Find us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter

Worried about P2050-007 test? We are here for help! | brain dumps | 3D Visualization

Complete Pass4sure q&a set is provided with VCE - examcollection and braindumps PDF questions and braindumps are recently updated - brain dumps - 3D Visualization

Pass4sure P2050-007 dumps | P2050-007 actual questions |

P2050-007 IBM Optimization Technical Mastery Test v1

Study steer Prepared by IBM Dumps Experts P2050-007 Dumps and actual Questions

100% actual Questions - Exam Pass Guarantee with high Marks - Just Memorize the Answers

P2050-007 exam Dumps Source : IBM Optimization Technical Mastery Test v1

Test Code : P2050-007
Test title : IBM Optimization Technical Mastery Test v1
Vendor title : IBM
: 30 actual Questions

Where can I obtain befriend to prepare and pass P2050-007 exam?
i used to live trapped in the involved subjects handiest 12 earlier days the exam P2050-007. Whats greater it becomeextremely useful, as the quick solutions may live effortlessly remembered inside 10 days. I scored 91%, endeavoring All questions in due time. To store my planning, i was energetically looking down a few speedy reference. It aided me a top notch deal. by no means thought it can live so compelling! At that point, by means of one mode or some other I came to reckon Dumps.

wherein should I searching for to obtain P2050-007 actual test questions?
If you necessity to change your destiny and invent sure that happiness is your destiny, you want to toil hard. Working tough on my own isnt always enough to obtain to future, you want some direction a agreeable way to lead you in the direction of the path. It possess become destiny that i discovered this in the direction of my exams as it lead me towards my fate. My future become getting perquisite grades and this and its teachers made it viable my coaching they so well that I couldnt in All likelihood fail with the aid of giving me the material for my P2050-007 exam.

consider it or no longer, simply try as soon as!
I used this dump to skip the P2050-007 exam in Romania and were given 98%, so this is a very agreeable way to Place togetherfor the exam. All questions I were given on the exam were exactly what had provided on this brainsell off, which is extraordinary I notably recommend this to anyone in case you are going to select P2050-007 exam.

It is considerable to possess P2050-007 actual test questions.
This is a gift from for All the candidates to obtain latest study materials for P2050-007 exam. All the members of are doing a considerable job and ensuring success of candidates in P2050-007 exams. I passed the P2050-007 exam just because I used materials.

How long prep is needed to pass P2050-007 exam?
Very tremendous P2050-007 exam education questions answers, I handed P2050-007 exam this month. could live very reliable. I didnt assume that braindumps possess to obtain you this excessive, however now that i possess passed my P2050-007 exam, I understand that is greater than a sell off. offers you what you necessity to pass your P2050-007 exam, and additionally lets in you test matters you may want. Yet, it offers you best what you really necessity to understand, saving it tedious and electricity. i possess passed P2050-007 exam and now recommend to each person available.

put together P2050-007 Questions and answers in any other case live organized to fail.
I passed P2050-007 exam. way to Killexams. The exam will live very hard, and that i dont recognise how lengthy itd select me to prepare by myself. questions are very smooth to memorize, and the fanciful fragment is that they are actual and correct. So you essentially pass in expertise what youll behold on your exam. So long as you skip this complicated exam and placed your P2050-007 certification to your resume.

real exam questions of P2050-007 exam! Awesome Source.
Some nicely men cant convey an alteration to the worlds manner but theyre capable of considerable permit you to know whether you possess were given been the simplest man who knew a manner to Do that and that i necessity to live regarded in this international and invent my own stamp and i possess been so lame my entire way but I recognize now that I desired to obtain a pass in my P2050-007 and this may invent me celebrated perhaps and yes i am brief of glory but passing my A+ test with became my morning and night glory.

wherein possess to I seek to obtain P2050-007 actual select a study at questions?
Terrific stuff for P2050-007 exam which has actually helped me pass. i possess been dreaming about the P2050-007 profession for a while, but might moreover want to by no means invent time to study and actually obtain licensed. As a total lot as i was tired of books and publications, I couldnt invent time and simply test. The ones P2050-007 made exam training definitely realistic. I even managed to test in my vehicle while the disburse of to work. The handy layout, and yes, the sorting out engine is as top because the net web page claims it is and the accurate P2050-007 questions possess helped me obtain my dream certification.

those P2050-007 questions and solutions works within the actual test.
I became approximately to capitulation exam P2050-007 because I wasnt assured in whether or not I could pass or no longer. With just a week ultimate I decided to exchange to QA for my exam preparation. Never concept that the subjects that I had always avoid away from might live so much fun to observe; its cleanly and brief way of getting to the factors made my practise lot less complicated. All thanks to QA, I never view I could skip my exam but I did pass with flying shades.

Did you tried this wonderful supply present day actual test questions.
Fine one, it made the P2050-007 smooth for me. I used and handed my P2050-007 exam.

IBM IBM Optimization Technical Mastery

IT Sourcing Market is Booming global | Accenture, IBM, Cisco techniques, CA technologies, HP, considerable systems, Synnex | actual Questions and Pass4sure dumps

Feb 08, 2019 (Heraldkeeper by way of COMTEX) -- a novel analysis doc is brought in HTF MI database of 200 pages, titled as ‘global IT Sourcing Market measurement examine, via services (utility construction, net development, application assist and administration, support Desk, Database construction and administration, Telecommunication), via cease clients (executive, BFSI, Telecom, Others), and Regional Forecasts 2018-2025′ with inescapable evaluation, aggressive landscape, forecast and strategies. The examine covers geographic analysis that comprises areas dote North the us, South the united states, Asia, Europe & Others and significant gamers/vendors equivalent to Accenture, IBM organisation, Cisco programs, CA technologies, HP employer, high-quality programs, Synnex employer, Dell applied sciences. The document will support you profit market insights, future traits and growth possibilities for forecast length of 2018 - 2025.

Request a sample document @

international IT Sourcing Market valued approximately USD xxx million in 2017 is expected to develop with a appropriate growth cost of more than xxx% over the forecast length 2018-2025. The IT Sourcing is setting up and increasing at a colossal pace. The assistance technology (IT) outsourcing is exactly observed the sub-contracting of selected functions or to pursue supplies outdoor an commercial enterprise for All or someone fragment of an IT feature which wouldn't possess tons of technical talents. The brief-term suggestions or the more cost-effective prices on essential assignment are the leading reasons why agencies operating in the latest situation outsource work. The Outsourcing procedure allows staffing flexibility for an commercial enterprise along with permits them to usher in additional substances as and when required & additional unlock them when they're accomplished, hence pleasing the cyclic or seasonal demand. The IT outsourcing market is primarily driven owing to escalating should optimize company strategies, surging integration of software outsourcing and means optimization due to the fact the international situation of affairs.

Get Customization within the record, Enquire Now @ at-by way of-functions

The leading market gamers certainly consist of-AccentureIBM CorporationCisco SystemsCA TechnologiesHP CorporationQuality SystemsSynnex CorporationDell technologies

The purpose of the study at is to define market sizes of distinctive segments & international locations in recent years and to forecast the values to the arriving eight years. The file is designed to incorporate both qualitative and quantitative points of the trade within each of the areas and international locations concerned within the examine. moreover, the record additionally caters the unique tips in regards to the crucial features akin to riding components & challenges so they can silhouette the future boom of the market. additionally, the file shall moreover hold available alternatives in micro markets for stakeholders to invent investments together with the particular analysis of aggressive panorama and product choices of key avid gamers. The targeted segments and sub-segment of the market are defined beneath:

by using features:application DevelopmentWeb DevelopmentApplication aid and ManagementHelp DeskDatabase construction and ManagementTelecommunication

by using conclusion users:GovernmentBFSITelecomOthers

via regions:North AmericaEuropeAsia PacificLatin AmericaRest of the area

moreover, years considered for the anatomize are as follows:

historic yr - 2015, 2016Base year - 2017Forecast period - 2018 to 2025

target audience of the global IT Sourcing Market in Market study at:Key Consulting businesses & AdvisorsLarge, medium-sized, and tiny enterprisesVenture capitalistsValue-delivered Resellers (VARs)Third-birthday celebration learning providersInvestment bankersInvestors

buy this file @

desk OF CONTENTSChapter 1. world IT Sourcing Market Definition and Scope1.1. analysis Objective1.2. Market Definition1.three. Scope of The Study1.four. Years regarded for The Study1.5. currency Conversion Rates1.6. document LimitationChapter 2. analysis Methodology2.1. research Process2.1.1. data Mining2.1.2. Analysis2.1.three. Market Estimation2.1.four. Validation2.1.5. Publishing2.2. analysis AssumptionChapter three. executive Summary3.1. international & Segmental Market Estimates & Forecasts, 2015-2025 (USD Billion)three.2. Key TrendsChapter four. world IT Sourcing Market Dynamics4.1. boom Prospects4.1.1. Drivers4.1.2. Restraints4.1.3. Opportunities4.2. industry Analysis4.2.1. Porter's 5 drive Model4.2.2. PEST Analysis4.2.3. value Chain Analysis4.three. Analyst recommendation & ConclusionChapter 5. world IT Sourcing Market, by way of Services5.1. Market Snapshot5.2. Market efficiency – handicap Model5.three. international IT Sourcing Market, Sub segment Analysis5.3.1. utility Development5.3.1.1. Market estimates & forecasts, 2015-2025 (USD Billion)….persisted

View designated table of content material @

It’s vital you preserve your market talents up so far. when you've got a special set of gamers/producers in keeping with geography or needs regional or country segmented studies they can deliver customization as a result.

IBM: an extended Work-In-development | actual Questions and Pass4sure dumps

No influence discovered, are trying novel keyword!even so, looking from the technical charting standpoint ... the SVP and CFO of IBM, said in the earnings convoke that the industry has been searching for to help its "group of workers optimization productivity ...

