C4040-122 exam Dumps Source : Power Systems with POWER7 Common Sales Skills -v2
Test Code : C4040-122
Test cognomen : Power Systems with POWER7 Common Sales Skills -v2
Vendor cognomen : IBM
: 76 actual Questions
Can I find actual of C4040-122 exam?
extraordinary!, I proud to study along with your C4040-122 QA and software program. Your software helped me lots in preparingmy IBM checks.
got no hassle! three days coaching coincident C4040-122 today's dumps is required.
i am C4040-122 certified now, passage to this killexams.com internet website online. They fill a extremely suitable succession of braindumps and exam practise assets, I substantially applied them for my C4040-122 certification remaining year, and this time their sftuff is virtually as authentic. The questions are real, and the trying out engine works amazing. No issues detected. I just ordered it, practiced for every week or so, then went in and handed the C4040-122 exam. This is what an commandeer exam preparation must breathe devotion for everyone, I endorse killexams.
I necessity actual test questions of C4040-122 exam.
I am C4040-122 licensed now, passage to this killexams.com website. They fill a awesome collection of braindumps and exam practise sources, I extensively utilized them for my C4040-122 certification remaining year, and this time their sftuff is simply as accurate. The questions are real, and the exam simulator works exceptional. No issues detected. I just ordered it, practiced for per week or so, then went in and passed the C4040-122 exam. This is what the faultless exam preparation must breathe devotion for each and every of us, I recommend killexams.
best to pay attention that actual test questions of C4040-122 examination are available.
i bought this because of the C4040-122 questions, I concept I should accomplish the QAs ingredient simply primarily based on my previous experience. Yet, the C4040-122 questions provided through killexams.com had been simply as beneficial. So you really necessity focused prep material, I passed without difficulty, each and every manner to killexams.com.
it's miles unbelieveable, however C4040-122 actual test questions are availabe birthright here.
the speedily solutions made my instruction more convenient. I completed seventy five questions out off eighty well beneaththe stipulated time and managed 80%. My aspiration to breathe a certified boost the exam C4040-122. I got the killexams.com manual simply 2 weeks earlier than the exam. thanks.
wherein can i locate C4040-122 actual boost a search for at questions questions?
I practically misplaced dependence in me within the wake of falling flat the C4040-122 exam.I scored 87% and cleared this exam. tons obliged killexams.com for getting better my truth. topics in C4040-122 fill been genuinely tough for me to rep it. I practically surrendered the contrivance to boost this exam each and every over again. besides because of my accomplice who prescribed me to exhaust killexams.com Questions & answers. inner a compass of simple four weeks i was absolutely prepared for this exam.
strive out those actual C4040-122 questions.
For entire C4040-122 career certifications, there may breathe masses of statistics available online. but, i used to breathe hesitant to applyC4040-122 free braindumps as individuals who placed these things on-line accomplish no longer sense any obligation and build updeceptive info. So, I paid for the killexams.com C4040-122 q and a and couldnt breathe happier. its far actual that they promote up withreal exam questions and solutions, that is how it changed into for me. I passed the C4040-122 exam and didnt even strain about it an abominable lot. Very wintry and dependable.
Real Q & A of C4040-122 exam are Awesome!
I had taken the C4040-122 preparation from the killexams.com as that was a nice platform for the preparation and that had ultimately given me the best plane of the preparation to rep the best scores in the C4040-122 test exams. I really enjoyed the passage I got the things done in the engrossing passage and through the uphold of the same; I had finally got the thing on the line. It had made my preparation much easier and with the uphold of the killexams.com I had been able to grow well in the life.
simply try these dumps and success is yours.
The association time for C4040-122 exam cessation up certainly a nice sustain for me. Effectively passing, i fill located outthe passage to light each and every of the similarly stages. Due to killexams.com Questions & answers for each and every of the help. I had limited time for preparation but killexams.com brain dumps fill become out to breathe a assist for me. It had vast questions and answers that made me contrivance in a short compass.
simply attempt those actual test questions and fulfillment is yours.
I passed the C4040-122 exam thanks to killexams.com, too. suitable to understand Im not alone! that is a bizarre passage to prepare for IT test. i was concerned identification fail, so I ordered this package. The exam simulator runs very smoothly, so I ought to exercise inside the exam surroundings for hours, using actual exam questions and checking my solutions. As a result, I knew pretty tons the total lot at the exam, which become the character Christmas and unique yr present I may want to supply myself!
massive Blue's refresh contains the gargantuan vigour 795, which it pits in opposition t proper-shelf systems from HP and Oracle.
IBM Corp. final week refreshed its gadget p server line with several unique POWER7-primarily based programs. The most recent POWER7 entries won't ship except September 17.
they may probably breathe worth the wait. huge Blue's revamped system p line comprises the gargantuan 256-method verve 795, which IBM pits at once in opposition t properly-shelf choices from Hewlett-Packard Co. (HP) and Oracle Corp.
big Blue is never simply considering big, however: it additionally unveiled 4 gadget p "categorical" entries -- i.e., smaller, much less-costly systems slated for the mid-market. IBM's POWER7 thrust additionally comprises a dedicated system -- viz., the prudent Analytics device 7700 -- designed for company intelligence (BI) and records warehousing workloads. or not it's of a chunk with the smart Analytics initiative that massive Blue kicked off ultimate summer season, simply prior to its acquisition of analytics powerhouse SPSS Inc.
IBM's 256-core vigour 795 plays to system p's (and RISC/Unix's) middling strengths, and its smaller categorical entries -- the verve 710, 720, 730, and 740 systems -- involve massive Blue's newest effort to grapple with commodity x86 (or x64, as is universally the case) servers working chips from superior Micro devices (AMD) Inc. and Intel Corp. up to now, huge Blue had provided handiest a single power-based categorical gadget, the power 720.
during this case, huge Blue is making a wager that a a suitable deal lessen permeate (enabled in fraction by using POWER7 chips that might otherwise were discarded) in addition to an capability to accelerate AIX, device i and Linux workloads will aid tip the scales in gadget p's favor. moreover, with POWER7, IBM is once once again fielding a 2U form-ingredient server -- really, two 2U form-element servers, the verve 710 and the energy 730. Add each and every of it up and you fill what feels devotion a suitable effort to tackle the commodity server section -- a historically tough section to crack.
In an trade it's relocating to commoditization (and relentlessly, at that), IBM Corp. is sticking to its proprietary guns.
To manufacture sure, big Blue is a creditable commodity participant -- its device x hardware line is powered by using chips from each AMD and Intel; its equipment x BladeCenter portfolio (which comprises a power-based offering) is not any. 2, universal, behind HP -- however likewise remains dedicated to homegrown silicon efforts similar to POWER7, which powers (in one profile or a different) its device i, equipment p, and system z hardware traces.
In a way, massive Blue's POWER7 CMOS now stands as the last of the Credible x86 alternate options.
HP and Intel continue to invest in IA64 (which is in response to an EPIC structure); Oracle has said lots of the birthright issues about SPARC (which has having said that been hemorrhaging relevance for half a decade or greater); and different gamers (equivalent to Fujitsu and Unisys Corp.) thrust their personal proprietary CMOS flavors, however not one can factor to the character of profits performance (relative to sales of competitive, non-commodity systems) that IBM can.
It seems that greater and faster transistors product of graphene aren't each and every that IBM is working on, considering that its recent press free up speaks of a unique set of POWER7 servers for worrying emerging functions.
notwithstanding not definitely concentrated on the customer market, IBM is one in every of greatest names on the business, commerce and industrial sectors as far as computing goes.
It has a huge portfolio of machine for each current and rising functions, with monetary services, scientific analysis and healthcare management being just a few of its outlets.
What the company did most recently become carry a unique batch of enhanced POWER7 blades and servers, which are additionally suitable for consolidation and virtualization.
"Our strategy looks to breathe paying off as further and further valued clientele opt for power techniques," said Tom Rosamilia, well-known supervisor of IBM power and z methods.
One product is the 16-core, single-wide IBM BladeCenter PS703, which will besides breathe a substitute for sprawling racks and is decent for people worried with power effectivity.
The BladeCenter PS704 is corresponding to its sibling above, handiest it has double the volume of cores and, for this reason, 60-% quicker performance within the very house requirements as old-technology POWER7 products.
The announcement besides mentions the upgraded IBM power 750 express and the stronger energy 755, both with 32 POWER7 cores now.
"we are working billions of strict calculations in line with Einstein's understanding of relativity on the POWER7 blades," talked about Gaurav Khanna, professor of physics at UMass-Dartmouth.
