes you rep ready for the IT certification exam inside a brief timeframe traverse. The P8010-034 exam offers key focuses. The killexams.com pass4sure dumps retains the essential questions or ideas of the P8010-034 exam

    At killexams.com, they give completely surveyed IBM P8010-034 preparing assets which are the best to pass P8010-034 exam, and to rep certified by IBM. It is a best determination to quicken up your position as an expert in the Information Technology industry. They are pleased with their notoriety of helping individuals pass the P8010-034 test in their first attempt. Their prosperity rates in the previous two years maintain been completely great, because of their upbeat clients who are currently ready to impel their positions in the snappily track. killexams.com is the main determination among IT experts, particularly the ones who are hoping to traipse up the progression levels quicker in their individual associations. IBM is the business pioneer in data innovation, and getting certified by them is an ensured approach to prevail with IT positions. They enable you to accomplish actually that with their superb IBM P8010-034 preparing materials.

    killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
    WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for everyone exams on website
    PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
    DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
    DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for everyone Orders


    IBM P8010-034 is rare everyone around the globe, and the business and programming arrangements gave by them are being grasped by every one of the organizations. They maintain helped in driving a large number of organizations on the beyond any doubt shot pass of achievement. Far reaching learning of IBM items are viewed as a captious capability, and the experts certified by them are exceptionally esteemed in everyone associations.

    P8010-034 Practice Test | P8010-034 examcollection | P8010-034 VCE | P8010-034 study guide | P8010-034 practice exam | P8010-034 cram


    Killexams 1Z0-034 study guide | Killexams E20-393 braindumps | Killexams 9L0-064 true questions | Killexams 1Z0-969 sample test | Killexams 000-204 bootcamp | Killexams 4A0-108 free pdf | Killexams GB0-280 drill test | Killexams CTEL drill exam | Killexams A2030-280 braindumps | Killexams NS0-511 dump | Killexams E20-365 questions answers | Killexams 00M-654 test prep | Killexams MB2-718 test prep | Killexams SC0-501 questions and answers | Killexams 1Z0-321 pdf download | Killexams P2090-086 drill test | Killexams CCD-333 drill test | Killexams C9010-030 exam prep | Killexams 920-458 examcollection | Killexams 000-N41 braindumps |


    killexams.com huge List of Exam Braindumps

    View Complete list of Killexams.com Brain dumps


    Killexams 9A0-084 cram | Killexams A2090-463 brain dumps | Killexams 1Z0-591 braindumps | Killexams 200-355 drill test | Killexams S10-110 bootcamp | Killexams 00M-233 examcollection | Killexams 700-038 mock exam | Killexams 1Z0-870 study guide | Killexams HP0-698 drill test | Killexams HP0-265 study guide | Killexams HP0-P15 free pdf | Killexams HP2-B118 exam questions | Killexams 922-100 pdf download | Killexams 3M0-250 drill test | Killexams HP0-276 drill questions | Killexams HP2-E15 test prep | Killexams BH0-002 sample test | Killexams 000-025 dumps | Killexams 050-694 true questions | Killexams EADA10 dumps questions |


    Tealeaf Technical Mastery Test v1

    Pass 4 positive P8010-034 dumps | Killexams.com P8010-034 true questions | http://morganstudioonline.com/

    Declassified documents tender a new perspective on Yuri Gagarin’s flight | killexams.com true questions and Pass4sure dumps

      Gagarin launch

    The launch of Vostok on April 12, 1961. A declassified document offers new information on what happened during Gagarin’s flight.

    by Asif SiddiqiMonday, October 12, 2015 Bookmark and Share

    As anyone who has done research on the topic knows, there’s an abundance of bewildering information about the Soviet space program, both in print and especially online. During the gelid War, Westerners generally had miniature to proceed on, but enterprising dabbler sleuths chipped away at the edifice of secrecy, thus bringing to light many of its darkest secrets. The quit of the gelid War brought a deluge of information on the program, most of it filtered through Russian journalists who were trustworthy at tracking down veterans willing to talk. The result was a kind of revisionist history, a history concerned with “what really happened” rather than “what they thought happened.”

    Despite everyone this quite impressive work, the principal challenge of doing Soviet space history has always been the problem of archival research. How accomplish you proceed about digging into archives in Moscow to rep at the documents, as one is able to accomplish (for example) with the American space program?

    With Russian openness, a huge market opened up in the US and Europe for writers (mostly dabbler historians or journalists) to step in and succumb an unending stream of books on arcane aspects of the program. This strand has been further enriched by academics—mostly professional historians of modern Russia—who maintain looked at the wealthy cultural detritus of the Soviet space program. There’s a lot of this stuff out there, and some of it is very good, shedding light on the cultural consequence of the Soviet space program as well as mapping how Russian culture has cultivate an interest in space exploration for well over a hundred years. (For those interested, I moderated a very spirited discussion on Soviet space culture a brace of years ago on the Russian History Blog.)

    Gagarin launch

    Gagarin being led to his spaceship at the top of the gantry by Oleg Ivanovsky who was the “lead” (production) designer of the Vostok spaceship.

    Despite everyone this quite impressive work, the principal challenge of doing Soviet space history has always been the problem of archival research. How accomplish you proceed about digging into archives in Moscow to rep at the documents, as one is able to accomplish (for example) with the American space program? Since the early 1990s, it has actually been viable to visit archives in Moscow and rep access to Party and government documents at various condition archives. It’s not easy, but it can breathe done and there are many academics, both professors and graduate students, who routinely accomplish research at Russian archives on a huge array of topics related to Soviet history. I myself maintain been in Moscow many times (including for months at a time) working at various archives for my bespeak on the pre-Sputnik history of the Soviet space program.

    Of course, as with any archival document, one has to maintain a captious eye and contextualize, evaluate, and weigh any document by drawing from other sources. Nevertheless, the availability of archival documents on the Soviet space program has been both a boon and source of confusion. Russian archival authorities, for example, published several collections of primary source documents in 2011 on the early days of the space program (all in Russian) which are now commercially available (I’ve written brief summaries of some of them in this NASA Newsletter, pp. 19–24) but at the very time, there is undoubtedly some selection bias in what has been included and what has been omitted. Selection bias is, of course, a problem with any published collection of archival documents but the Russian ones Come with their own peculiar set of problems.

    It was in this context that I was in Moscow this past summer and spent a month digging through archives on a non-space related bespeak project (actually on the history of scientists and engineers who worked in the Stalinist Gulag). I had a few days left at the quit and went digging for space-related documents. At the Russian condition Archive of the Economy (RGAE), one can find thousands of chunky binders containing records of the grim-sounding Military-Industrial Commission, the body that managed Soviet military R&D and production during much of the gelid War. These folders are heavy, dusty, and for the most part, no one has looked at them since they were originally set away by archivists. The richness of materials is quite astonishing. Over the past few years, I maintain institute and collected an tremendous amount of material on the space program and related fields. These include: plans and schedules for their interplanetary program; circumstantial lists of technical materials from the American aerospace industry coveted by Soviet industrial managers; documents complaining that secrecy at Baikonur (the site from where the Soviets launched their satellites and cosmonauts) was not strict enough; abandoned anti-satellite projects; and documents on their massive N-1 Moon program.

    Gagarin launch

    Ivanovsky helping Gagarin rep settled in his ship.

    In this catalog of riches, in June of this year, I ran across a document on the historic flight of famed cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin, who on April 12, 1961, became the first human being in space. The document sheds new light on that historical flight, revealing the tremendous risks involved in that mission. Gagarin’s Vostok flight, of course, has been quite amply documented, in print and online (with quite a nice recent biography in English by Andrew Jenks). I myself published a lengthy account, based largely on official mission documents (released in 1991), in one my earlier books, Challenge to Apollo: The Soviet Union and the Space Race, 1945–1974. However, documents maintain continued to trickle out on the flight in the past decade, and while nothing that has been declassified fundamentally shifts their perception of the mission, the Russian declassifications from 2011 maintain clarified much about the flight. The document that I institute also provides confirmation of inescapable aspects of the flight, which is everyone the more necessary given the proliferation of Gagarin machination websites (especially in Russian) which are effortless to find with a Google search. Many websites will bid you that Gagarin was not the first human in space, that there were earlier “lost cosmonauts,” and, most sensationally, that his untimely death in 1968 was Part of some nefarious Communist Party plan.

    The document underscores what has often been overlooked by casual historians—that the flight of Gagarin’s Vostok was fundamentally embedded in a military environment. His spaceship was actually an offshoot variant of a new spy satellite (“Zenit”), not, as many often claim, that the spy satellite was the offshoot of the human variant.

    The text of my document was remarkably somber in tone, very much in line with Soviet bureaucratic norms. Its title a literal description of its contents: “On the Results of the Launch of the ‘Vostok’ Space Ship with a Human on Board and on Plans for Future work on Launches of the ‘Vostok’ Space Ship.” What was this? It was the official summary report—classified “Top Secret”—on Gagarin’s mission prepared by designers for the highest levels of the Soviet government. This five-page summary report, produced on May 9, 1961, less than a month after Gagarin’s flight, briefly compiled everyone that engineers knew about the flight. How did Gagarin do? How well did his spaceship perform? What can they accomplish next?

    For a start, they can sack the notion that Gagarin was not well during the flight. The authors of the document note that “Cosmonaut Major Yu. A. Gagarin normally bore the effects of everyone the factors accompanying the insertion of [his] ship into orbit, the space flight, and the revert to Earth, maintaining replete working ability during the flight and fully completed the flight assignment and program of observation.”

    The document underscores what has often been overlooked by casual historians—that the flight of Gagarin’s Vostok was fundamentally embedded in a military environment. His spaceship was actually an offshoot variant of a new spy satellite (“Zenit”), not, as many often claim, that the spy satellite was the offshoot of the human variant. Engineers basically took out the cameras from the spy satellite, added life support, an ejection seat, and redundancies, and rigged the spacecraft for a human being. Besides the document’s observation about a “program of observation,” they rep an definite confirmation of the military consequence of Gagarin’s flight in the next sentence, when the authors note that the flight has “opened up new prospects in the mastery of cosmic space and the utilize of these objects for the interests of defense.”

    Gagarin launch

    The “USSR” insignia was not originally on Gagarin’s helmet but was painted on on the morning of his flight.

    Despite the obvious note of self-congratulation about the flight (“all systems ensuring the insertion into orbit, flight in orbit, and revert of the revert module and the cosmonaut [back] to Earth, worked normally”) the document notes there were numerous “basic shortcomings” during the preparation and implementation of the mission. Going through these they rep a rare and peculiar glimpse into the gelid War Soviet space program and its functioning in a climate of elevated stakes and incredibly elevated risk.

    We find from the document that during the preparation of two precursor missions with dogs in March 1961, and then in manufacturing Gagarin’s actual vehicle, at least 70 anomalies were detected in instruments on the vehicle. Yet, still, the flight went ahead!

    Second, the “air conditioning” (basically, the life uphold system on Vostok) “did not fully correspond to the [design] requirements,” import that life uphold was essentially operating at its limits for Gagarin.

    We also know that there were a few other “anomalies” (in NASA parlance) that marred the mission, including one that potentially could maintain killed Gagarin.

    Third, the “portable emergency reserve” (in Russian, known as NAZ for nosimyy avariynyy zapas), a package used by cosmonauts to survive (for about three extra days) in case of landing in an unexpected area, was insufficiently debugged, especially for emergency splashdowns, which was certainly a possibility. In fact, the document notes that after being ejected from his capsule after his sole orbit, when Gagarin was parachuting down, “the cable connected to the [portable emergency reserve] snapped,” basically depriving him of these supplies. In other words, if he had actually landed pass off target, he would maintain had to survive without any supplies.

    Fourth, a key valve in an engine (known variously as the 8D719, RD-0109, or RO-7) on two upper stages was assembled incorrectly at the factory, which, the document notes, “could maintain led to a premature shutdown of the engine and [failure] of orbital insertion of the [spaceship].” One imagines the outcome for Gagarin if that had happened. The best case scenario was an unscheduled landing, perhaps in eastern Siberia, on the initial portion of the orbital ground track. The worst case, given everyone the unknowns, was a fatality. In fact, as I report below, this particular valve and its operation during orbital insertion did set Gagarin’s life in staid jeopardy, but not in the pass one might expect.

    Fifth, the short-wave mode for the voice radio-communication system (known as “Zarya”) basically did not “provide for timehonored communications during flight of the cosmonaut with ground communication stations,” which explains the repeated complaints by both the ground and Gagarin of difficulty in hearing each other, not to mention the impoverished attribute of the audio that has been released by Russian archivists.1 Yet, Gagarin recorded some vivid impressions of his time in orbit on a tape recorder in true time. (“The flight is proceeding marvelously. The emotion of weightlessness is no problem, I feel fine… At the edge of the Earth, at the edge of the horizon, there’s such a comely blue halo that becomes darker the farther it is from the Earth…”)

    Sixth, one of the two onboard radar sensors (known as “Rubin”), which helped the ground track the coordinates of the spaceship, did not work during Gagarin’s flight. This meant that tracking data during the mission was spotty at best.

    Finally, the spaceship’s main data recorder (a kind of “black box”) known as “Mir-V1” did not work during reentry and landing due to “unsound assembly” at the factory. This meant that much captious data on the final portion of Gagarin’s mission was simply never recorded, making troubleshooting after the mission that much harder.

    document cover

    Front page of the document institute at an archive in Moscow reporting on the results of Gagarin's flight to government leaders.

    We also know that there were a few other “anomalies” (in NASA parlance) that marred the mission, including one that potentially could maintain killed Gagarin. During launch into orbit, the upper stage engine worked longer (the faulty valve!) than it should have, putting Gagarin in a much higher orbit than planned—the apogee of the orbit was 327 kilometers instead of 230 kilometers. This meant that in case the retrorocket system failed, Gagarin’s ship would not naturally decay after a week or so, or even after ten days—the absolute circumscribe of resources in the ship. It would instead reenter after 30 days, by which time Gagarin would certainly breathe dead, having exhausted everyone the air inside. In other words, either the retrorocket worked, or Gagarin was a extinct man.

    In his postflight report, he remembered, “I waited for separation. There was no separation.”

    During the actual flight, as soon as orbital insertion occurred, a timer known as Granit-5V activated. Precisely 67 minutes later, this timer sent a signal to fire the retrorocket engine (known as the S5.4) which, basically, did its job and deorbited Gagarin. In retrospect, that the retrorocket engine fired as it was intended to accomplish is not terribly surprising given that it was one of the most ground-tested elements of the entire spaceship—17 out of 18 ground firings before the launch were successful. An spirited aside to everyone this is that during the entire time he was in space, Gagarin had no concept he was in the wrong orbit.

    A much bigger problem occurred when, having ignited, the retrorocket engine stopped firing after 44 seconds, one second before the planned shutdown time due to another faulty valve. That one second meant that Gagarin would land 300 kilometers short of the planned target point. The lack of a proper shutdown also meant that some remaining propellant from the retro-engine (as well as residual gas from the gas bottles of the attitude control system) set Gagarin’s ship in an uncontrolled spin (of about 30° per second). Gagarin, as affable as always, reported on this in his later postflight report as a “corps de ballet” as the spaceship madly spun around. He remembered that it was “head, then feet, head, then feet, rotating rapidly. Everything was spinning around. Now I survey Africa… next the horizon, then the sky… I was wondering what was going on.”

    The problem, however, was much more staid than anyone could maintain anticipated, for the unexpected spin disrupted the internal program that would maintain immediately (four to eight seconds after engine shutdown) led to separation of the two modules that made up the Vostok spaceship: the spherical descent module carrying Gagarin, and the conical instrument module, which lacked a heat shield but ideally would singe up separately far from Gagarin’s capsule. In his postflight report, he remembered, “I waited for separation. There was no separation.” Instead, shackled to each other, the two objects began to enter the atmosphere as one. This was highly dangerous, for parts of the module not designed to survive reentry could maintain easily impacted and blown through Gagarin’s capsule. Fortunately for Gagarin, about ten minutes later, the two parts of Vostok separated, at an altitude of about 150–170 kilometers above the Mediterranean. That was lower than usual, but quiet elevated enough that Gagarin’s capsule was unharmed. And even then everyone was not safe. For a few seconds, a wiring harness kept the two modules connected, in a wild dance, separating only when four steel strips attaching the harness came off.