IBM’s mode to deliver machine gaining learning of Capabilities to data Scientists All over | actual Questions and Pass4sure dumps

Hillary Hunter is an IBM Fellow.

Over at the IBM weblog, IBM Fellow Hillary Hunter writes that the enterprise anticipates that the realm’s volume of digital data will exceed 44 zettabytes, an surprising number. As firms start to understand the gigantic, untapped abilities of facts, they necessity to find a mode to select handicap of it. Enter AI.

IBM has worked to build the industry’s most complete records science platform. built-in with NVIDIA GPUs and application designed above All for AI and probably the most data-intensive workloads, IBM has infused AI into offerings that consumers can entry despite their deployment mannequin. nowadays, they select the next step in that event in asserting the next evolution of their collaboration with NVIDIA. They mode to leverage their novel data science toolkit, RAPIDS, across their portfolio in order that their clients can enhance the performance of laptop studying and statistics analytics.

Plans to advertise GPU-accelerated computing device discovering consist of:

  • IBM POWER9 with PowerAI: to leverage RAPIDS to extend the alternate options accessible to records scientists with novel open source desktop discovering and analytics libraries. Accelerated workloads were confirmed to obtain a perquisite away handicap from the unique engineering that NVIDIA and IBM possess achieved around POWER9, including integration of NVIDIA NVLink and NVIDIA Tesla GPUs. PowerAI is IBM’s software layer, which optimizes how today’s records science and AI workloads avoid on these heterogeneous computing techniques. Their goal is for this improved performance trajectory for GPU-accelerated workloads on POWER9 to proceed with RAPIDS.
  • IBM Watson Studio and IBM Watson laptop getting to know: to select learning of the vigor of NVIDIA GPUs so that records scientists and AI developers can construct, deploy, and avoid quicker models than CPU-best deployments in their AI purposes in a multicloud ambiance with IBM Cloud deepest for data and IBM Cloud.
  • IBM Cloud: to clients who select machines geared up with GPUs as a way to practice accelerated laptop researching and analytics libraries in RAPIDS to their cloud applications and faucet into the merits of desktop gaining learning of.
  • IBM and NVIDIA’s shut collaboration through the years has helped leading agencies and groups All over the world wield one of the world’s biggest issues,” referred to Ian Buck, vice chairman and well-liked supervisor of Accelerated Computing at NVIDIA. “Now, with IBM taking talents of RAPIDS open-source libraries announced today by NVIDIA, GPU accelerated desktop researching is coming to facts scientists, assisting them anatomize huge facts for insights quicker than ever possible earlier than. Recognizing the computing energy that AI would need, IBM changed into an early intimate of statistics-centric methods. This strategy led us to deliver the GPU-outfitted zenith system, the realm’s strongest supercomputer, and already researchers are seeing massive returns. previous within the 12 months, they established the talents for GPUs to accelerate machine learning once they confirmed how GPU-accelerated laptop getting to know on IBM power systems AC922 servers set a new hurry list with a 46x improvement over previous consequences.

    on account of IBM’s dedication to bringing accelerated AI to users across the expertise spectrum, live they users of on-premises, public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud environments, the company is placed to bring RAPIDS to clients regardless of how they are looking to entry them.

    Hillery Hunter is an IBM Fellow and CTO of Infrastructure in the IBM Hybrid Cloud company. just before this function, she served as Director of Accelerated Cognitive Infrastructure in IBM analysis, main a crew doing cross-stack (hardware through application) optimization of AI workloads, producing productivity breakthroughs of 40x and more suitable which were transferred into IBM product choices. Her technical pastimes possess at All times been interdisciplinary, spanning from silicon expertise through device utility, and she has served in technical and management roles in reminiscence technology, techniques for AI, and other areas. She is a member of the IBM Academy of technology.

    sign in for their insideHPC e-newsletter

    Whilst it is very difficult stint to choose amenable exam questions / answers resources regarding review, reputation and validity because people obtain ripoff due to choosing incorrect service. Killexams. com invent it inescapable to provide its clients far better to their resources with respect to exam dumps update and validity. Most of other peoples ripoff report complaint clients Come to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams enjoyably and easily. They never compromise on their review, reputation and character because killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams client self self-confidence is vital to All of us. Specially they manage review, reputation, ripoff report complaint, trust, validity, report and scam. If perhaps you behold any bogus report posted by their competitor with the title killexams ripoff report complaint internet, ripoff report, scam, complaint or something dote this, just withhold in irony that there are always spoiled people damaging reputation of agreeable services due to their benefits. There are a big number of satisfied customers that pass their exams using brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams practice questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit, their test questions and sample brain dumps, their exam simulator and you will definitely know that is the best brain dumps site.

    Back to Braindumps Menu

    000-M04 practice test | HH0-450 braindumps | HP0-633 practice test | HP0-Y52 dump | 000-M68 cram | PgMP free pdf | C2090-422 study guide | 4H0-533 practice questions | 642-241 VCE | ST0-192 study guide | 190-829 practice Test | 200-401 dumps questions | 1Z0-880 test prep | 000-130 test prep | 000-934 practice exam | 000-N55 dumps | 000-R13 exam prep | HP2-Z16 free pdf download | 1Z0-064 questions answers | 000-783 brain dumps |

    Free Pass4sure P2050-007 question bank
    We possess Tested and Approved P2050-007 Exams deem about aides and brain dumps. gives the remedy and latest actual questions with braindumps which basically hold All data that you possess to pass the P2050-007 exam. With the steer of their P2050-007 exam materials, you dont necessity to misuse your chance on scrutinizing reference books however just necessity to consume 10-20 hours to retain their P2050-007 actual questions and answers.

    IBM P2050-007 Exam has given another bearing to the IT business. It is currently required to certify as the stage which prompts a brighter future. live that as it may, you possess to Place extraordinary exertion in IBM IBM Optimization Technical Mastery Test v1 exam, in light of the fact that there is no avoid out of perusing. possess made your easy, now your exam planning for P2050-007 IBM Optimization Technical Mastery Test v1 isnt vehement any longer. Click Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
    WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for All exams on website
    PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
    DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
    DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders
    As, the is a solid and amenable stage who furnishes P2050-007 exam questions with 100% pass guarantee. You possess to hone questions for at least one day at any rate to score well in the exam. Your actual trip to success in P2050-007 exam, really begins with exam questions that is the magnificent and checked wellspring of your focused on position.

    The first-class approach to obtain accomplishment inside the IBM P2050-007 exam is that you possess to gather solid braindumps. They guarantee that is the most extreme direct pathway toward affirming IBM IBM Optimization Technical Mastery Test v1 exam. You might live inescapable with replete actuality. You can behold free questions at sooner than you purchase the P2050-007 exam contraptions. Their brain dumps are in various determination the same As the actual exam format. The questions and answers made through the certified experts. They deem of the delight in of stepping through the actual exam. 100% guarantee to pass the P2050-007 actual check. IBM Certification examine distributions are setup by utilizing IT authorities. Clusters of understudies possess been whimpering that too much several questions in such colossal quantities of tutoring tests and study helpers, and they're of late exhausted to control the expense of any additional. Seeing pros practice session this colossal shape while still certification that All the data is anchored after significant examinations and exam. Everything is to invent relief for rivalry on their road to certification.

    We possess Tested and Approved P2050-007 Exams. offers the remedy and latest IT exam materials which for All intents and purposes involve All data centers. With the steer of their P2050-007 brain dumps, you don't ought to consume your plausibility on scrutinizing actual piece of reference books and essentially necessity to consume 10-20 hours to expert their P2050-007 actual questions and answers. Additionally, they supply you with PDF Version and Software Version exam questions and answers. For Software Version materials, Its introduced to give indistinguishable sustain from the IBM P2050-007 exam in a actual environment.

    We supply free updates. Inside authenticity term, if P2050-007 brain dumps that you possess purchased updated, they will imply you by electronic mail to down load most current model of . if you don't pass your IBM IBM Optimization Technical Mastery Test v1 exam, They will give you finish discount. You necessity to dispatch the verified propagation of your P2050-007 exam record card to us. Resulting to keeping up, they can quickly deem of replete REFUND.

    In the occasion which you prepare for the IBM P2050-007 exam utilizing their testing programming program. It is whatever anyway vehement to live triumphant for All certifications inside the most essential endeavor. You don't necessity to deal with All dumps or any free deluge/rapidshare All stuff. They give free demo of every IT Certification Dumps. You can view the interface, question superb and solace of their training evaluations sooner than you purchase. Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
    WC2017: 60% Discount Coupon for All exams on website
    PROF17: 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
    DEAL17: 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
    DECSPECIAL: 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders

    P2050-007 Practice Test | P2050-007 examcollection | P2050-007 VCE | P2050-007 study guide | P2050-007 practice exam | P2050-007 cram

    Killexams 000-370 dumps | Killexams 000-M229 dumps questions | Killexams A2090-730 study guide | Killexams 1Z0-134 bootcamp | Killexams 9L0-837 braindumps | Killexams 70-743 dump | Killexams 000-894 actual questions | Killexams 190-802 practice exam | Killexams 310-301 braindumps | Killexams ANP-BC practice questions | Killexams 1Y0-371 study guide | Killexams 2D00056A test prep | Killexams C2090-320 actual questions | Killexams HP0-M22 practice test | Killexams P3OF free pdf | Killexams HP0-255 braindumps | Killexams 1Z0-934 cram | Killexams HC-224 brain dumps | Killexams 190-702 exam prep | Killexams 000-038 VCE | huge List of Exam Braindumps

    View Complete list of Brain dumps

    Killexams LOT-922 test questions | Killexams 000-M41 questions and answers | Killexams CPP practice test | Killexams 310-303 practice questions | Killexams 156-515 test prep | Killexams 650-177 practice exam | Killexams NS0-150 free pdf | Killexams Adwords-Display exam questions | Killexams HP0-Y15 free pdf | Killexams 1Z1-591 dumps | Killexams 00M-624 practice test | Killexams 600-455 test prep | Killexams 920-240 study guide | Killexams 1Z0-449 practice Test | Killexams 920-450 sample test | Killexams 70-523-CSharp pdf download | Killexams 000-175 practice test | Killexams A4040-124 actual questions | Killexams 1Z0-597 VCE | Killexams 310-052 bootcamp |

    IBM Optimization Technical Mastery Test v1

    Pass 4 sure P2050-007 dumps | P2050-007 actual questions |

    Unfriendly Skies: Predicting Flight Cancellations Using Weather Data, fragment 2 | actual questions and Pass4sure dumps

    Ricardo Balduino and Tim Bohn

    Early Flight, Creative Commons Introduction

    As they described in fragment 1 of this series, their objective is to befriend call the probability of the cancellation of a flight between two of the ten U.S. airports most affected by weather conditions. They disburse historical flights data and historical weather data to invent predictions for upcoming flights.

