Find us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter





























Most effortless LOT-986 readiness strategy at killexams.com | brain dumps | 3D Visualization

Latest Pass4sure PDF Dumps of LOT-986 examcollection - Prepare Pass4sure LOT-986 Questions and Answers - practice questions - VCE - examcollection and pass LOT-986 actual exam - brain dumps - 3D Visualization

Pass4sure LOT-986 dumps | Killexams.com LOT-986 actual questions | http://morganstudioonline.com/

LOT-986 Creating IBM Lotus Notes and Domino 8.5(R) Applications with Xpages and Advanced Techniques

Study pilot Prepared by Killexams.com IBM Dumps Experts


Killexams.com LOT-986 Dumps and actual Questions

100% actual Questions - Exam Pass Guarantee with towering Marks - Just Memorize the Answers



LOT-986 exam Dumps Source : Creating IBM Lotus Notes and Domino 8.5(R) Applications with Xpages and Advanced Techniques

Test Code : LOT-986
Test cognomen : Creating IBM Lotus Notes and Domino 8.5(R) Applications with Xpages and Advanced Techniques
Vendor cognomen : IBM
: 164 actual Questions

i've discovered a very splendid source modern day LOT-986 cloth.
I was 2 weeks short of my LOT-986 exam and my schooling was now not full finished as my LOT-986 books were given burnt in hearth incident at my location. full I thought at that point became to give up the choice of giving the paper as I didnt believe any aid to set together from. Then I opted for killexams.com and that i although am in a nation of marvel that I cleared my LOT-986 exam. With the free demo of killexams.com, i was capable of preserve near things without troubles.


That turned into terrific! I got dumps modern-day LOT-986 exam.
Its concise answers helped me to carry out perquisite marks noting full questions beneath the stipulated time in LOT-986. Being an IT master, my competencies with recognize are so forth want to breathe pinnacle. No longer withstanding, proceeding with a customaryemployment with huge duties, it believe become no longer clean for me to pick a solid planning. At that factor, i establish out about the usually organized question and retort aide of killexams.com dumps.


Afraid of failing LOT-986 exam!
With using exceptional products of killexams.com, I had scored 92 percent marks in LOT-986 certification. i used to breathe looking for dependable test material to boom my information stage. Technical concepts and tough language of my certification changed into difficult to understand consequently i used to breathe on the lookout for dependable and easy examine products. I had foster to understand this website for the guidance of expert certification. It was not an easy job but simplest killexams.com has made this process smooth for me. i am sentiment arrogate for my fulfillment and this platform is exceptional for me.


it's miles remarkable to believe LOT-986 actual exam questions.
due to LOT-986 certificate you got many chances for security experts improvement for your career. I desired to developmentmy vocation in records safety and desired to grow to breathe certified as a LOT-986. in that case I determined to pick palliate from killexams.com and began my LOT-986 exam education thru LOT-986 exam cram. LOT-986 exam cram made LOT-986 certificatestudies easy to me and helped me to gather my desires effortlessly. Now im able to command without hesitation, without this website I by no means passed my LOT-986 exam in first strive.


I feel very confident by preparing LOT-986 actual test questions.
I cracked my LOT-986 exam on my first try with seventy two.Five% in just 2 days of education. Thank you killexams.com on your valuable questions. I did the exam with None worry. Looking ahead to smooth the LOT-986 exam along side your assist.


I feel very confident with LOT-986 question bank.
Attempted masses to clear my LOT-986 exam taking assist from the books. However the difficult motives and toughinstance made things worse and that i skipped the check two instances. Ultimately, my fine pal recommended me the question& retort via passage of killexams.com. And consider me, it labored so nicely! The exceptional contents were awesome to undergo and comprehend the subjects. I must with out issues cram it too and answered the questions in barely a hundred and 80 minutes time. Felt elated to skip well. Thank you, killexams.com dumps. passage to my lovely friend too.


just depend upon this LOT-986 actual question source.
I actually believe lately handed the LOT-986 exam with this bundle. This is a incredible retort if you need a brief yet dependable training for LOT-986 exam. This is a expert degree, so count on that you nonetheless want to disburse time playing with - practical bask in is key. Yet, as a ways and exam simulations move, killexams.com is the winner. Their exam simulator surely simulates the exam, such as the particular query sorts. It does effect things less complicated, and in my case, I consider it contributed to me getting a 100% marks! I could not confidence my eyes! I knew I did nicely, however this changed into a surprise!!


got most LOT-986 Quiz in actual check that I prepared.
Due to consecutive failures in my LOT-986 exam, I was full devastated and thought of changing my territory as I felt that this is not my cup of tea. But then someone told me to give one final try of the LOT-986 exam with killexams.com and that I wont breathe disappointed for sure. I thought about it and gave one final try. The final try with killexams.com for the LOT-986 exam went successful as this site didnt set full the efforts to effect things labor for me. It didnt let me change my territory as I cleared the paper.


Get these and chillout!
I had taken the LOT-986 arrangement from the killexams.com as that was an uninterested stage for the preparation which had eventually given the best flush of the planning to prick the 92% scores inside the LOT-986 check exams. I really delighted in the system I got issues the things emptied the provocative technique and thru the advocate of the same; I had at long final got the thing out and about. It had made my arrangement a ton of simpler and with the advocate of the killexams.com I had been prepared to develop well inside the life.


So clean questions in LOT-986 exam! i used to breathe already enough organized.
Analyzing for the LOT-986 exam has been a difficult going. With so many puzzling topics to cowl, killexams.com prompted the self notion for passing the exam via taking me through headquarters questions on the situation of affairs. It paid off as I should skip the exam with a outstanding pass percent of 80 4%. A number of the questions came twisted, but the answers that matched from killexams.com helped me price the perquisite solutions.


IBM Creating IBM Lotus Notes

as soon as king of commerce software, Lotus Notes is dragging IBM down | killexams.com actual Questions and Pass4sure dumps

Lotus Notes is coming! Or, perhaps it's declining

When IBM bought Lotus for $three.5 billion in 1995, it regarded as although the venerable computing gigantic was basically to lock up the software trade and coast to unstoppable gains.

Eighteen years later, Lotus looks more like a millstone around IBM’s neck than a flywheel giving it additional speed.

according to a file in the Wall road Journal, in boost of IBM’s this autumn profits unlock nowadays, Lotus was the weakest performer in IBM’s software portfolio, shedding 6.4 % of its revenue volume in the first nine months of 2012.

It probably bills for roughly $1 billion in annual revenue, in accordance with estimates sourced via the WSJ, or one-sixth to 1-fifth of IBM’s overall utility enterprise.

paradoxically, Lotus once led the passage towards nowadays’s hottest commercial enterprise applied sciences, the collaborative utility that helps teams talk and labor together on tasks. one of the vital success reviews of that niche is Yammer, which Microsoft obtained closing 12 months for $1.2 billion. So, why is IBM sitting at the back of the pack as a substitute of leading from the entrance?

Lotus, which made the primary blockbuster “killer app” in the 1980s (Lotus 1-2-three, a phenomenally a hit spreadsheet program), went on to create Lotus Notes, a powerful groupware suite that got here out in the early Nineteen Nineties earlier than anybody had any theory what “groupware” become.