    After experiencing about 10–12 g’s during reentry, Gagarin, once in the atmosphere, ejected from his capsule at an altitude of approximately seven kilometers. However, he soon discovered that once his primary large parachute deployed, the reserve parachute, slightly smaller than the primary one, also partially deployed. Fortunately, descending with one fully deployed parachute and one partial one—a recipe for cataclysm in a worst case scenario—did not adversely strike his descent. Gagarin was, however, industrious with other problems: for six minutes, as he descended, he struggled to open a respiration valve on his spacesuit to assist him breathe atmospheric air. His life was not in danger but it must maintain been extremely uncomfortable for a few tense minutes. Luckily, None the worse for the wear, he parachuted down safely at 1053 Moscow Time (not at 1055, as thought for decades).

    he many problems that Gagarin faced on his mission were not necessarily due to impoverished design or bad engineering, I would argue, but instead a combination of hurry and impoverished workmanship on the factory floor. I would wrangle that the Vostok design was in fact excellent engineering if they define “excellent engineering” as also being incredibly robust.

    What does this everyone mean? Gagarin was an incredibly lucky man to maintain Come out of this unhurt and alive. In rushing to accomplish a human spaceflight in the race with the US, Soviet engineers pushed the circumscribe of acceptable risk to its limits. Fortunately for Soviet planners everything went well. Sure, some of this was due to luck. Things that could maintain gone wrong didn’t. But some of it was also the undeniably robust design of the Vostok spaceship itself. Its relatively simple and elegant design was intended first and foremost to rep a person into orbit and back as quickly and reliably as possible. The Soviets, for example, bypassed a slightly more complicated blunt, truncated cone design (such as used on NASA’s Mercury spacecraft) in favor of a simple sphere capable of ballistic reentry into the Earth’s atmosphere.

    The many problems that Gagarin faced on his mission were not necessarily due to impoverished design or bad engineering, I would argue, but instead a combination of hurry and impoverished workmanship on the factory floor. consider that the Vostok spacecraft consisted of 241 vacuum tubes, more than 6,000 transistors, 56 electric motors, and about 800 relays and switches connected by about 15 kilometers of cable. In addition, there were 880 plug connectors, each (on average) having 850 contact points. A total of 123 organizations, including 36 factories, contributed parts to the entire Vostok system. Despite redundancy in a large number of systems, human-rating such a spacecraft with absolute confidence was practically impossible. Yet, the pass that Soviet engineers designed the system, it was meant to operate even at the blurry edges where parameters were pushed to the max. It is because of this that I would wrangle that the Vostok design was in fact excellent engineering if they define “excellent engineering” as also being incredibly robust.

    The problem with Vostok was not the design itself but that it was insufficiently tested. There were too many bugs in the system that could maintain been eliminated in a slower testing program. But the frantic pace of the “space race” ensured that you had to sacrifice thorough ground testing in favor of debugging the technology in space. This means that you automatically expand the risk to human subjects on board spaceships. Extended ground testing versus flight testing is a tough call for mission managers, and depending on the urgency (as in Apollo 8, for example), you sometimes accomplish something on the mission that you haven’t really tested on the ground—or can’t test at all.

    What everyone this tells us is that while “good engineering” has some objective measures for evaluation, they also need to interlard context into the equation. The question is not simply, “Will it rep the job done?” The question is, “Will it rep the job done, on time, and even if lots of things proceed wrong?” And in Gagarin’s case, the respond was obviously “yes.” Regardless of everyone the troubles on his mission, he will always breathe the first human being in space. You can’t capture that away.

    Endnote
  • Basically, UHF communications with Gagarin were maintained from the jiffy he entered the capsule to about 23 minutes after launch. After that, they switched to short-wave, from various ground stations. But Novosibirsk and Alma-Ata received no word from Gagarin, while Khabarovsk maintained two-way communication for only four minutes (from 09:53 to 09:57 Moscow Time), and Moscow for a minute or so (beginning 10:13 Moscow Time).
  • General References
  • “On the Results of the Launch of the ‘Vostok’ Space Ship with a Human on Board and on Plans for Future work on Launches of the ‘Vostok’ Space Ship” (May 9, 1961) [in Russian], Russian condition Archive of the Economy (RGAE), fond 298, opis’ 1, delo 2057, ll. 249-253.
  • Asif A. Siddiqi, Challenge to Apollo: The Soviet Union and the Space Race, 1945–1974 (Washington, DC: NASA History Office, 2000).
  • L. V. Uspenskaya, ed., Chelovek. Korabl’. Kosmos: sbornik dokumentov i materialov k 50-letiyu poleta v kosmos Yu. A. Gagarina (Moscow: Novyy khronograf, 2011).

  • Key Takeaway Points and Lessons erudite from QCon London 2015 | killexams.com true questions and Pass4sure dumps

    Now in its ninth consecutive year, QCon London 2015 featured thought-provoking and engaging keynotes from "Eloquent Ruby” author Russ Olsen, Cobalt Advisors managing confederate Enyo Kumahor, Principal Software Engineer, Google Infrastructure John Wilkes, and Netflix Insight Engineering Manager Roy Rapoport.

    This was the largest London QCon yet with 1,200 team leads, architects, and project managers attending 120 technical sessions across 19 concurrent tracks and 13 in-depth tutorials. Attendees had near instant access to video from nearly everyone of the sessions.

    This article summarizes the key takeaways and highlights from QCon London 2015 as blogged and tweeted by attendees. Over the course of the coming months, InfoQ will breathe publishing most of the conference sessions online, including video interviews that were recorded by the InfoQ editorial team.  The publishing schedule can breathe institute on the QCon London web site. You can also survey numerous photos of QCon on Flickr.

    Training

    Keynotes

    Tracks and Talks

    Architecture Improvements

    Architectures You've Always Wondered About

    Big Data Frameworks, Architectures, and Data Science

    Devops and Continuous Delivery: Code Beyond the Dev Team

    Docker, Containers and Application Portability

    Engineering Culture

    Evolving Agile

    HTML And JS Today

    Internet of Things

    Java - Not extinct Yet

    Modern CS in the true World

    Product Mastery

    Reactive Architecture

    Taming Microservices

    Taming Mobile

    The proceed Language

    Sponsored Solutions Track

    Opinions about QCon

    Takeaways

    Conclusion

    Design & Implementation of Microservices

    by James Lewis

    Twitter feedback on this training session included:

    @fotuzlab: Experimentation is the key #qconlondon #microservices http://t.co/CLUI5HWabz

    Java 8 Lambda Expressions & Streams

    by Raoul-Gabriel Urma

    Twitter feedback on this training session included:

    @dsommerville_nw: Impressed with lambdas and fashion references in #java8 so far - far less boilerplate and MUCH more readable. #qconlondon

    Cluster Management at Google

    by John Wilkes

    Will Hamill attended this keynote:

    John Wilkes … got straight into the examples of starting up services on Google’s internal cloud. birth with a simple ‘hello world’ service, John then created a cluster configuration request for 10,000 instances.

    10,000 was the number picked because this is the default maximum in a ‘cell’, a unit of management of clusters. Only 9993 were actually started as some had failed, or more commonly some machines had been taken down for OS upgrades (a rolling scheduled process), or for various other reasons the exact upper circumscribe was not reached, but closely enough to breathe dependable and at this scale you start to rep an appreciation for how inevitable and continuous failures will breathe in Part of the network. John gave us stats collected that betoken that on a 2000 machine cluster, you can anticipate to maintain > 10 crashes per day.

    This appreciation leads to having more design discussions about reliability; about what happens if something fails while doing maintenance or upgrades, as resilience and weakness tolerance are initially more desirable than focusing design pains on quicken - as at these resource levels beastly obligate can build up for quicken in the short term. John also repeated the remark that they should “treat servers like cattle, not pets”, as while your development laptop is likely to breathe treated like a precious snowflake, the machines you deploy upon can breathe automatically created and destroyed much more easily. When the jobs/services you are developing maintain to tolerate faults in this way, it means that migrating tasks from one machine to another is extinct simple: abolish it and start up a new one elsewhere….

    All of this deployment management, metering, reallocation, live experimentation and such is only available to the teams because Google has made such an investment in monitoring. John impressed the consequence upon the audience: “If you are not monitoring it, it is out of control”. …

    As demonstrated during the keynote, everything in Google internally runs on containers. Seeing the upcoming schedule, John said of Docker “we don’t utilize it internally, as they maintain their own system, but they really like it”. Google maintain also published the Kubernetes project, a appliance for managing clusters of containerised applications that looks really interesting. Asked about when the utility of Kubernetes kicks in, John replied “If you’re going to accomplish one or two or three containers just utilize Docker. Kubernetes helps you manage things if you maintain hundreds.” …

    John ended the keynote by summarising with a call for incremental improvement, saw that the likelihood for success and structure momentum is much higher than a big-bang project: “roofshot is better than moonshot”. John left us with three points to finish:

  • Resilience is more necessary than performance
  • It’s okay to utilize other people’s stuff, don’t accomplish it everyone yourself
  • Do more monitoring
  • Twitter feedback on this keynote included:

    @Helenislovely: #qconlondon "we want their developers to breathe productive not jump through consent hoops" sounds trustworthy @google

    @andyhedges: At google devs can spin up their code on up to 10,000 nodes without permission. They want their devs to breathe productive #qconlondon

    @alblue: So Google's internal system for scheduling is called The Borg and they maintain a bunch of borglets #QConLondon http://t.co/G3q2jbqY34

    @adrianmouat: The reason things notice like they work from the outside is because they assume they don't work on the inside John Wilkes (google) #qconlondon

    @mylenereiners: John Wilkes (#Google ): of course they accomplish not work. Things smash everyone the time. (...) that's OK. #qconlondon

    @rvedotrc: For a service running on 2,000 machines (say, Google Calendar), 10 machine failures per day is normal, and fine – John Wilkes #qconlondon

    @rvedotrc: Servers are cattle; you don’t imbue if you lose one. Your laptop is a pet.– John Wilkes, Google #qconlondon

    @rvedotrc: “When Michael Jackson died, they thought it was a denial of service attack.”John Wilkes, Google #qconlondon

    @floydmarinescu: Google mixes production apps (gmail) and batch jobs on the very machines for cost efficiency #qconlondon http://t.co/gzm6VPsjh2

    @scottwambler: accomplish you understand everyone of the trade offs associated with a given strategy? Or just focused on how it affects you? #qconlondon

    @rvedotrc: true data is noisy. Live with it.”– John Wilkes, Google #qconlondon

    @rvedotrc: Experiments [on live] are OK, provided you maintain a trustworthy pass of stopping them in a hasten and rolling back”– John Wilkes, Google #qconlondon

    @andyp1per: Exposing mechanisms [to users] is delicate - John Wilkes #qconlondon

    @pzfreo: #qconlondon nice distinction between slo (objectives

    @bruntonspall: If you are not monitoring it, it *is* out of control #qconlondon

    @hnzekto: John Wilkes: "70% of their resources are spent in application monitoring." @Google Cluster Management #qconlondon

    @rvedotrc: Everything at Google runs in a container – including their VMs.”John Wilkes #qconlondon

    @pzfreo: Not advice but confirmed. Google starts 2 billion containers a week #qconlondon

    @ludovicianul: internally they don't utilize Docker, externally it turns out to breathe a trustworthy thing - John Wilkens, Google. #qconlondon

    @csanchez: John Wilkes: "you shouldn't utilize Kubernetes in production until v1, which should breathe released in 1-2 months" #qconlondon

    Netflix Built Its Own Monitoring System - and Why You Probably Shouldn't

    by Roy Rapoport

    Pere Villega attended this session:

    His talk revolved around the NIH issue that affects many companies. If you maintain a problem,you should consider some questions first:

  • are you the first person to maintain this issue?
  • are you the first to imbue about it given your constraints: relevance to business, your scale, etc
  • are you positive about the above answers?
  • In some cases you may really breathe the first and you may need to build your own solution. But most of the time that is not factual as solutions, either paid or free, exist.

    In the end, NIH is about trust: they don't confidence other people's code, their product, their organisation, or that they will capture trustworthy imbue of us as a customer. Even past performance of a 3rd party in other domains may traipse the balance towards structure their own solution.

    If the determination is to build your own product, that's ok.

    Will Hamill attended this keynote:

    Roy started with describing Netflix’s culture, which is also aptly circumstantial in CEO Reed Hasting’s now notorious ‘Culture Deck’ which you should definitely read. Netflix optimises their organisation to expand the quicken of innovation by fostering a culture of freedom and responsibility. Netflix maintain an inherent anti-process bias that tends to weed out suboptimal procedures; if it doesn’t work it will breathe corrected or abandoned.

    Roy discussed ‘Not Invented Here’, recommending that when you maintain a problem to decipher in your organisation, you should interrogate if you are the first to maintain it. Most times you are not the first to maintain that issue which means there is trustworthy news: there are already things out there to assist that you can use….

    NIH often boils down to ‘not invented by us, an organisation that they can trust’. A few reasons why they wouldn’t confidence them are that they don’t confidence the technical credentials; they maintain been warned away from them by people they accomplish trust; they don’t confidence that the other organisation has their best interests in intellect (for example, they’re selling us something).

    Occasionally, NIH is caused by CV-driven development. Roy argues that this is not always bad, as there is value in learning, there is value in improving the reputation of the company by creating a new product especially if you open-source the result, and value in keeping the developers fortunate in working on something challenging. …

    Roy discussed one fashion for mitigating this when using OSS; forking the project and merging contributions back into it. Roy also talked about composability of the components within your solution: consider whether you may want to supplant any of these with other people’s work in order to enhance the system. This would require a trustworthy separation of responsibilities across parts of the system to capture odds of such a plug-and-play approach….

    Wrapping up, Roy said that when addressing NIH issues, dig in and find out which reasons are actually necessary to you. Find out if it’s really a technical decision, and if there is any pass you can mitigate the consequence while quiet meeting the needs.

    Twitter feedback on this keynote included:

    @csanchez: Netflix "we hire really smart engineers and abide the heck out of their way" @royrapoport #qconlondon http://t.co/sAEgdPH0mm

    @trisha_gee: Process should breathe descriptive not prescriptive - it should report what you already do, not bid you how to accomplish it @royrapoport #qconlondon

    @rvedotrc: “You added the config [by convention]. then magic would happen. Not necessarily the magic you wanted though.” @royrapoport #qconlondon

    @danielbryantuk: Magic would happen, although often not the magic you wanted @royrapoport on home-grown software solutions at #qconlondon

    @scottejames: Eventual consistency as a paradigm can ( should ) breathe applied to architecture decisions. #qconlondon

    @danielbryantuk: No one is going to build a monolith without creating it from a succession of components, right? @royrapoport at #qconlondon

    @csanchez: Netflix: maintain detached and build it yourself @royropoport #qconlondon http://t.co/4Kjg4aJSWO

    @danielbryantuk: Allowing developers to build stuff they want can breathe trustworthy for esprit and hiring. Just breathe lucid when doing it @royrapoport #qconlondon

    @trisha_gee: Making developers fortunate is a trustworthy Thing. You might want to let them innovate @royrapoport at #qconlondon

    @csanchez: Netflix monitoring processes 1.2 billion data points per minute @royrapoport #qconlondon

    Software development Tales from the Continent

    by Enyo Kumahor

    Will Hamill attended this keynote:

    Enyo took to the stage for the closing keynote to give us an insight into some of the different challenges and opportunities that are encountered in Africa in software development. This was a really spirited session, giving a completely different view to how to enhance people’s lives with technology than the gauge software company style of talks that filled the repose of the conference.

    Enyo described with graphs and maps how Africa is considered a mobile-first and mobile-only continent. Mobile penetration is elevated with the mediocre person having more than one phone [though it is likely a featurephone] in contrast to a very low uptake of wired broadband internet access, which is typically only prevalent in coastal areas where internet fiber connections unite the continent.