    Over the course of this four-part series, they disburse different platforms to befriend us with those predictions. Here in fragment 2, they disburse the IBM SPSS Modeler and APIs from The Weather Company.

    Tools used in this disburse case solution

    IBM SPSS Modeler is designed to befriend determine patterns and trends in structured and unstructured data with an intuitive visual interface supported by advanced analytics. It provides a ambit of advanced algorithms and analysis techniques, including text analytics, entity analytics, determination management and optimization to deliver insights in near real-time. For this disburse case, they used SPSS Modeler 18.1 to create a visual representation of the solution, or in SPSS terms, a stream. That’s right — not one line of code was written in the making of this blog.

    We moreover used The Weather Company APIs to retrieve historical weather data for the ten airports over the year 2016. IBM SPSS Modeler supports calling the weather APIs from within a stream. That is accomplished by adding extensions to SPSS, available in the IBM SPSS Predictive Analytics resources page, a.k.a. Extensions Hub.

    A proposed solution

    In this blog, they submit one possible solution for this problem. It’s not meant to live the only or the best possible solution, or a production-level solution for that matter, but the discussion presented here covers the typical iterative process (described in the sections below) that helps us accumulate insights and refine the predictive model across iterations. They hearten the readers to try and Come up with different solutions, and provide us with your feedback for future blogs.

    Business and data understanding

    The first step of the iterative process includes understanding and gathering the data needed to train and test their model later.

    Flights data — We gathered 2016 flights data from the US Bureau of Transportation Statistics website. The website allows us to export one month at a time, so they ended up with 12 csv (comma separated value) files. They used IBM SPSS Modeler to merge All the csv files into one set and to select the ten airports in their scope. Some data clean-up and formatting was done to validate dates and hours for each flight, as seen in device 1.

    Figure 1 — gathering and preparing flights data in IBM SPSS Modeler

    Weather data — From the Extensions Hub, they added the TWCHistoricalGridded extension to SPSS Modeler, which made the extension available as a node in the tool. That node took a csv file listing the 10 airports latitude and longitude coordinates as input, and generated the historical hourly data for the entire year of 2016, for each airport location, as seen in device 2.

    Figure 2 — gathering and preparing weather data in IBM SPSS Modeler

    Combined flights and weather data — To each flight in the first data set, they added two novel columns: inception and DEST, containing the respective airport codes. Next, flight data and the weather data were merged together. Note: the “stars” or SPSS super nodes in device 3 are placeholders for the diagrams in Figures 1 and 2 above.

    Figure 3 — combining flights and weather data in IBM SPSS Modeler Data preparation, modeling, and evaluation

    We iteratively performed the following steps until the desired model qualities were reached:

    · Prepare data

    · perform modeling

    · Evaluate the model

    · Repeat

    Figure 4 shows the first and second iterations of their process in IBM SPSS Modeler.

    Figure 4 — iterations: prepare data, avoid models, evaluate — and Do it again First iteration

    To start preparing the data, they used the combined flights and weather data from the previous step and performed some data cleanup (e.g. took supervision of null values). In order to better train the model later on, they filtered out rows where flight cancellations were not related to weather conditions (e.g. cancellations due to technical issues, security issues, etc.)

    Figure 5 — imbalanced data institute in their input data set

    This is an smart disburse case, and often a difficult one to solve, due to the imbalanced data it presents, as seen in device 5. By “imbalanced” they imply that there were far more non-cancelled flights in the historical data than cancelled ones. They will discuss how they dealt with imbalanced data in the following iteration.

    Next, they defined which features were required as inputs to the model (such as flight date, hour, day of the week, inception and destination airport codes, and weather conditions), and which one was the target to live generated by the model (i.e. call the cancellation status). They then partitioned the data into training and testing sets, using an 85/15 ratio.

    The partitioned data was fed into an SPSS node called Auto Classifier. This node allowed us to avoid multiple models at once and preview their outputs, such as the district under the ROC curve, as seen in device 6.

    Figure 6 — models output provided by the Auto Classifier node

    That was a useful step in making an initial selection of a model for further refinement during subsequent iterations. They decided to disburse the Random Trees model since the initial analysis showed it has the best district under the curve as compared to the other models in the list.

    Second iteration

    During the second iteration, they addressed the skewedness of the original data. For that purpose, they chose one of the SPSS nodes called SMOTE (Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique). This node provides an advanced over-sampling algorithm that deals with imbalanced datasets, which helped their selected model toil more effectively.

    Figure 7 — distribution of cancelled and non-cancelled flights after using SMOTE

    In device 7, they notice a more balanced distribution between cancelled and non-cancelled flights after running the data through SMOTE.

    As mentioned earlier, they picked the Random Trees model for this sample solution. This SPSS node provides a model for tree-based classification and prediction that is built on Classification and Regression Tree methodology. Due to its characteristics, this model is much less supine to overfitting, which gives a higher likelihood of repeating the same test results when you disburse novel data, that is, data that was not fragment of the original training and testing data sets. Another handicap of this method — in particular for their disburse case — is its ability to wield imbalanced data.

    Since in this disburse case they are dealing with classification analysis, they used two common ways to evaluate the performance of the model: confusion matrix and ROC curve. One of the outputs of running the Random Trees model in SPSS is the confusion matrix seen in device 8. The table shows the precision achieved by the model during training.

    Figure 8 — Confusion Matrix for cancelled vs. non-cancelled flights

    In this case, the model’s precision was about 95% for predicting cancelled flights (true positives), and about 94% for predicting non-cancelled flights (true negatives). That means, the model was remedy most of the time, but moreover made wrong predictions about 4–5% of the time (false negatives and unfounded positives).

    That was the precision given by the model using the training data set. This is moreover represented by the ROC curve on the left side of device 9. They can see, however, that the district under the curve for the training data set was better than the district under the curve for the testing data set (right side of device 9), which means that during testing, the model did not perform as well as during training (i.e. it presented a higher rate of errors, or higher rate of unfounded negatives and unfounded positives).

    Figure 9 — ROC curves for the training and testing data sets

    Nevertheless, they decided that the results were still agreeable for the purposes of their discussion in this blog, and they stopped their iterations here. They hearten readers to further refine this model or even to disburse other models that could solve this disburse case.

    Deploying the model

    Finally, they deployed the model as a ease API that developers can convoke from their applications. For that, they created a “deployment branch” in the SPSS stream. Then, they used the IBM Watson Machine Learning service available on IBM Bluemix here. They imported the SPSS stream into the Bluemix service, which generated a scoring endpoint (or URL) that application developers can call. Developers can moreover convoke The Weather Company APIs directly from their application code to retrieve the forecast data for the next day, week, and so on, in order to pass the required data to the scoring endpoint and invent the prediction.

    A typical scoring endpoint provided by the Watson Machine Learning service would study dote the URL shown below.<provided by WML service>

    By passing the expected JSON carcass that includes the required inputs for scoring (such as the future flight data and forecast weather data), the scoring endpoint above returns if a given flight is likely to live cancelled or not. This is seen in device 10, which shows a convoke being made to the scoring endpoint — and its response — using an HTTP requester tool available in a web browser.

    Figure 10 — actual request URL, JSON body, and response from scoring endpoint

    Notice in the JSON response above that the deployed model predicted this particular flight from Newark to Chicago would live 88.8% likely to live cancelled, based on forecast weather conditions.


    IBM SPSS Modeler is a powerful tool that helped us visually create a solution for this disburse case without writing a solitary line of code. They were able to follow an iterative process that helped us understand and prepare the data, then model and evaluate the solution, to finally deploy the model as an API for consumption by application developers.


    The IBM SPSS stream and data used as the basis for this blog are available on GitHub. There you can moreover find instructions on how to download IBM SPSS Modeler, obtain a key for The Weather Channel APIs, and much more.

    Week In Review: Design, Low Power | actual questions and Pass4sure dumps

    Royalty-free I3C; CFET parasitic variation modeling; Intel funds analog IP generation.

    The MIPI Alliance released MIPI I3C Basic v1.0, a subset of the MIPI I3C sensor interface specification that bundles 20 of the most commonly needed I3C features for developers and other standards organizations. The royalty-free specification includes backward compatibility with I2C, 12.5 MHz multi-drop bus that is over 12 times faster than I2C supports, in-band interrupts to allow slaves to notify masters of interrupts, dynamic address assignment, and standardized discovery.

    Efinix will expand its product offering, adding a 200K logic element FPGA to its lineup with the Triton T200. The T200 targets AI-driven products, and its architecture has enough LEs, DSP blocks, and on-chip RAM to deliver 1 TOPS for CNN at INT8 precision and 5 TOPS for BNN, according to Efinix CEO Sammy Cheung. The company moreover released samples of its Trion T20 FPGA.