I used it significantly at a few corporations I worked with. in the beginning, it became mysterious and strong. like most conclusion-users of Lotus Notes, I used it essentially as an email program. It had its quirks, nonetheless it worked. however there turned into a further dimension to Notes, a magnificent, programmable backend that permit you to create databases and workspaces for collaborative work, contact management, tips sharing, and communique.

these days, we’d summon it a collaboration device or a company social-media tool, and it will breathe web-primarily based and requisites-compliant, like Yammer, Jive, and Huddle. within the absence of requisites, Notes’ engineers needed to invent every exiguous thing themselves, making it a astute but proprietary solution.

however lengthy earlier than those web-based startups got here along, Notes was already losing its cool. The client software grew to become huge and bloated. It became towering priced to set into effect and difficult to customise.

as the web gained popularity in the late Nineties, Lotus brought requirements, like POP3 and IMAP electronic mail interfaces. They didn’t accomplish that neatly with the requisites department, besides the fact that children, riding anybody who had to exhaust a web mail client with a Lotus Notes mail server absolutely insane.

The upshot is that, simply as the cyber web grew to breathe universal, Lotus Notes became disturbing and obsolete.

sure, it became nonetheless powerful, however unlocking the dash of Notes often required professional skills, giving ascend to a sector of Notes consultants. No flabbergast that these consultants are having a tough time getting taken severely these days. The WSJ costs a Notes advisor who complains about his reception:

“i am going to a party, and that i shortly obtain insulted,” says Eugen Tarnow, a director of the consultancy Avalon company techniques, which sells the growing faded email application to agencies. “they are saying, ‘Lotus Notes, that’s nevertheless around?’ It’s no enjoyable.”

lamentably, IBM’s engineers realized the value of requisites compliance too late and didn’t bake interoperability into Lotus Notes smartly adequate or early ample. So, as efficient as Notes may well be, it became and is sick-prepared to labor in these days’s API-wealthy cloud atmosphere.

IBM has extra modern social-media application, too, but most efficient makes about $55 million per yr from that section of its enterprise. So the challenge for IBM is to proceed milking as lots income as it can from Lotus, while regularly shifting the branding and the income to newer, sexier lines of business. One example: Renaming its annual Lotus convention, Lotusphere, as “Connect2013.” Yeah, that’ll support.

We’ll breathe looking at to see if the profits document sheds any more mild on IBM’s efforts to exhibit Notes around. however as for me, I’m now not protecting my breath.

picture credit score: Andrew Mason by passage of photopin cc


IBM to invest $2B into AI hardware efforts in manhattan: three notes | killexams.com actual Questions and Pass4sure dumps

Jessica Kim Cohen - Friday, February 8th, 2019 Print  | electronic mail

IBM plans to effect investments greater than $2 billion to develop its ersatz intelligence footprint in expansive apple state, manhattan Governor Andrew Cuomo announced Feb. 7.

"ny has at full times been at the forefront of emerging industries, and this deepest sector investment to create a hub for ersatz intelligence research will attract world-classification minds and power economic boom in the vicinity," Mr. Cuomo stated in a information release.

Three notes:

1. IBM will invest in AI efforts at SUNY Polytechnic Institute's campus in Albany, N.Y., and other IBM facilities in the state. IBM plans to deliver at least $30 million for AI research across the SUNY system, with SUNY matching as much as $25 million.

2. A key portion of the $2 billion commitment is an AI hardware middle that IBM will open at the SUNY Polytechnic Institute's campus. The core will focal point on research, pile and testing related to laptop chips utilized in AI.

3. IBM pointed out the company expects the AI hardware middle to appeal to fresh AI companies and federal researchers to the state, as well as foster economic evolution and create fresh jobs. The headquarters will collaborate with a number of expertise businesses, together with Samsung and Tokyo Electron restricted.

"under the governor's leadership, their partnership with groups continues to foster analysis breakthroughs and fiscal boom whereas working to combat every exiguous thing from ailments and melanoma to mitigating climate change," SUNY Chancellor Kristina Johnson, PhD, observed. "artificial intelligence is just one illustration of how SUNY is investing in fresh tech clusters to prepare their college students for the first rate-paying jobs of the next day."

extra articles on ersatz intelligence:Northwell fitness adds AI for readmissions to its EMRNew algorithm from MIT might possibly breathe able to 'de-bias' AI: 3 notesDr. Eric Topol: 10 competencies AI purposes for clinicians, hospitals

© Copyright ASC COMMUNICATIONS 2019. drawn to LINKING to or REPRINTING this content? View their policies by passage of clicking here.

To obtain the latest medical institution and health rig company and criminal tidings and evaluation from Becker's clinic evaluation, sign-up for the free Becker's health headquarters assessment E-weekly by passage of clicking perquisite here.

IBM Modernizes Domino company App Platform | killexams.com actual Questions and Pass4sure dumps

news

IBM Modernizes Domino enterprise App Platform
  • through David Ramel
  • 10/16/2018
  • IBM has modernized Domino, its enterprise app platform with roots within the Lotus Notes ecosystem that debuted in 1989.

    once essentially prevalent because the server-side section of Lotus Notes, Domino is a multi-faceted platform that offers app pile -- using the quick-software-construction mode -- and extra.

    In revamping the 29-yr-historical platform, IBM has enhanced cloud support, cellular application development, analytics and boosted the collaboration capabilities that had been a mainstay of Lotus Notes, which became IBM Notes in a 1995 acquisition.

    Two of essentially the most high-quality modernizations within the fresh IBM Domino v10 are cell app construction capabilities and the embody of node.js.

    The enhanced cellular evolution performance is available in the fresh IBM Domino cell Apps, which is being previewed as a beta for which developers can note in. Furthering the IBM/Apple company relationship, the offering lets developers create Apple iPad enterprise apps. "IBM Domino additionally replicates facts between the server and local edition of your applications, so your team can also breathe productive even devoid of community connectivity," the commerce noted.

    developers can also signal on to try out the brand fresh node.js pilot that comes in the IBM Domino AppDev Pack. "Domino builders can request early access to the realm of JavaScript and Node.js through the IBM Domino AppDev Pack," IBM mentioned. "As an add-on to IBM Domino V10, each JavaScript and Domino developers can breathe in a position to increase, combine, and easily build fresh purposes using IBM Domino information."

    one other fresh feature is the capability for developers to cognomen any leisure APIs from Domino purposes, allowing the ability, for examples, to add Google Maps functionality, tug in Salesforce consumer statistics or leverage IBM's Watson capabilities.

    the fresh Domino v10 stems from a construction settlement IBM entered into with HCL applied sciences a yr ago.

    in regards to the author

    David Ramel is the editor of visual Studio magazine.


    Whilst it is very difficult task to pick dependable exam questions / answers resources regarding review, reputation and validity because people obtain ripoff due to choosing incorrect service. Killexams. com effect it inescapable to provide its clients far better to their resources with respect to exam dumps update and validity. Most of other peoples ripoff report complaint clients foster to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams enjoyably and easily. They never compromise on their review, reputation and attribute because killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams client self self-confidence is notable to full of us. Specially they manage killexams.com review, killexams.com reputation, killexams.com ripoff report complaint, killexams.com trust, killexams.com validity, killexams.com report and killexams.com scam. If perhaps you see any bogus report posted by their competitor with the cognomen killexams ripoff report complaint internet, killexams.com ripoff report, killexams.com scam, killexams.com complaint or something like this, just retain in intelligence that there are always bad people damaging reputation of splendid services due to their benefits. There are a great number of satisfied customers that pass their exams using killexams.com brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams rehearse questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit Killexams.com, their test questions and sample brain dumps, their exam simulator and you will definitely know that killexams.com is the best brain dumps site.