    Voice content and SMS based services are more popular, forming the majority of traffic on mobile networks, with data utilize very low. Interestingly, Enyo answered a question from the audience about low smartphone uptake and didn’t give the “smartphones cost a lot up front” respond I reflect most people (myself included) were expecting. Smartphones cost more initially but cost a lot to operate, as they must breathe charged every night. Not every person has on-demand access to dependable power, so charging would require going to somewhere a diesel generator is being operated. The cost of fuel has gone up considerably in recent years so this is prohibitively expensive….

    Enyo stated that it was most necessary to utilize design thinking to rep the captious context for how the software was actually to breathe used in order to decipher the true problem. One of the side effects of being a developing continent means that few constraints to new systems already exist in this respect - Enyo elicited an “oooh” from the attendees as she deployed the line “we don’t maintain legacy code on the continent”!

    Twitter feedback on this keynote included:

    @peter_pilgrim: Crikey! A massive occasion in #Africa where it is not uncommon to own 2 mobiles for each network #QConLondon http://t.co/FDio5Wc3Mg

    @annashipman: Left pic is the *two* Internet cables servicing the all of Africa in 2009. Fascinating talk by @enyok #qconlondon http://t.co/A37dWB7L0f

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @enyok odds of structure software in Africa - no legacy code, everyone solutions are new

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @enyok Africa has manpower - technology shouldn't supplant jobs it should uphold them.

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @enyok Software needs to enable a zero cost service, no barrier to entry.

    @danielbryantuk: Understanding local context is key when developing software. Superb evening keynote about software dev in Africa by @enyok at #qconlondon

    To the Moon

    by Russ Olsen

    Quinten Krijger attended this keynote:

    The kick-off key note “To the Moon” was given by Russ Olsen. In a very entertaining and energetic pass he reviewed the Apollo project. He started at the 1959, when the Western world was plagued by protests and panic because of the gelid War. At this time, Russia was ahead in the space race and had produced the first picture of the far side of the Moon. The reaction of president Kennedy was to declare the goal of landing on the Moon before 1970. Russ Olsen took a chronological approach though the Apollo project, reflecting often on how difficult this actually was.

    Some nice things I will recollect from this story.

    - The software driving the Eagle that landed was developed by a woman named Margaret Hamilton. Designing the first program that needed to accomplish multiple things at once and should breathe able to react to unexpected situations, Olsen states that she invented the term “Software Engineering” to report the province of programming at an unprecedented even of complexity, where human lives were on line.

    - Although the space race was itself a Part of the gelid War, the side consequence of it was a hopeful subject. When the landing actually took place, the sense of exhilaration was enormous.

    - Very minuscule faults can maintain life-threatening implication. As an example: the air lock not being completely vented when the pod was released from the ship that was at that time already orbiting the moon led to about a 0.1% disagreement in speed. The result was that Armstrong and Aldrin had to literally capture last-minute measures to avoid landing on a very unfriendly piece of Moon. A trustworthy lesson for programmers!….

    Aim for the moon. It’s in the nature of an engineer to accomplish so.

    Tracks and Talks

    An Architect’s World View

    by Colin Garlick

    Will Hamill attended this session:

    Colin began his talk by outlining the structure of the architectural world view he wanted to describe: values leading to principles which are implemented by practices. The analogy given was how the agile manifesto states core values, and is backed by more specific principles and then implemented with particular practices. So without getting as prescriptive as practices, Colin told us about the values that he thought a conscientious architect should maintain and the principles they inform.

    The values of an architect as Colin describes them are as follows: the customers of the architect are both the business and IT; an architect is interested in the vast picture (conceptual integrity, as Fred Brooks puts it); leadership and humility - specifically being an enabler of the system rather than the boss; teamwork and an understanding of the types of people involved in the team and their needs (Myers-Briggs given here as an illustration of differences between different archetypes of persons); and finally the integrity and consistency to warrant the confidence invested in the architect to deliver….

    Simplicity is an necessary principle, ensuring that the models created, documents generated etc are done for a specific audience and purpose rather than for their own sakes. Injecting patterns into solutions adds complexity rather than simplicity - less is more. …

    The next principle Colin talked about was just-in-time design. Delayed decisions are made with more erudition about the situation. Deferring decisions to the terminal amenable jiffy allows us to investigate and try and bombard the assumptions they would make. …

    ‘Deliver working solutions’ was Colin’s next principle. …

    An architect should also maintain learning; using retrospectives, lessons erudite sessions and the likes to find out how the architecture or design you proposed actually fared in the true world. Find out what happened when the decisions you made and plans you set were actually carried out by teams, and how the implementation panned out in reality….

    Quality should breathe a main consideration of the work of an architect - planning for testing and verification of the assumptions is important. An architecture that does not consider testability is usually not a trustworthy architecture. Know when ‘good enough’ occurs for your work, and try to attain this balancing point in ensuring you maintain built in enough attribute and not over-egged the pudding.

    Managing change and complexity was Colin’s final principle. … anticipate that your architecture will need to change as they find out more about the problem domain. Don’t try and obviate change or preempt future needs, but create systems where changing your approach or throwing away parts of the architecture can breathe done if needed.

    Twitter feedback on this session included:

    @lamb0: Architecture should breathe simple and grounded in values that people can buy into #qconlondon @ColinGarlick

    @piotrbetkier: Any brilliant fool can build things more complex, it takes a genius to accomplish the opposite. At #qconlondon on talk about designing architecture

    @marekasf: Antipattern: Ivory Tower Architecture @ColinGarlick #qconlondon

    Evolutionary Architecture and Micro-services - a Match Enabled by Continuous Delivery

    by Rebecca Parsons

    Will Hamill attended this session:

    Microservices … mind to breathe smaller than SOA services …, smaller, and focused around sole business capabilities instead of technologies. Microservices need to breathe independently deployable as they change at different rates, require miniature centralised management, and seclude tech choices internally from the other services that depend upon it. Microservices are often described as having smart endpoints but mute pipes. Another very common factor is the lack of (what I call) the BandwagonDB - the sole monster database that everyone The Data lives in; microservices are often amenable for their own data and sharing access or reporting is done via APIs.

    More granular services become smaller and chattier but larger services are more adamant and can suffer from complexity and coupling, so getting the size arrogate is tricky. The implications of pursuing a microservice based approach are heavily weighted towards the operations side: independently scalable implies worthy investment into deployment automation and continuous delivery; monitoring for services is crucial; it is impossible to counterfeit that service failures will not happen; eventual consistency in data needs properly addressed. …

    Decomposing the monolith: consider DDD bounded contexts to assist split responsibilities and business capabilities. reflect about what the consumers for the service need - and if there is no consumer, then perhaps there is no need for that service? Consumer driven contracts for services can also figure client tests for the interfaces. …

    Evolutionary architecture is derived from evolvability of the system as a first class concern during its design. Tolerate and anticipate change rather than attempting to forecast the future and lock in requirements that don’t exist yet. Being sensible of Conway’s Law, they can try and design their teams to reflect how they intend the architecture - in particular arranging teams around the services to create for business capabilities.

    Microservices is clearly a spicy topic perquisite now, but requires discipline, insight into the problem domain and above everyone is no silver bullet.

    Quinten Krijger attended this session:

    A nice concept here was the “Reverse Conway’s Law”. While intuitive and on some occasions actual Part of their strategy consultancy, this was the first I heard it defined as such. Conway’s Law in short states that organisation structures will breathe reflected in the architecture of the software that the organisation develops. For example, a company without a DevOps culture (meaning that operations is a divorce team) that tries to implement a microservice architecture, will probably quit up with many components that are strongly coupled on an operational even that can’t breathe deployed separately. The “Reverse Conway’s Law” then, is to create software in the pass you would like the organisation to be. You will need to breathe conscious of the many pitfalls of Conway’s Law itself, but when done correctly this can breathe a trustworthy pass to induce organisational changes.

    Implementing Continuous Delivery: Adjusting Your Architecture

    by Rachel Laycock

    Will Hamill attended this session:

    Rachel began by describing the scenario when she was brought into a client site and given a require by a customer exec “We want Continuous Delivery”. From working with the client and understanding their environment Rachel’s response was “you can’t maintain CD” - not a satisfying respond for an exec who wants to rep to value. When working with the client and their complicated codebase, Rachel came across a lot of the aspects of “you must breathe this tall to ride” barriers to entry of a microservices architecture and implementing CD. Three of the main things she erudite were the implications of Conway’s Law, the consequence of keeping things simple, and evolving the architecture….

    The ‘big ball of mud’ architecture often results because expediency in releasing the system is focused over a spotless and evolvable design. More code is added as more features are rushed out the door, increasing technical debt as no slack exists to preserve or improve attribute as they proceed along. vast coupling problems chance in the codebase and the components in the design are pulled tighter together as this happens, which leads to inflexibility in operation. …

    Rachel describes the smart of software architecture as dealing with the tension between striving for low coupling and elevated cohesion. Attempting to mitigate this on the vast ball of mud systems means identifying the seams and interfaces between areas of different behaviour and writing tests around those boundaries to allow us to safely divorce the components from each other. Rachel also described the Strangler Pattern to start replacing parts of the older system and redirecting functionality to newer, cleaner components.

    Rachel then went on to discuss the aspects of a microservice architecture that can mitigate against these issues. … Things to watch out for when touching to microservices involve distributed transactions and an understanding of the domain (as services should split along domain boundaries and not technical ones). Rachel says that they don’t need to microservice-ify everything; that maturity and competence in continuous delivery is an necessary pre-requisite, and that automation and near collaboration with operations are very necessary to assist manage the overheads of going from sole monolith deployments to deploying, operating and maintaining many services.

    Rachel finished off her talk with calling for an appreciation of evolvability in system architectures. You don’t need to design for Google scale now, but you should design for the ability to breathe changed. Architecture of the system is the things about it that are hard to change. The parts these are usually correspond to -ilities and bigger decisions made that can’t breathe unmade cheaply or quickly; to identify where these decisions are you need to breathe talking to the customer about their scale, security, business needs, and future direction. Creating an architecture where components can evolve separately, with less constraint to change, is more necessary than trying to forecast an unknown future. Areas which need to change most often are likely to veil the most complexity. Putting more accent on the testability of these areas and treating the testability as a top even requirement of the architecture will result in a higher attribute system.

    Twitter feedback on this session included:

    @paulacwalter: Flexibility of organisation is key for effectual design. Otherwise it's very hard to build changes where needed @rachellaycock #qconlondon

    @AndrewGorton: Software architecture represents the tension between coupling and cohesion @rachellaycock #qconlondon

    @randyshoup: Yesterday's best drill is tomorrow's anti-pattern @rachellaycock #qconlondon

    @randyshoup: Hope is not a design pattern @mtnygard via @rachellaycock #qconlondon

    Small Is Beautiful

    by Kevlin Henney

    Yan Cui attended this session:

    Kevlin has plenty of well-applied, mem­o­rable quotes, start­ing with this one:

    Sus­tain­able devel­op­ment is devel­op­ment that meets the needs of the present with­out com­pro­mis­ing the abil­ity of future gen­er­a­tions to meet their own needs. - the report of the Brundt­land Commission

    when applied to soft­ware devel­op­ment, my inter­pre­ta­tion of it is : “don’t capture on more tech­ni­cal debt than you can rea­son­ably pay back in the future in favour of short-term gains”….

    On the other extreme of the spec­trum, you maintain peo­ple who are so con­cerned about future needs they quit up com­pletely over-engineering their solu­tion to cope with this uncer­tainty and quit up with projects that are delayed or worse, never delivered.

    You should reflect of soft­ware as prod­ucts, not projects. If soft­ware are projects then they should maintain well-defined quit state, but most often, soft­ware accomplish not maintain well-defined quit state, but rather evolved con­tin­u­ously for as long as it remains desir­able and purposeful….

    Cre­ativ­ity needs a bound­ary. With­out any bound­aries, a painter might breathe lost if you just interrogate him to “draw a pic­ture”, and would you cre­ate any­thing more than a “hello, world!” appli­ca­tion if asked to just “write a program”? …

    Kevlin also pointed out another trustworthy point – the more time you spend work­ing on a project, the more the endow­ment consequence kicks in and they become less inclined to change. …

    Twitter feedback on this session included:

    @JanSabbe: Best pass to deal with legacy code? Beer. #qconlondon

    @adrianmouat: 'This legacy system is really minuscule and comprehensible' - things people don't mumble @KevlinHenney at #qconlondon

    @alblue: “It hit the deadline — at some considerable quicken judging by the fallout” — @KevlinHenney at #QConLondon

    @camassey: Software is executable fiction -@KevlinHenney #qconlondon http://t.co/pK9mLdPqca

    @camassey: Coding styles, if practiced by enough people, *are your architecture*. @KevlinHenney #qconlondon

    @camassey: For any activity, there is an arrogate scale. @KevlinHenney #qconlondon

    @camassey: If you are striving for beauty or elegance, *constraints are necessary*. You need a boundary. @KevlinHenney #qconlondon

    @jgrodziski: Softwares accomplish NOT maintain economies of scale @KevlinHenney #qconlondon minuscule software is cheaper http://t.co/BxxAv0VuGD

    @daverog: Unlike milk, software gets more expensive, per unit, in larger quantities (diseconomies of scale) @KevlinHenney #qconlondon

    @camassey: Trees nicely report a neatly decomposed structure. Except that the true world is complicated @KevlinHenney #qconlondon http://t.co/78vg0eefM9

    @camassey: They design & staff-up teams at the start of the project. When they are the *most* ignorant about its requirements. @KevlinHenney #qconlondon

    Treat Your Code as a Crime Scene

    by Adam Tornhill

    Ben Basson attended this session:

    Adam quickly introduced the concept of Geographical Profiling - a criminal investigative fashion used to assist narrow down the likely region where a serial offender may live or work, based on the location where the related crimes were committed. I very much indulge in the concept that bugs are essentially "code crimes" and that they may breathe able to leverage data in such a pass as to zero-in on troublesome areas in this way.

    Of course, to accomplish this they can't just notice at the code in its current state, they must draw upon revision history and statistics from version control, and then analyse and present this data in a useful manner. Adam introduced a number of potential visualisations, including the intriguing Code City, where lines of code are represented in the height of the generated buildings.

    Adam goes on to hint that the code attribute of an individual source file is inversely related to the number of programmers that maintain worked on a source file (the theory being that more people rep involved in troublesome areas as they maintain to breathe touched more often), and that while there are lots of measures of complexity, the number of lines is in most cases a pretty trustworthy indicator.

    The final suggestion from Adam was that in addition to analysing code in this way, it would breathe spirited to experiment with more proactive warnings or monitoring - letting developers know when they're about to work on particularly complicated or commonly edited code (i.e. here breathe dragons). He also suggested that version control tools could implement Amazon-style recommendations; "other developers that worked on file A also worked on file B", which sounds like a worthy idea.

    Yan Cui attended this session:

    Many stud­ies maintain showed that they spend most of their time mak­ing changes or fix­ing bugs, which always start with under­stand­ing what the code does. They should there­fore they opti­mize for that.

    A com­mon prob­lem they puss in today’s world is that soft­ware is pro­duced by many devel­op­ers across many teams, and no one has a holis­tic view of how the all looks.

    When it comes to mea­sur­ing com­plex­ity, both lines-of-code and  cyclo­matic com­plex­ity are use­ful met­rics to con­sider even though nei­ther pro­vide a replete pic­ture of what we’re up against. They are use­ful because they suitable nicely with their main con­straint as devel­op­ers — their work­ing memory.

    Adam shows us how tech­niques from foren­sic psy­chol­ogy can breathe applied in soft­ware, specif­i­cally the prac­tice of geo­graph­i­cal offender pro­fil­ing. …

    Using tools such as CodeCity you can lay down the geog­ra­phy for your code which reflect their complexity…. Adam also showed how you can track com­plex­ity of spicy spots over time and utilize them to project into the future with Com­plex­ity Trend analysis….

    Tem­po­ral Cou­pling – by analysing your com­mit his­tory, you can find source files that are changed together in com­mits to iden­tify depen­den­cies (phys­i­cal cou­pling), as well as ‘copy-and-paste’ code (log­i­cal coupling)….