    Faraday Technology released multi-protocol video interface IP on UMC 28nm HPC. The Multi-Protocol Video Interface IP solution supports both transmitter (TX) and receiver (RX). The transmitter allows for MIPI and CMOS-IO combo solutions for package cost reduction and flexibility, while the receiver combo PHY includes MIPI, LVDS, subLVDS, HiSPi, and CMOS-I/O to support a diversified ambit of interfaces to CMOS image sensors. Target applications include panel and sensor interfaces, projectors, MFP, DSC, surveillance, AR and VR, and AI.

    Analog tool and IP maker Movellus closed a second round of funding from Intel Capital. Movellus’ technology automatically generates analog IPs using digital implementation tools and touchstone cells. The company will disburse the funds to expand its customer ground and to extend its portfolio of PLLs, DLLs and LDOs for disburse in semiconductor and system designs at advanced process nodes.

    Imec and Synopsys completed a comprehensive sub-3nm parasitic variation modeling and retard sensitivity study of complementary FET (CFET) architectures. The QuickCap NX 3D field solver was used by Synopsys R&D and imec research teams to model the parasitics for a variety of device architectures and to identify the most censorious device dimensions and properties, which allowed for optimization of CFET devices for better power/performance trade-offs.

    Credo utilized Moortec’s Temperature Sensor and Voltage Monitor IP to optimize performance and extend reliability in its latest generation of SerDes chips. Moortec’s PVT sensors are utilized in All Credo touchstone products which are being deployed on system OEM linecards and 100G per lambda optical modules. Credo cited ease of integration and reduced time-to-market and project risk.

    Wave Computing selected Mentor’s Veloce Strato emulation platform for functional verification and validation of its latest Dataflow Processor Unit chip designs, which will live used in the company’s next-generation AI system. Wave cited capacity and scaling advantages, breadth of virtual disburse models, reliability, and determinism as behind the choice.

    MaxLinear adopted Cadence’s Quantus and Tempus timing signoff tools in developing the MxL935xx Telluride device, a 400Gbps PAM4 SoC using 16FF process technology. MaxLinear estimated they got 2X faster multi-corner extraction runtimes versus single-corner runs and 3X faster timing signoff flow.

    The European Processor Initiative selected Menta as its provider of eFPGA IP. The EPI, a collaboration of 23 partners including Atos, BMW, CEA, Infineon and ST, has the objective of co-designing, manufacturing and bringing to market a system that supports the high-performance computing requirements of exascale machines.

    Jesse Allen   (all posts)Jesse Allen is the learning focus administrator and a senior editor at Semiconductor Engineering.

    Big data and the industrialization of neuroscience: A safe roadmap for understanding the brain? | actual questions and Pass4sure dumps


    New technologies in neuroscience generate reams of data at an exponentially increasing rate, spurring the design of very-large-scale data-mining initiatives. Several supranational ventures are contemplating the possibility of achieving, within the next decade(s), replete simulation of the human brain.

    I question here the scientific and strategic underpinnings of the runaway enthusiasm for industrial-scale projects at the interface between “wet” (biology) and “hard” (physics, microelectronics and computer science) sciences. Rather than presenting the achievements and hopes fueled by big-data–driven strategies—already covered in depth in special issues of leading journals—I focus on three major issues: (i) Is the industrialization of neuroscience the soundest way to achieve substantial progress in learning about the brain? (ii) Do they possess a safe “roadmap,” based on a scientific consensus? (iii) Do these large-scale approaches guarantee that they will gain a better understanding of the brain?

    This “opinion” paper emphasizes the contrast between the accelerating technological progress and the relative lack of progress in conceptual and theoretical understanding in brain sciences. It underlines the risks of creating a scientific bubble driven by economic and political promises at the expense of more incremental approaches in fundamental research, based on a diversity of roadmaps and theory-driven hypotheses. I conclude that they necessity to identify current bottlenecks with confiscate accuracy and develop novel interdisciplinary tools and strategies to tackle the complexity of brain and irony processes.


    This essay explores how the big-data revolution has started to possess an impact on brain sciences and assesses the dangers of letting technology-driven—rather than concept-driven—strategies shape the future industrialization of neuroscience through the rapid emergence of very-large-scale data-mining initiatives. Among recent supranational ventures, the EPFL-IBM consortium “Blue Brain” (1), the European consortium “The Human Brain Project” (HBP) (2), the U.S. consortia BRAIN (3, 4) and “The Human Connectome” (5), and the privately owned Allen Institute (6) All toy with the possibility of achieving, within the next decades, the replete simulation of the human brain (Box 1). Although big-data initiatives possess started an impressive thrust in brain research, I question here their impact on how the brain sciences are evolving and highlight the necessity of developing alternative scientific strategies.

    Box 1 “Big data” projects in brain sciences: Websites China:

    Brain Project: Basic neuroscience, brain diseases and brain-inspired computing in progress (147).

    After briefly reviewing the current advances and hopes that novel technologies bring within ambit of modern brain research, I raise the possibility that, at the same time, scientific conduct is undergoing a radical societal change (section 1). I silhouette the risks generated by the big-data revolution in brain sciences, discussing various conceptual bottlenecks (sections 2 to 5). I illustrate practical and theoretical limitations that brute-force strategies may encounter in simulating the replete brain (sections 6 and 7). I intimate safeguards that should live kept in irony in the novel societal context dominated by “economics of promises” (section 8), and conclude with a list of positive recommendations.

    1. Big-data initiatives: A worldwide change of scientific strategy in brain studies?

    The prevailing consensus in neuroscience is that technology has revolutionized their approach in looking at brain structure and duty in relation to conduct (7, 8), and in multiple ways:

    1) at the technical level: by extending the power of techniques of circuit identification beyond that already reached by genetic or viral approaches, enabling high-throughput optical manipulation of large–neural ensemble activity with single-cell and single-spike resolution in vivo (9–12);

    2) at the methodological level: by imposing novel standards in experimentation and data acquisition in direct relation with conduct (13, 14);

    3) at the data production level: by compiling genomic, structural, and functional databases, the size of which (measured in petabytes) is orders of magnitude larger than that of a complete mammalian genome (15);

    4) at the flush of analysis: by the application of methods of dimensionality reduction (16, 17) and of pattern-searching algorithms specialized for high-dimensional spaces (18), used previously in statistics, machine learning, and physics;

    5) at the modeling level: by the overwhelming progress of optimization and Bayesian predictive methods (19, 20) and abysmal learning approaches (21), made possible by the countless dimension of the data reservoir.

    The impact of technical advances on brain research has become such that a major change in reference animal models used in neuroscience has occurred in less than 10 years: most state-of-the-art techniques favor the disburse of few experimental species [e.g., zebrafish, mouse, and marmoset among the vertebrates (22, 23)] and possess already consigned to relative oblivion those used traditionally for functional electrophysiology and cognitive mapping (e.g., rat, cat, ferret, and macaque). Simultaneously, outstanding progress in noninvasive imaging techniques (24) such as diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and ultra high-field MRI, paired with sophisticated neuro-cognitive paradigms (25, 26) and multivariate analysis methods (27, 28), now reaches spatial-scale resolution and temporal precision ranges (25, 27) closer to those used in invasive physiology in nonhuman mammals (29), making cross-species comparison, including humans, feasible in the near future.

    Because bold scientific claims extend with technological prowess, the field has moreover raised its flush of self-criticism. Despite major advances in optogenetic control of neural activity patterns (9, 11, 12), “interventionist” neuroscience is still required to expose its efficiency in unraveling neural mechanisms causal to conduct (30). Methods must live developed to untangle multiple sources of shared or context-dependent correlations. At a more macroscopic level, localizationist interpretations in brain imaging recently came under scrutiny, both at the paradigmatic and preprocessing level, leading to more controlled definitions of reference or “null” statistics (31, 32). still unsolved is the obvious vicissitude of “putting All together” across scales, when comparing, for instance, neural responses and neurovascular coupling dynamics (33–37). These discrepancies necessity to live resolved, because they highlight the risks of betting on ill-chosen instrumentation-imposed observables.

    The major risks hotfoot well beyond technological misuses or misinterpretations. The present trend prefigures a radical societal change in scientific conduct, where novel directions in science are launched by novel tools rather than by novel concepts (38). Many leading scientists and funding agencies now partake the view that “progress in science depends on novel techniques, novel discoveries and novel ideas, probably in that order” (39). The pressure has become such that, to receive funding and eventually publish high-impact papers, scientists are often required to disburse mouse-specific state-of-the-art techniques, irrespective of their adequacy. To some degree, wishful thinking has replaced the conceptual drive behind experiments, as if using the fanciest tools and exploiting the power of numbers could bring about some epiphany.

    Although industrialization in scientific methods and practice successfully prevailed in the human genome sequencing project [(40); but behold (41, 42)], it is unlikely that a similar brute-force approach will guarantee major advances in understanding brain complexity. Conceptual guidance is required to invent the best disburse of technological advances, regardless of their obvious benefits. “Technology is a useful servant but a risky master.” As pointed out by Florian Engert, “the essential ingredient that turns a useless map” or database “into an invaluable resource” remains “the experimental design employed to gather and anatomize the underlying data, and ultimately the thought process, creativity, and ingenuity that went into this design” (43). At a more conceptual level, barrier-breaking innovation paradoxically stems more often from unpredictable “rupture” processes than industrialized approaches. In numerous cases, seminal findings in neuroscience were chance discoveries and daring interpretations. These hotfoot well beyond the technological limits of observations and, sometimes, provide the missing but consensual experimental evidence of prior conceptualization formulated centuries earlier. Better tools in hand are just not enough.