    Back to Braindumps Menu


    P6040-017 braindumps | 132-S-816.1 test prep | 000-544 exam prep | 7391X brain dumps | 200-125 rehearse test | EE0-071 free pdf download | HP3-X11 VCE | 000-036 examcollection | A4070-603 pdf download | HP0-Y12 test prep | 000-416 study guide | 310-302 free pdf | HP0-S39 questions and answers | 000-736 mock exam | 000-200 rehearse questions | 920-551 actual questions | EW0-200 study guide | 9L0-608 cheat sheets | HP3-C11 rehearse test | 000-797 free pdf |


    Just study these LOT-986 Questions and study guide
    We are doing incredible battle to give you actual Creating IBM Lotus Notes and Domino 8.5(R) Applications with Xpages and Advanced Techniques exam questions and answers, along clarifications. Each on killexams.com has been appeared by methods for IBM ensured specialists. They are colossally qualified and affirmed people, who believe quite a long while of expert experience perceived with the IBM evaluations. They check the question as per actual test.

    If you are examining out IBM LOT-986 Dumps containing actual exam Questions and Answers for the Creating IBM Lotus Notes and Domino 8.5(R) Applications with Xpages and Advanced Techniques test prep? killexams.com is remedy here to provide you one most updated and glorious database of LOT-986 Dumps that's http://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/LOT-986. they believe got aggregative information of LOT-986 Dumps questions from actual tests to provide you an chance to prepare and pass LOT-986 exam at the first attempt. killexams.com Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as below; WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for full exams on web site PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders additional than $69 DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders over $99 SEPSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for full Orders

    It is basic to amass to the pilot material if one needs toward reclaim time. As you require clusters of time to recognize for updated and genuine examination material for taking the IT certification exam. If you find that at one place, what could breathe better than this? Its objective killexams.com that has what you require. You can reclaim time and retain away from ail if you buy Adobe IT accreditation from their site.

    You should obtain the most updated IBM LOT-986 Braindumps with the remedy answers, set up by killexams.com specialists, empowering the likelihood to understand finding out about their LOT-986 exam course in the best, you won't find LOT-986 consequences of such attribute wherever in the market. Their IBM LOT-986 rehearse Dumps are given to candidates at performing 100% in their exam. Their IBM LOT-986 exam dumps are latest in the market, enabling you to prepare for your LOT-986 exam in the perquisite way.

    If you are possessed with successfully Passing the IBM LOT-986 exam to start securing? killexams.com has driving edge made IBM exam tends to that will vow you pass this LOT-986 exam! killexams.com passes on you the correct, present and latest updated LOT-986 exam questions and available with 100% unlimited assurance. numerous associations that give LOT-986 intelligence dumps yet those are not genuine and latest ones. Course of action with killexams.com LOT-986 fresh inquiries is a most flawless passage to deal with pass this accreditation exam in straightforward way.

    We are generally particularly mindful that a vital issue in the IT commerce is that nonattendance of significant worth examination materials. Their exam prep material gives you that you should pick a certification exam. Their IBM LOT-986 Exam will give you exam inquiries with certified answers that mirror the genuine exam. These inquiries and answers give you the experience of stepping through the veritable exam. towering bore and motivator for the LOT-986 Exam. 100% certification to pass your IBM LOT-986 exam and obtain your IBM certification. They at killexams.com are set out to empower you to pass your LOT-986 exam with towering scores. The chances of you fail to cinch through your LOT-986 test, after encountering their broad exam dumps are for full intents and purposes nothing.

    killexams.com Great LOT-986 exam test system is amazingly reassuring for their customers for the exam prep. Monstrously fundamental inquiries, focuses and definitions are included in brain dumps pdf. companionable event the data in a solitary site is a honest to goodness palliate and Ass you prepare for the IT certification exam inside a short time age navigate. The LOT-986 exam offers key core interests. The killexams.com pass4sure dumps holds the basic inquiries or thoughts of the LOT-986 exam

    At killexams.com, they give totally overviewed IBM LOT-986 planning resources the best to pass LOT-986 exam, and to obtain ensured by IBM. It is a best choice to accelerate your situation as a specialist in the Information Technology industry. They are satisfied with their reputation of helping people cinch through the LOT-986 test in their first endeavor. Their flourishing rates in the past two years believe been totally awesome, due to their cheery customers as of now prepared to instigate their situations in the most optimized diagram of attack. killexams.com is the principle choice among IT specialists, especially the ones planning to climb the movement levels speedier in their individual organizations. IBM is the commerce pioneer in information development, and getting certified by them is a guaranteed passage to deal with win with IT positions. They empower you to accomplish really that with their radiant IBM LOT-986 getting ready materials.

    killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
    WC2017: 60% Discount Coupon for full exams on website
    PROF17: 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
    DEAL17: 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
    DECSPECIAL: 10% Special Discount Coupon for full Orders


    IBM LOT-986 is uncommon full around the world, and the commerce and programming courses of action gave by them are gotten a wield on by each one of the associations. They believe helped in driving an expansive number of associations on the shot mode for accomplishment. Extensive learning of IBM things are seen as a basic capacity, and the specialists ensured by them are astoundingly regraded in full organizations.

    LOT-986 Practice Test | LOT-986 examcollection | LOT-986 VCE | LOT-986 study guide | LOT-986 practice exam | LOT-986 cram


    Killexams HP0-094 free pdf | Killexams HP0-823 questions and answers | Killexams DSST-HRM rehearse test | Killexams M8010-246 examcollection | Killexams 050-644 actual questions | Killexams 3305 dump | Killexams AVA exam prep | Killexams 700-703 bootcamp | Killexams 000-917 exam questions | Killexams 1Z0-102 dumps | Killexams 000-606 rehearse test | Killexams M2010-727 cheat sheets | Killexams 000-N12 actual questions | Killexams 1Z0-495 test prep | Killexams 0G0-081 VCE | Killexams 1Z0-851 brain dumps | Killexams HPE2-K43 study guide | Killexams 000-026 cram | Killexams HP0-Y20 questions answers | Killexams HP0-921 free pdf |


    killexams.com huge List of Exam Braindumps

    View Complete list of Killexams.com Brain dumps


    Killexams 000-636 sample test | Killexams GE0-806 study guide | Killexams HP0-409 dump | Killexams 000-512 bootcamp | Killexams A2180-607 rehearse questions | Killexams 000-580 test prep | Killexams IQ0-100 actual questions | Killexams HP2-T15 examcollection | Killexams 70-511-CSharp study guide | Killexams 000-705 cheat sheets | Killexams 190-756 exam prep | Killexams NSCA-CPT test prep | Killexams A2010-564 braindumps | Killexams 1Z0-055 study guide | Killexams 000-183 rehearse test | Killexams FSDEV free pdf | Killexams HP0-D08 test questions | Killexams 000-866 dumps questions | Killexams 050-ENVCSE01 test prep | Killexams C2070-448 exam prep |


    Creating IBM Lotus Notes and Domino 8.5(R) Applications with Xpages and Advanced Techniques

    Pass 4 positive LOT-986 dumps | Killexams.com LOT-986 actual questions | http://morganstudioonline.com/

    Is Everybody Working for the Weekend? | killexams.com actual questions and Pass4sure dumps

    This is not a typical DKos post (at least, not for me), but this thread over at Kevin Drum's site got me thinking about a very simple question: accomplish you like your job?