    By show­ing the num­ber of com­mits each devel­oper makes on a source file you can iden­tify the knowl­edge own­ers of that Part of your codebase. …In the per­fect world, everyone knowl­edge own­ers for a com­po­nent (source files for one project, for instance) would breathe con­cen­trated within a team, which shows that the respon­si­bil­ity of that com­po­nent is well defined and aligns with the orga­ni­za­tional structure.

    Twitter feedback on this session included:

    @ignazw: Code as a crime scene. Pretty cool! There's a lot of crime info in your software control system. #qconlondon http://t.co/EQQVEQ7OOt

    @willhamill: But the change took ages because DBAs are where Change Requests proceed to die - @AdamTornhill at #qconlondon

    @danielbryantuk: Adding extra software development teams to a project increases communication channels @AdamTornhill at #qconlondon http://t.co/fEnD918NHq

    Building a Modern Microservices Architecture at Gilt: the Essentials

    by Yoni Goldberg

    Will Hamill attended this session:

    Yoni described how Gilt made three main architectural changes to their application: touching the application platform to the JVM (primarily Scala) for perceived platform maturity, the stability & concurrency benefits and the garbage collection; refactored the sole Postgres database into dedicated data stores for different parts of the application; and began splitting the monolith up by behaviours, which Yoni called entering “the era of macro and micro services”.

    Initially splitting the application into a minuscule number of services met the majority of the scaling needs but most of the developer smart was not solved: the new services became almost monolithic due to size and internal complexity and quiet the codebases had miniature ‘ownership’ and integration and deploys were painful.

    The team at Gilt then doubled-down on the microservices approach, reducing the scope of individual services and empowering the teams as the owners of the service amenable for the deployment and focusing on continuous delivery as a means of streamlining the releases. APIs used for the microservices to communicate with each other were defined by an ‘API design committee’ in each team and documentation generated using Swagger. The front quit was decomposed into a larger number of Play and Scala applications amenable for different sections of the website. For example, the search pages, product pages, checkout and so on are everyone served by different apps….

    Data ownership was devolved to the teams operating the services, and each team chose the best solution for storing their data. Managing databases, a schema evolution manager independent from the service code was amenable for DB changes, deploying updates as tar files to breathe applied to the database. Fix-forward was the approach taken to DB migration, with no rollbacks.

    Yoni also described the concept of ‘mid tier microservices’ which exist to aggregate multiple calls to many fine grained services (for illustration a ‘customer’ mid-tier service aggregating calls across half a dozen or more specific ‘customer account’ or ‘customer profile’ kind services) to cache, decorate and collect results needed by other depending services.

    Pere Villega attended this session:

    Yoni Goldberg, Lead Software Engineer at Gilt, explained the Gilt moved from a Ruby monolith to a Microservices approach. The reason was that Gilt operates a model of scintillate sales with massive spikes, and adding inescapable vendor caused cascading errors across the site. To fix the issues they moved to JVM, started what he calls a macro/micro services era and used dedicated data stores.

    During the process they realised the new services where semi-monoliths, not fixing everyone of the issues, so they kept working until they reduced the scope of the services (both for back-end and front-end, they maintain multiple webapps for UI), which in circle facilitated deployment and rollbacks.

    Currently they maintain 300 services in production, and their data prove a very spirited pattern: once they had in plot everyone the perquisite tools such a team could proceed from creation to deployment of a new service (a basic placeholder) in around 10 minutes, the productivity and the number of services increased a lot….

    Something that has facilitated the adoption of Microservices has been a well defined API. Yoni argues that a well defined API solves issues like discoverability, documentation and internal adoption. Tools like Swagger facilitate this.

    An issue associated to having so many Microservices that is not mentioned often is that the network ends up acting as a bottleneck, due to the amount of calls generated. Their solution is to create mid-tier Microservices, which are a obscene API that hides multiple minuscule services from the request. Your application just calls an endpoint and that, in turn, does several calls. This reduces the load, even more if you utilize caching….

    Gilt also uses micro-databases, that is, every Microservice has its own database, they are not shared across services. This means the service owns everything: API, data, behaviour. No conflicts between services due to shared databases.

    Finally, they don't counsel teams of less than 30 people to proceed into Microservices due to the manpower needed.

    Rebuilding Atlas -- Advertising at Scale at Facebook

    by Jason McHugh

    Twitter feedback on this session included:

    @charleshumble: Time spent on mobile in the US surpassed time spent watching TV. Just mobile. #qconlondon

    @charleshumble: Facebook Atlas uses Presto extensively. Useful when you need a relational model and can't easily Shard #qconlondon https://t.co/imrxOi9MPn

    @ignazw: So Facebook aquired Atlas for 100 M$ ... http://t.co/NO9ZCqguoV via @forbes #qconlondon

    Scaling Uber's Real-time Market Platform

    by Matt Ranney

    Leo Simons attended this session:

    My favorite talk of the day is from Matt Ranney, who talks about uber's true time challenges. It's a pretty quirky talk about a pretty quirky architecture. The shape of uber's problem is a bit different from a lot of other vast architectures, and so Uber are doing various spirited things really differently. For example, they erudite that when failing over a data center, uber stores the energetic trip data on the driver's phone, and when that phone gets routed to the new data center, it's tasked to re-upload that data to the new data center. This means they rep to avoid expensive cross-data hub replication for the spicy data. They also learn that Uber is being a trustworthy open source national and open sourcing various spirited bits; I'm definitely going to breathe studying some of that!

    Yan Cui attended this session:

    Uber’s ser­vices are writ­ten in a mix­ture of Node.js, Python, Java and Go, whilst a all merge of data­bases are used – Post­greSQL, Redis, MySQL and Riak….

    In order to scale their ser­vices, Uber went with an approach of build­ing state­ful ser­vices using Node.js. In addi­tion, they also intro­duced a cus­tom RPC pro­to­col called ring­pop, which is based on the SWIM paper. Ring­pop also runs on its own TChan­nel mul­ti­plex­ing and fram­ing protocol….

    For Uber, avail­abil­ity is of para­mount impor­tance, as the cost of switch­ing to com­peti­tor is low.

    Twitter feedback on this session included:

    @randyshoup: Never underestimate the power of developer enthusiasm @mranney @Uber #qconlondon

    @csanchez: Uber's dispatch system is written in NodeJS. DBs used: Redis, Postgres, MySQL, Riak,… @mranney #qconlondon

    @glynn_bird: Uber talk their AP data layer: "we always favour availability because the user will switch to a competitor if we're down" #qconlondon

    @markgibaud: In NodeJS, tchannel [Uber's custom RPC protocol] is 20x faster than HTTP - @mranney at #qconlondon

    @csanchez: Uber availability: everything retriable, killable, crash only (no graceful stops) even databases @mranney #qconlondon http://t.co/1ro9il6tLs

    @vwggolf3: #qconlondon Uber fails over data centers by using condition & data stored in confederate phones

    @FZammit: Uber using mobile app as a failover mechanism #developers #qconlondon

    @randyshoup: @Uber fails over between data centers by having driver apps regularly replay their state. Clever! @mranney #qconlondon

    @colmg: Everything is retryable, everything is killable at Uber - @mranney #qconlondon @aolireland

    Service Architectures at Scale: Lessons from Google and eBay

    by Randy Shoup

    Yan Cui attended this session:

    At Google, there has never been a top-down design approach to build­ing sys­tems, but rather an evo­lu­tion­ary process using nat­ural selec­tion – ser­vices sur­vive  by jus­ti­fy­ing their exis­tence through usage or they are dep­re­cated….

    Ser­vices are built from bottom-up but you can quiet quit up with clean, lucid sep­a­ra­tion of concerns.

    At Google, there are no “archi­tect” roles, nor is there a cen­tral approval process for tech­nol­ogy deci­sions. Most tech­nol­ogy deci­sions are made within the team, so they’re empow­ered to build the deci­sions that are best for them and their service. …

    Even with­out the pres­ence of a cen­tral­ized con­trol body, Google proved that it’s quiet pos­si­ble to achieved stan­dard­iza­tion across the organization.

    Within Google, com­mu­ni­ca­tion meth­ods (e.g.. net­work pro­to­col, data for­mat, struc­tured pass of express­ing inter­face, etc.) as well as com­mon infra­struc­ture (source con­trol, mon­i­tor­ing, alert­ing, etc.) are stan­dard­ized by encour­age­ment rather than enforcement. …

    Whilst the sur­face areas of ser­vices are stan­dard­ized, the inter­nals of the ser­vices are not, leav­ing devel­op­ers to choose:

  • pro­gram­ming lan­guage (C++, Go, Python or Java)
  • frame­works
  • per­sis­tence mechanisms…
  • If it proves to breathe suc­cess­ful then it’s extracted out and gen­er­al­ized as a ser­vice of its own with a new team formed around it. Many pop­u­lar ser­vices today everyone started life this pass – Gmail, App Engine and BigTable to title a few….

    As the owner of a ser­vice, your pri­mary focus should breathe the needs of your clients, and to meet their needs at min­i­mum cost and effort. This includes lever­ag­ing com­mon tools, infra­struc­tures and exist­ing ser­vice as well as automat­ing as much as possible.

    The ser­vice owner should maintain end-to-end own­er­ship, and the mantra should breathe “You build it, you flee it”.

    The teams should maintain auton­omy to choose the perquisite tech­nol­ogy and breathe held respon­si­ble for the results of those choices.

    Twitter feedback on this session included:

    @ignazw: large companies change their architecture regularly #ebay #twitter #amazon #qconlondon http://t.co/DZAjSMPCYY

    @AlibertiLuca: #qconlondon why is Google so snappily ?? Simple :) http://t.co/ZZIRW9fwTu

    @jabley: 'At Google, most technology decisions are made locally rather than globally. Better decisions made in the field.' – @randyshoup #qconlondon

    @charleshumble: No architect role at Google. No central approval for technology decisions. eBay did maintain architecture review board @randyshoup #qconlondon

    @grantjforrester: “Standards become standards by being better than the alternative” @randyshoup #qconlondon

    @jgrodziski: In a age service ecosystem, they standardize the arc of the graph, not the nodes #qconlondon @randyshoup

    @charleshumble: Every service at Google is either deprecated or not ready yet. Google engineering proverb. @randyshoup #qconlondon

    @solsila: On establishing standards: build it really effortless to accomplish the perquisite thing and really hard to accomplish the wrong thing. @randyshoup #google #qconlondon

    @a_alissa: #qconlondon google does not invoke standards, each team can utilize any programing language and libs they want#empowering_teams

    @djmcglade: Microservice - the word is relatively new, the concept is relatively archaic @randyshoup #qconlondon

    @charleshumble: Teams should breathe no larger than can breathe fed by two large pizzas. @randyshoup #qconlondon

    @jabley: trustworthy utilize of economic incentives to align service teams at Google. imbue downstream teams to grow more considerate customers. #qconlondon

    @jgrodziski: Risk of code change is nonlinear in the size of the change @randyshoup #qconlondon

    @charleshumble: Every code submission is reviewed at Google. #qconlondon

    @charleshumble: You can maintain too much alerting but you can't maintain too much monitoring @randyshoup #qconlondon

    Evolving a Data System

    by Simon Metson

    Twitter feedback on this session included:

    @paulacwalter: choose a realistic problem, not "We need to fix everyone of their IT in the next six months. Here's a L20 note. proceed accomplish it." @drsm79 #qconlondon

    @paulacwalter: It's not rocket science. Identify a problem (this is the hardest part), build a solution, evaluate it and repeat. #qconlondon @drsm79

    @paulacwalter: Evolving Data services. The apposite problems are not technical. How are they going to talk to each other and partake data? @drsm79 #qconlondon

    Continuous Delivery: Tools, Collaboration, and Conway's Law

    by Matthew Skelton

    Twitter feedback on this session included:

    @dsommerville_nw: Conway's Law (and the Inverse Conway Maneuver) becoming a recurrent theme at #qconlondon

    @DevOpsGuys: Bring people with you, prize current skills #qconlondon #devops

    @DevOpsGuys: Optimise globally across the teams that need to collaborate #qconlondon #devops

    @camassey: Silos exist across environments as well as roles. Don't optimise your pipeline for just one environment! @matthewpskelton #qconlondon

    @Idris_Ahmed251: More dev teams solves nothing. Adds coupling with people's work, causes merge problems! (Conway's Law) #qconlondon http://t.co/oBPJ70WcQV

    @camassey: Conway's law has HUGE implications for org architecture, if you want particular software architectures @matthewpskelton #qconlondon

    @marekasf: microservices are like children: they're small, cute and the more the better "@DevOpsGuys #qconlondon @camassey http://t.co/IMRaoVaBeO ”

    @julianghionoiu: The organisation's topology should closely resemble the application's architecture. #qconlondon http://t.co/h8aVdjxn7k

    @neilisfragile: Hadn't considered that appliance option not only to promote collaboration, but also to discourage inescapable interactions #qconlondon @matthewpskelton

    Delivering Gov.Uk: Devops for the Nation

    by Anna Shipman

    Ben Basson attended this session:

    The things about the talk that I institute spirited were:

    1. There is a well-maintained operations manual to assist people uphold the live services, so if someone is on-call and doesn't know a particular region that well, they can draw on a wealth of information - or write that information for the next person once the problem has been investigated and resolved. This is clearly a trustworthy concept that everyone companies should really maintain in place.

    2. Deployment to production is managed by the requirement to maintain custody of a stuffed toy badger in order to deploy. I don't know if it's an intentional spoof of the Government's policy on culling badgers, but I couldn't assist but chuckle slightly at the irony. It seems a miniature silly, but I can survey the merit, especially as…

    3. Developers can deploy from their own laptops - a stark contrast to the usual Government process of using dedicated, locked-down machines with direct VPN access to data centers.

    Twitter feedback on this session included:

    @matthewpskelton: .@annashipman "#DevOps is a *culture* where developers and operations people work together" #qconlondon http://t.co/70FxG0lOz0

    @rvedotrc: Allowing the developers to deploy using their own hardware, not locked-down gov hardware, was a vast win says @annashipman #qconlondon

    @rvedotrc: Heartbleed announced at 10pm, patched by 2am, deployments done from home, just because devs cared - @annashipman #qconlondon

    @rvedotrc: “Are you positive the deployment process will work?”“Well, they maintain done over 1000 of them already”- epic from @annashipman #qconlondon

    @matthewpskelton: .@annashipman "Technology choices at @gdsteam are *not* top-down" < +1 chosen by team in collaboration #qconlondon

    @danielbryantuk: utilize what technology you like, as you're going to breathe supporting it in production paraphrasing @annashipman on GDS DevOps at #qconlondon

    @matthewpskelton: .@annashipman "I could not bring @BadgerOfDeploy with me today because that would halt deployments!" #qconlondon http://t.co/pOfdf9bzd7

    @matthewpskelton: .@annashipman "The most necessary appliance they maintain is their Ops Manual" "It's a alive document" < +1 #qconlondon

    @peter_pilgrim: GOV.UK now puts their operational service manual online on GitHub. "Document everything for people who are new to it." #qconlondon #in

    @camassey: How to bring in #DevOps: Document everyone The Things -@annashipman #qconlondon http://t.co/elPCYQeGCR

    @camassey: #DevOps has implications for everything - inc. hiring, leaving, and (obviously) team trust. @annashipman #qconlondon http://t.co/qJBRcRv43E

    @phuturespace: #qconlondon. worthy talk by @annashipman. worthy to survey a practical successful application of DevOps.