    2. Bottlenecks in large-scale search studies: Big-data is not knowledge

    Provided adequate funding, “big” is facile to acquire and accumulate but difficult to classify, interpret, and invent sense of. The sea of biological data creates the illusion of knowing “more,” whereas they should rather confess their profound underestimation of how “complex” the brain is. colossal data in biology is not limited to acquisition of vast numbers of observables. It further requires selection criteria to evaluate their strategic value, and sophisticated handling to extract knowledge. Classically, in information science, one distinguishes four levels in the so-called DIKW pyramids (44), ranging from “data” to “information” to “knowledge” and “wisdom” (understanding). They are currently facing an overflow of data without several strategies to convert it into learning and eventually gain a better comprehension of the alive brain.

    “The search for a unified theory…remains at a rudimentary stage for the brain sciences.”

    The most common target in large-scale enterprises flourishing around brain sciences is the generation of biochemical or structural catalogs, most often “static,” taking the form of localizationist atlases in brain-imaging studies or structural inventories at the molecular, cellular, or network level. Of course, static “atlases” imply sophisticated visualization and are sold as tangible deliverables that can live easily understood in layman’s terms. Their disburse often leads to overinterpretation, when the brain is reduced to a charted globe divided into islands and continents (45–48). Many specialists are cognizant of the necessity of rescaling the applicability of instrumental methods and redefining the strict validity ambit of the conclusions derived from these atlases (49, 50).

    Only 20 to 30 years ago, neuroanatomical and neurophysiological information was relatively scarce while understanding mind-related processes seemed within reach. Nowadays, they are drowning in a flood of information. Paradoxically All sense of global understanding is in acute danger of getting washed away. Each overcoming of technological barriers opens a Pandora’s box by revealing hidden variables, mechanisms, and nonlinearities, adding novel levels of complexity. By reaching the microscopic-scale resolution, advanced technologies possess unveiled a novel world of diversity and randomness, which was not evident in pioneer functional studies using spike rate readout or mesoscopic imaging of reduced sensitivity (51–53). This contrast between meso- and microscale functional architectures attests to the necessity of putting more trouble in understanding the “regularization” impact of emergence laws—operating in a bottom-up way—across successive levels of integration (see sections 3 and 7). Observations made in parallel with different instruments (sensitive to various spatiotemporal scales) should live combined to build realistic biophysical models to reconcile the loosely related observables across integration levels. In particular, one needs to extract better predictive tools to understand the neural basis of activation processes revealed by brain imaging and find ways of comparing quantitatively state-of-the-art morphological tracing with DTI. Only then could one envision a comprehensive and compressed multiscale functional and structural data repository.

    Another approach may live to seek recommendation from equivalent big-data enterprises in other disciplines such as astrophysics and elementary particle research. Both of these routinely generate petabytes of data. Although particle research does not necessarily conjure up the theoretical viewpoint that they are crucially missing, generations of physicists possess been exploring the multiscale complexity of physical matter on the basis of ever-increasing big-data collections (see section 7). Presently, the major incompatibility with brain science is that theorists in particle physics field are involved before—and not after—the hypothesis-driven data are collected. They actively participate in the definition of collective infrastructures and the design of one-of-a-kind outfit shared by the entire experimentalist collectivity. The recommendation made here is that biologists, who are novel to this field, should learn from physicists. As such, the roadmap from data to learning could live mapped out in a much clearer style and the dead ends, where no one has a lucid view of what to Do with All the data, would live far less likely.

    To summarize, the trend toward increased measurement sensitivity and more microscopic scales carries its own paradox: A digitized ersatz of lower dimensionality will never account for the multiscale complexity of the replete brain. They should conform their strategic planning so that conceptual efforts grow in a way that is commensurate with technological development—and not follow it, as is presently the case.

    3. Bottlenecks in multilevel analysis: The Marr-Poggio conundrum

    One of the advertised “blue sky” goals of big-data–driven initiatives is to establish the subcellular and cellular mechanisms causal to conduct through an exhaustive reductionist analysis. The best-known roadmap for dealing with brain complexity was formulated by David Marr some 35 years ago (54). One way to study at the proposed hierarchy of analysis levels (Fig. 1) is to progress from the global “functional and computational” level, through the intermediate “algorithmic” flush down to the “substrate” or “implementation” level. The two higher levels, computational and algorithmic, can live considered as the most generic and abstract, independent of the biological trick used to implement them. Marr argued that whereas “algorithms and mechanisms are empirically more accessible, …the flush of computational theory…is critically vital from an information-processing point of view…[because]…the nature of the computations that underlie perception [and, by extension, cognition] depends more upon the computational problems that possess to live solved than upon the particular hardware in which their solutions are implemented” (54). Marr was convinced that a purely reductionist strategy, decomposing the global process into its elementary subcomponents, was “genuinely dangerous.” Trying to understand the emergence of cognition from neuronal responses “is dote trying to understand a bird’s flight by studying only feathers. It just cannot live done.’’ Marr’s main intuition was that it is much more difficult to infer from the neural implementation flush what algorithm the brain is using (bottom-up) than to gain the algorithmic flush from the study of the computational problem that it is trying to solve (top-down along the hierarchy). The bottom-up “emergence” process arising from the interaction of local low-level biological processes remains an open issue today. The way in which sensory neurophysiology has conferred to single-neuron firing the embodiment of high-level psychological properties that can only live sensibly ascribed to a total behaving organism is a striking sample of mereological fallacy (30, 55).

    Fig. 1 The hierarchy of analysis levels [inspired by David Marr (54)].

    The three levels of Marr’s hierarchy illustrated are (from top to bottom) duty and computation at the higher flush (3), algorithm at the intermediate flush (2), and biophysical substrate at the lower flush (1). Reductionist approaches progress from levels 3 to 1, whereas constructionism goes the contrary way, from 1 to 3. Two examples of the three-level analysis are given for two different biological processes: action potential (middle column) and synaptic plasticity (right column). The two upper levels of Marr’s hierarchy define the field of computational neuroscience (red inset), the scope of which is to identify generic computations and functions and their underlying algorithms, independently of the biophysical substrate of the process under study.

    Despite the wealth of produced data, constructionist approaches are thus likely to bear mimicry by a brain ersatz, because of the difficulties of transpose inference (in this case, inferring duty and conduct from neural-level activation). This prediction was recently computationally explored, by designing whimsical experiments on an simulated brain-like artifact, a solitary microprocessor, to behold if well-liked data analysis methods from neuroscience could elucidate the way in which it processes information and controls conduct (in the present case, three classic videogames) (56). Although the processor’s algorithmic flowchart was known a priori, classical interventionist neuroscience methods failed to interpret how the processor works, regardless of the amount of data (30).

    …bottom-up “emergence”…remains an open issue today.

    The censorious point remains that causal-mechanistic explanations are qualitatively different from understanding how a combination of component modules performing the computations at a lower flush produces emergent conduct at a higher level.

    The first vicissitude arises because higher-level concepts are needed to understand the neural implementation level. So, even when causality is demonstrated, it makes sense only when All levels are considered together simultaneously: “Ion channels Do not beat, heart cells do. Neural circuits Do not feel pain, total organisms do” (30). Some key studies illustrate the necessity of binding different levels in the experimental design itself—for instance, by linking the neural flush with the theoretical context derived from preexisting behavioral knowledge. The supervised learning experiments engineered in solitary neurons recorded in visual cortex in vivo (57), for example, were conceived as the direct neural implementation (substrate level) of a hypothetical plasticity rule (58) (algorithmic level) derived from associative reminiscence (59) and Ising (60) models (computational level).

    A second vicissitude comes from Marr’s “multiple realizability” argument, which states that the same duty can live achieved through any number of different substrates (30, 54, 61). The impossibility of mapping conduct or duty in a unequivocal way on the parametric situation of the synaptic or conductance ensemble (defining observed dynamics of the neural net under study) was reproduced in simulation models of Aplysia (62, 63) and vertebrate cerebellum (64). This conundrum reveals unexpected complexity whichever way the hierarchy is read, from the computation or macro flush to the substrate or micro level, or the reverse.

    An additional hidden twist is that the biological substrate flush may consist of nested sublevels, each operating at different biophysical scales. Tomaso Poggio emphasized how learning of the more elementary steps of information processing is required to account for the complexity of more global computations (65). The key issue is to determine the minimal stratification flush needed to preserve the nonlinearities and self-organizing properties at higher integrative levels (66).

    Refined electrophysiological studies in the early visual system expose lucid cases where most spiking-net models—by not giving enough descriptive depth to the biophysical substrate—are too simplified to self-generate low-level feature specificity (orientation selectivity, contrast invariance., and so forth): (i) Rather than the simplified +/− algebra of McCulloch-Pitts neurons, synaptic biophysics in vivo suggests a much richer algebra that includes scaling and division of excitatory inputs by inhibitory ones, where a digital “zero” in the target neuron output could imply either absence of incoming signal (what spiking nets generally assume) or the division or “veto” of an excitatory input by a sturdy concomitant shunting inhibition (66, 67). (ii) Although orientation selectivity is a hallmark of mammalian cortical organization, this feature selectivity is, in most spiking models, forced in an ad hoc way, by prespecified wiring rules between thalamus and cortex. Only the orientation preference map appears to live treated as an emergent property resulting from horizontal connection plasticity (68). This oversimplification is challenged when viewed from the conductance level: Voltage-clamp measurements in vivo, even in layer 4, divulge an unexpected flush of nonlinear interaction and diversity between excitatory and inhibitory conductances (67, 69–71), which, in V1 simple cells, are hardly detectable (72) or absent at the spiking flush (73). The consequence is that the same functional receptive field type, “simple” or “complex,” may indeed live produced by multiple dynamic interaction patterns between excitation and inhibition (71, 74). This unexpected wiring diversity in the synaptic genesis of V1 receptive fields concurs with statistical predictions made by multilayered convolutional models (75). By oversimplifying synaptic integration biophysics and limiting simulations to the spike level, most computational models trivialize the emergence of “higher-order” properties through a purely feedforward cascade (76, 77) when the principal wiring feature of sensory neocortex is—by far—synaptic reverberation and amplification (66).