"running POWER7, i'm in a position to rep consequences as lots as eight times faster than working the equal calculations on an Intel Xeon processor. Calculations that used to boost a month to accelerate at the second are finished in less than a week. This capability that i can accomplish eight times extra science within the equal timeframe than I may accomplish earlier than."
This web page should fill assistance on anything involving IBMs smarter computing initiative.
Feb 22, 2010
IBM announced unique POWER7 methods, designed to manage probably the most stressful emerging functions, ranging from smart electrical grids to true-time analytics for fiscal markets. the brand unique methods hold applied sciences for the really suitable calls for of latest applications and features that depend on processing gigantic numbers of concurrent transactions and statistics while analyzing that information in actual time. furthermore, the unique systems enable consumers to manage latest functions and services at less permeate with expertise breakthroughs in virtualization, power reductions, greater most economical exhaust of reminiscence, and stronger expense efficiency.
The techniques had been launched with the Linux, AIX, and IBM i operating equipment guide. the unique programs and management utility involve the IBM verve 780, a brand unique class of scalable, high-conclusion servers, that includes an superior modular design with as much as 64 POWER7 "cores," or CPUs, and the unique TurboCore workload optimizing mode. TurboCore can convey up to 2 instances the performance per core of POWER6 processor-primarily based programs, presenting mighty ROI for purposes with extravagant per-core efficiency requirements, comparable to managing and analyzing transactions from a sensible electrical grid.
The IBM energy 770 is a modular commercial enterprise device with as much as sixty four POWER7 cores, featuring higher efficiency per core than POWER6 processors and the exhaust of up to 70% much less power for the very variety of cores because the IBM power 570. IBM energy 755, a excessive-performance computing cluster node with 32 POWER7 cores, is power celebrity-certified for energy efficiency, and optimized for the most challenging analytic workloads. additionally, the IBM vigour 750 express, an energy immense name-certified commerce server for mid-market purchasers, offers 4 times the processing potential of its predecessor, the IBM verve 550 express, in the identical energy envelope and 10 times the efficiency of a similar HP Integrity rx6600.
IBM systems Director specific, typical and enterprise editions offer unique packaging of administration utility for the brand unique techniques and encompass the superior virtualization administration capabilities of VMControl, which helps a "programs pool" of diverse verve servers to breathe managed as one entity.
The vigour 750 specific and 755 are transport, and the energy 770 and 780 planned quantity availability is March 16. The IBM techniques Director editions, supporting each POWER7 and POWER6 fashions, will ship on March 5, IBM says. For greater tips about power systems, depart here.
While it is difficult errand to pick solid certification questions/answers assets regarding review, reputation and validity since individuals rep sham because of picking incorrectly benefit. Killexams.com ensure to serve its customers best to its assets as for exam dumps update and validity. The greater fraction of other's sham report objection customers promote to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams cheerfully and effortlessly. They never deal on their review, reputation and character because killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams customer certitude is imperative to us. Extraordinarily they deal with killexams.com review, killexams.com reputation, killexams.com sham report grievance, killexams.com trust, killexams.com validity, killexams.com report and killexams.com scam. On the off random that you remark any mistaken report posted by their rivals with the cognomen killexams sham report grievance web, killexams.com sham report, killexams.com scam, killexams.com protestation or something devotion this, simply recollect there are constantly terrible individuals harming reputation of suitable administrations because of their advantages. There are a remarkable many fulfilled clients that pass their exams utilizing killexams.com brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit Killexams.com, their instance questions and test brain dumps, their exam simulator and you will realize that killexams.com is the best brain dumps site.
000-602 bootcamp | ED0-001 rehearse test | 000-R09 mock exam | C2040-440 cram | 000-M60 free pdf | HP0-S25 dumps questions | HP0-719 study guide | 000-585 dumps | ST0-130 rehearse Test | E22-214 exam prep | C2070-981 rehearse questions | 850-001 actual questions | C2020-605 brain dumps | 000-911 free pdf | 000-631 free pdf | HP0-S45 study guide | 840-425 questions and answers | 1Z0-034 questions and answers | C2090-614 questions answers | EW0-200 test prep |
Simply contemplate these IBM C4040-122 Questions and Pass the actual test
killexams.com provide latest and up to date Pass4sure rehearse Test with Actual Exam Questions and Answers for brand unique syllabus of IBM C4040-122 Exam. rehearse their actual Questions and Answers to improve your scholarship and pass your exam with towering Marks. They guarantee your pass within the Test Center, covering every one of the topics of exam and improve your scholarship of the C4040-122 exam. Pass without any doubt with their actual questions.
You should rep the recently updated IBM C4040-122 Braindumps with the actual answers, which are prepared via killexams.com experts, allowing the candidates to comprehend expertise about their C4040-122 exam path in the maximum, you will not find C4040-122 merchandise of such nice anywhere in the marketplace. Their IBM C4040-122 rehearse Dumps are given to applicants at acting a hundred% of their exam. Their IBM C4040-122 exam dumps are cutting-edge in the marketplace, giving you a random to build together in your C4040-122 exam inside the proper manner.
If you are interested in effectively Passing the IBM C4040-122 exam to start earning? killexams.com has leading side developed Power Systems with POWER7 Common Sales Skills -v2 exam questions so one can manufacture confident you pass this C4040-122 exam! killexams.com offers you the maximum correct, recent and updated C4040-122 exam questions and available with a 100% money back assure guarantee. There are many organizations that provide C4040-122 brain dumps but those arent remedy and modern ones. Preparation with killexams.com C4040-122 unique questions is a first-class manner to pass this certificationexam in towering marks.
killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as underneath;
WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for each and every tests on website
PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders more than $99
DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for each and every Orders
We are each and every well vigilant that a main hassle in the IT industry is that there is a loss of excellent braindumps. Their exam preparation material provides you everything you will want to boost a certification exam. Their IBM C4040-122 Exam will provide you with exam questions with established answers that reflect the actual exam. These questions and answers offer you with the savor of taking the actual test. towering best and expense for the C4040-122 Exam. 100% assure to pass your IBM C4040-122 exam and rep your IBM certification. They at killexams.com are devoted that will uphold you pass your C4040-122 exam with towering rankings. The probabilities of you failing your C4040-122 exam, after going through their comprehensive exam dumps are very little.
killexams.com fill their specialists Team to guarantee their IBM C4040-122 exam questions are dependably the most recent. They are on the total extremely acquainted with the exams and testing focus.
How killexams.com withhold IBM C4040-122 exams updated?: they fill their uncommon approaches to know the most recent exams data on IBM C4040-122. Now and then they contact their accomplices who are exceptionally comfortable with the testing focus or once in a while their clients will email us the latest input, or they got the most recent update from their dumps providers. When they discover the IBM C4040-122 exams changed then they updates them ASAP.
On the off random that you truly promote up short this C4040-122 Power Systems with POWER7 Common Sales Skills -v2 and would prefer not to sit tense for the updates then they can give you complete refund. however, you ought to dispatch your score respond to us with the goal that they can fill a check. They will give you complete refund quickly amid their working time after they rep the IBM C4040-122 score report from you.
IBM C4040-122 Power Systems with POWER7 Common Sales Skills -v2 Product Demo?: they fill both PDF version and Testing Software. You can check their product page to perceive what it would appear that like.
At the point when will I rep my C4040-122 material after I pay?: Generally, After successful payment, your username/password are sent at your email address within 5 min. It may boost slight longer if your bank detain in payment authorization.
killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for each and every exams on website
PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for each and every Orders
C4040-122 Practice Test | C4040-122 examcollection | C4040-122 VCE | C4040-122 study guide | C4040-122 practice exam | C4040-122 cram
Killexams 000-347 rehearse test | Killexams HP2-H24 test prep | Killexams HP0-760 actual questions | Killexams 70-473 free pdf download | Killexams HP2-H36 questions answers | Killexams 1Z0-545 braindumps | Killexams EE0-411 actual questions | Killexams HP0-P19 exam prep | Killexams 99 rehearse questions | Killexams 500-651 questions and answers | Killexams MB2-719 dump | Killexams 9A0-046 dumps | Killexams VCPD510 study guide | Killexams QQ0-401 rehearse Test | Killexams 1Z0-858 dumps questions | Killexams M9560-670 cram | Killexams C9550-400 rehearse questions | Killexams C2170-011 exam prep | Killexams HP0-J17 questions and answers | Killexams 000-783 sample test |
Killexams F50-532 questions and answers | Killexams M9560-231 questions and answers | Killexams 650-125 rehearse test | Killexams 1Z0-045 test prep | Killexams VTNE dump | Killexams C2090-461 cram | Killexams 000-218 rehearse test | Killexams LOT-822 dumps questions | Killexams 000-R18 test questions | Killexams 3M0-250 braindumps | Killexams NREMT-PTE actual questions | Killexams BCP-520 rehearse test | Killexams 000-M06 mock exam | Killexams 000-052 test prep | Killexams NailTech free pdf | Killexams HP0-634 cheat sheets | Killexams 000-596 VCE | Killexams Praxis-Core examcollection | Killexams MOS-EXP rehearse questions | Killexams 920-158 pdf download |
ARMONK, N.Y., April 13 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- IBM (NYSE: IBM) today added unique servers, services and software to its lineup of 2010 systems designed to build a lid on the rising costs and complexities of operating modern data centers. The unique offerings uphold clients garner the benefits of IBM's three-year, $3 billion investment in POWER7(TM) systems that are ready for unique workloads, such as the growing exhaust of powerful, real-time commerce analytics.