    @matthewpskelton: .@annashipman "I accomplish not survey architecture as Command & Control, but instead to assist the teams and then rep out of their way" #qconlondon

    Devops and the need for Speed

    by Stephen Thair

    Twitter feedback on this session included:

    @lamb0: If you don't engage HR and Finance, then you will fail to adopt devops, it’s a mindset and organisational model #qconlondon @TheOpsMgr

    Making Continuous Delivery work for You: The Songkick Experience

    by Amy Phillips

    Twitter feedback on this session included:

    @rvedotrc: “If you rep 4 people to notice at code for 2 hours before release, I guarantee you, you *will* find a bug” - @ItJustBroke #qconlondon

    @matthewpskelton: .@ItJustBroke "Adding more developers did not build things faster" #qconlondon http://t.co/fSDHEGx2IC

    @matthewpskelton: Release processes need flexibility and risk assessment - @ItJustBroke #qconlondon http://t.co/AHgug7UZDs

    @rvedotrc: “Features add no value until your users are using them” – the controversy for snappily turnaround, by @ItJustBroke #qconlondon

    @matthewpskelton: .@ItJustBroke "We asked the business to assist define the acceptance tests" +1 parallel pipeline stages #qconlondon http://t.co/XDzf4pN0Fn

    @rvedotrc: “Limiting their automated Selenium acceptance tests to around 5 minutes, gives us the even of assurance they need” – @ItJustBroke #qconlondon

    @rvedotrc: Identify the biggest problem with your process. Fix it. Repeat.Using problems to drive positive change.– @ItJustBroke #qconlondon

    Docker Clustering - Batteries Included

    by Jessie Frazelle

    Will Hamill attended this session:

    Docker supports clustering of containers OOTB with Swarm which serves the gauge Docker API and allows transparent scaling to multiple hosts. If Swarm isn’t your bag, LibContainer which is also written in proceed can breathe used, and LxC containers are now supported as well.

    Service discovery is also provided OOTB with Docker, though it can breathe configured to utilize etcd, consul or zookeeper instead. For scheduling, bin packing is provided OOTB and there is also a aboriginal option, with Mesos currently on the way.

    Jessie then gave a demo of using Docker with Swarm to define clusters of containers and manage them on the CLI. Regular Docker commands for individual container management work with Swarm, and also Swarm adds a number of commands for provisioning clusters, joining containers to clusters and the like with simplicity: docker haul swarm,docker flee --rm swarm create and docker flee -r swarm join….

    Wrapping up, Jessie outlined the future direction of Swarm; rescheduling policies, further backend drivers for OOTB management functionality, uphold for Mesos, cluster leader elections and more & faster integration with new Docker features.

    motwin attended this session:

    A new appliance in the Docker ecosystem: Swarm, which is a cluster management system for Docker containers.

    This is a aboriginal clustering system for Docker with:

  • native discovery of containers (and optional feature based on either etcd, consul or Zookeeper)
  • schedulers (bin-packing and random which are aboriginal uphold and soon Mesos)
  • constraints management
  • affinity management
  • Docker, Data & Extensions

    by Luke Marsden

    motwin attended this session:

    Fig alias now Docker Compose enables composition at the host level. For instance, if you maintain an application deployable on a servlet container that needs a database, you may choose in a microservices approach to utilize one Docker container for your servlet container and one for your database. But you need to deploy and flee these containers in the perquisite order (the database first and then the servlet container), links these two containers to each others, setup the endpoints / ports and so on…

    Flocker can breathe seen as the companion of Fig. In addition of a Fig yaml configuration file, Flocker needs a second yaml file that describes the topology of your Docker containers cluster: you report on which node each of your Docker container has to breathe installed. The description of the Docker container being hold by the Fig file.

    A second issue addressed by Flocker is the migration of a Docker container from one node to another node. Let’s mumble you maintain a database wrapped in a container. To persist the data stored in the database, you can utilize Docker volumes that enables to persist data outside the container in the filesystem of the host. What happens if, for one reason or another, you wish to migrate the database from one node to another? Flocker does the job: it can migrate a such container from one node to another. …

    Another miss of Docker is a plugins / extension mechanism. perquisite now, it’s hard to glue some tools based on Docker (for instance, Weave and Flocker).Powerstrip may circumvent this issue. It’s an open-source project which train to rapidly prototype extensions to Docker and enables to glue them. …

    What I maintain erudite is also that using Docker volumes leads a coupling between the Docker container and its host. Hence, you can maintain issues when it handles to migrate a such container to another host.

    Docker vs Paas: May the Best Container Win

    by Paula Kennedy & Colin Humphreys

    Will Hamill attended this session:

    This talk was about discussing the disagreement in needs which may lead you to choose Docker over PaaS - obviously a straight comparison of one versus the other would breathe illogical, so the two tried to point out the areas where one approach is stronger than the other. PaaS can easily wield multiple application instances and can maintain autoscaling rules defined; Docker does exactly and only what you configure it to do. PaaS can feature shared services such as health checking of tenant applications, centralised log aggregation, etc; Docker does not seek to provide this and you would need to create it yourself.

    Docker is more about the basics - letting you flee your application in a lightweight containerised environment and touching or creating new instances of that container rather than value-adding features like PaaS now tends to be. Docker focuses on customisability and control in ways that you cannot control on PaaS. Docker container provisioning is much faster than instantiating a new virtual machine on IaaS.

    Colin and Paula argued each other down to an agreement: PaaS is likely to breathe better for snappily iteration of a basic application, and Docker is likely better for control and more specific needs such as database management. Colin recommended that PaaS breathe considered more for apps following the12 Factor principles, and containers with storage volumes used for stateful micro-services….

    Overall I was convinced that the controversy comes down again to whether you want to give up control of low even concerns in order to benefit from paying for more hands-off deployments and scalability, and if you can live with the lock-in that PaaS tends to imply. It depends - on your particular environment constraints :).

    motwin attended this session:

    Colin and Paula harmonize that there is plot for both PAAS and containers:

  • if your micro-services require to suitable the 12 factors, then a stateless PAAS can breathe your holy graal
  • if your micro-services didn’t require to suitable the 12 factors, then Docker containers with volumes management can accomplish the job
  • How to Train Your Docker Cloud

    by Andrew Kennedy

    motwin attended this session:

    Clocker is a Docker containers cloud manager that can deploy applications described in the Brooklyn blueprint format. It can deploy the application on containers of several nodes and across multi-hosts. Clocker seems to maintain lots of features:

  • autonomics: scaling policies that can breathe driven by sensors, cluster resizing
  • health room: to ensure resources availability (cpu, memory, etc.)
  • container management: with Docker images catalog, uphold of Docker files, creation of images automatically
  • placement and provisioning: on demand, with several viable placements strategies (random, CPU, memory, geography, and so on)
  • network management: with network creation, IP pool control, Docker ports forwarding for debug purposes, pluggable network providers (Weave,Kubernetes, libswarm), network virtualization
  • Securing "Platform as a Service" with Docker and Weave

    by David Pollak

    Will Hamill attended this session:

    David Pollack, the creator of Lift, began his talk about securing PaaS stating he believes that security skills require a different mentality to most developers, and understanding of more granular responsibilities. David said that he wanted to try and hire more replaceable people rather than creating esoteric tech experts (for obvious business reasons) so he preferred more widely understood and adopted technologies for securing his platforms - Docker and IP tables being better collectively understood than JVM Security Manager, in David’s example. David also praised Docker’s ease of use, providing a declarative format for configuration instead of relying upon Perl scripts and raw LxC containers….

    One of the problems David had was considering not only layers (a typical approach to both physical and application security) but also isolating the tenants of the PaaS from each other. Tenants’ applications needed to flee inside containers on virtual LANs that can talk to each other and shared backend resources but not other tenants. Shared services at the backend may breathe topic to potential attack, so splitting into read only or write only services can circumscribe surface region and impact.

    David addresses these issues in his platform with each tenant application deployed into a Docker container, using Weave to define the tenant-specific subnet and IP tables to secure the access to the repose of the network. Shared data services in an RDBMS utilize table or column even access controls managed by the RDBMS, and I/O hefty services with well understood security models can also breathe shared. Credentials for services are isolated to each tenant and not globally visible.

    David said that he was fortunate with Docker’s security as LxC containers are a reasonably well understood technology and the new popularity it meant that there are many eyes looking at it both to exploit and improve it. Finishing his talk, David said that he thinks the traipse from VMs to containers is as vast a shift in approach and utility as the shift from physical machines to VMs; that IP tables quiet work just fine for network even application isolation; and that a layered approach to isolating risks is quiet the best approach.

    motwin attended this session:

    David Pollak distinguishes 5 threat models:

  • app to shared services (e.g. credentials)
  • app to the world via the network
  • app to the host via the code that runs on the host
  • app to the host via the network
  • app to app via the network
  • To obviate from these vulnerabilities, Docker provides a quite reasonable isolation from the host, while Weave subnets can seclude tenants (i.e. different apps). As far as iptables, they can secure the repose of network.

    At terminal some takeaways from David Pollak:

  • –icc=false in DOCKER_OPTS which means no intercontainer communication except via Weave
  • use iptables to control / restrict the bridge traffic to well known ports and public hosts
  • partition tenants onto divorce Weave subnets
  • Cake Driven Development: Engineering at moo.com

    Will Hamill attended this session:

    Mike described how a few years ago Moo was facing troubles internally with meeting the needs of the business to release new products to market quickly … the teams were dissolved and reformed into cross functional groups amenable for specific business areas/products. The new teams, called crews, had responsibility for making a new cocktail and hosting an event to welcome each other into the new figure of the business … Crews were given specific business-aligned goals for their areas of work, were allowed to create their own workflows and were not forced into homogenising with the repose of the company. Autonomy in how the crews accomplish their goals is a powerful factor of motivation.

    Mike then revealed that most crews had stopped doing formal estimation of work items - instead of producing estimates for each item and planning an iteration, the crews moved to a flood based system, doing planning as needed and working to improve the product backlog. The business don’t imbue that you are not doing circumstantial estimates for each piece of work when you can prove that you are releasing new working software on a regular and dependable basis. Product managers from the crews were mediated when they clashed by a crew lead representing the overall business goals.

    After the reorganisations, the smaller cross functional crews had better determination making as everyone needed to understand how they can release working software was embedded in the teams. The development manager role is being replaced with a platform manager, someone with vision across the teams and who can assist balance doing things snappily with doing things right. Another role added was the ‘people engineer’, combining HR responsibilities with the tech team lead responsibilities.

    In day to day work terms, Mike described the culture in Moo as being focused on teams aligning their releases with a fortnightly release train. … ‘Bug squashing Tuesday’ is set aside for people to tackle defects and improve complicated or low attribute areas, and people in the crews typically utilize XP practices such as pair programming, regular retrospectives and collective ownership. … Wrapping up, Mike stated that overall they train to create a culture which empowers people to breathe proactive to decipher problems.

    Dream Job? The Vision and Journey to the Company Culture You Want

    by Pete tribulation & Helen Walton

    Twitter feedback on this session included:

    @SalFreudenberg: @Helenislovely #qconlondon I've seen companies ignore ideas because the person is too junior, too external or just from another department..

    @portiatung: #qconlondon @Helenislovely @peteburden How systems shape their behaviours and the people they become http://t.co/xF5odzo8vi

    @portiatung: #qconlondon @peteburden @Helenislovely "Advocacy 6 times more than inquisition in organisations"

    The Power of Hope: Getting You from Here to There

    by Portia Tung

    Twitter feedback on this session included:

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @portiatung hope ISN'T - unrealistic optimism, erudite optimism, kind A mindset, a measure of intelligence or previous achievement

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @portiatung Hope is "the sum of the willpower and waypower to achieve your goals"

    @Helenislovely: pass power: mental capacity they call on to find more effectual ways of reaching goals. Hope with @portiatung #qconlondon

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @portiatung useful goals need success criteria. Validate the clarity of the goal.

    @Helenislovely: Validate your goals. Write in pairs to clarify. #qconlondon

    @charleshumble: @portiatung true options. Never relegate early unless you know why. #qconlondon

    @johannescarlen: Aren't programmers the most hopeful people you know? - Portia Tung #qconlondon

    @SalFreudenberg: @portiatung #qconlondon improve hope by letting proceed of panic of failure. Whatever the outcome I will maintain learned.

    Back to the Future: What Ever Happened to Being Extreme?

    by Rachel Davies

    Ben Basson attended this session:

    Some of the things I institute really fascinating included:

  • Developers resolve what to work on next - they accomplish research with the business and work out shared priorities, so that nobody spends time working on features that provide no business value.
  • Mobbing - basically the very concept as paired programming but with more people involved, so a group sit around a large TV and commemorate and discuss while one person writes code - swapping around every 10 minutes.
  • Building 20% learning time into the working velocity - to maintain fresh ideas coming in and motivation high.
  • Using a developer-on-support rota essentially as a human distraction shield, so the other developers can rep on without interruption.
  • It turns out that developers at intractable only write code about 40% of the time, due to the 20% learning time and other responsibilities (research, monitoring, support, etc). As Rachel points out, this is fine.
  • Sebastian Bruckner attended this session:

    Great talk from Rachel remembering of the core principles of Extreme Programming which sometimes might Come too short in the today’s agile life. She also gave an spirited insight about how she and her teams were implementing it in the field. Among the known and well adapted aspects of XP she mentioned a fashion which was new to me.

    Mobbing (Mob Programming):

    Mobbing is similar to pair programming but with three to five persons instead. The code is on a vast TV, one developer is actually programming the others are thinking and discussing. After a fixed time box (e.g. 20 minutes) another one grabs the keyboard, similar to pair programming. – They utilize mobbing to start difficult or complicated stories.

    Twitter feedback on this session included:

    @Helenislovely: Microsoft windows XP was the death of extreme programming. title no longer cool. @rachelcdavies #qconlondon

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @rachelcdavies one risk with a unadulterated craftsmanship focus is losing the focus on structure software for people

    @paulacwalter: Continuous everything, no divorce integration and testing phases, accomplish everyone activities everyone of the time. @rachelcdavies #qconlondon

    @douglastalbot: #qconlondon No point in researching features if you are simply going to accomplish everyone of them! Just rep structure @rachelcdavies

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @rachelcdavies When the people who build the product also uphold it "they don't build mute things that don't work"

    @Helenislovely: Being able to maintain learning keeps you fresh. Keeps you happy. This is a very @SparkConf drill from @rachelcdavies #qconlondon

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @rachelcdavies retrospectives: it's essential that teams rep together and examine how they are working and adapt

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @rachelcdavies XP is about "if there is something that works, how can they accomplish more of it" circle the dial up. Experiment and learn

    @dsommerville_nw: veracity around the world: developers are always downstairs - so set some "interruptable" devs upstairs [with the business] #qconlondon

    @paulacwalter: focus on quick continuous feedback but don't ignore feedback that takes longer to arrive, like customer usage! @rachelcdavies #qconlondon

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @rachelcdavies XP lets us: Deliver value sustainably and build change tolerant systems. also Mastery & Autonomy,

    @metmajer: If you pair with the very person for a long time you really maintain to like them. @rachelcdavies on #PairProgramming at #qconlondon

    @mattwynne: Team at @unrulyco only budget to spend 40% of time developing stories — spirited stat from @racheldavies at #qconlondon

    @paulacwalter: Learning time for the team is just Part of the service, factored in like holidays and meetings @rachelcdavies #qconlondon

    Learning to Become Agile, with Retrospectives

    by Ben Linders

    Twitter feedback on this session included:

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @BenLinders Evaluate your retrospectives - build positive the team is getting value from the time spent

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @BenLinders in retrospectives the facilitator must breathe focused on allowing the team to build trustworthy decisions for themselves

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @BenLinders Coach role in retrospectives is to uphold team with the perquisite questions and to uphold them in making changes

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @BenLinders Yes! the product owner is Part of the team - they should breathe in the retrospective!