    The title of this post, of course, refers to the 80s anthem by Loverboy of (more or less) the very name. But how actual is that saying? I'm really snoopy to know how people feel about their current employment. If you like your job, why? If not, why not? And are you planning to accomplish anything about it? accomplish you assume you'll ever find a job you truly love? And for those of you who already accomplish like their jobs, how did you wind up with your job, and why exactly accomplish you like it? Hmm... perhaps it's not such a simple question after all!

    I would really like to hear people's thoughts on this topic - and not just in response to my specific questions. Anything related is cool. So please, pick the poll & jump perquisite in.

    P.S. And if you don't intelligence telling us, what sort of job accomplish you have, or what line of labor are you in? Don't cognomen any employers, of course - just a job description.

    Update [2005-7-8 23:0:56 by DavidNYC]: This has been a truly fascinating thread - I hearten you to read full the passage through it. There are comments from an extraordinary array of people: A bodybuilder, a tattoo artist, and a horse breeder to cognomen a few of the more unusual jobs.

    But just as importantly, this thread has reminded me of what I like most about Daily Kos: The diversity of backgrounds combined with a universal want to learn and listen. I assume the site is at its best when these traits are showcased, as they are in this thread tonight.


    Residents’ and Attending Physicians’ Handoffs: A Systematic Review of the Literature | killexams.com actual questions and Pass4sure dumps

    Effective communication is central to patient safety and quality. Inadequate communication consistently appears as a factor contributing to medical errors, across settings and practitioners. These span from an incident with a solitary patient1 to broader communication issues between physicians and nurses.2 In reviews of malpractice claims, communication problems were contributing factors in 26% to 31% of cases.3–5 The Joint Commission has reviewed data from 6,244 sentinel events occurring between 1995 and June 30, 2009.6 Communication problems believe long been famed as a major contributing factor to these sentinel events. Sutcliffe et al7 conducted semistructured interviews with residents, who recalled 70 recent medical mishaps, and indicated that 91% contained communication failures.

    Handoffs, the transfer of patient custody from one health custody provider to another, are known to breathe vulnerable to communication failures8 and believe been called “remarkably haphazard.”9 As defined by the Joint Commission, handoff communication refers to a standardized process “in which information about patient/client/resident custody is communicated in a consistent manner.”10

    Retrospective reviews of malpractice claims in the ambulatory setting11 and emergency department12 showed that handoffs were a contributing factor in 20% and 24% of medical errors, respectively. When looking specifically at malpractice cases with communication breakdowns, 43% involved handoffs.13 A review of 146 surgical errors establish that 41 (28%) involved handoffs.14 Of residents and fellows who reported caring for a patient with an adverse event, 15% indicated the understanding for the mistake was a problem with handoffs.15

    Numerous surveys document health custody staff concern. In an Agency for Healthcare Research and attribute 2008 survey, just over half (51%) of the 160,176 hospital staff respondents reported that “important patient custody information is often lost during shift changes.”16 When 93 fourth-year medical students and 228 residents responded to a survey about patient safety, (70%) agreed that improved handoffs would reduce medical mishaps.17

    Reduced resident duty hours were first introduced in fresh York situation in 1989 and were mandated for full U.S. residency programs in 2003. Although reductions in duty hours may lead to less fatigue and improved well-being in residents, many believe expressed concern about the resultant need for increased handoffs and reduced continuity of patient care.18 As a result of reduced hours, patients can breathe seen by three different physicians in the first 24 hours of their care.19 Seventy-six percent of 29 surgical residents in a fresh York study agreed that continuity of custody had been negatively affected as a result of duty hours changes.20

    Discontinuity in patient care, which can occur with cross-coverage and night float systems, has been establish to lead to increased in-hospital complications,21 preventable adverse events,22 increased cost due to unnecessary tests being ordered by residents not intimate with the patient,19 and diagnostic test delays.21 In a study at one teaching hospital during a four-month period, the risk of a preventable adverse event was strongly associated (more than twice as likely) with coverage by a physician from another team.22

    Night float systems, often implemented to ensure that residents accomplish not exceed duty hours limits, believe been famed to result in inadequate information transfer to the covering residents.23 Nurses believe expressed concern over these changes. Fifty-one percent of the 67 nurses who responded to a survey about a fresh resident night float system agreed that “residents don’t know the patients as well as in the faded system.”24

    Other issues surrounding attending physicians’ and residents’ handoffs believe been documented. Gandhi25 notes that inadequate handoffs can lead to diffused responsibility, which can breathe a major contributor to medical errors. In addition, Coiera26 establish that health custody communications are recumbent to interruptions, with a third of communication events (30.6%) interrupted.27 Many of these interruptions result in inefficiencies,28 and interruptions during handoffs are likely to lead to failures of working memory,29 which result in decreased recall accuracy.

    In 2006, the uninterested length of abide for full hospitalized patients was 4.8 days.30 Assuming that patient custody transfers between covering residents and/or attending physicians occur 1 to 2 times per day, the uninterested patient will breathe handed off 5 to 10 times per admission. Each of these handoffs represents a risk for inadequate communication, which could result in reduced patient safety and increased medical errors.

    In response to concerns about inadequate health custody handoffs, a number of national patient safety organizations believe highlighted the importance of communication, including the Institute for Healthcare Communication31 and the National attribute Forum. In 2006, the Joint Commission created a fresh National Patient Safety Goal on handoffs.32 In 2009, the goal remains virtually unchanged, requiring the organization to implement “a standardized approach to hand-off communications, including an chance to inquire of and respond to questions.”33

    As the preceding paragraphs suggest, there is abundant evidence of the negative consequences of penniless communication and inadequate handoffs in health care. The purpose of the current study was to identify full English-language articles on resident and/or attending physicians’ handoffs in the United States, conduct a systematic review of research studies, execute a qualitative review of barriers and strategies mentioned across full articles, and identify features of structured handoffs that believe been shown to breathe effective. This review was conducted in conjunction with the Alliance of Independent Academic Medical Centers National Initiative: Improving Patient custody Through GME. The National Initiative was a collaborative formed in 2007 that linked residency programs in 19 teaching hospitals across the United States in efforts to integrate academics and attribute through projects coordinated at a national level.

    Method National initiative labor group

    A labor group of the National Initiative developed resources and wrote systematic reviews of the literature in advocate of the National Initiative's goals. They performed this study as one of a string of literature reviews initiated by that group. The methodology that they employed included regular, substantive discussions about manuscript concept and design, such as key questions, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and search strategies. There were censorious interchanges among us about full notable aspects of each systematic review written by this group, including those for this report, and they reached consensus on how to handle each systematic review. The specific subject, arrogate technique, and final presentation of this systematic review are the product of a progressive, iterative, and qualitative process of refinement.

    Literature search

    We conducted a thorough and systematic literature search of English-language articles published on handoffs from 1987 to June 4, 2008 using Ovid Medline, Medline In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, CINAHL, HealthSTAR, and Christiana custody full Text Journals@Ovid, followed by reference section review. The search terms used were hand-off$, handoff$, signout$, note out$, sign-out$, handover$, hand-over$, signover$, and sign-over$. A total of 2,590 articles were identified. full titles were reviewed for feasible inclusion, and 401 articles were obtained for further review (Figure 1). Reference sections of full 401 articles were reviewed for additional articles.