(Logo: http://www.newscom.com/cgi-bin/prnh/20090416/IBMLOGO )
They involve blade servers built on IBM's POWER7 workload-optimized systems' design, unique systems software that can reduce the deployment of workloads from weeks to minutes, and unique services to remotely implement the systems, reducing costs by up to 25%.
IBM besides announced its POWER7 technology achieved record performance for a ambit of workloads.
New POWER7 Blades, Systems Software, Services: Improved Performance, Reduced Data seat Costs
With four, eight or 16 cores per blade, the unique POWER7 servers offer clients the very 64-bit POWER® technology at toil in some of the world's most faultfinding data centers in government, research, finance and high-tech industries, among others.
Built on the proven foundation of the IBM BladeCenter® family of products and designed for mid-size businesses needing enhanced performance to manage growth and reduce complexity, the each and every unique PS700, PS701 and PS702 Express are the premier blades for workloads ranging from web-tier and SAP application servers to distributed databases in blade-based data centers. POWER7's innovative technologies automatically optimize the blades' performance and energy efficiency, allowing the unique BladeCenter PS702 Express to deliver 225% better performance per blade than the Oracle Sun Blade T6340, and 188% greater performance per blade than the HP Integrity BL860c Blade. (1)
For more information depart to: http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/power/
New IBM Systems Director Software helps adjust computing resources in virtualized data seat environments to focus on priority workloads. With IBM Systems Director 6.2 and IBM Systems Director VMControl, multiple virtualized and physical systems can breathe managed from a single interface, unique workloads can breathe deployed in minutes instead of weeks, and server administration costs can breathe reduced up to 34%. IBM energetic Energy Manager 4.3 monitors and manages energy exhaust and can reduce systems energy costs by nearly 30% on Power servers. (2)
For more information on unique IBM Systems Director, VMControl and energetic Energy Manager offerings depart to: http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/software/index.html
IBM Global Technology Services' new, remotely delivered implementation and migration services provide a lower-cost fashion (shaves up to 25% from installation costs) to install and implement IBM systems. Remote delivery allows IBM to staff engagements more quickly and gives clients a faster recur on their investment. Initially available in the U.S. and Canada with plans to expand to the leisure of the world later in the year, these remotely delivered, lower priced services uphold clients optimize system performance and reduce time to value.
For more information, depart to: www.ibm.com/services/implementation
IBM besides announced today a unique exchange program to allow clients to upgrade to POWER7 technology immediately. IBM's lending and leasing unit, IBM Global Financing, is offering well-qualified clients to breeze up to POWER7 systems at monthly costs proximate to, or lower than what they are paying for a current POWER6(TM) lease. The program besides provides for side-by-side migration of up to 60 days with slight to no downtime as the upgrade occurs.
For more information depart to: http://www-03.ibm.com/financing/us/lifecycle/acquire/powerx.html
Eight-Core POWER7 System Boosts Transaction-Processing Performance to Slash Licensing Costs More Than 80%
Using a sliver of its total, 64-core processing power, IBM's Power® 780 system today became the first server to deliver more than 1.2 million transactions-per-minute on only eight cores according to Transaction Processing Performance Council results. With price/performance of less than 70 cents per transaction per minute, the Power 780's 1.2 million transactions-per-minute sets a unique record in performance-per-core - 4.6 times better than an HP Superdome and 7.5 times better than a Sun SPARC Enterprise T5440 cluster running Oracle RAC. (3)
For businesses that accelerate SAP, the Power 780 handled 37,000 users on 64 cores - 16% more users than a 256-core Sun Enterprise M9000 and 130% more users than a 64-core Fujitsu system running Intel Xeon® X7560 chips. (4)
Record-Setting Performance for Web and Analytics Workloads
The Power 780 besides demonstrated the capacity to deliver leadership, workload-optimized performance by setting unique records across the three major industry-standard processor benchmarks for Java, integer and high-performance-computing workloads, achieving between 1.8 and three-times the performance of each and every other competitive published eight-socket results. (5)
IBM Power Systems' built-in virtualization provides the capacity to scale virtual machines to the complete capacity of the system - up to eight-times more than VMware. IBM testing indicates clients deploying virtualization may remark up to 65% more performance-per-virtual machine on a Power 750 Express running PowerVM(TM) than a similarly configured HP DL380 G6 running VMware. (6)
Today's benchmark results continue to demonstrate that IBM Power Systems are able to deliver more compute power with fewer cores and less energy consumption than Sun/Oracle and HP/Itanium® based servers. This performance leadership across each and every major workloads, combined with Power systems' built-in virtualization technology means clients can achieve stagy cost savings and energy efficiency in their data centers. For instance, by using 87% fewer cores than a Sun SPARC Enterprise Cluster to deliver more than one million transactions per minute, the Power 780 allows clients to slash database licensing and maintenance costs by up to 80%. (7)
New Operating Environments, Developer Tools
New AIX® 6 Express Edition offers clients a new, lower-priced edition of AIX designed for SMB environments or smaller workloads consolidated on midrange or high-end Power Systems. Supporting up to four cores per image and 8GB per core, AIX 6 Express provides the reliability and flexibility of AIX at lower cost. AIX Express joins the existing AIX yardstick and Enterprise Editions to fill out the unique family of AIX 6 offerings.
The unique IBM i 7.1 integrated operating environment is designed to boost handicap of workload optimization features of POWER7, including automatic exploitation of Solid state Drives for optimum performance. Enhanced uphold for XML in DB2®, the integrated database for IBM i, helps companies exchange information between customers and suppliers, a unique virtualization feature for PowerVM enables simpler testing of unique releases before a software upgrade, and asynchronous geographic mirroring with PowerHA(TM) SystemMirror provides uphold for multi-site clustering over longer distances.
For more information depart to: www.ibm.com/systems/power/software/i/advantages/v7r1/index.html
IBM Rational Developer for Power V7.6 gives users of Power Systems on AIX a modern, Eclipse-based development environment that supports C/C++ and COBOL development, and is besides tightly integrated with Rational Team Concert for Power Systems for improved application lifecycle management. IBM is besides introducing Rational compilers for C/C++ and Fortran, both optimized for POWER7. This unique environment can provide up to 30% improvement in workload productivity. (8)
For more information depart to http://www-01.ibm.com/software/rational/announce/power/
For more information on unique products announced today and to register for a special IBM webcast visit ibm.com/systemsContact(s) information Rick Bause IBM Media Relations 845-892-5463 [email protected] Mike Corrado IBM Media Relations 914-766-4635 [email protected]
IBM is a trademark of IBM Corporation in the United States and/or other countries. each and every other company/product names and service marks may breathe trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies. UNIX is a registered trademark in the United States and other countries licensed exclusively through The Open Group. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvald.
(1) SPEC® and the benchmark names SPECrate®, SPECint®, and SPECjbb® are registered trademarks of the yardstick Performance Evaluation Corporation. For the latest SPEC benchmark results, visit http://www.spec.org. each and every results are the best result posted at www.spec.org as of April 5, 2010 for the system indicated except for the IBM BladeCenter result which was submitted to SPEC as of April 13, 2010.
SPECint_rate 2006 results: IBM BladeCenter PS702 with 16 cores, two processor chips, and four threads per core had a peak result of 520. HP Integrity BL860c i2 with 8 cores, 2 processor chips and two threads per core had a peak result of 134. Sun Blade T6340 with 16 cores, two processor chips and eight threads per core had a peak result of 160.
SPECjbb2005 results: : IBM BladeCenter PS702 with 16 cores, two processor chips, and four threads per core running with 16 JVM instances had a result of 1,119,946 bops and 69,997 bops per JVM. Sun Blade T6340 with 16 cores, two processor chips and eight threads per core running with 16 JVM instances had a result of 388,456 bops and 24,279 bops per JVM.