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @BenLinders Manager role in retrospectives is to uphold and empower the team to build changes

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @BenLinders some of the benefits that effectual retrospectives can enable in your teams http://t.co/lEAEuNmdjT

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @BenLinders don't allow teams to overwhelm themselves with too many action items - circumscribe the number of actions #retrospective

    Progress from "What?" and "So What?" to "Now What?"

    by Larry Maccherone

    Twitter feedback on this session included:

    @rvedotrc: Challenge people for rationale and to provide models used for decisions – @lmaccherone #qconlondon

    @_yowan_: Every determination that you build is a forecast #qconlondon http://t.co/vzTDcXzYOB

    @Helenislovely: Monte Carlo forecasting to build probability distribution. Improvement on #noestimates? @LMaccherone #qconlondon

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @LMaccherone utilize metrics correctly to change the nature of the forecasting conversation

    @Helenislovely: unbelievable how often people create slow metrics because they forget the outcome they wanted them for in the 1st plot #qconlondon

    @Helenislovely: How to choose correct visualisation. Comparison, trend, forest AND trees @LMaccherone #qconlondon

    @Helenislovely: Only 2% of the data collected gets used. Don't improve analytics, bake data utilize into product #qconlondon

    @Helenislovely: Pattern-based determination makers. Issue is that they rep the wrong pattern, often filtered by the cognitive bias @LMaccherone #qconlondon

    @Helenislovely: Changing habits: direct the rider, motivate the elephant and shape the path #qconlondon

    @Helenislovely: They build emotional decisions but they reflect it's rationally based on data. So true. @LMaccherone #qconlondon

    @Helenislovely: Imperfect data may breathe better than no data. not positive imperfect models better. reflect of bad decisions driven by bell curves #qconlondon

    Taking Back Agile

    by Tim Ottinger & Ruud Wijnands

    Twitter feedback on this session included:

    @Helenislovely: I recognise everyone these agile pains. But I reflect they originate from control cultures and that is hard to fix. @tottinge @RuudWijnands #qconlondon

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @tottinge @RuudWijnands No one else will build change for you - you maintain to build the change yourself

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @tottinge @RuudWijnands Original intent Programming More Intensely , but that was PMI and was already taken so it became XP

    @Helenislovely: 'Death of hope' that resonates for me. Keeping hoping something will change can rep in the pass of action. #qconlondon

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @tottinge @RuudWijnands Becoming (acknowledge lack of erudition and build it up) vs Seeming (cannot admit ignorance)

    @twicezer0: Don't stockpile pain: root of agile. @tottinge @RuudWijnands #qconlondon

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @tottinge @RuudWijnands recollect the birth of the #AgileManifesto - "we are uncovering" - constant ongoing learning

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @tottinge @RuudWijnands The productive sociable context of getting things done, done, done! I want this agile back.

    @Helenislovely: 'Getting it done, not holding hands and talking about feelings'. XP group hug! @tottinge @RuudWijnands #qconlondon

    @Helenislovely: You don't need consent but companies can create blocks. @tottinge @RuudWijnands #qconlondon

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @tottinge @RuudWijnands as a leader give people enough confidence to grow into.

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @tottinge @RuudWijnands rep rid of hope (someone else will fix it) and capture responsibility to fix it yourself

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @tottinge @RuudWijnands Velocity is not a option - it is a consequence. Every bug is a determination making flaw.

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @tottinge @RuudWijnands how snappily you proceed today depends entirely on the attribute of the code you work on.

    @Helenislovely: Bugs are defects in thinking. Nice description. And bugs in culture are what bother me. @tottinge #qconlondon

    @V_Formicola: How snappily you develop a epic depends on the condition in which codebase is…@tottinge #qconlondon

    Why BDD Can save Agile

    by Matt Wynne

    Ben Basson attended this session:

    Matt gets quickly to the point, identifying the common problems faced by software development teams:

  • Predictability - is the team delivering on time?
  • Communication - are they working together well as a team (including everyone disciplines, i.e. testers, product owners, developers)?
  • Quality - strongly related to the two above - it causes frustration for the team if there are lots of problems or defects.
  • He goes on to expound that it's viable to counteract these by addressing them directly:

  • Small pieces (solve predictability by breaking things up properly).
  • Collaboration (communicate and really work with each other)
  • Technical discipline (TDD, refactoring)…
  • Explaining why TDD (Test Driven Development) is important, Matt says that automated tests are essentially warning lights, and whether you add them before or after writing code, you guard against the risk of regression later on when making changes. The crucial thing that this enables you to accomplish is refactoring - which he says is a horrible technical term that means that product owners and customers don't necessarily reflect it is a necessary practice, when in fact they should breathe interested as it is a key Part of maintaining the health of their software….

    Matt concludes by saw that you can't just cheat on agile, you maintain to require excellent communication, maintain excellent collaboration and maintain excellent code; this is where the agility comes from in agile.

    Twitter feedback on this session included:

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon #mattwynne How BDD can save Agile, necessary point: Scrum != Agile http://t.co/TFtXRaZwVt

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @mattwynne minuscule pieces, collaboration and technical discipline are frequently missing in many "agile" implementations

    @Hylke1982: #BDD / #ATDD helps us with delivering minuscule pieces, collaboration and with technical discipline #qconlondon

    @Hylke1982: BDD is a conversation between different roles to define and drive out specificatons in a structured understandable way. #qconlondon

    @V_Formicola: “...test after is ok, but if you want to accomplish it perquisite you TDD” @mattwynne #qconlondon

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @mattwynne #BDD Conversations matter because ignorance is the bottleneck in software development

    @rvedotrc: “Writing down the list of things you don’t know [business rules, examples, questions] is very helpful” - @mattwynne #qconlondon

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @mattwynne 3 Amigo's workshop - customer, developer, tester spend 20 mins to assist understand the needs and express them usefully

    @V_Formicola: “Analysing stories as a minuscule group breeds empathy in a team and brings everyone at the very even of understanding” @mattwynne #qconlondon

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @mattwynne there is no excuse for not using a ubiquitous language - just breathe consistent!

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @mattwynn The bit of TDD that everyone forgets is Refactoring. Refactoring should breathe a constant activity!

    @V_Formicola: Technical discipline….is what is missing in teams which are doing “half-agile” @mattwynne #qconlondon

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @mattwynn You can't abide agile without spotless code! Refactor it, and that needs TDD as the warning lights about regression.

    @merybere: You will fail unless you are listening to The tests #BDD #qconlondon

    @Hylke1982: Product owners should/must require refactoring to ensure agility #BDD #qconlondon

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @mattwynn To maintain true agility you need Excellent communication & excellent code

    @paulacwalter: A code foundation without refactoring is like a nasty kitchen. You risk injury and impoverished hygiene when you trip up #qconlondon @mattwynne

    @_yowan_: You can't cheat on Agile practices and anticipate things to work #qconlondon http://t.co/gz29NahE4W

    @V_Formicola: You can’t cheat on Agile...it requires commitment..you need to maintain worthy communication...you need to maintain worthy code @mattwynne #qconlondon

    @markhobson: worthy reaffirming talk by @mattwynne. No agile w/o refactoring, no refactor w/o tests. #qconlondon cc/@BlackPepperLtd http://t.co/dqRqcPYgnn

    The business of Front-end Development

    by Rachel Andrew

    Twitter feedback on this session included:

    @DevOpsMD: Don't become an expert in one brand of hammer. Become a master carpenter. Develop timeless skills. --Rachel Andrew #qconlondon

    @wonderb0lt: You rep a lot of stuff for free if you're just doing it well. @rachelandrew #qconlondon

    @V_Formicola: @rachelandrew “Progressive enhancement. Start with the core experience. They ship. They iterate.”. Sounds like Agile to me. :) #qconlondon

    @nimpedrojo: You can't accomplish everything.You can accomplish something . @rachelandrew in #qconlondon

    @DevOpsMD: They don't halt playing because we're old; they grow archaic because they halt playing -- @rachelandrew #qconlondon

    @rajshahuk: How many people actually quit up with the 'not invented here' problem and proceed of and create something new? via @rachelandrew #qconlondon

    @rajshahuk: Flip side is that they are fearful to create and become more reliant on frameworks! I reflect this is more true. @rachelandrew #qconlondon

    @dsommerville_nw: also a huge fan of: Ship the core experience and *then* iterate [via progressive enhancement]; utilize tools lightly @rachelandrew #qconlondon

    When Arduino Meets Application Server: esteem at Second Sight

    by Holly Cummins

    Twitter feedback on this session included:

    @deonvanaarde: IoT: Websphere Liberty app server running on @holly_cummins homemade ball on pcDuino over WiFi... Cool!! #qconlondon http://t.co/2JXbyoi6MO

    @techiewatt: IoT track at #qconlondon with demonstration by @holly_cummins of a literally throwable websphere server with sensors! http://t.co/3OBxBmPnbl

    @lauracowen: The world's first cuddly, throwable application server, with creator @holly_cummins. Running #WASLiberty #qconlondon http://t.co/FcDuyaASj8

    Refactoring to Functional

    by Hadi Hariri

    motwin attended this session:

    Hadi showed how some OO patterns can breathe turned into a functional style. T utilize functions to pass conduct t was the motto and cooking recipe. Thus, it demonstrated how to rewrite a bunch of classes that implement the template patterns into one class. Again, thanks to the “use functions to pass behavior” principle. The Strategy pattern is also a trustworthy candidate for being rewritten in a functionalish style: the strategy has only to breathe encapsulated as function. Elegant code and less code: wintry ! And as matter of fact, “Patterns of yesterday can become anti-patterns of today” (which is more or less a citation I don’t recollect the author). Another use-case of Hadi is when the dependencies of a class grow. Firstly, it may connote the code aroma bad. Secondly, it may connote that they maintain lots of dependencies just because they need to utilize dependencies behavior. And as in a functional style, you can “use functions to pass behavior”, … you rep the trick, now. In functional programming, as a duty can revert a function, you can rep a pipeline of functions call. That can also contribute to build the code shorted and more readable. Hadi just warned a too long pipeline can breathe in circle unreadable… so, breathe sage and encapsulate behaviors in meaningful named functions to avoid a too vast chain of functions.

    Scala in the Enterprise

    by Peter Pilgrim

    Will Hamill attended this session:

    Peter started with some simpler Scala examples of pattern matching, reducing boilerplate compared to Java code, collections operations and Futures for asynchronous fashion processing. HSBC were used as an illustration of a larger enterprise that has some Scala adoption along with GOV.UKwho utilize the Play Framework in some places. Peter said that Scala adoption depends on a confident and talented team, and delivering something working was the key to proving viability. …

    Scala was then demonstrated for the very types of behaviours as the Java 8 examples. … Peter covered duty composition, partial functions, tail recursion, functions returning other functions and gauge map reduce kind examples. Futures and Promises were also briefly covered, though I reflect that should breathe focused a miniature more given the power of this in Scala compared to Java.

    Peter finished his talk by stating that while Java 8 is new, Scala is here already and can breathe used as a full-fat functional language as well as object-oriented. Java 8 however changes things by making functional paradigms accessible to a much wider and arguably slower-changing audience.

    Protocols - the Glue for Applications

    by Torben Hoffmann

    Will Hamill attended this session:

    Torben advocates Erlang for learning how objects should decipher problems by communicating with each other, rather than ‘single page programming’ where people learn only to develop with an understanding only of the current class. Torben proclaimed the ‘golden trinity’ of Erlang: fail fast, failure handling, partake nothing. Including failure handling as a specific case in your protocol means you should breathe able to wield failure gracefully. In Java world, failures are not tolerated and unexpected exceptions reason your process to die. In Erlang world, failures are embraced as alternate scenarios and managed.

    Torben gave an illustration of a monetary application for a simple stock exchange. Buyers post purchase intentions, sellers post sale intentions, deals chance when the seller expense <= buyer price. In Erlang, this will breathe modeled using one buyer process and one seller process per sale interaction, communicating by sending messages that figure the sale protocol. gproc, a process registry, would breathe used as a pub/sub mechanism for buyers and sellers listen for messages of intent to sell/buy. After expense conditions are met, the sale is confirmed with a three-way handshake.

    Failure is handled in the message protocol such that when the buyer or seller dies after the initial message of intent (determined by response timeout or monitoring the other process) then the processes can simply restart the interaction. If a party dies after the first Part of the handshake, e.g. buyer dies before getting sale complete message after seller closed sale on their side, a restart of the process will the buyer back to the previous state. A supervisor process is commonly used in Erlang to monitor worker processes and wield restarts. Other options for handling failure in the stock exchange are to maintain a transaction log per-process in order to easily replay until the terminal state. Alternatively a central ledger process could breathe used which tracks completed deals and allocates buyer and seller processes deal IDs so they can link back up when they fail.

    Twitter feedback on this session included:

    @jimshep: These 2 tools are everyone you need to build mission-critical systems @LeHoff #QConLondon http://t.co/fQFaA1Y76G

    @dthume: Erlang fail snappily mistake handling - "if you don't know what to do, what's the point in living?" @lehoff at #qconlondon

    @solsila: If a process makes a call with incorrect data, it deserves to die @LeHoff on protocols #qconlondon

    @willhamill: if you call the API with the wrong data, you deserve to die - @LeHoff on process mistake handling in Erlang #qconlondon

    Product Ownership Is a Team Sport

    by Shane Hastie

    Twitter feedback on this session included:

    @NitinBharti: Product management is a "value management" *team* sport #qconlondon @shanehastie http://t.co/orWdN63iXR

    @solsila: Velocity is a measure of work (cost), not value. @shanehastie #qconlondon

    @lissijean: structure more is not always better. Recognize when the value flattens out. @shanehastie #qconlondon http://t.co/2xHhcnOZeh

    Product thru the Looking Glass

    by Chris Matts

    Twitter feedback on this session included:

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @PapaChrisMatts The agile test: Deliver quality: Deliver attribute (bugs, pert UX) : Short Iterations (max 1 month)

    @lissijean: They don't want a tea bag, they want the value they rep from a cup of tea - quenching thirst. #prodmgmt #qconlondon @PapaChrisMatts

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @PapaChrisMatts Product management is the realm of hypothesis - they reflect that the need exists and meeting them matters

    @lissijean: After you've gathered insights you need to manage them. dissect by value and personas. @PapaChrisMatts #qconlondon

    @lissijean: Testing hypotheses is a #Kanban process not scrum. Don't try to shove it into a sprint. @PapaChrisMatts #qconlondon http://t.co/XVLqrwPn5D

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @PapaChrisMatts getting the audience to build UI designs and vote on them in the session. bad concept terminator works @lissijean

    The bad concept Terminator

    by Melissa Perri

    Yan Cui attended this session:

    We often start off doing things perquisite – they test and iter­ate on their ideas before they hit the mar­ket, and then they quit up with some­thing that peo­ple want to use. But then they just maintain on build­ing with­out going back to find­ing those inno­v­a­tive ideas that peo­ple love. …

    We can tumble into the build trap in a num­ber of ways, including:

  • pres­sure from stake­hold­ers to always release new fea­tures
  • arbi­trary dead­lines and fail­ure to respond to change – set­ting dead­lines that are too far out and not being flex­i­ble enough to reconcile to change
  • “build­ing is work­ing” men­tal­ity – which doesn’t allow time for us to step back and reflect if we’re build­ing the perquisite things…
  • So how accomplish you become the bad concept Ter­mi­na­tor, i.e. the per­son that goes and destroys everyone the bad ideas so they can focus on the trustworthy ones? They can start by iden­ti­fy­ing some com­mon mis­takes they make.

    Mis­take 1 : don’t rec­og­nize bias…

    Mis­take 2 : solu­tions with no problems - When peo­ple sug­gest new ideas, most of the time they Come to the table with solu­tions. Instead, they need to start with the WHY, and focus on the prob­lem that we’re try­ing to solve….

    Mis­take 3 : build­ing with­out testing - When they rep stuck in the build trap they don’t mind to test their assump­tion, as they mind to com­mit to one solu­tion too early. Instead, they should solicit many solu­tions at first, and rep peo­ple off the fix­a­tion on the one idea….

    Mis­take 4 : no suc­cess metrics - Another com­mon mis­take is to not set suc­cess met­rics when they proceed and accomplish exper­i­ments, and they also don’t set suc­cess met­rics when build­ing new features.

    Twitter feedback on this session included:

    @paulacwalter: Figuring out what to build is the hard part. Don't rep stuck in the "building is working" trap. @lissijean #qconlondon

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @lissijean in software they rep stuck in the build trap - just build the next piece, halt and proceed back to check that quiet want it

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @lissijean Putting out more features doesn't build your product more attractive, just bloated

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @lissijean The most necessary Part of the product manager role is the ability to mumble No

    @_yowan_: Feature ideas are not your babies inspiring talk by @lissijean #qconlondon http://t.co/Yjemn9rHji

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @lissijean concept terminator: notice differences among customers and businesses

    @quaasteniet: Now The bad concept terminator where @lissijean talks about killing bad ideas even more useful than killing bad code ;) #qconlondon #TOPdesk

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @lissijean bad concept terminator: Change perspective

    @Helenislovely: structure in questions that assist evaluate features and therefore truly prioritise. Dealing with ideas @lissijean #qconlondon

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @lissijean bad concept terminator: Focus on the problem

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @lissijean bad concept terminator: Is this a problem they can and want to solve?