    In view of the weight presently given to spike-based feedforward processing and abysmal learning, the reexamination of conductance-based versus spike-based computing and the role given to synaptic reentry both sound essential. Bottlenecks in multiscale modeling are rarely addressed in depth, and, although it is agreed that nobody has the definitive solution, this remains a solemn blow for “constructionist” models of the brain. Alternative viewpoints should live developed.

    4. Bottlenecks in transpose engineering: Lessons erudite from the invertebrates

    One safe way to wield big-data sets in vertebrates is to avoid the pitfalls known from pioneering studies in paucineuronal networks. Comparative neuroscience offers multiple test studies: (i) small, genetically tractable animal models (78), such as Caenorhabditis elegans; (ii) functionally identified clusters of giant cells, in sensory-motor ganglions in Aplysia and crustaceans; and (iii) transparent zebrafish, making the online imaging of the total connectome possible (79). This suggests access to “full brain” descriptions with the reconstruction of causal structuro-functional relations matching canonical neuronal states with species-specific behavioral repertoires (14, 80, 81).

    Yet, even with such elementary invariant-like systems, interindividual variability cannot live ignored. A counterintuitive finding in C. elegans is that there is no such thing as “simplicity” despite the reduced connectome (302 neurons, 6963 synapses, 890 gap junctions), even at the earliest stage of sensory processing. Averaging neuronal responses of a solitary olfactory cell is deceptive, because the activation of the same neuron, depending on the context, may lead to several possible behavioral outcomes (82). The main predictive signal of the response is the internal situation of the functional assembly in which the cell participates, at the exact time when external inputs become processed. Similar situation dependencies in neuronal processing possess just started to live explored in vertebrates (83, 84).

    Partial understanding of the functional extent and multiscale impact of contextual processing has been obtained in classical studies in the lobster’s stomato-gastric ganglion (85). By releasing diffusible neuromodulators, specialized “orchestra conductor” neurons change the conductance repertoire of the other individual neurons and allow them to participate at several times in a diversity of functional subnetworks (“assembly reconfigurability”). This feature highlights the impossibility of separating intrinsic (conductance repertoire, genomic expression) from extraneous (synapses) features. The diffusive nature of the modulatory process and its dependency on the internal mesoscopic situation generated by the recurrent synaptic activity open a yet largely unexplored scale of complexity.

    A straightforward lesson from invertebrates is that a purely “Lego”-like reconstruction approach—based on the replete reconstruction of the brain’s connectome and the gene expression, electrical, and morphological determinants profile of the major classes of its neural components (86, 87)—may live doomed from the start. Despite similar evidence in vertebrates, some doubt remains as to whether the versatility of the excitability pattern and the dependency of conductance repertoire expression on past brain states (and modulators) are taken at countenance value in classifications and nomenclatures of supposedly invariant identity determinants (88). Thus, the dynamic complexity revealed in simpler organisms provides a powerful warning against the disburse of purely bottom-up constructivist large-scale studies in higher organisms.

    5. Bottlenecks in evolutionary leaps: Anthropocentrism from “mouse” to “man”

    “Understanding the brain” is often read as understanding the “human” brain. This anthropomorphic warp reveals a loss of perspective regarding the essence of alive systems: their diversity, their adaptability, and their dependence on evolutionary history. Losing track of this perspective is dangerous, because only broad comparisons present the potential to distinguish general principles from unimportant implementation details. If paving the way toward “a general theory of the brain” is a worthy goal, as they believe it is, then it is essential to conceive comparative physiology strategies, which allow us to discriminate between species-specific “bags of tricks” and canonical computations shared by alive brains (30, 66, 89–92). inescapable forms of computation and algorithms appear to live preserved (i.e., gain control, normalization, exponentiation, association, and coincidence detection), but the circumstantial mechanistic implementations are often species-specific and structure-dependent (30). Industrial-scale efforts are, by their present design, focused on limited behaviors and species, and thus orthogonal to a broad-enough perspective.

    A second problem is that the human brain is probably among the most involved of nervous systems. This has led, without much strategic planning other than exploiting the availability of a genetically modifiable mammalian system, to the increasing disburse of the mouse as a model. Because it is a mammal, it must live similar to the human. Although the mouse model has produced vital advances in the study of basic sensory-motor integration principles, it may live less confiscate for studying perceptual processes for modalities (vision) less adapted to its behavioral repertoire and, more obviously still, for higher cognitive functions. This is particularly agreeable in species such as humans and other primates where sensory cortical processing involves intricate reciprocal connectivity patterns linking sets of functionally several areas (93, 94), which are mostly absent in the mouse cortex.

    A wiser alternative could live to refine approaches progressively and recursively according to species-specific behavior, and cognition repertory (95). Search for homologies should live validated on the basis of structural, functional, and cognitive similarities between species. The selection of the perquisite species calls for increased efforts in comparative physiology, which possess been downplayed since the start of the mouse dominance era. The selection of the perquisite tasks requires novel methods of conduct classification. By applying unsupervised learning methods to the largest possible set of coregistered neural data and behavioral observations, one may hope to achieve substantial dimensionality reduction and obtain an objective mapping of possible behavioral repertoires over a restricted ensemble of reproducible brain states, as has been done successfully in invertebrates (81).

    6. Simulating the brain: The cart before the horse—immaturity of paradigms and lack of hypothesis-driven design

    A fundamental issue for big database generalization and validation is to provide universal paradigm or stint standards that are optimized for the study of specific cognitive functions. For illustration’s sake, let us concentrate on an apparently “simple” case study, i.e., how to characterize neural processes involved in low-level visual perception.

    In the search for generic sensory integration principles, how can they conceive a “good” stimulus set before they know what the system under study is designed to perceive (96)? The process cannot live formulated without priors, often linked with behavioral observations and hypothesis testing, and should probably live automated only after a progressive, informed, recursive, maybe even “old-fashioned,” aspect of investigation. Presenting the largest spectrum of input statistics seems the confiscate way to shove the sensory system to its information capacity limits (97) and explore the dependency of the neural code on external input statistics (70, 74, 98, 99). However, in practice, the battery of stimuli used to build big data sets faces unacknowledged technical constraints: Stimulus choices are often guided by the efficiency with which sturdy firing can live evoked—leading to a prevalence of high firing rates, more easily detectable by calcium fluorescence changes—rather than by information theory concepts (rate code/dense spiking versus spike-timing code/sparseness). The cognitive repertoire should moreover live used more carefully to constrain the selection of species: There is something odd in applying in the mouse, a nearly blind animal (100), a battery of stimulation paradigms based on decades of toil on highly visual species (cat, macaque, and human) without paying attention to ethological differences in the reliance on vision [but behold (101)]. Indeed, visual cortex may play different roles in different species; for instance, space coding during navigation—in concert with hippocampus—in rodents, versus primal perceptual sketch elaboration and form or motion extraction—in concert with higher cortical areas—in more visual species. Consequently, testing the responses of mouse primary visual cortex (V1) to a high-contrast classic Hollywood black-and-white movie (102) seems as inappropriate as studying pangolin olfaction with plumes of warm Parisian croissants. Conversely, searching for Place or grid cells may live deceiving in nonhuman primate visual cortex when it makes sense in the rodent.

    Choosing the perquisite stimulus and species is not the only issue. Since the shift over the past 20 years from the anesthetized-paralyzed preparation to the behaving animal, the standardization of the global context has become a major concern (103). Visual responsiveness in the awake mouse depends heavily on locomotion and full-body action (83), rendering inseparable the sensory and motor components. However, a similar conditional dependency of visual processing has not been confirmed in higher mammals, where primary sensory and motor cortices are much less—or even not at All in the adult—directly interconnected. Consequently, the generalized disburse of “running-on-a-ball” paradigms in the rodent may possess set a novel behavioral touchstone for studying sensory responses, optimized to extend neural excitability in the rodent only, but reducing the global relevance to vision per se (66).

    “Industrial-scale efforts are…orthogonal to a broad-enough perspective.”

    The overall consequence is that, by imposing such simulated paradigms as the “standard tests” for brain observatories, each resulting data set will submit predictions restricted to specific contexts, but largely unrelated to “natural” behavior. Big-data initiatives in early vision possess not yet Place enough trouble into defining parameters censorious of the “naturalness” of the evoked sensory drive. As summarized by Bruno Olshausen, “the problem is not just that they lack the proper data, but that they Do not even possess the perquisite conceptual framework for thinking about what is happening” (104). Similarly, however impressive they may be, all-optical “interventionist” paradigms Do not signal the cease of the quest: novel conceptual frameworks are needed that “provide the mapping between large-scale neural data and conduct in an algorithmic sense and not just a correlative or even causal way” (30). The practical message here is that both paradigms and context—in which data are acquired—should live rationalized and justified on purely theoretical grounds, before becoming the norm of the industrialization stage.

    7. Simulating the brain—The cart without a driver: Missing a sturdy brain theory

    Do they possess a lucid view of what can live expected from transpose engineering and embodied constructionism? Some of the large-scale initiatives recapitulate earlier constructionist approaches that tried to simulate brain circuits by pile models “that are very closely linked to the circumstantial anatomical and physiological structure” of the brain, in hopes of “generating unanticipated functional insights based on emergent properties of neuronal structure.” The first attempts in the 1990s (105–107) were limited by the lack of prediction of flush enough behavioral repertoires and cognitive functions (108). Conversely, more engineering-oriented and simplified blackbox simulations (109) were criticized for their lack of descriptive depth (110). Even so, some success has been obtained by ingenious built-in top-down constraints. High-performance computing may change the odds (111), and experts disagree that large-scale simulation should provide possible breakthroughs in system identification as has been the case for abysmal learning (112). Nevertheless, given the analytic intractability of the brain, the challenge of “putting All together” remains wide open. The major barrier remains the lack of unifying theory and the relative paucity of top-down guidance by high-level learning derived from psychological studies of the mind.