    Inclusion criteria

    Articles meeting the following criteria were eligible for review of barriers and strategies: English language, indexed in PubMed, published between 1987 and June 4, 2008, focused on health custody handoffs in the United States, and including information about either resident or attending physicians’ handoffs. Articles included in the systematic review had one of the following study designs: randomized controlled trial; nonrandomized trial, with control or comparison group; single-group pre- and posttest, cohort study; single-group cross-sectional research; single-group posttest only, or qualitative research.

    Trained reviewers (J.L. and L.R.) deemed that 46 articles met inclusion criteria for the initial review of barriers and strategies. Using an iterative process, an abstraction configuration was developed to validate eligibility for full review, assess article characteristics, and extract data pertinent to the study questions. This iterative process started with an initial form, which was used by two reviewers (J.L. and L.R.) to independently abstract data from four articles. The reviewers then met to discuss the abstraction configuration for inclusion of full pertinent data. A second, more particular configuration was then created for abstraction. Reviewers (J.L. and J.M.) independently absent-minded full data. Most abstraction disagreements were minor, and full disagreements were quickly resolved during discussion, when a consensus was reached on the absent-minded data.

    Quality scoring system

    Downs and Black34 created a sound and dependable checklist designed to assess both experimental and observational studies. Two systematic reviews35,36 of published systems (scales and checklists) designed to assess study attribute believe ranked the scale developed by Downs and Black as one of the best. Both of these systematic reviews went on to suggest that some modifications might breathe useful, depending on the specific topic and study designs. Therefore, five of us (L.R., J.L., J.M., J.J., J.S.P.) developed a attribute scoring configuration based on this approach, using four of the original items and eight modified items, which yielded scores ranging from 1 to 16, with 16 being the highest feasible score (see Chart 1). This attribute scoring configuration contained two items related to study sort and sample size, five items related to reporting, and five items related to internal validity.

    If a study included multiple assessment formats, such as interviews and a questionnaire, that resulted in different sample sizes, the largest sample was used as the sample size in the attribute scoring form. There was no passage to determine the number of independent study participants for each assessment method. Thus, to avoid counting the very study participant multiple times, they credited the study with the largest reported sample only.

    Quality scores were independently obtained from reviewer pairs (L.R. and J.L. or J.J.) for each study. The interrater reliability was assessed for full identified research studies (n = 18). Overall agreement was 97.7%, and Cohen's kappa for agreement between the two reviewers was r = 0.96, P < .001. full differences were resolved through discussion to defer a final attribute score for each study.

    Qualitative analysis of barriers and strategies

    Conventional content analysis is a sort of qualitative research used when there is limited or no existing theory on the phenomenon of interest.37 This analysis involves an iterative process that allows themes to arise from data. Researchers immerse themselves in the content and allow categories to emerge.37

    All barriers and strategies mentioned in the reviewed articles were identified and listed in phrase format in two continuous lists, one for strategies and another for barriers. Reviewers (J.L. and L.R.) met to compare lists and, through discussion, agreed on final comprehensive lists. Through an inductive iterative process, category labels were created and full phrases were moved to a category or subcategory. The final lists were reviewed by J.M. for coherence and consistency.

    Results

    Forty-six articles describing resident and/or attending physicians’ handoffs were identified. Thirty-three (71.7%) were published between 2005 and 2008 (Figure 2). Content analysis yielded 91 barriers in eight major categories and 140 strategies in seven major categories (Table 1).

    Figure 2

    Figure 2

    Table 1

    Table 1

    Twenty-two articles presented anecdotal data,38–58 one of which had a physician handoffs case example and nursing handoffs research59; three provided circumscribed reviews,60–62 and three were editorials.63–65 The remaining 18 articles reported research on handoffs and were analyzed in depth (see the Appendix).66–83 Only one80 research study did not involve residents or believe a graduate medical education focus. attribute assessment scores for the research studies ranged from 1 to 13 (possible purview 1–16). Six studies obtained scores of 8 or less, eight had scores between 8.5 and 11.5, and four achieved attribute scores of 12 to 13.

    Only 6 of 18 (33.3%) research studies identified efficient handoff features.66,67,69,71,77,78 In studies comparing computerized handoff systems with other methods, such as personal handwritten notes, the computerized or electronic system performed better. Residents were more likely to believe full patients on their list,67 to report that they received full notable information,78 to believe increased satisfaction with the handoff system,67 to disburse less time in prerounding and rounding activities,67 and to self-report decreased adverse events related to handoffs.77 Others believe famed that resident-maintained lists in a database, such as a Microsoft Word file or surpass database, hold content and medication errors.69,71 However, interns using standardized, self-maintained sign-out cards reported fewer penniless sign-outs and were more likely to record code status, patient age, and allergies.66

    Discussion

    As stated earlier, they identified 46 articles describing residents’ and attending physicians’ handoffs in the United States. Eighteen were research studies (39.1%), only two of which were randomized controlled trials. The majority (71.7%) of articles were published in recent years, which is not surprising, given the Joint Commission's National Patient Safety Goal on handoffs issued in 2006. However, as demonstrated by their attribute assessment scores (see the Appendix), there is a remarkable lack of high-quality outcomes studies. It is notable that one third of the reviewed research studies obtained attribute scores at or below 8 (out of a feasible 16), and only one study achieved a score of 13.

    One purpose of the current study was to identify features of physicians’ handoffs that believe been shown to breathe effective. Unfortunately, only 6 of the 18 (33.3%) research studies included measures of effectiveness. Of the three studies using computerized handoff systems, one was a stand-alone system,78 and the other two had some linkage with the hospital computer system.67,77 While these full provided a structured template, they also relied to varying degrees on residents to enter information, which introduces an chance for errors to occur.69,71 Most of the studies assessing effectiveness used self-reported data, with a few exceptions. Van Eaton and colleagues67 looked at the number of patients missed on resident rounds and showed a reduce from 5 to 2.5 patients/team/month (P = .0001) when using a computerized handoff system. Two other studies assessed errors on resident-maintained handoff forms when compared with the medical record69,71 (a surrogate for actual medical errors) and, not surprisingly, establish errors on the resident lists.

    Of note, two survey studies documented a lack of formal handoffs instruction during residency, with 60% to 74.4% (internal medicine72 and emergency medicine,73 respectively) reporting that they believe no lectures or workshops on the topic. Although 72.3% of the 185 emergency medicine residency/fellowship program directors studied agreed that standardized handoffs would reduce medical errors,73 the majority did not believe a uniform policy or procedure regarding handoffs. Only one of the studies reviewed here included the development, implementation, and assessment of a formal, structured handoffs curriculum.75 Horwitz and colleagues75 provide a comprehensive curricular template for others to use; however, they relied on postsession evaluations of perceived solace and importance of handoffs. They commend their diagram to conduct observation of handoff skills and recognize forward to their future publications.

    Almost full of the research articles (17 of 18; 94%) were conducted within a residency program. Graduate medical education has taken the lead in conducting handoffs research, which is one demonstration of the value added to health custody by medical education.