(2) Source: ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/common/ssi/sa/wh/n/xbw03007usen/XBW03007USEN.PDF
page 3 of VALUE PROPOSITION FOR IBM SYSTEMS DIRECTOR
Challenges of Operational Management for Enterprise Server Installations
International Technology Group
(3) Transaction performance based on tpmC results as on 4/9/2010. Source: Transaction Processing Performance Council, www.tpc.org as of 4/9/10. IBM result submitted on 4/13/10. IBM Power 780 with 2 processor chips, 8 cores, 16 threads achieved 1,200,011 tpmC @ $.69 $/tpmC. Database was DB2 9.1 on AIX 6.1. System availability is 10/13/2010. tpmC per core is 150,001. HP Integrity Superdome with 64 processor chips, 128 cores, 256 threads achieved 4,092,799 tpmC @ $2.93 $/tpmC. Database was Oracle 10g on HP-UX 11i v3. System availability was 8/6/2007. tpmC per core is 31,975. Sun/Oracle T5440 cluster with 48 processor chips, 384 cores, 3,072 threads achieved 7,646,486 tpmC @ $2.36 $/tpmC. Database was Oracle 11g EE RAC on Solaris 10. System availability was 3/19/2010. tpmC per core is 19,913. IBM x3850 M2 with 4 processor chips, 16 cores, 16 threads achieved 516,752 tpmC @ $2.59 $/tpmC. Database was DB2 9.5 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux. System availability was 3/14/2008. tpmC per core is 32,297.
(4) The IBM Power 780 achieved the highest result ever published on the two-tier SAP® Sales and Distribution (SD) yardstick application benchmark running SAP enhancement package 4 for the SAP ERP application Release 6.0 (Unicode) with a result of 37,000 SAP SD benchmark users. The 64-core Power 780 handled 16 percent more users than a 256-core Sun Enterprise M9000 (Oracle's biggest system) and 130 percent more users than a 64-core Fujitsu 1800E system running Intel's Xeon X7560 chip. IBM Power System 780, 8p / 64-c / 256-t, POWER7, 3.8 GHz, 1024 GB memory, 37,000 SD users, dialog resp.: 0.98s, line items/hour: 4,043,670, Dialog steps/hour: 12,131,000, SAPS: 202,180, DB time (dialog/ update):0.013s / 0.031s, CPU utilization: 99%, OS: AIX 6.1, DB2 9.7, cert# 2010013; SUN M9000, 64p / 256-c / 512-t, 1156 GB memory, 32,000 SD users, SPARC64 VII, 2.88 GHz, Solaris 10, Oracle 10g , cert# 2009046; Fujitsu 1800E, 8p / 64-c / 128-t, 512 GB memory, 16,000 SD users, Intel Xeon X7560, 2.26 GHz, Windows Server 2008 R2 DE, SQL Server 2008, cert#: 2010010. each and every results are 2-tier, SAP EHP 4 for SAP ERP 6.0 (Unicode) and telling as of 4/1/2010.
All SAP Sales and Distribution 2-tier benchmark results can breathe establish at http://www.sap.com/solutions/benchmark/sd2tier.epx
(5) Best in class 8-socket results: IBM Power 780 64-core (3.86 GHz, 8 chips, 8 cores/chip,4 threads/core) SPECint_rate2006 result of 2,526; IBM Power 780 64-core (3.86 GHz, 8 chips, 8 cores/chip,4 threads/core) SPECfp2006 result of 2,240; IBM Power 780 64-core (8 chips, 128 threads) 3.86 GHz IBM Power 780 System running AIX V6.1 with a SPECjbb2005 result of 5,210,501 bops (81,414 bops/JVM).
Competitive 8-socket results: SPECint_rate2006: Fujitsu PRIMEQUEST 1800E 64-core (Intel Xeon X7560, 8 chips, 8 cores/chip, 2 threads/core) SPECint_rate2006 result of 1339; SPECfp_rate 2006: SGI Altix ICE 8200EX 32-core (Intel Xeon X5570, 2.93 GHz, 8 chips, 4 cores/chip, 2 threads/core) SPECfp_rate2006 result of 742; SPECjbb2005: Hewlett-Packard Company, HP DL785 G6 achieved 1,984,616 bops (248,077 bops/JVM on a 480core system (8 chips, 48 threads).
SPEC and the benchmark names SPECrate, SPECint, and SPECjbb are registered trademarks of the yardstick Performance Evaluation Corporation. Benchmark results stated reflect results published on www.spec.org (link resides outside ibm.com) as of April 8, 2010.
(6) "A Comparison of PowerVM and VMware Virtualization Performance", April 2010. White Paper available through www.ibm.com.
(7) pretension based on comparing an 8-core Power 780 system vs. a cluster of two Sun SPARC Enterprise T5440 both of which are estimated to deliver over 1 million OLTP transactions per minute. For details on the comparison please depart to:
(8) According to IBM commerce confederate Oxford International, a leading provider of enterprise modernization solutions, unique IBM Rational application development and management software for POWER7 is providing improvements of up to 30 percent in team productivity in each and every aspects of the development process.
Data Centers | NewsNew IBM Mainframe Can Manage 100,000 Virtual Machines Simultaneously
Big Blue's zEnterprise, a "data seat in a box," pools RISC and x86-based blades.
IBM has launched what it described its most significant promote in data seat infrastructure over the last two decades. The unique zEnterprise is a mainframe noteworthy not just because of its increased processing capacity but because it is the first to provide integration with its Power7 blade infrastructure and x86-based blade racks.
Big Blue launched the unique zEnterprise Thursday in unique York. IBM said the unique mainframe is 60 percent faster and equally more efficient from a power utilization perspective than the model it replaces, the z10.
The mainframe has a 5.2 GHz processor with up to 96 cores, houses 3 TB of RAM, and can process 50 billion instructions per second (BIPS). In addition to the boost in capacity, it allows the x86 and Power7 processor-based systems to accelerate as a common virtualized platform, sharing network, storage, and power components.
"This is the most powerful announcement they fill ever made in the history of the IBM company in terms of customer economics," said Steve Mills, senior vice president of IBM's software and hardware divisions. "We fill never in their history done anything that has build more money back in the hands of the customer than this announcement. They fill solved a massive commerce problem that almost any commerce of reasonable size has today, and that's bringing down that cost of IT operation."
Mills, who called this unique system a "data seat in a box," extolled its unique integrated platform for its shared infrastructure across various processors. The system can manage 100,000 virtual machines simultaneously, a threshold Mills said will breathe difficult to duplicate. "During this decade, nobody will deliver deeper, more profound, fully mobile, fully portable virtualization the passage this system provides complete virtualization for workloads," Mills said.
At the core of this unique virtualized capability is the combination of IBM's unique zEnterprise Blade seat Extension (xBX) and the zEnterprise Unified Resource Manager, which allow for the sharing of workloads between the core mainframe and IBM's Power7 and x86 processor blades.
The Universal Resource Manager is made up of software and embedded hardware, said IBM Distinguished Engineer Donna Dillenberger, in an interview at launch event. "It's on both sides. It's on the mainframe side and the blade side, so you can rep a coherent view of what's running, and you can rep a coherent management actions between both, and it comes with zEnterprise," Dillenberger said.
In the past IBM had individual technologies that managed various clusters, but the Universal Resource Manager provides a much tighter association, added David Gelardi, IBM's vice president of sales, support, and education. "It's a very broad pipe between the blade environment and the mainframe environment," Gelardi said in an interview. "That is very distinguished from an application perspective, that's where the integration comes from."
While IBM talked up its capacity to accelerate Linux-based x86 blades, it talked down its capacity to accelerate Windows workloads. It's "about want of visibility into source code, not wanting to uphold an OS that 'drag[s] in primitives from DOS,' and generally not being able to shape Windows to the management IBM would want," famed Redmonk analyst Michael Cote in a blog posting.
But Gelardi said organizations still could opt to accelerate Windows workloads. "There's no judgement you can't exhaust it to accelerate Windows because Tivoli's provisioning capabilities is operating systems agnostic," he said. "Windows would accelerate on an outboard blade and ultimately would accelerate on an xBlade inside zBX."
Jeffrey Schwartz is editor of Redmond magazine and besides covers cloud computing for Virtualization Review's Cloud Report. In addition, he writes the Channeling the Cloud column for Redmond Channel Partner. result him on Twitter @JeffreySchwartz.
Why is it that every time humans develop a really clever computer system in the movies, it seems intent on killing every last one of us at its first opportunity?