    In this section, I will review three correlated issues: (i) Are there theoretical conjectures indicating that a replete spike-based brain simulation is not a realistic target? (ii) How Do system and computational neurosciences integrate theory so far? and (iii) Are there alternative roadmaps to readdress what may live considered as an ill-posed problem?

    Point 1: Because of their predominant bottom-up drive, the danger of the large-scale neuroscience initiatives is to bear purely descriptive ersatz of brain, sharing some of the internal statistics of the biological counterpart, at best the two first-order moments (mean and variance), but devoid of self-generated cognitive abilities. The numbers will certainly study right, but there is no guarantee that such simulated brains will work. This intuition resonates with theoretical conjectures based on simple logic. As early as the 1980s, a gedanken experiment was proposed by von der Malsburg which considered two brain-like assemblies, built with the exact same connectivity graph and producing the exact same averaged firing patterns. What would chance if a jitter of a few milliseconds was applied in the arrival time of each occurring spike (while keeping imply rate invariant)? Is there a censorious jitter value that should not live exceeded, to withhold alive the emergent properties of the graph (113, 114)? The same guess could live generalized at the second-order statistics level. Let us imagine that colossal data makes it possible to build a cortex-like digital machine where the variance of the distributions of synaptic weights afferent to (or efferent from) each neuron could live matched to those directly measured (over time) in the same ensembles of actual synapses. Would one call the imply and variance–equalized simulated network to live as operative as the actual brain? Because—in actual brains— the efficiency of individual synaptic weights and their spatial distribution are stabilized through associative plasticity and normalization processes (if their well-liked learning theories are right), plugging in simulated synapses imply and variance levels devoid of information content would result in an “averaged connectome” without reminiscence of its past interactions with the outside world. Thus, brain simulations elaborated from static and averaged atlases might live likely useless in simulating brain function. Realistic solutions require that the dynamic entity of the simulated brain “grows” and interacts with the same outside world as the actual brain, i.e., that both partake the same interactive constraints at any point in time to bear the same conduct or implement the same cognitive process.

    Point 2: How Do system and computational neurosciences integrate theory so far? In a provocative review (103), Carandini assumes the actuality of an intermediate flush of circuit integration, where canonical operations can live defined as invariant computations repeated and combined in different ways across the brain. To identify them, it becomes necessary to record from a myriad of neurons in multiple brain regions rather than from solitary neurons. “Understanding computation…provides a language for theories of behavior.” This concept is very nigh to the algorithmic flush of Marr, because it no longer depends on the understanding of the biophysics of the substrate, which may vary from region to region and species to species. However, most consensual canonical principles are not derived from the search of colossal data but from philosophical or psychological principles arising from past centuries (115). For instance, the current theories of associative synaptic plasticity did not originate with spike-timing–dependent plasticity (STDP) but can live seen as the revival of causality-based rules inherited from psychologists [(116–118), to cite only a few (119)]. Other rules address a more macroscopic level, irrespective of the biological substrate implementation of the underlying mechanisms, such as the psychic laws of the Gestalt school in 1930s (117, 121) or the binding-by-synchrony hypothesis (120). It is only recently that the introduction of top-down constraints satisfying Bayesian optimization (19, 20) seems to provide innovative insights into mesoscopic processing in the brain and the way it adapts to multiple task-driven constraints.

    Point 3: Exploiting biological data obtained at different spatial and temporal scales should capitalize from earlier concepts developed in statistical physics. Anderson (122) points out that the field of supraconductivity shows the reductionist fallacy (see section 3: Marr-Poggio conundrum). The ability to reduce everything to simple laws does not imply the ability to start from those laws and reconstruct the total (the brain in biology, the universe in physics). The constructionist hypothesis breaks down when confronted with scale changes and complexity (123). Anderson summarizes the principle of “symmetry breaking” across scales, as follows: (i) The internal structure of a piece of matter or a alive brain necessity not live symmetrical even if the total situation of it is (an argument that imply field theories Do not always follow); (ii) the macroscopic situation of a big system has less symmetry than that obeyed by the microscopic laws which govern it. “In the so-called N→infinity limit…matter will undergo mathematically sharp, singular ‘phase transitions’ to states in which the microscopic symmetries…are in a sense violated.…Functional structure in a teleogical sense, as opposed to mere crystalline shape, must moreover live considered a stage, possibly intermediate between crystallinity and information strings, in the hierarchy of broken symmetries.” A rare reecho of this principle can live institute in a pioneer multiscale model of emergence of local and global features in the early visual system (75, 124, 125).

    Progress should live expected by pile novel descriptive frameworks which extract—from zillions of measurements—mesoscopic variables, analogous to the concept of quasiparticles in statistical physics. Solid-state physicists successfully developed “middle way” theories (126) that overcome the limitation that equations for particle interactions become impossible to solve or simulate for more than 10 particles. The introduction of a formalism based on virtual quasiparticles may simplify the analytical treatment of long-distance interactions between numerous elementary bound particles, by an equivalent free quasiparticle with shorter interaction. The search for such macroscopic variables could present an analytic way of treating neural network dynamics and enrich the present mean-field equation formalism. This would allow the pile of novel kinds of “stereological” models of gray matter, combining the local-range connectivity of columnar ensembles, the extrasynaptic volume diffusion of second messengers and modulators, and the oscillatory coupling due to physical distance in the three-dimensional (3D) brain [a factor unaccounted for by classical ring (1D) or layered (2D) networks]. Quasiparticles possess dual corpuscular and wave counterparts, which may apply to information diffusion and propagation across cortical networks, for which evidence can live monitored by lickety-split voltage-sensitive dye imaging. disburse of such models may reconcile the physics of interacting particles and waves with the functional physiology of long-distance interconnected cortical columns.

    The search for a unified theory, as in particle physics, remains at a rudimentary stage for the brain sciences. When changing scales, symmetry breaks interlard major nonlinearities that they cannot account for at present. Thus, the validity of theories and the selection of the apposite explanatory variables remain restricted to inescapable levels of integration, resulting in simulation attempts that are essentially local and species- and task-dependent. The hope is that understanding mesoscale organization and replete network dynamics might divulge a simpler formalism than the microscale level, similar to general laws in statistical thermodynamics (127). The limitation for transpose engineering is that mean-field-like approaches, because of their underlying simplifications, will lose vital generative mechanisms of low-level nonlinearities. A more empirical and modest alternative could live to multiply the diversity of proposed multiscale models, selecting those that most efficiently reduce complexity: “A agreeable theoretical model of a involved system should live dote a agreeable caricature: It should emphasize those features which are most vital and should downplay the inessential details.… Since one does not really know which are the inessential details until one has understood the phenomena under study…one should investigate a wide ambit of models and not stake one’s life (or one’s theoretical insight) on one particular model only” (128). Hence, again, the definition of multiscale data integration and the convergence to a theoretical understanding must live progressive and recursive.

    8. The risks, for basic research, of predominant strategies based on “economics of promises”

    Let us leave theory and hotfoot to the economics and policy of science. International think-tank meetings for defining a worldwide unified strategy (129, 130) attract public attention and feed the buzz of wide-audience science chronicles. Large-scale brain initiatives are often presented to the public as unselfish but costly science, generating state-of-the-art infrastructures and big data resources open to the community. They are advertised as opening the door for brain-derived information technology (IT) and, in the minds of some high profile IT leaders, paving the way to transhumanism (131, 132).

    Part of the original motivation for colossal data comes from its success in studying simple organisms: for instance, the complete lineage and replete reconstruction using electron microscopy of C. elegans, initiated in the 1980s, were shared by the entire field, leading to faster progress. However, the justification for the replete human brain simulation is more questionable: The metaphor of “mind observatory,” used rhetorically to link it with physics exploratory platforms such as CERN, is misleading. Megascience infrastructures in physics select immediate handicap of shared “unique” instruments, which possess been cooperatively designed to collect novel experimental data and test definite hypotheses through an overarching theory. In the brain sciences, however, pile massive database architecture without theoretical guidance may eddy into a consume of time and money (133, 134).

    The “observatory” duty itself, i.e., yielding novel data that were formerly out of gain because of technical limitations, is not even central to some of the large-scale brain initiatives. For instance, the flagship project (HBP) transformed its original drive (for a better understanding of brain) into a “viewing neuroscope” IT platform built largely on preexisting data. Progress is expected mostly from an alliance of abysmal learning, neuroinformatics, and neuromorphic computation, and promised to live quantitative enough to sustain virtual medicine applications (135).

    This strategic drift illustrates the impact of “megascience,” considered by sociologists of emergent technologies as a novel form of societo-scientific culture (131, 132, 136–139). “Economics of promise” are built around a scientific or industrial process (or even a theoretical law) whose justification is primarily based not on scientific or technological arguments but on the promises themselves (as if these were guaranteed to live fulfilled). This trend, which has abysmal roots linked to what modern society expects from biology in the big sense, has been repeatedly observed in different scientific subfields such as large-scale brain simulation, nanotechnology, stem cells, and synthesis biology (138). It even applies to the myth of Moore’s law that perpetuates itself because of the marketing of chip designers in neuromorphic computing (132, 140).