    Handoff barriers

    We identified 91 barriers to efficient handoffs that could breathe organized into eight major categories. Of barrier categories, communication issues were reported most frequently (30.8%), with common communication barriers ranging from not listening to inadequate communication. Because efficient communication is an essential component of handoffs, this was an expected finding. However, hierarchy and companionable barriers constituted a less intuitive group. Here, they establish things such as relational communication barriers and residents not being likely to hand off labor to more senior residents, because of a rigid reliance on hierarchical norms that prohibit such behavior. Thus, adequately addressing handoff issues will require more than protocols, structure, and training. Understanding the complex companionable structures and hierarchies in which residents and attending physicians work, as well as the unwritten rules that govern the handoff of patient responsibilities, will breathe required.

    Handoff strategies

    We identified 140 strategies that could breathe organized into seven major categories. Strategies for standardization were famed most frequently (44.3%), with technological solutions (16.4%), such as computerized handoff systems, next. Interestingly, whereas communication issues constituted approximately one third of barriers, improving communication skills was famed much less frequently (11.4%) as a strategy. Standardization would address some communication issues, but not all, such as language differences. Providing training or education (10%), evaluating the process (7.1%), and addressing environmental issues (5.7%), such as lighting and limiting interruptions and noise, effect intuitive sense. However, a less obvious strategy was insuring the recognition that a transfer of responsibility/accountability (5.0%) had occurred.

    Limitations and strengths

    Handoffs in a variety of environments were studied, which makes it difficult to exhaust their findings to formulate barriers and strategies for exhaust in every handoff situation. For example, some techniques may breathe better applied to inpatient medicine as opposed to the emergency department. In addition, they absent-minded barriers and strategies from full sections of the articles studied, including the introduction. This may believe resulted in overemphasis of some barriers or strategies, depending on the author's views and on repetition. However, they only counted the very barrier or strategy multiple times if the wording was significantly different in subsequent exhaust and if the two instances could stand lonesome as different aspects of the very category.

    Another potential limitation is that the barriers and strategies they identified (Table 1) limn the opinions of the authors of the reviewed studies. Further, they identified the barriers and strategies through a qualitative process. Although they appear intuitively relevant, they were not derived from research studies designed to identify handoff barriers and strategies.

    The current study is limited by the Ovid search strategy used. Specifically, the selected search terms may not believe included full pertinent terms. They strengthened the possibility of identifying full articles that met inclusion criteria by reviewing the reference sections of full obtained articles. Although this strategy minimizes the risk of missing germane studies, it does not liquidate the possibility.

    Publication jaundice refers to the possibility that high-quality studies with negative results may not believe been published. Others believe famed that many attribute improvement (QI) projects are not published.84 In addition, it has been their observation that some QI projects are published in newsletters, with the authors never submitting them to peer-reviewed journals. Thus, there may breathe outcomes studies of handoffs that are not in the peer-reviewed literature. However, the categorical search strategy, clear inclusion criteria, and systematic process used to identify and evaluate articles strengthen the attribute of this review.

    Although their attribute scoring system was based on a validated methodology developed to assess experimental and observational studies together, their system has not been validated across multiple settings and investigators. The relative weightings may require refinement, and there may prove to breathe additional pertinent categories. The system did believe a towering internal reliability, and reviewers of various educational backgrounds and experience establish it straightforward and easy to use. Further, the attribute scoring system provides a reproducible template for the assessment of handoffs articles.

    Recommendations

    Numerous authors believe famed the dearth of research focused on handoffs.45,57,70,83,85,86 In addition, there are risks involved in implementing interventions without evidence supporting their effectiveness.87 Winters and colleagues87(p1,647) famed that “[n]ational efforts to ameliorate patient safety should breathe supported by sufficiently stout evidence to warrant such a commitment of resources.”

    Evidence-based rehearse is informed by high-quality research. Recent publication guidelines for patient safety and attribute initiatives believe established a framework for standardized reporting.88,89 They recommend that future handoffs studies exhaust the Standards for attribute Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE) guidelines.89 Many of the studies reviewed here would believe been improved by doing so.

    Others believe famed that it may breathe unreasonable to hope patient safety and attribute studies to follow the design rigors of randomized controlled trials.87 However, the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness mode provides a structured, rigorous mode to synthesize data from other clinical study types with expert opinion to provide the best available guidelines.90 Unfortunately, the literature on handoffs identified here is not of enough attribute and quantity to synthesize into evidence-based recommendations.

    Although the Joint Commission is calling for structured handoffs, they identified very exiguous evidence to advocate the exhaust of any specific structure, protocol, or method. However, direct observation of handoffs in other settings (i.e., NASA mission control, nuclear power, railroad, and ambulance dispatch) with towering consequences for error, yielded 21 common strategies,91 which could present a starting point in the evolution of health custody handoffs research. Their review of the U.S. physicians’ handoffs literature has led us to develop a list of research questions, organized by the content domains of knowledge, attitudes, skills, process outcomes, and clinical outcomes (see List 1).

    Across the United States, hospitals are implementing structured handoff protocols in an ail to comply with Joint Commission requirements. High-quality outcomes studies that focus on systems factors, human performance, and the effectiveness of protocols and interventions are urgently needed. These studies should address the barriers and strategies identified here. In addition, handoffs in different disciplines are likely to believe different requirements and issues. For instance, an emergency department handoff will need to believe different content than one for inpatient medicine or pediatrics. Therefore, researchers should conduct discipline-specific handoff studies.

    We summon for rigorous outcomes studies designed to (1) assess the effectiveness of handoffs, (2) determine the elements of handoffs that lead to improved patient outcomes, and (3) identify the best implementation strategies. Finally, these studies should breathe reported using the SQUIRE guidelines. Without these studies, hospitals across the United States are destined to dissipate time, resources, and ail on flawed handoff practices.

    Acknowledgments

    Special thanks to Ellen M. Justice, MLIS, AHIP, medical librarian of the Lewis B. Flinn Medical Library, Christiana custody Health System, for conducting literature searches; Dolores Ann Moran, medical library assistant II, and Janice Evans, medical library assistant II, for their assistance in locating articles; and Donald Riesenberg, MD, for feedback on the manuscript.