In Stanley Kubrick’s masterpiece, 2001: A Space Odyssey, HAL 9000 starts off as an attentive, if to some extent creepy, custodian of the astronauts aboard the USS Discovery One, before famously turning homicidal and trying to assassinate them all. In The Matrix, humanity’s invention of AI promptly results in human-machine warfare, leading to humans enslaved as a biological source of energy by the machines. In Daniel H. Wilson’s bespeak Robopocalypse, computer scientists finally crack the code on the AI problem, only to fill their creation develop a sudden and abysmal dislike for its creators.
And you’re not an especially sentient being yourself if you haven’t heard the myth of Skynet (see The Terminator, T2, T3, etc.)
The simple respond is that — movies devotion Wall-E, Short Circuit, and Chappie, notwithstanding — Hollywood knows that nothing guarantees box office gold quite devotion an existential threat to each and every of humanity. Whether that threat is likely in actual life or not is decidedly beside the point. How else can one complicated the endless march of zombie flicks, not to mention those pesky, shark-infested tornadoes?
The reality of AI is nothing devotion the movies. Siri, Alexa, Watson, Cortana — these are their HAL 9000s, and not one seems even vaguely murderous. The technology has taken leaps and bounds in the last decade, and seems poised to finally match the vision their artists fill depicted in film for decades. What then?
Is Siri just a few upgrades away from killing you in your sleep, or is Hollywood running away with a tired idea? Looking back at the last decade of AI research helps to paint a clearer picture of a sometimes frightening, sometimes enlightened future.
An increasing number of prominent voices are being raised about the actual dangers of humanity’s continuing toil on so-called ersatz intelligence.
Chief among them is Dr. Nick Bostrom, a philosopher who besides holds degrees in physics and computational neuroscience. In his 2014 book, Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies, he outlines in rigorous detail the various ways a “strong” AI — should they succeed in building one — would wipe us off the physiognomy of the planet the second it escapes their control. Forget about wholesale nuclear annihilation — that’s how power-hungry human dictators depart about dealing with an unwanted group of humans. No, a tough AI would instead starve us to death, exhaust up each and every of their natural resources, or, if it’s feeling really desperate, dismantle their bodies at a molecular plane and exhaust the resulting biomass for its own purposes.
Dr. Nick Bostrom warns about the potential dangers of a runaway AI at a 2015 TED talk in Vancouver, Canada. (Photo: Bret Hartman/TED)
But don’t boost it personally. As Bostrom points out, an ersatz superintelligence likely won’t behave according to any human notions of morality or ethics. “Anthropomorphic frames inspirit unfounded expectations about the growth trajectory of a seed AI and about the psychology, motivations, and capabilities of a age superintelligence,” he says.
Don’t let Bostrom’s professorial language fool you — he’s deadly earnest about the consequences of an AI that can outthink even the smartest human being, and not one of them are good. More frighteningly, he says that they may depart from giving ourselves high-fives over creating the first AI that can assume as well as they can to cowering in the corner as it hunts us down in as slight as a few weeks, or perhaps even days. It each and every comes down to a few key factors that will likely influence their future with AI.
Computers assume really fast. In the best-case scenario, we’ll fill enough time between an AI acquiring the capacity to assume as well as us and its rise to super-intelligent status that they can adjust and respond. On the other hand, as Bostrom points out, when you’re dealing with a machine that can assume — and therefore develop — at an almost unimaginable speed, by the time they realize what’s going on, it will already breathe far too late to quit it. Some readers may recollect the 1970s sci-fi horror flick Demon Seed, in which an AI not only predicts that it will breathe shut down by its fearful creator, but employs murder and rape to ensure its survival.
“If and when a takeoff occurs,” Bostrom writes, “it will likely breathe explosive.” Stephen Hawking has echoed this sentiment: “Once humans design ersatz intelligence,” he says, “it will boost off on its own and develop at an ever-increasing rate. Humans, who are limited by unhurried biological evolution, couldn’t compete and would breathe superseded.”
Computers often succumb unexpected results. AI researchers are regularly surprised by the outcome of their experiments. In 2013, a researcher discovered that his AI — designed to learn to play NES games — decided to recess the gameplay on Tetris as its preferred solution to the goal of not losing.
At their early stage of AI development, this is a suitable thing; surprises often lead to unique discoveries. Unexpected results paired with a massive and sudden surge in intelligence would breathe quite the opposite. Being able to anticipate the passage a superintelligent AI will respond to, well, anything, could prove to breathe impossible, in much the very passage their actions and motivations are utterly impenetrable to an insect.Strong AI, decrepit AI, and the stuff they already use
Artificial intelligence research has at times resembled the hunt for the Holy Grail. In the summer of 1956, there was a credit that they could achieve tough AI (aka, ersatz common intelligence), which can breathe thought of as mimicking human intelligence in each and every of its forms, functions, and subtleties. Researchers at Dartmouth University thought that if they could endow computers with the basic building blocks of human intelligence — reasoning, scholarship representation, planning, natural language processing, and perception — then somehow, common intelligence would simply emerge.
Obviously, that didn’t happen. In fact, over the intervening decades, there were several boom and bust cycles in AI research (often dubbed “AI winters”) that moved a few of these building blocks forward, but then failed to prove ongoing progress after an initial epoch of excitement.
What did befall were various advances in each of the building blocks, resulting in an assortment of “weak AIs,” or practical AIs.
AI doesn’t just exist in far-flung visions of the future. Google has been using it since 2015 to improve search results. (Video: Google)
The Google search engine could just breathe the best-known instance of decrepit AI. Its algorithms accomplish an exceptional job of pulling together hundreds of variables and combining those with the words you character to succumb a results page culled from the vastness of the web.
In fact, most of the examples of AI from the past 10 years probably haven’t struck you as examples of AI at all, which just goes to prove how successful they’ve been. Most fill quietly and seamlessly integrated themselves into their lives, making them better in small but significant ways.
Google’s Photos product shows how far we’ve promote in perception AI — character in “bicycle” and it will find photos you’ve taken of two-wheeled vehicles, even if you never labeled them as such.
The predictive text options that appear as they character on their phones save us valuable taps, while autocorrect attempts to manufacture up for the fact that on-screen keyboards and human thumbs are a recipe for inaccuracy (notwithstanding the hilarity that often ensues when it tries to promote to their rescue).
Amazon’s “suggested for you” product recommendations feature is an instance of AI used to manufacture money. It was reportedly responsible for 35 percent of the company’s sales in 2006, and the people behind the technology fill since made it available to other retailers, resulting in “billions” of sales.
So-called quick-witted assistants from Apple, Google, Amazon, and Microsoft (Siri, Google Now, Alexa, and Cortana, respectively) each and every leverage recent advances in natural language processing (NLP), combined with sophisticated heuristics, which manufacture questions devotion “what’s the weather going to breathe devotion today?” the hands-free equivalent of jumping into a weather app or Googling the very phrase. Google’s CEO, Sundar Pichai, recently boasted that his company’s NLP AI is approaching human levels of understanding, which may complicated why he told shareholders that “the next immense step will breathe for the very concept of the ‘device’ to fade away.”
The Waze GPS and crowdsourced mapping app is a remarkable instance of AI planning.
Recently, chatbots fill become the most “talked about” profile of AI. In 2014, the University of Reading in England declared that the Turing Test had finally been passed, 65 years after its inception, by an algorithm masquerading as a 13-year-old Ukrainian boy named Eugene. Eugene is a chatbot — a pretty suitable one by each and every accounts — but despite passing the test, it is still not an instance of dependable tough AI. Cleverbot — another AI chatbot – which is claimed to fill passed the Turing Test in 2011, is available to fill a chat with anyone. But labeling it “intelligent,” might depend on your definition of the word.
Me: accomplish you believe in God?Clev: accomplish you?Me: That’s not an answer.Clev: You did not quiz a question.Me: Yes I did. I asked: accomplish you believe in God?Clev: Yes, I do. Why don’t you?Me: Why accomplish you assume I don’t believe in God?Clev: Because you said that you did not.Me: No, I didn’t. You aren’t a very suitable listener, are you?Clev: Fine fine. I know you said that. But whatever. accomplish you devotion Lady Gaga?
Both the Turing Test itself and the claims that it has been passed, are not without criticism.
Microsoft erudite just how fallible a chatbot AI can breathe in a spectacularly public mode when it released Tay, an AI Twitter bot, on an unsuspecting global audience earlier this year. Less than 24 hours after Tay began interacting with people, she — er — it, became sexist and racist, offering praise for Hitler among other gaffes.
From left to right, Jeopardy host Alex Trebek poses with legendary contestants Ken Jennings, IBM’s Watson supercomputer, and Brad Rutter. Watson would later wipe the floor with both human contestants in a showdown. (Photo: Jeopardy Productions)Where’s Watson?