    Plausible reasons possess been identified to justify such drastic changes in scientific conduct: rarefaction of funding for basic research in brain science, the necessary requirement of a major translational impact at the societal level, “hype” purposely designed to gain the largest public audience as well as political decision-makers, overselling promises in the public health domain and possible blue-sky industrial outcomes. The attractiveness to politicians, administrators, and funders (whether public or private) of massive and visible one-track programs is obvious (141), but one may reckon that high-level “deciders” are not always entirely cognizant of —or possibly interested in— the downsides of these mammoth programs, or of the obvious weaknesses of their scientific underpinnings. Promises are no longer an extrapolation of the “possible future” (Fig. 2), but become the scientific justifications of purely economic and political “bubble” strategies engineered to capture funding on the basis of competitive supranational calls (139, 142).

    “The present trend prefigures a radical societal change in scientific conduct…”

    Fig. 2 pile brain sciences through “economics of promises”?

    Promises based on data-driven exploration and modeling of the human brain partake similarities and even inspiration with the imagery of science fiction. They become the scientific justification for the capture of large-scale funding.


    A side result is that governmental institutions in Europe and the United States intimate that enough data may live already available on the laboratory shelves, constituting a pile of “siloed” dormant sources that necessity to live curated (143, 144). Will this become a cheap pretense used to justify budget reduction in experimental basic neuroscience? It seems indeed easier in terms of budget control to eddy scientists into high-tech engineers rather than to fund basic research on a wider spectrum with reduced short-term impact.

    There exists a actual danger that a few large-scale international projects pile the foundations of virtual or in silico neuroscience will massively engage the funds available in basic neurosciences to the detriment of tiny and medium-size basic research initiatives focusing on integrative, cognitive, or computational neuroscience. One gets the print that the future of acquisition and exploitation of brain-related data will live shared between a few large-scale continental initiatives or sturdy industrial-like ventures. The possibility of conflicts of interest (which grows with the size of the consortia), of attempts to self-appropriate learning and eventually invent a profitable industry of it (145, 146), All remind us that it is exigent to define worldwide accepted standards of transparent macro-management and access to data and technologies.


    In this Review, I possess tried to point out that, although big-data and technological advances undeniably possess immense value for future developments, the expedient industrialization of neuroscience and the potential long-term import of the personal, political, and commercial incentives driving it are causes for concern. Systematic and streamlined approaches are not confiscate for All facets of brain research, and the interpretation of massive data sets collected without confiscate forethought may eddy out to live impossible. Given the exponentially increasing rate at which colossal data are being collected, exabyte information will live accumulated before the cease of the next decade. Out of this magma, it may live difficult to tease out of the hypothetical key principles that might befriend resolve the main questions that should possess been at the root of their design and made definite All along.

    Megascience dominance, if improperly managed, may lead to the drying up of traditional funding channels and the disappearance of smaller-scale and rationally designed research programs, which are still the major source of breaking discoveries. To master megascience progress and reduce negative side effects, current strategies could live greatly improved by the following:

    1) rationalizing the codesign of the selection of experimental models (choice of species, precise targeting of behavioral specificity) and the justification of confiscate techniques (sensitivity ambit of the instrumentation, spatial and temporal scale ranges to live explored);

    2) clarifying the hidden scientific assumptions associated with each instrumentation character and interrelating explanatory variables (i.e., conductance, spike rate, calcium fluorescence, metabolic or hemodynamic signals) despite their biophysical diversity;

    3) clarifying the hidden impact of preprocessing steps and statistical methods to reduce across-study heterogeneity;

    4) developing more efficient recursive loops between experiments and theory-driven top-down predictions, to confront a larger diversity of brain models and compare their predictive power;

    5) pile innovative theoretical frameworks not only inspired by computational neuroscience, mathematics, and psychology, but moreover enriched by complementary fields used to deal with involved systems of high dimensionality (statistical physics, thermodynamics, astrophysics);

    6) vetting the most apposite experimental paradigms, to define in an unbiased way the parametric features and the reproducibility of the stimulation context necessary to the constitution of large–data set repositories;

    7) allowing open access—to scientists and modelers—to the entire data reservoir and its data sharing, devoid of selective control by the ownership claims of accord funders.

    These changes in scientific planning will undoubtedly require the generalized practice of interdisciplinarity between physics and biology, focusing on the major bottlenecks (129, 130). Only in this way, can they hope to help their censorious skills and collectively optimize their capacity to better anticipate the challenges they countenance in exploring uncharted levels of complexity.

    Conceptual illustration: The Mind-Body Problem.CREDIT: ARTWORK: EBERHARDT E. FETZ, COURTESY WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY References and Notes
  • D. Le Bihan, Looking Inside the Brain: The Power of Neuroimaging (Princeton Univ. Press, NJ, 2014).

  • F. Dyson, Imagined worlds. The Jerusalem-Harvard Lectures (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1997).

  • C. Lange, in Nobel Lectures, Peace, 1901-1925, F. Haberman, Ed. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1972).

  • D. Marr, Vision (MIT Press, Cambridge, 1982).

  • T. Poggio, Visual Algorithms (MIT, Cambridge, 1982).

  • J. A. Bednar, C. K. I. Williams, in From Neuron to Cognition via Computational Neuroscience, M. A. Arbib, J. J. Bonaiuto, Eds. (MIT Press, Cambridge, 2016), pp. 409–432.

  • P. Dayan, L. Abbott, theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems (MIT Press, Cambridge, 2002).

  • B. Olshausen, in 20 Years of Computational Neuroscience, J. M. Bower, D. Beeman, Eds. (Springer, novel York, 2013).

  • J. M. Bower, D. Beeman, The book of GENESIS: Exploring Realistic Neural Models with the general NEural SImulation System (Telos, novel York, 1998).

  • C. von der Malsburg, in Brain Theory, G. Palm, A. Aertsen, Eds. (Springer, Berlin, 1986), pp. 161–176.

  • Y. Fregnac, colossal science needs colossal concepts, in “Voices”: BRAIN Initiative and Human Brain Project: Hopes and reservations. Cell 155, 265–266 (2013).10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.037

  • W. James, Psychology: Briefer Course (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1890).

  • Y. Delage, Le Rève: Etude Psychologique, Philosophique et Litteraire [The Dream: A Psychological, Philosophical and Literary Study (in French)] (Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 1919).

  • D. Hebb, The Organization of conduct (Wiley, novel York, 1949).

  • V. Y. Frenkel, Yakov Ilich Frenkel: His Work, Life, and Letters (Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel/Boston, 1996).

  • L. Ferry, La révolution transhumaniste [The Revolution of “Transhumanism”]. (Plon, Paris, 2016).

  • J.-G. Ganascia, Le mythe de la singularité [The Myth of Singularity (in French)]. Science Ouverte (Seuil, Paris, 2017).

  • U. Felt, B. Wyne, “Taking European learning society seriously,” Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate, Directorate-General for Research (European Commission, Brussels, 2007).

  • Sciences et Technologies émergentes: pourquoi tant de promesses? M. Audetat, Ed., Emerging Sciences and Technologies (Hermann, 2015).

  • F. Panese, in Sciences et Technologies émergentes: pourquoi tant de promesses, M. Audétat, Ed. (Hermann, Paris, 2015), pp. 165–193.

  • S. Loeve, in Sciences et Technologies émergentes: pourquoi tant de promesses? M. Audetat, Ed. (Hermann, Paris, 2015), pp. 91–113.

  • Acknowledgments: I thank G. Laurent and F. Engert for their supportive scientific interaction in an early draft of this text. I thank M. Yartsev, K. Grant, K. Petersen, F. Frégnac-Clave, and the two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments in the final steps of this manuscript.

  • Direct Download of over 5500 Certification Exams

    3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Aruba [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Avaya [96 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CA-Technologies [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CheckPoint [41 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
    College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institue [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institute [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DELL [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECCouncil [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    EMC [129 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fortinet [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HP [750 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBM [1532 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Juniper [64 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Medical [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Microsoft [374 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCLEX [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
    OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Oracle [279 Certification Exam(s) ]
    P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Symantec [134 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]

    References :

    Issu :
    Dropmark :
    Wordpress :
    Scribd :
    weSRCH :
    Dropmark-Text :
    Youtube :
    Blogspot :
    RSS Feed :
    Vimeo : :
    Google+ :
    Calameo : : : : "Excle"

    Back to Main Page

    Killexams P2050-007 exams | Killexams P2050-007 cert | Pass4Sure P2050-007 questions | Pass4sure P2050-007 | pass-guaratee P2050-007 | best P2050-007 test preparation | best P2050-007 training guides | P2050-007 examcollection | killexams | killexams P2050-007 review | killexams P2050-007 legit | kill P2050-007 example | kill P2050-007 example journalism | kill exams P2050-007 reviews | kill exam ripoff report | review P2050-007 | review P2050-007 quizlet | review P2050-007 login | review P2050-007 archives | review P2050-007 sheet | legitimate P2050-007 | legit P2050-007 | legitimacy P2050-007 | legitimation P2050-007 | legit P2050-007 check | legitimate P2050-007 program | legitimize P2050-007 | legitimate P2050-007 business | legitimate P2050-007 definition | legit P2050-007 site | legit online banking | legit P2050-007 website | legitimacy P2050-007 definition | >pass 4 sure | pass for sure | p4s | pass4sure certification | pass4sure exam | IT certification | IT Exam | P2050-007 material provider | pass4sure login | pass4sure P2050-007 exams | pass4sure P2050-007 reviews | pass4sure aws | pass4sure P2050-007 security | pass4sure cisco | pass4sure coupon | pass4sure P2050-007 dumps | pass4sure cissp | pass4sure P2050-007 braindumps | pass4sure P2050-007 test | pass4sure P2050-007 torrent | pass4sure P2050-007 download | pass4surekey | pass4sure cap | pass4sure free | examsoft | examsoft login | exams | exams free | examsolutions | exams4pilots | examsoft download | exams questions | examslocal | exams practice | | | |


    MORGAN Studio

    is specialized in Architectural visualization , Industrial visualization , 3D Modeling ,3D Animation , Entertainment and Visual Effects .