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @lissijean bad concept terminator: consider many solutions

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @lissijean bad concept terminator: Test the viable solutions very quickly for very low investment

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @lissijean bad concept terminator: set success metrics when you identify the experiment, then CHECK THE RESULTS

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @lissijean bad concept terminator: Set goals early (late goals will breathe adjusted to their bias) and build positive they align with KPIs

    @Helenislovely: Thinking of 2 other biases that abolish their innovation: loss aversion and attachment to their own creativity. @lissijean #qconlondon

    @solsila: The faster you abolish the bad ideas, the more time you maintain for the trustworthy ones. Becoming a bad Ideas Terminator w/ @lissijean #qconlondon

    The Sensemaker Method

    by Tony Quinlan

    Twitter feedback on this session included:

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @tquinlan direct questions never give you the veracity - need to rep underneath to rep meaning

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @tquinlan is your solution actually creating the problem?

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @tquinlan "on average" doesn't help, what you want is specifics to understand actual needs

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @tquinlan collecting stories as people experience the system/environment allows import to breathe exposed

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @tquinlan context and jiffy matters - people are complex, can't simply extrapolate

    @Helenislovely: import is not in the content you're reading. Its the context and intertextuality. @tquinlan #qconlondon

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @tquinlan "red shirt" is an assessment of life expectancy not a fashion statement (#startrek) #context matters

    @Helenislovely: congregate smart feedback @tquinlan connects to @LMaccherone point about using data to change the tone of conversation. #qconlondon

    @shanehastie: #qconlondon @tquinlan collect stories with the audience's meaning; notice for patterns that emerge; Come up with activities to improve soltn

    Responding Rapidly When You maintain 100GB+ Data Sets in Java

    by Peter Lawrey

    Will Hamill attended this session:

    Peter described how he believes that a modern system should breathe reactive: responsive, resilient and elastic. When your weapon of option is the JVM, you can process data much faster when you can map your entire data set into reminiscence (given I/O bottlenecks, I’m positive this is factual for almost any language). However, what happens when you traipse into the realms of very large data sets - which in Java land is pretty much anything beyond 32GB?…

    In terms of accessing more reminiscence on the JVM, going beyond 32GB on gauge compute platforms means you’ll need to jump up to 64-bit address references, which though increasing available reminiscence region also reduces the efficiency of CPU caches due to increased protest size. Garbage collection of such larger reminiscence spaces also starts to become a problem, with a concurrent collector being needed to avoid stop-the-world execution pauses.

    Peter described how the Azul Zing concurrent collector was an option for tackling this issue up to a given size, as for reminiscence sets of around ~100s GBs their garbage collector will discharge with minimal execution impact. A different approach would breathe to utilize TerraCotta BigMemory as a reminiscence management layer inside your application, allowing the application to utilize off-heap memory, though the disadvantage is needing to explicitly build applications against their library so it can’t breathe injected in to existing applications as a mitigation in the very pass using Azul Zing could be.

    When addressing bigger data sets of up to 1TB in Java, the NUMA region circumscribe kicks in at around 40 bits of physical reminiscence (40 bits for Ivy Bridge and Sandy Bridge generation Intel CPUs, 48 bits for Haswell generation CPUs). Addressing beyond 40 bits requires using a 48-bit virtual address space, with data paged in on demand. The 48-bit circumscribe then pushes the threshold to 256TB in CentOS, 192 TB in Windows and 128TB in Ubuntu. I can’t wait for someone to breathe quoted at this point saw “128TB will breathe enough for anyone!” that they can everyone notice back upon and laugh in 2025 :). touching further up the orders of magnitude, a 1PB (Petabyte!) reminiscence space can breathe achieved by mapping the address tables themselves into the main addressable space, in order to achieve paging of the virtual space.

    Twitter feedback on this session included:

    @peter_pilgrim: Reactive system design to consider if your data size >32GB from @PeterLawrey #qconlondon #in #java #performance http://t.co/2VJvkKs903

    @charleshumble: “32 bit i quiet apposite in IoT. If you maintain a digital toaster it's unlikely to need more than 32 bits." @PeterLawrey #qconlondon

    @Idris_Ahmed251: x86 computers... Your toaster will never need that! #qconlondon @peterlawrey

    @charleshumble: Many systems maintain NUMA regions that are limited to 1TB. @PeterLawrey #qconlondon

    @charleshumble: PetaByte JVMs for a utilize case that needs random access without going across networks @PeterLawrey #qconlondon http://t.co/9PyGDF8ilC

    The art of Protocol Design

    by Pieter Hintjens

    Twitter feedback on this session included:

    @miguel_f: Don't smash user code! Once again: don't smash user code! @hintjens #qconlondon

    @marcusolsson: Versioning is not an excuse to smash contracts. @hintjens #qconlondon

    Microservices Are Too (Conceptually) Big

    by Philip Wills

    Pere Villega attended this session:

    In this talk, Philip Wills, Senior Software Architect at The Guardian, explains how The Guardian moved from a monolith to Microservices. Currently they release around 40 different services to production each week.

    When they were a monolith they started to find some problems. … They also had a concern with limiting the scope of failure. The monolith allowed embedding some microapps into specific places, but they hit performance and coupling issues soon enough. …

    So they moved to sole responsibility apps, focused on resilience and with limited scope (you can suitable it in your head)….

    An necessary point he raised is that they try to avoid sharing libraries across services, due to the amount of contention they cause. They consider this a terminal resort.

    Will Hamill attended this session:

    Phil explained that the main reason The Guardian had pursued a microservices architecture was for faster innovation in a elevated pressure media marketplace. Independent teams were needed for the different functional areas of the platform, and as on the archaic platform taking something experimental from a Hackday and putting it into production was prohibitively expensive, the organisation wanted the teams to breathe able to work independently from each other and release rapidly without overhead….

    With the ‘micro app’ approach, teams at The Guardian were developing independent products with ownership inside the team. This made removing and replacing parts much easier than the smart caused when they tried to accomplish this with the monolith application. Teams were no longer dependent upon each other for releases and making changes to their interfaces backwards compatible reduced interdependencies. Phil mentioned how it was necessary for each team to own their own datastore and to prohibit integration via DB so as to maintain the benefit of cleanly defined APIs.

    Each application had a sole responsibility, and a sole key metric that would bid teams about its performance, in terms of that responsibility. Different applications change at different rates, so they want them not to depend on each other, as this would restrict them to the lowest common denominator.

    Twitter feedback on this session included:

    @stefanoric: #qconlondon Some lessons from The Guardian about microservices: divorce teams, circumscribe scope of failures, design for things to die.

    @danielbryantuk: Fail-fast for the win in a monolith and microservice integration @philwills at #qconlondon

    @danielbryantuk: JSON is a really impoverished interface mechanism. We're looking at Thrift to provide strong-typing for protocols @philwills at #qconlondon

    @stefanoric: #qconlondon The Guardian is considering ditching JSON and proceed with Thrift

    @rvedotrc: “On AWS, you can pitch more hardware at it, or circle it off and on again. This solves a surprisingly large amount.” @philwills #qconlondon

    @danielbryantuk: spirited to survey the Guardian focusing on 'single responsibility apps'. Find one key metric for each app that measures repercussion #qconlondon

    @adrianmouat: Everything was crashing, but nothing was causing a problem @philwills on the advantages of microservices at #qconlondon

    @rajshahuk: Yeah! The Guardian try to avoid shared libraries via @philwills #qconlondon

    Microservices: Software That Fits in Your Head

    by Dan North

    Will Hamill attended this session:

    Dan has argued for some time that software itself is not an asset but a liability, so producing more code is less valuable than making the software more effective. The costs (as well documented across the industry) cover not just creating the code, but understanding and maintaining it on an ongoing basis. The biggest problem to software development is the code in the system that nobody knows about, as this is expensive and risky to maintain. The best pass to deal with this is to stabilise the offending code or abolish it off.

    Dan describes two complementary patterns for understandable, maintainable code: ‘short software half-life’ and ‘fits in my head’. …

    Short half-life results from the replaceability of discrete components with lucid boundaries and defined purposes and responsibilities. …

    ‘Fits in my head’, a metric originally inspired by the length of a class on screen compared to James Lewis’ head but not generally referring to the ability of a person to understand the conceptual all of a component at a given even of abstraction, is used to arbiter whether or not other people on the team can reason about the component with the very context as whoever designed or first implemented it. This is useful as the contextual consistency for the person understanding the component is more necessary than homogeneity across implementation methods, so that freedom is left to meet the needs inside the component in whichever pass is best, but the people making decisions about it will Come to similar decisions as the designer/implementer would have. When you maintain this contextual consistency you can confidence that the decisions people build that result in different outcomes maintain been driven by different needs rather than arbitrarily.

    Dan described the approach of splitting these components into services that together suitable the business need as a ‘replaceable components’ style (no doubt close to anyone who understands the original intent of SOA). To reduce coupling these components should breathe isolated from each other and should communicate by passing messages through well-defined APIs. Implicit coupling between components can breathe identified by hefty utilize of mocks - over-dependence on mocking implies you are too tightly coupled to the behaviours of other components.

    Pere Villega attended this session:

    We don't imbue about code, but about the business impact. That is to connote that the code is not an asset, is a cost they assume to obtain the business impact. Writing code, changing code, and understanding code; they are everyone costs.

    As a consequence they want to stabilise their code or, alternatively, abolish it snappily and supplant it by less-costly code. As it happens, the patterns that facilitate this process lead to Microservices.

    The first pattern is to maintain a short software half-life. An application can breathe long lived, but the code that composes that application may not be. effectual teams mind to maintain a very short code half-life, in which after a few weeks the code has changed a lot and all sections maintain been replaced or moved. This keeps the costs associated to code low.

    To facilitate a short half-life they want to write discrete components, with lucid boundaries, and lucid purpose and responsibility. The boundaries chance at many levels: deployment (containers), design (DDD), etc. A lucid purpose reduces uncertainty….

    Another pattern is to consider anything that doesn't suitable in your head as too big. …

    A Microservice can breathe a kind of replaceable component architecture, if you optimise for replaceability and consistency. Don't optimise for size, smaller is not necessarily better, more replaceable is better. And abolish code fearlessly.

    Twitter feedback on this session included:

    @rvedotrc: The goal of software development is NOT to succumb software – it’s to sustainably deliver positive business repercussion @tastapod #qconlondon

    @V_Formicola: What is their business about? “Sustainably minimise lead time to business impact.” @tastapod #qconlondon

    @trisha_gee: Code is not the asset, code is the cost @tastapod at #qconlondon http://t.co/gqtnarm5xv

    @jimshep: productive != effective- @tastapod #QConLondon http://t.co/LGSmbZ3mok

    @rvedotrc: Writing code is the annoying time-expensive Part that gets in the pass of solving problems (paraphrasing @tastapod #qconlondon)

    @stefanoric: Code should breathe stabilized or killed off Dan North #qconlondon

    @solsila: Heisenberg consequence in code: the issue occurs until you try to commemorate it! #thisexplainsalot @tastapod #qconlondon

    @trisha_gee: An application can maintain a long life, but the code should maintain a short half life @tastapod at #qconlondon

    @rvedotrc: “If I can’t reason about [a component], I can’t abolish it” @tastapod #qconlondon

    @paulacwalter: Documentation is valuable. Documenting everything a shocking dissipate of time. Tricky bit is knowing what to document. @tastapod #qconlondon

    @rajshahuk: Killing code is refactoring, it isn't brutal -- @tastapod #qconlondon

    @V_Formicola: “I don’t like to notice at code that doesn't suitable in my head” @tastapod @boicy #qconlondon

    @V_Formicola: Familiarity is different than simplicity@tastapod #qconlondon

    @AlibertiLuca: #qconlondon Mocking is an anti-pattern @tastapod

    @axhixh: I am going to write best code I can that I don't imbue about. @tastapod #qconlondon

    No Free Lunch, Indeed: Three Years of Microservices at Soundcloud

    by Phil Calcado

    Pere Villega attended this session:

    SoundCloud moved from a Sacrificial Architecture to Microservices. … Before you can start with Microservices, you need 3 things:

  • rapid provisioning of servers (or containers or vm's)
  • basic monitoring
  • rapid app deployment with a short turnaround
  • For provisioning, SoundCloud moved from AWS to their own datacenter in Amsterdam, although they quiet utilize S3 and some other Amazon services….

    On telemetry they institute a similar issue: the tools available at 2011 weren't great. The common tooling was a thrust model based on StatsD, Graphite and Nagios. Engineers they hired at that time wanted a haul model so they developed Prometheus which works along Icinga to provide better data. When they moved to Microservices their monitoring didn't break. …

    Regarding their pipeline at the birth they had 2 different pipelines: one for build, one for release. Customisation and other factors ended up creating 7 different deployment scripts. Currently they utilize Docker to flee tests when in development. Jenkins takes imbue of structure and packaging the application as a deb package, and they utilize that for deployment. They maintain not adopted Docker yet as they don't want a tough coupling.

    Will Hamill attended this session:

    The three aspects of this that Phil institute most necessary at Soundcloud were rapid environment provisioning, basic monitoring, and rapid application deployment. The first of these, provisioning, looked a miniature different in 2011 than it did now when Soundcloud were preparing for what they thought would breathe the “microservices explosion”. With Heroku as the example, usingDoozer for service discovery, LxC containers and the 12 Factor principles, Soundcloud managed to set together a provisioning platform much better than any other complete solution around at the time….

    In terms of telemetry and monitoring (another spicy topic at QCon this year), Phil described how in 2011 the tooling available was not quite what it is today, and dissatisfaction with some common tools led Soundcloud to build their own system. Interestingly, some of the former Google Site Reliability Engineers that had been hired by Soundcloud advocated this as they missed the circumstantial monitoring when touching away from the Google platform. touching from a solution of Statsd, Graphite and Nagios, Soundcloud developed and subsequently open-sourced Prometheus as their metrics & monitoring system, with utilize of Icinga and PagerDuty for alerting.

    Teams at Soundcloud were also reorganised - component teams became feature teams with more vertical responsibility (surprisingly no definite call out for Conway’s Law).

    The second of the three aspects Phil talked about was deployment. Soundcloud moved from a two-pronged delivery pipeline using build and Jenkins where Jenkins ran many sets of tests but did not build the artefacts which would actually breathe deployed, to a singular pipeline of Docker containerisation for unit/integration tests before relegate to source, then Jenkins running a wider set of tests on the latest code, generating packages either for including in an AMI for AWS deployment, or for containerisation to allow developers to flee a ‘mini-soundcloud’ for dev/testing purposes.

    Twitter feedback on this session included:

    @danielbryantuk: People are always migrating to something from Rails @pcalcado on the current #microservice migration trends at #qconlondon

    @philwills: .@pcalcado says at @SoundCloudDev their engineers with a javascript background write scala, so not just us at @gdndevelopers #qconlondon

    @rvedotrc: “When you maintain a monolith, and it breaks overnight, you know where the problem is: it’s in the monolith” @pcalcado #qconlondon

    @markhneedham: They had Scala people getting very confused about JavaScript... #qconlondon @pcalcado

    @tastapod: “Don’t forget companies that open source cloud, monitoring, lservices, etc. got it wrong a bunch of times first!" @pcalcado at #qconlondon

    Operating Microservices

    by Michael Brunton-Spall

    Pere Villega attended this session:

    His talk applied to Microservices understood as 'vertically aligned stacks that communicate via simple and gauge interfaces'. In this context ownership of data matters, you don't want to partake data. Teams own the code, people outside the team don't modify that code. Teams also own the runtime, they choose what they want to use, even Erlang in a supposedly JVM shop. …

    Microservices are [using] Conway's Law. Management and developers esteem them because:

  • small owned services that can breathe updated more often
  • teams can traipse snappily and smash stuff
  • teams can own the all stack
  • On the other hand infrastructure teams scorn them because:

  • small owned services that can breathe updated more often. But changing things breaks things.
  • teams can traipse snappily and smash stuff. Ops want to breathe gradual and stable, avoid breaking things
  • teams can own the all stack. Ops are not required, thus they lose control over security …
  • The best starting point it to just flee 1 Microservice, by itself, successfully. Microservices in the small. You need to:

  • make positive you are able to accomplish it
  • automate your infrastructure (use of containers is not necessary)
  • create a foundation image for your service
  • deploy it fast, with a time-to-server of a few minutes, not hours …
  • You need monitoring tools that are effortless to hook into. …

    You must automate your deployment. It doesn't need to breathe complex, it can breathe as simple as executing a self-contained Jetty, but maintain a log of the deploys done including the commits that were released. And you must give the keys to the development team, as well as root. And give them pagers too: if they smash it, they fix it. But to accomplish that they need replete access….