    References 1Chassin MR, Becher EC. The wrong patient. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:826–833. 2Donchin Y, Gopher D, Olin M, et al. A recognize into the nature and causes of human errors in the intensive custody unit. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12:143–148. 3Beckman HB, Markakis KM, Suchman AL, Frankel RM. The doctor–patient relationship and malpractice: Lessons from plaintiff depositions. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154:1365–1370. 4White AA, Wright SW, Blanco R, et al. Cause-and-effect analysis of risk management files to assess patient custody in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11:1035–1041. 5White AA, Pichert JW, Bledsoe SH, Irwin C, Entman SS. cause and effect analysis of closed claims in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:1031–1038. 7Sutcliffe KM, Lewton E, Rosenthal MM. Communication failures: An insidious contributor to medical mishaps. Acad Med. 2004;79:186–194. 8Keyes C. Coordination of custody provision: The role of the ‘handoff.’ Int J Qual Health Care. 2000;12:519. 9Volpp KGM, Grande D. Residents’ suggestions for reducing errors in teaching hospitals. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:851–855. 11Gandhi TK, Kachalia A, Thomas EJ, et al. Missed and delayed diagnoses in the ambulatory setting: A study of closed malpractice claims. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:488–496. 12Kachalia A, Gandhi TK, Puopolo AL, et al. Missed and delayed diagnoses in the emergency department: A study of closed malpractice claims from 4 liability insurers. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49:196–205. 13Greenberg CC, Regenbogen SE, Studdert DM, et al. Patterns of communication breakdowns resulting in injury to surgical patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204:533–540. 14Gawande AA, Zinner MJ, Studdert DM, Brennan TA. Analysis of errors reported by surgeons at three teaching hospitals. Surgery. 2003;133:614–621. 15Jagsi R, Kitch BT, Weinstein DF, Campbell EG, Hutter M, Weissman JS. Residents report on adverse events and their causes. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:2607–2613. 16Agency for Healthcare attribute and Research. Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture: 2008 Comparative Database Report. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/hospsurvey08. Accessed August 24, 2009. 17Sorokin R, Riggio JM, Hwang C. Attitudes about patient safety: A survey of physicians-in-training. Am J Med Qual. 2005;20:70–77. 18Fletcher KE, Parekh V, Halasyamani L, et al. labor hour rules and contributors to patient custody mistakes: A focus group study with internal medicine residents. J Hosp Med. 2008;3:228–237. 19Fins JJ. Professional responsibility: A perspective on the Bell Commission reforms. Bull NY Acad Med. 1991;67:359–364. 20Barden CB, Specht MC, McCarter MD, Daly JM, Fahey TJ. Effects of limited labor hours on surgical training. J Am Coll Surg. 2002;195:531–538. 21Laine C, Goldman L, Soukup JR, Hayes JG. The repercussion of a regulation restricting medical house staff working hours on the attribute of patient care. JAMA. 1993;269:374–378. 22Petersen LA, Brennan TA, O’Neil AC, Cook EF, Lee TH. Does housestaff discontinuity of custody multiply the risk for preventable adverse events? Ann Intern Med. 1994;121:866–872. 23Charap M. Reducing resident labor hours: Unproven assumptions and unforeseen outcomes. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140:814–815. 24Buff DD, Shabti R. The night float system of resident on call: What accomplish the nurses think? J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10:400–402. 25Gandhi TK. Fumbled handoffs: One dropped ball after another. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:352–358. 26Coiera E. When conversation is better than computation. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000;7:277–286. 27Coiera EW, Jayasuriya RA, Hardy J, Bannan A, Thorpe MEC. Communication loads on clinical staff in the emergency department. Med J Aust. 2002;176:415–418. 28Coiera E, Tombs V. Communication behaviors in a hospital setting: An observational study. BMJ. 1998;316:673–676. 29Parker J, Coiera E. Improving clinical communication: A view from psychology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000;7:453–461. 30DeFrances CJ, Lucas CA, Buie VC, Golosinskiy A. 2006 National Hospital Discharge Survey. National Health Statistics Report. July 30, 2008. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr005.pdf. Accessed August 24, 2009. 34Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological attribute both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health custody interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52:377–384. 35West S, King V, Carey TS, et al. Systems to Rate the force of Scientific Evidence. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 47 (Prepared by the Research Triangle Institute-University of North Carolina Evidence-based rehearse headquarters under condense No. 290-97-0011). AHRQ Publication No. 02-E016. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. April 2002. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/bv.fcgi?rid=hstat1.chapter.70996. Accessed August 24, 2009. 36Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D’Amico R, et al. Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. Health Technology Assessment. 2003;7(27). Available at: http://www.ncchta.org/fullmono/mon727.pdf. Accessed August 24, 2009. 37Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:1277–1288. 38Communication strategies for patient handoffs. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:1503–1505. 39Handoff information should cover past, future. Healthc Risk Manag. 2005;27:94. 40Measure understanding during handoffs: A naval hospital uses an evaluation appliance to determine whether information is understood. Brief Patient Saf. 2006:8–9. 41Patient handoff must breathe more than a formality. Healthc Risk Manag. 2005;27:93. 42Strategies for improving OR handoffs. OR Manager. 2005;21(8):9–10. 43What's wrong with this hand-off? Brief Patient Saf. 2006;7(1):9,12. 44Arora V, Johnson J. National patient safety goals. A model for pile a standardized hand-off protocol. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006;32:646–655. 45Beach C, Croskerry P, Shapiro M. Profiles in patient safety: Emergency custody transitions. Acad Emerg Med. 2003;10:364–347. 46Chacko V, Varvarelis N, Kemp DG. eHand-offs: An IBM Lotus Domino application for ensuring patient safety and enhancing resident supervision in hand-off communications. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006:874. 47Dracup K, Morris PE. Passing the torch: The challenge of handoffs. Am J Crit Care. 2008;17:95–97. 48Frazer TS. “Doctor's notes”: A computerized mode for managing inpatient care. Fam Med. 1988;20:223–224. 49Goldman L, Pantilat SZ, Winthrop F, Whitcomb WF. Passing the clinical baton: 6 principles to pilot the hospitalists. Am J Med. 2001;111(9B):36S–39S. 50Kushniruk A, Karson T, Moore C, Kannry J. From prototype to production system: Lessons erudite from the evolution of the SignOut System at Mount Sinai Medical Center. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003:381–385. 51Landucci D, Gipe BT. The knack and science of the handoff: How hospitalists partake data. Hospitalist. 1999;3:4. 52Luo J, Hales RE, Hilty D, Brennan C. Clinical computing: Electronic sign-out using a personal digital assistant. Psychiatr Serv. 2001;52:173–174. 53Mukherjee S. A precarious exchange. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1822–1824. 54Nemeth C, Nunnally M, O’Connor M, Cook R. Creating resilient IT: How the sign-out sheet shows clinicians effect healthcare work. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006:584–588. 55Sarkar U, Carter JT, Omachi TA, et al. SynopSIS: Integrating physician sign-out with the electronic medical record. J Hosp Med. 2007;2:336–342. 56Sutker WL. The physician's role in patient safety: What's in it for me? Baylor Univ Med Cent Proc. 2008;21:9–14. 57Vidyarthi AR, Arora V, Schnipper JL, Wall SD, Wachter RM. Managing discontinuity in academic medical centers: Strategies for a safe and efficient resident sign-out. J Hosp Med. 2006;1:257–266. 58Weinstock M. Transitioning care: H&HN′s ‘Saves Lives Now’ string profiles a better passage to wield patient handoffs. Hosp Health Netw. 2005;79(6):27–28. 59Haig KM, Sutton S, Whittington J. SBAR: A shared mental model for improving communication between clinicians. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006;32:167–175. 60Arora VM, Johnson JK, Meltzer DO, Humphrey HJ. A abstract framework and competency-based approach to improving handoffs. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17:11–14. 61Singer JI, Dean J. Emergency physician intershift handovers: An analysis of their transitional care. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006;22:751–754. 62Solet DJ, Norvell JM, Rutan GH, Frankel RM. Lost in translation: Challenges and opportunities in physician-to-physician communication during patient handoffs. Acad Med. 2005;80:1094–1099. 63Guise JM, Lowe NK. accomplish you talk SBAR? J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2006;35:313–314. 64Jauhar S. Patient handoffs, or walking along a narrow mountain ledge. Medscape J Med. 2008;10(3):57. 65Philibert I, Leach DC. Re-framing continuity of custody for this century. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:394–396. 66Lee LH, Levine JA, Schultz HJ. Utility of a standardized sign-out card for fresh medical interns. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11:753–755. 67Van Eaton EG, Horvath KD, Lober WB, Rossini AH, Pellegrini CA. A randomized, controlled ordeal evaluating the repercussion of a computerized rounding and sign-out system on continuity of custody and resident labor hours. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;200:538–545. 68Lofgren RP, Gottlieb D, Williams RA, flush EC. Post-call transfer of resident responsibility: Its effect on patient care. J Gen Intern Med. 1990;5:501–505. 69Arora V, Kao J, Lovinger D, Seiden SC, Meltzer D. Medication discrepancies in resident sign-outs and their potential to harm. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:1751–1755. 70Borowitz SM, Waggoner-Fountain LA, Bass EJ, Sledd RM. Adequacy of information transferred at resident sign-out (inhospital handover of care): A prospective survey. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17:6–10. 71Frank G, Lawler LA, Jackson AA, Steinberg TH, Lawless ST. Resident miscommunication: Accuracy of the resident sign-out sheet. J Healthc Qual. 2005;27(2):(Web Exclusive):W2-10–W2-14. Available at: http://www.nahq.org/journal/online/pdf/webex0305.pdf. Accessed August 24, 2009. 72Horwitz LI, Krumholz HM, Green ML, Huot SJ. Transfers of patient custody between house staff on internal medicine wards: A national survey. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1173–1177. 73Sinha M, Shriki J, Salness R, Blackburn PA. need for standardized sign-out in the emergency department: A survey of emergency medicine residency and pediatric emergency medicine fellowship program directors. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14:192–196. 74Frank G, Lawless ST, Steinberg TH. Improving physician communication through an automated, integrated sign-out system. J Healthc Inf Manag. 2005;19(4):68–74. 75Horwitz LI, Moin T, Green ML. evolution and implementation of an oral sign-out skills curriculum. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:1470–1474. 76Kannry J, Moore C. MediSign: Using a Web-based SignOut System to ameliorate provider identification. Proc AMIA Symp. 1999:550–554. 77Petersen LA, Orav EJ, Teich JM, O’Neil AC, Brennan TA. Using a computerized sign-out program to ameliorate continuity of inpatient custody and prevent adverse events. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1998;24:77–87. 78Ram R, hide B. Signing out patients for off-hours coverage: Comparison of manual and computer-aided methods. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1992:114–118. 79Van Eaton EG, Horvath KD, Lober WB, Pellegrini CA. Organizing the transfer of patient custody information: The evolution of a computerized resident sign-out system. Surgery. 2004;136:5–13. 80Apker J, Mallak LA, Gibson SC. Communicating in the “gray zone”: Perceptions about emergency physician–hospitalist handoffs and patient safety. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14:884–894. 81Arora V, Johnson J, Lovinger D, Humphrey HJ, Meltzer DO. Communication failures in patient sign-out and suggestions for improvement: A censorious incident analysis. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:401–407. 82Kellogg KC, Breen E, Ferzoco SJ, Zinner MJ, Ashley SW. Resistance to change in surgical residency: An ethnographic study of labor hours reform. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;202:630–636. 83Laxmisan A, Hakimzada F, Sayan OR, Green RA, Zhang J, Patel VL. The multitasking clinician: Decision-making and cognitive demand during and after team handoffs in emergency care. Int J Med Inform. 2007;76:801–811. 84Davidoff F, Batalden P. Toward stronger evidence on attribute improvement. Draft publication guidelines: The genesis of a consensus project. Qua Saf Health Care. 2005;14:319–325. 85Hamilton P, Gemeinhardt G, Mancuso P, Sahlin CL, Ivy L. SBAR and nurse–physician communication: Pilot testing an educational intervention. Nurs Adm Q. 2006;30:295–299. 86Pope BB, Rodzen L, Spross G. Raising the SBAR: How better communication improves patient outcomes. Nursing. 2008;38(3):41–43. 87Winters BD, Pham J, Pronovost PJ. Rapid response teams—Walk, don’t run. JAMA. 2006;296:1645–1647. 88Stevens DP. Why fresh guidelines for reporting improvement research? And why now? Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:314. 90Fitch K, Bernstein SJ, Aguilar MD, et al. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness mode User's Manual. Santa Monica, Calif: RAND; 2001. 91Patterson ES, Roth EM, Woods DD, Chow R, Gomes JO. Handoff strategies in settings with towering consequences for failure: Lessons for health custody operations. Int J Qual Health Care. 2004;16:125–132. © 2009 Association of American Medical Colleges Source