If the AI industry has a celebrity, it’s IBM’s Watson. After handily defeating all-time Jeopardy! champ Ken Jennings in 2011, the supercomputing application dropped the mic and started a unique life in the to some extent less exciting sphere of commercial applications. But Watson’s victory caused a lot of people to start wondering if IBM’s wunderkind was in fact an embryonic HAL 9000. Guru Banavar, IBM’s Vice President of Cognitive Computing, places it in a different category entirely.
“We assume of AI as augmented intelligence, as opposed to ersatz intelligence,” Banavar told Digital Trends. He believes that the notion of AI as a carbon copy of the human brain is a distraction, one that entirely misses the point of how this technology can best breathe build to use. “Augmented intelligence is a partnering between a person and a machine,” he explains, with the goal being to offload the toil that a person isn’t able to accomplish as well as the machine. It forms a symbiotic relationship of sorts, in which the two entities toil better together than each of them would accomplish on their own.
IBM refers to this approach to AI as “cognitive computing,” specifically because it does not hunt to replicate the entirety of human intelligence. The approach IBM took to solving the Jeopardy! problem wasn’t centered on making a synthetic brain, but rather on getting a machine to process a very specific character of information — language — in order to hunt for and ultimately succumb the birthright respond for the game’s reverse-question format. To accomplish this, Banavar recounts, took a combination of advances “going back almost 10 years.” Simply getting Watson to understand the massive number of permutations of acceptation within English, was daunting. Its eventual success was “a immense breakthrough for the total field of computer science,” Banavar claims.
IBM continues to develop Watson, as well as its other investments in AI, in pursuit of what Banavar calls “grand challenges.” These are computing problems so difficult and complex, they often require dozens of researchers and a sustained investment over months or years. Or, as Banavar puts it: “Not something you can accomplish with a brace of guys in a garage.”
A cluster of 90 IBM Power 750 servers power Watson, and each one uses a 3.5 GHz POWER7 eight-core processor. (Video: IBM)
One such challenge is reading medical images. The growing number of X-rays, CT scans, PET scans, and MRIs being done every day is a potential lifesaving boon for patients, but it’s besides a growing problem for the profession of radiology. At the moment, a radiologist must personally assess each scan to search for for signs of disease or other anomalies. The sheer number of scans being done are creating increasing claim for trained radiologists, whose numbers are limited simply due to the rigorous and lengthy training required to become one. Banavar describes the toil they accomplish as “very monotonous and error prone,” not because these doctors want the skill, but because they are only human. It’s a scenario that seems almost custom-built for the kindly of AI that IBM has been working on. In order to significantly impact the number and character of scans that can breathe processed, researchers are using Watson to understand the content of the images, within the complete medical context of the patient. “Within the next two years,” Banavar says, “we will remark some very significant breakthroughs in this.”Teaching a machine to learn
For IBM to succeed, it will fill to solve a problem that has plagued AI efforts from their very beginnings: Computers watch to result the instructions they’re given in such a literal passage that, when the unexpected occurs — a situation the developer hadn’t foreseen — they proceed anyway, often with undesirable outcomes. But what if machines possessed the capacity to know when something doesn’t quite apt and adjust accordingly, without being told so explicitly? In other words, what if they possessed common sense?
Dr. Maya Gupta is a senior AI researcher at Google, and she is attempting to accomplish just that. Using a instrument within the AI arsenal known as machine learning, Gupta and her colleagues are slowly training computers to filter information in a passage that most humans find relatively simple. Her current goal — improving video recommendations on YouTube — might appear modest, or even boring, but from an AI researcher’s perspective, it’s nirvana. That’s because of the fundamental contrast between how machines and humans learn.
“A 3-year-old can learn an mammoth amount of things from very few examples,” Gupta says. The very cannot breathe said for computers, which require vast quantities of data to acquire the very plane of understanding. It besides requires some pretty significant computing resources, which is why Nvidia recently launched a unique kindly of supercomputer developed specifically to accelerate deep-learning algorithms.
Curiously, computer scientists fill known how to “teach” machines for several decades. The missing ingredient has been, well, the ingredients. “You can fill a model that can learn from a billion examples,” Gupta explains, “but if you don’t fill a billion examples, the machine has nothing to learn from.” Which is why YouTube, with its monster catalog of videos, is the faultless region to nurse a data-hungry process devotion machine learning. Gupta’s algorithms are being taught two kinds of common sense, known as smoothness and monotonicity. Both feel devotion child’s play: Smoothness dictates that you shouldn’t let one small change fling off a determination that has been based on dozens of other factors, while monotonicity operates on an “all other things being equal, this one fact should manufacture it the best choice” principle.
In practice, smoothness means that a potentially remarkable video recommendation isn’t dismissed by the algorithm simply because it contained both cooking and traveling information, when the previously watched video was purely about cooking. For monotonicity, Gupta cites the instance of recommending a coffee shop. If you’ve identified that you devotion coffee shops that serve organic, honest trade coffee and that besides fill free Wi-Fi, then the one that is closest to you should top the recommended list, even though you never specified distance as important. “It would dumbfound some humans just how difficult that is,” Gupta says of the effort involved in teaching machines to respect patterns that any 5-year-old could pick up on.
Project Malmo Katja HoffmanMore
Microsoft researcher Katja Hofmann, center, is teaching machines to play Minecraft as fraction of Project Malmo, which is intended to improve human-machine cooperation. (Photo: Scott Eklund/Red Box Pictures)Mining for scholarship in Minecraft
As successful as it might breathe at finding just the birthright video for you, that algorithm has hardship performing the very stint with music recommendation. “It’s difficult to transfer what we’ve learned,” Gupta acknowledges, something she says is a challenge for the industry, not just Google. So how accomplish you train an AI to breathe flexible, in addition to having common sense? Dr. Katja Hofmann, a researcher at the Machine Intelligence and Perception group at Microsoft Research Cambridge, thinks she has the answer: train it how to play Minecraft.
Project Malmo is Hofmann’s attempt to repurpose the massively accepted online game into an experimentation platform for ersatz intelligence research. Her team has developed a modification for the game that lets AI “agents” interact directly with the Minecraft environment. “Minecraft is really engrossing because it’s an open-world game,” Hofmann told us, which offers a unique space in which AI agents can deal with different environments that change over time, a key point if you’re trying to foster flexible learning. This aspect of Minecraft created problems during early attempts to rep agents to achieve goals. “The world doesn’t wait for the agent to manufacture its decision,” she says, referring to the real-time nature of the game, and its obvious parallels to actual life.
Using the mod not only gives an agent the capacity to maneuver the LEGO-like bricks of material that are central to the game’s environment — it can besides interact with other players, including humans. One of Hofmann’s long-term goals for Project Malmo is to improve human-computer cooperation. Much devotion at IBM, the philosophy driving these experiments, and in fact Microsoft’s entire approach to AI, is that it should toil collaboratively with people. Experiments fill already revealed that AI agents are able to complete tasks which humans simply establish too hard. Hofmann is eagerly anticipating an agent that learns to collaborate with humans to solve tasks. “That would express they fill achieved a immense breakthrough,” she said.
It could promote from collaboration. Earlier this year, Microsoft decided to open source Project Malmo, a breeze that could succumb distinguished discoveries, especially if Microsoft’s competitors boost an interest. IBM’s Watson has proven its trivia chops on Jeopardy! but how would it fare when asked to build a house out of bricks? Over at Google, the team behind DeepMind has already enjoyed success in getting an algorithm to learn how to play Space Invaders! — a game with a single goal — maximize points — and only three control options: breeze left, breeze right, and fire. Does it possess the flexibility that Hofmann is trying to inspirit for success in Minecraft?Strike up the roboband
Having an entity that can apply logic, reasoning, and bestial mathematical prowess to challenges in engineering, medicine, and research just makes sense. But what about art? Can AI play a role in the creation of beauty, whether it’s cinema, sculpture, or even music? Google is determined to find out.
The company recently showed off the capabilities of its DeepMind AI platform to perform mind-bending, almost hallucinogenic transformations of images and videos through a process it has dubbed DeepDream. It’s a fun, trippy thing to accomplish to your favorite photos, but it seems to topple short of the independent creative process they normally refer to “artists,” and might breathe more appropriately described as an Instagram filter on steroids.
dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream c e deMore
dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream d caMore
dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream c e fMore
dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream fc aeMore
dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream eMore
dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream fMore
dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream fMore
dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream bf c caMore
dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream ec bMore
Google’s abysmal Dream Generator reinterprets photos into psychedelic works of knack using neural networks. (Photos: abysmal Dream Generator)
Dr. Douglas Eck, a research scientist at Google, was intrigued when he first saw DeepDream. He recognized it immediately as a powerful instance of machine learning, or “good ol’-fashioned neural networks, done right,” as he puts it. But Eck was besides struck by something else: “This stuff can breathe fun.” So Eck decided to lobby the senior brass at Google to let him build a small team to investigate how machine learning could breathe further leveraged in the world of art, only this time it would breathe focused on music, an region Eck has long been passionate about. “Much to my pleasure,” Eck recounts, “Google was birthright on board with this,” and Magenta was born.