    At this point point you maintain 1 Microservice running. Now repeated to rep 10, 100, ... Microservices in the large.

    When you maintain many services running, they are going to fail in more spectacular ways than their equivalent monoliths. They are not complicated (like a car), but complicated (like a traffic system) in which the root reason may breathe far in time and space. Due to that, diagnosis tools are a must.

    Twitter feedback on this session included:

    @danielbryantuk: I've never known an ops team who like the phrase 'move snappily and smash things' @bruntonspall on operational microservices at #qconlondon

    @rvedotrc: Ops teams scorn microservices because you can change stuff, and change it without them. @bruntonspall #qconlondon

    @jabley: lservices as a pass of subverting Conway's Law and redesigning your organisation – spirited concept from @bruntonspall #qconlondon

    @danielbryantuk: Simple, complicated, complicated <- everyone microservice architectures are complex! @bruntonspall on complexity at #qconlondon

    @markhneedham: We're structure the new legacy services #qconlondon @bruntonspall http://t.co/piNTvakhmc

    @kronk2002de: Operations teams should act more like consultants @bruntonspall #qconlondon

    @V_Formicola: The first person pays the price, the next will pave the road, the following will maintain a road to walk on. @bruntonspall #qconlondon

    @danielbryantuk: notice at the 90th, 95th and 99th percentile when dealing with microservice telemetry <- this stuff matters at scale #qconlondon

    Protocols of Interaction: Best Current Practices

    by Todd Montgomery

    Will Hamill attended this session:

    Todd began by describing some of the issues of service communication that can breathe observed and sometimes addressed in protocols. Data loss, duplication and reordering as the most common issues tackled and can chance even in protocols portrayed as ‘reliable’. In TCP, for example, connections can breathe closed or traffic interfered with by proxies.

    In request/response synchronous comms, throughput is limited by the round trip time for each communication multiplied by the number of requests. Asynchronous communication can reduce this to closer to the round trip time for a sole communication but responses require correlation to original requests and this therefore adds complexity. Ordering of messages is an illusory guarantee, as the compiler, runtime environment and CPU can change ordering in true terms, so ordering is imposed upon events by the protocol….

    In scenarios when multiple recipients are sent the very data set, if each recipient requests a retransmit of a different Part of the data set, it will reason a retransmit of the entire set even if between them the entire set was accepted - a common problem when distributing loads across horizontally scaled consumers. Solving this is non-trivial, and Todd recommends a combination of patience, and waiting to listen for viable retransmit requests from everyone recipients. …

    For queue management, Todd recommends using a bound total queue length and using back pressure or even dropping messages to ensure minimisation of the queue contents. Extended queue lengths leads to ‘buffer bloat’ and delays between services (large queues between work states being a reason of delays should breathe known to anyone close with queuing or ToC).

    Todd concluded by summarising that existing protocols such as TCP, Aeron and SRM, are replete of patterns for tackling complicated communications problems, and that they should notice to how others maintain solved these problems when working on their own systems.

    Pere Villega attended this session:

    Protocol definition matters. Protocols not only define how they format and handle data, they also define how accomplish they interact with something. Protocols of interaction matter much more now that they are embracing Microservices, and they are a worthy solution for many of the problems raised by them. Internet (in fact, any network) is an hostile environment were data can breathe lost, duplicated, reordered, etc. And TCP is not a safeguard from those issues. They will happen.

    The main takeaway of the talk: Protocols are a wealthy source of solutions to complicated problems.

    How They Build Rock-solid Apps and maintain 100M+ Users fortunate at Shazam

    by Savvas Dalkitsis & Iordanis Giannakakis

    Twitter feedback on this session included:

    @IsraKaos: Test first, they institute is actually easier @iordanis_g @geeky_android Now even in Android!! #qconlondon

    @RogerSuffling: #Shazam and how to accomplish rock solid builds. cheerful to survey testing is central #qconlondon http://t.co/AsDwh2LbEt

    @trisha_gee: I actually institute the code version of the test easier to understand than the user story! @geeky_android at #qconlondon http://t.co/VkztZDl3aT

    @trisha_gee: Unit tests that capture 3 or 4 seconds to flee are not acceptable @geeky_android at #qconlondon

    @trisha_gee: Cognitive load is lower when you don't utilize a DI framework in Android - @iordanis_g at #qconlondon

    @trisha_gee: The power of manual testing comes in when you're trying to accomplish things like check your animations are smooth @iordanis_g at #qconlondon

    Tales from Making Mobile Games

    by Jesper Richter-Reichhelm

    Twitter feedback on this session included:

    @IsraKaos: With 20 internal teams (2-32) if one fail it's just one. But when 1 succeeds, everyone 20 can benefit from it @jrirei #qconlondon

    @trisha_gee: Feature switching useful not just for A/B testing to survey what's effective, but also to circle off features with bugs @jrirei at #qconlondon

    @IsraKaos: While they waited for the iOS version to breathe approved, the Android guys released 8 times in their timehonored cycle Hehehehehe @jrirei #qconlondon

    @JanSabbe: I esteem Apple, but... I'm starting to esteem Android even more @jrirei #qconlondon

    @ellispritchard: Apple loosing esteem to Android due to lack of staged roll-out/slow iteration #qconlondon

    Infrastructure Built in Go

    by Jessie Frazelle

    Will Hamill attended this session:

    Jessie began with giving an overview of what Docker is and what it’s for: a runtime for application containers, which are a subset of Linux kernel features such as namespaces, cgroups and pivots. Docker allows you to ‘containerise’ your application and succumb a fully static binary containing everyone dependencies, giving ease of installation and deployment. This can breathe as basic as scp the container to the target server and bootstrap the binary. Jessie also informed us that Docker uphold would breathe coming to Windows, which would bring the lineup to four main platforms (the others being Darwin, BSD Unix and Linux).

    Jessie also described a distributed message platform in proceed called NSQ which is used to assist scale the Docker project in a number of ways. NSQ is used by the build app amenable for listening to GitHub hooks to trigger builds and deployments, used by the Docker master binary build to flee on every thrust to the master branch, and used by the app which automates structure and publishing docs from the code. The team at Docker rewrote a Python-based Jenkins plugin in proceed to wield the haul requests, which also uses NSQ to discharge housekeeping such as checking for signed commits, labels and documentation comments.

    The proceed language was chosen by the Docker team for a number of reasons: it’s simple, has common useful tools such asfmt, vet, lint, and others for documentation and tests. Some of the issues they institute when using proceed were in package versioning across the teams and inconsistency in approaches to this. The proceed test framework is also quiet basic and not as fully-featured as those in other languages (like JUnit for example) and so lacks some useful aspects such as setup and teardown step definitions. The proceed community is also smaller than that of other languages and as a result is quiet helpful, friendly and comparatively drama-free.

    Twitter feedback on this session included:

    @paulacwalter: A container is a magical thing that doesn't really exist  in the wild. @frazelledazzell #qconlondon

    @csanchez: proceed is a neutral language, not like Java. It's the Switzerland of languages @frazelledazzell #qconlondon http://t.co/cD2q3SHsnf

    Microservices, Micro Deployments and Devops

    by Alois Reitbauer

    Sebastian Bruckner attended this session:

    An advanced micro service talk with the focus on creating resilient, changeable services and how to operate them. Especially his anti- or problem patterns in a micro service architecture were very interesting.

  • The Gatekeeper – Many outgoing dependencies
  • likely not very “micro”
  • complex application logic
  • very deployment sensitive
  • Single Point of Failure – Many incoming dependencies
  • central application service
  • very delicate to scaling
  • user facing impact
  • Hub – Many incoming and outgoing dependencies
  • the worst thing to happen
  • “legacy” migration
  • highest deployment risk
  • Sebastian Bruckner attended the microservices open space:

    Every track on the QCon had a slot with an open space. An open space doesn’t maintain a prepared talk but several slots where the attendees can promote topics they are interested in and want to talk about. The microservice open space was the first and only open space I attended at QCon. The topics were surprisingly advanced, I really enjoyed it. I can only recommend you to try this format.

    Impressions expressed on Twitter included:

    @stealthness: Day 1 of #QConlondon 2015 and the QEII Conference hub had build over since last. Looking very silken and modern. http://t.co/WMRCpGNvpp

    @QuackingPlums: #qconlondon is worth it every year just for this view… http://t.co/dDD5CPj51O

    @V_Formicola: Positively impressed by the % of women at #qconlondon, the most I maintain ever seen at a technology conference! Are things finally changing?

    @lauracowen: #qconlondon accomplish some very trustworthy food. Nom http://t.co/CK8CSHdxJf

    Ben Basson’s takeaways were:

    It seems like a lot of teams are struggling to properly implement agile practices, and I'm cheerful to survey that I'm not the only one who has experienced some of these problems over the terminal few years. I got a lot of food for thought, but what I institute worthy about QCon was the focus not only on ideas, but how to sell them and the true business benefits behind these improvements in working practices.

    Takeaways from QCon London included:

    @fotuzlab: structure software is not like structure a house, it’s like town planning #qconlondon

    @_angelos: Observing #qconlondon, I rep the emotion much of software engineering is about automating what exists, not inventing what isn’t there.

    @Helenislovely: This all conference is like an index of things I don't know but should. trustworthy coz I like learning but also overwhelming! #qconlondon

    @Yann_G: How to maintain running the romance w. Agile in a team? Fresh air comes from the outside! send teams to conferences! #qconlondon

    @solsila: Main #qconlondon themes this year? Culture, Microservices, DevOps, Docker... and cats.

    @rolios: Firebase, microservices at The guardian and at Soundcloud, protocols, rxjava on Android, Aeron. terminal day at #qconlondon was huge. The end!

    @bencochez: Almost home after a week at #qconlondon. A truly inspiring experience.

    @portiatung: @rkasper #qconlondon Thanks for the worthy facilitation of the open spaces!

    The ninth annual QCon London brought together over 1,100 attendees - including more than 100 speakers – who are disseminating innovation in software development projects across the enterprise. QCon's focus on practitioner-driven content is reflected in the fact that the program committee that selects the talks and speakers is itself comprised of technical practitioners from the software development community.

    As well as being notable for its size this QCon represented another milestone. InfoQ.com & Trifork maintain brought you QCon London in partnership since 2005. Now InfoQ is acquiring Trifork's interest in QCon London. Trifork runs GOTO conference in Chicago, Amsterdam, Copenhagen, Berlin, as well as Scala Days & FlowCon. Going forward, London will host two separately flee conferences, reflecting the two companies’ different visions for how to flee developer conferences:

  • QCon London: 3 days conf, 2 days tutorial - March 7-11 2016 - 1,200 attendees. flee by InfoQ.com who runs QCon San Francisco, New York, Sao Paolo, Rio, Beijing, Shanghai, Tokyo.
  • GOTO London: 2 days conf, 2 days tutorial - September 14-17 2015 - 450 attendees. flee by Trifork, who runs GOTO Aarhus, Amsterdam, Chicago, Berlin, Copenhagen, FlowCon, Scala days.
  • The two companies remain friends and Trifork maintains an equity stake in InfoQ's operating company C4Media Inc. The two conferences will cooperate and co-promote each other for the next few years.

    The next English language QCon is New York starting on June 8th, followed by San Francisco on November 16th. QCon London will revert on 7-11 March 2016.


    Marriages Made In Heaven | killexams.com true questions and Pass4sure dumps

    Marriages Made In Heaven

    By using this website you are consenting to the utilize of cookies. Electronics Weekly is owned by Metropolis International Group Limited, a member of the Metropolis Group; you can view their privacy and cookies policy here.

    Accept


    Direct Download of over 5500 Certification Exams

    3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Aruba [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Avaya [101 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CA-Technologies [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CheckPoint [43 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
    College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institute [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CyberArk [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DELL [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECCouncil [22 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    EMC [128 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fortinet [14 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HP [752 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBM [1533 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Juniper [65 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Medical [68 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Microsoft [375 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCLEX [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
    OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Oracle [282 Certification Exam(s) ]
    P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Real Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Symantec [135 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]





    References :


    Issu : https://issuu.com/trutrainers/docs/p8010-034
    Dropmark : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/11373754
    Wordpress : http://wp.me/p7SJ6L-cu
    weSRCH : https://www.wesrch.com/business/prpdfBU1HWO000PBGW
    Scribd : https://www.scribd.com/document/356684945/Pass4sure-P8010-034-Practice-Tests-with-Real-Questions
    Dropmark-Text : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/11997810
    Youtube : https://youtu.be/UKdg0pjpyD4
    Blogspot : http://killexams-braindumps.blogspot.com/2017/10/pass4sure-p8010-034-tealeaf-technical.html
    Vimeo : https://vimeo.com/239419781
    RSS Feed : http://feeds.feedburner.com/IbmP8010-034DumpsAndPracticeTestsWithRealQuestions
    publitas.com : https://view.publitas.com/trutrainers-inc/p8010-034-pdflooking-for-p8010-034-exam-dumps-that-works-in-real-exam
    Google+ : https://plus.google.com/112153555852933435691/posts/6HX86ax3onq?hl=en
    Calameo : http://en.calameo.com/account/book#
    Box.net : https://app.box.com/s/6ikrvm3s228qoajhfyqwwdl7v8s0xzvj
    zoho.com : https://docs.zoho.com/file/5bym277750a35422c453398ac69c093460f75
    coursehero.com : "Excle"






    Back to Main Page





    Killexams P8010-034 exams | Killexams P8010-034 cert | Pass4Sure P8010-034 questions | Pass4sure P8010-034 | pass-guaratee P8010-034 | best P8010-034 test preparation | best P8010-034 training guides | P8010-034 examcollection | killexams | killexams P8010-034 review | killexams P8010-034 legit | kill P8010-034 example | kill P8010-034 example journalism | kill exams P8010-034 reviews | kill exam ripoff report | review P8010-034 | review P8010-034 quizlet | review P8010-034 login | review P8010-034 archives | review P8010-034 sheet | legitimate P8010-034 | legit P8010-034 | legitimacy P8010-034 | legitimation P8010-034 | legit P8010-034 check | legitimate P8010-034 program | legitimize P8010-034 | legitimate P8010-034 business | legitimate P8010-034 definition | legit P8010-034 site | legit online banking | legit P8010-034 website | legitimacy P8010-034 definition | >pass 4 sure | pass for sure | p4s | pass4sure certification | pass4sure exam | IT certification | IT Exam | P8010-034 material provider | pass4sure login | pass4sure P8010-034 exams | pass4sure P8010-034 reviews | pass4sure aws | pass4sure P8010-034 security | pass4sure cisco | pass4sure coupon | pass4sure P8010-034 dumps | pass4sure cissp | pass4sure P8010-034 braindumps | pass4sure P8010-034 test | pass4sure P8010-034 torrent | pass4sure P8010-034 download | pass4surekey | pass4sure cap | pass4sure free | examsoft | examsoft login | exams | exams free | examsolutions | exams4pilots | examsoft download | exams questions | examslocal | exams practice |

    www.pass4surez.com | www.killcerts.com | www.search4exams.com | http://morganstudioonline.com/


    <

    MORGAN Studio

    is specialized in Architectural visualization , Industrial visualization , 3D Modeling ,3D Animation , Entertainment and Visual Effects .