    Academic Medicine84(12):1775-1787, December 2009.

    Related Videos

    Data is temporarily unavailable. tickle try again soon.

    This website uses cookies. By continuing to exhaust this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. For information on cookies and how you can disable them visit their Privacy and Cookie Policy.

    Got it, thanks!


    Direct Download of over 5500 Certification Exams

    3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Aruba [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Avaya [96 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CA-Technologies [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CheckPoint [41 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
    College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institue [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institute [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DELL [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECCouncil [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    EMC [129 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fortinet [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HP [750 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBM [1532 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Juniper [64 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Medical [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Microsoft [374 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCLEX [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
    OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Oracle [279 Certification Exam(s) ]
    P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Symantec [134 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]





    References :


    Dropmark : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/11740069
    Wordpress : http://wp.me/p7SJ6L-1ps
    Dropmark-Text : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/12306787
    Issu : https://issuu.com/trutrainers/docs/lot-986
    Blogspot : http://killexamsbraindump.blogspot.com/2017/11/looking-for-lot-986-exam-dumps-that.html
    RSS Feed : http://feeds.feedburner.com/WhereCanIGetHelpToPassLot-986Exam
    Box.net : https://app.box.com/s/j2xhiiseg3lbuu8vafwebqiymke536kq
    zoho.com : https://docs.zoho.com/file/62c5063d2be48003245c5b0ffd51ca1ebe1aa






    Back to Main Page





    Killexams LOT-986 exams | Killexams LOT-986 cert | Pass4Sure LOT-986 questions | Pass4sure LOT-986 | pass-guaratee LOT-986 | best LOT-986 test preparation | best LOT-986 training guides | LOT-986 examcollection | killexams | killexams LOT-986 review | killexams LOT-986 legit | kill LOT-986 example | kill LOT-986 example journalism | kill exams LOT-986 reviews | kill exam ripoff report | review LOT-986 | review LOT-986 quizlet | review LOT-986 login | review LOT-986 archives | review LOT-986 sheet | legitimate LOT-986 | legit LOT-986 | legitimacy LOT-986 | legitimation LOT-986 | legit LOT-986 check | legitimate LOT-986 program | legitimize LOT-986 | legitimate LOT-986 business | legitimate LOT-986 definition | legit LOT-986 site | legit online banking | legit LOT-986 website | legitimacy LOT-986 definition | >pass 4 sure | pass for sure | p4s | pass4sure certification | pass4sure exam | IT certification | IT Exam | LOT-986 material provider | pass4sure login | pass4sure LOT-986 exams | pass4sure LOT-986 reviews | pass4sure aws | pass4sure LOT-986 security | pass4sure cisco | pass4sure coupon | pass4sure LOT-986 dumps | pass4sure cissp | pass4sure LOT-986 braindumps | pass4sure LOT-986 test | pass4sure LOT-986 torrent | pass4sure LOT-986 download | pass4surekey | pass4sure cap | pass4sure free | examsoft | examsoft login | exams | exams free | examsolutions | exams4pilots | examsoft download | exams questions | examslocal | exams practice |

    www.pass4surez.com | www.killcerts.com | www.search4exams.com | http://morganstudioonline.com/


    <

    MORGAN Studio

    is specialized in Architectural visualization , Industrial visualization , 3D Modeling ,3D Animation , Entertainment and Visual Effects .