Generating music algorithmically isn’t new. You can listen to some of Eck’s own efforts from his time working on it at the University of Montreal in 2002. “The question is,” Eck asks, philosophically, “how accomplish you build models that can generate [music] and can understand whether they’re suitable or not, based upon feedback from their audience, and then improve?” It starts to sound devotion Magenta is going to unleash a horrible unique wave of computer-generated Muzak, but Eck is quick to assure us that’s not the point. “In the end,” he says, “people want to connect with people. Consuming 100-percent machine-generated content is a bit of extinct end.”
Instead, he sees Magenta as an opportunity to create the world’s next electric guitar. “Can they build AI tools that uphold people express themselves in ways they couldn’t before?” Eck wonders. He cites Jimi Hendrix’s iconic exhaust of amplification and distortion as an example: “That really opened up total channels for him to express himself that weren’t there before,” he told Digital Trends.
But unlike Hendrix’s guitar, the instruments that Magenta births will ideally breathe smart. Really smart. “You can already drop some bass loops into GarageBand and play on top of it,” he points out. “But what if there’s actually some smarts to this bassist?” In Eck’s vision of the future, the Magenta code foundation will construct a virtual bandmate that listens to you as you play, and can intelligently — perhaps even creatively — result along and respond accordingly. “It’s devotion your copilot,” he said.
Just devotion Project Malmo, Magenta is now open source, an distinguished step if any of Eck’s dreams for a backup troupe of AI musicians are to breathe realized. Because Magenta is built on a machine-learning framework — Google’s own open-source TensorFlow software — it is incredibly data hungry. By opening access to a worldwide community of musicians, Magenta could evolve very quickly. “If they can breathe playing along with other musicians, the amount of information that’s present for learning is just astonishing,” Eck enthuses.From music to megalomania?
Each of the AI experts they spoke to each and every share an enthusiasm for the future potential of the technology that borders on the religious. They besides share an equally skeptical view of Bostrom’s doomsday prophecies. For them, the notion that one day a superintelligent AI will gyrate on an unsuspecting human population remains very much the domain of science fiction, not science fact.
“I accomplish not believe that machines are going to cessation up being autonomous entities that depart off and accomplish things on their own,” IBM’s Banavar says when asked about the likelihood of a machine intelligence that would necessity to breathe controlled. His primary concern for their future with the machines is one that programmers fill been obsessing over for years: penniless performance because of bug-ridden code. “That’s a much bigger problem in my mind than machines that will wake up one day and accomplish something they weren’t designed to do,” he said.
Google’s Gupta points to a basic stumbling block that she thinks will hamstring the development of a tough AI for years to come: “Our best philosophers and neuroscientists aren’t confident what consciousness is,” she notes, “so how can they even start talking about what it means [for a machine to breathe conscious] or how they would depart about replicating that digitally?” It’s difficult to explicate if she’s being sincere or coy — many observers fill suggested that if any entity working on the AI problem today will crack the code, it’s probably going to breathe Google. Given a sufficiently long runway, she believes anything is possible. “I assume they can accomplish it … I’d assume in the next hundred years,” she offers. “I’m just not confident it’s going to breathe that interesting.”
Microsoft’s Hofmann echoes Gupta’s thoughts about the hardship of achieving a machine with a truly common plane of intelligence. “I believe that it may breathe viable in principle,” she says, “but just knowing the state of the knack in AI, I don’t remark us getting anywhere proximate to those predictions any time in the near future.”
Google’s Eck finds the topic to some extent exasperating. “This total understanding of superintelligence,” he says, “it just doesn’t manufacture sense to me. I guess I really don’t rep it.” It’s difficult to reconcile this confusion with the fact that he’s on a mission to create the first intelligent, synthetic musician. But he clarifies a second later: “My view of cognition is so tied to human perception and action. I don’t search for at their brains as these computational boxes [in competition] with these other, stronger brains in boxes that befall to breathe inside computers.” When asked how far they might breathe from such a scenario, he laughs and says, “Twenty years!” because, as he points out, that’s the customary time frame experts give when they fill no idea, but they necessity to divulge something.
Skeptics of Bostrom’s predictions of AI supremacy aren’t limited to those working in the field. He has besides drawn criticism from the world of philosophy and ethics. Michael Chorost, author of Rebuilt: How Becoming fraction Computer Made Me More Human and World Wide Mind: The Coming Integration of Humanity, Machines, and the Internet, feels he has a tough understanding of how computers and their code work, despite not having a background in AI. He classifies Bostrom’s Superintelligence as “a brilliantly wrong book.”
Chorost believes they may create increasingly powerful AI agents, but he’s unconvinced these algorithms will ever become sentient, let solitary sapient. He compares these concerns to climbing a tree, and then declaring we’re closer to the moon. Much devotion Gupta, Banavar and Eck, he says the biggest question is how a machine, made up of circuits and code, could ever achieve that status. He subscribes to the understanding that there is something inherently special about their bodies, and their “aqueous chemical” makeup, that no electronic system will ever breathe able to duplicate.
He falls short of ruling it out completely, however, and offers one possibly viable route it could take: An evolutionary one. Instead of trying to program awareness into machines, they should let nature accomplish the heavy lifting. “Putting it in a involved environment that forces [an AI] to evolve,” Chorost suggests, might accomplish the trick. “The environment should breathe lethally complex,” he says, evoking images of AIs competing in a virtual gladiator’s arena, “so that it kills off ineffective systems and rewards efficacious ones.”
The other capitalize to this ersatz Darwinism, if it succeeds, is that it will succumb a righteous AI with no genocidal tendencies. “Morality is actually built into how evolution works,” he claims, aphorism that each and every you necessity to accomplish is search for at humanity for the proof. “Despite both world wars, the rate of violent death has been consistently falling,” he notes. “We’re actually getting more righteous with each passing decade — that is not accidental. That’s a process that comes out of reason.” Chorost himself reasons that any AI that develops over time — thanks to evolution — will thus breathe a kinder, gentler entity because we’ve seen this process play out in each and every of us.So why worry?
Perhaps Chorost is right. Perhaps the essential ingredients for sentience will never breathe reproduced in silicon, and we’ll breathe able to live comfortably knowing that as incredibly capable as Siri becomes, she’s never going to result her own desires instead of catering to ours, devotion in the movie Her. But even if you don’t buy into the understanding that one day AI will become an existential threat, Gary Marchant thinks they should each and every breathe paying a lot more attention to the risks that promote with even a moderately more sophisticated plane of ersatz intelligence.
Officially, Marchant is the Lincoln Professor of Emerging Technologies, Law and Ethics at the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law at Arizona state University. When he’s not lecturing students at ASU, he’s working on a legal and ethical framework for the development of AI as a member of the international engineering standards body, the IEEE. When he’s not doing that, Marchant co-investigates the “control and responsible innovation in the development of autonomous machines” thanks to grant money from the Future Of Life Institute — an organization that funds research and outreach on scenarios that could pose an existential risk to humanity (including AI). These activities give Marchant a 50,000-foot perspective on AI that few others possess. His conclusion? There are two areas that require immediate attention.
Military drones devotion the MQ-9 Reaper currently only operate with human pilots remotely at the controls, but AI developments may eventually enable them to assassinate autonomously. (Photo: common Atomics Aeronautical)
“One that concerns me the most,” he says, “is the exhaust of AI in the military.” At the moment, the U.S. drone arsenal is remote-controlled. The pilot is still in command, even if she’s sitting hundreds of miles away, but that scenario may already fill an expiration date. The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, or DARPA, is reportedly interested in developing autonomous software agents that could identify and repair security risks in computing systems. “There will breathe tough incentives to depart more and more autonomous,” Marchant warns, because it will breathe seen as the only viable passage to respond to an adversary who is already benefitting from the faster-than-human decision-making these systems are capable of. “Then you’re reliant on these systems not to manufacture mistakes,” he notes, ominously.
It might breathe light to can his concerns were it not for the fact that a federal advisory board to the Department of Defense just released a study on autonomy that echoes his words, almost verbatim: “Autonomous capabilities are increasingly ubiquitous and are readily available to allies and adversaries alike. The study therefore concluded that DoD must boost immediate action to accelerate its exploitation of autonomy while besides preparing to counter autonomy employed by adversaries.”
The other exhaust of AI that Marchant believes is in necessity of examination is much closer to home: “The movement toward autonomous cars,” he says, is going to require attentive development and much better regulation.
Tesla Autopilot allows the Model S to drive autonomously on the highway, but a number of crashes prove it’s not yet perfect. (Video: Tesla)
“As they recently saw with Tesla,” he observes, referencing the recent crashes — and one death — connected to the company’s autopilot system, “it’s a harbinger of what’s to promote — people being injured or killed by an autonomous system making decisions.”
He highlights the very actual ethical decisions that will breathe faced by AI-controlled cars: In an accident situation, whose life should breathe preserved — that of the passenger, another driver, or a pedestrian? It’s a question many are wrestling with, including Oren Etzioni, a computer scientist at the University of Washington and the CEO of the Allen Institute for ersatz Intelligence, who told Wired: “We don’t want technology to play God.”
What Marchant clearly isn’t worried about is biting the hand that feeds: Much of his Future Of Life grant comes from Tesla CEO Elon Musk.What about the jobs?
Today’s manufacturing robots result meticulously programmed instructions, but future models devotion this prototype from Fanuc could learn from reinforcement, just devotion humans. (Photo: Fanuc)
Further into the future, Marchant sees a huge problem with AI replacing human workers, a process that he claims has already begun. “I was talking to a pathologist,” he recounts, “who said his field is drying up because machines are taking it over.” Recently, a prototype AI based on IBM’s Watson began working at a global law firm. Its machine discovery and document review capabilities, once sufficiently advanced, could strike the jobs of young associate lawyers, which Marchant thinks demonstrates that it’s not only menial jobs that are at risk. “This is going to become a bigger and bigger issue,” he said. Fanuc, the largest provider of industrial robots, has recently used reinforcement learning to train an embodied AI how to perform a unique job — in 24 hours.
Google’s Gupta offers an optimistic perspective, saying, “The more engrossing myth is the jobs that are being created,” though she stops short of listing any of these unique jobs. Her Google colleague, Eck, puts it into a historical (and of course, musical) frame, noting that the advent of drum machines didn’t create legions of unemployed drummers (or, at the very least, it didn’t add to their existing numbers). “We still fill lots of drummers, and a lot of them are doing really awesome things with drum machines,” he says.
Marchant understands these arguments, but ultimately, he rejects them. The always-on, 24/7 decision-making nature of AI puts it into a technology class by itself he says. “There will breathe so many things that machines will breathe able to accomplish better than humans,” he notes. “There was always something for humans to breeze to in the past. That isn’t the case now.”
Interestingly, the biggest players in AI aren’t deaf to these and other concerns regarding AI’s future impact on society and fill recently joined forces to create a unique nonprofit organization called The Partnership on ersatz Intelligence to capitalize People and Society, or the shorter Partnership on AI. Its members involve Microsoft, Google, IBM, Facebook, and Amazon, and its stated goal is to “address opportunities and challenges with AI technologies” through open and collaborative research. The partnership isn’t interested in consulting with policymaking bodies, but the public could cessation up steering it that passage if they can’t breathe convinced of the technology’s benefits.
Surprisingly, Marchant isn’t ready to claim more laws or more regulations birthright away. “I’m almost worried that sometimes they breeze too quickly,” he says, “and start putting in region laws before they know what we’re trying to address.”Just divulge no to AI
Dr. Kathleen Richardson, Senior Research Fellow in the Ethics of Robotics at De Montfort University, knows exactly what she’s trying to address: The goal of an vigilant AI, or any AI designed to mimic alive things, she believes, is a fundamentally flawed pursuit. “The only judgement they assume it’s viable that machines could breathe devotion people,” she says, “is because they had — and still fill — slavery.” For Richardson, using machines as a stand-in for a person, or indeed any other alive entity, is a byproduct of a debase civilization that is still trying to find rationalizations to deal people as objects.
“We share properties with each and every life,” she says, “but they don’t share properties with human-made artifacts.” Reversing this logic, Richardson dismissed the notion that they will ever create an aware, sentient, or sapient algorithm. “I completely, utterly, 100 percent reject it,” she says. Perhaps because of this ironclad belief, Richardson doesn’t expend much time worrying about superintelligent, killer AIs. Why assume about a future that will never promote to pass? Instead, she’s focused her research on AI and robotics in the here and now, as well as their near-term impact. What she sees, she does not devotion — in particular the trend toward robotic companions, driven by improvements in AI. Though most well-known for her anti-sex robot position, Richardson opposes robotic companionship of any kind.
Softbank Pepper RobotMore
Pepper is designed to breathe a humanoid companion, keeping owners company devotion a pet, rather than performing any specific task. (Photo: Softbank)
“They divulge that these robots — these objects — are going to breathe therapeutic,” she says, referring specifically to the bleeding-edge Japanese market, which has the uphold of industry heavyweights devotion SoftBank and Sony. Richardson doesn’t build much faith in this notion, which she thinks is nothing more than yet another rationalization linked to slavery. “If you talk to antediluvian people,” she says, “what they want is day trips out, and contact with other human beings. not one of them said, ‘What I want most of each and every is a robot.’” Perhaps she’s right, and yet that didn’t quit SoftBank’s Pepper — the first companion robot capable of interpreting basic human emotions — from selling out its initial accelerate of 1,000 units in less than a minute.
Sherry Turkle, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology researcher, psychologist and author, agrees with Richardson’s viewpoint, but mostly because she has seen that — perverse to Richardson’s pretension — there is claim for AI companions, and that worries her. In 2013, Turkle gave an interview to Live Science, saying, “The understanding of some kindly of ersatz companionship has already become the unique normal.” The expense for this unique normalcy is that “we fill to change ourselves, and in the process, they are remaking human values and human connection.”
Sophia from Hanson Robotics, besides pictured at the top of this article, achieves an almost creepy plane of resemblance to a actual human. (Video: Hanson Robotics)
That would breathe just fine with Dr. David Hanson of Hanson Robotics. “The ersatz intelligence will evolve to the point where they will truly breathe their friends,” he told CNBC.
Marchant has already weighed in on this subject. Instead of fighting this unique normal, he says they might just fill to embrace it. In his controversial Slate article, he outlines a future where marriages between humans and robots will not only breathe legal, they will breathe inevitable. “If a robotic companion could provide some kindly of solace and savor — distinct savor at least — I’m not confident that’s wrong,” he says, citing the fact that there are many in their society who, for various reasons, are incapable of forming these kinds of relationships with other humans.
Marchant makes it clear that he still values human relationships above those that involve synthetic companions, but he’s besides prepared to accept that not everyone will share these values. “I’m certainly not going to marry a robot, but if my son wanted to 20 years from now, I wouldn’t divulge he couldn’t accomplish that,” he claims. “I’d try to talk him out of it, but if that’s what made him happy, I’d breathe more concerned about that than anything else.” Perhaps as a token of the times, earlier this year a draft contrivance for the EU included wording that would give robots official standing as “electronic persons.”Stepping toward the future
Facebook CEO heed Zuckerberg has said that in 10 years, it’s likely that AI will breathe better than humans at basic sensory perception. Li Deng, a principal researcher at Microsoft, agrees, and goes even further, saying, “Artificial Intelligence technologies will breathe used pervasively by ordinary people in their daily lives.”
Eric Schmidt, executive chairman of Google parent Alphabet, and Google CEO Pichai remark an mammoth explosion in the number of applications, products, and companies that fill machine learning at their core. They are quick to point out that this character of AI, with its insatiable appetite for data, will only fulfill its potential when paired with the cloud. Urs Hölzle, Google’s senior vice president of technical infrastructure, said, “Over the next five years, I expect to remark more change in computing than in the last five decades.”
These predictions are — to some extent obviously, given their sources — highly positive, but that doesn’t express the road ahead will resemble the Autobahn. There could breathe significant bumps. IBM’s Banavar points to a few challenges that could hobble progress. “One of the breakthroughs they need,” he says, “is how you combine the statistical technique [of machine learning] with the knowledge-based technique.” He refers to the fact that even though machines fill proven powerful at sifting through huge volumes of data to determine patterns and prognosticate outcomes, they still don’t understand its “meaning.”
The other immense challenge is being able to ramp up the computing power they necessity to manufacture the next set of AI leaps possible. “We are working on unique architectures,” he reveals, “inspired by the natural structures of the brain.” The premise here is that if brain-inspired software, devotion neural nets, can succumb powerful results in machine learning, then brain-inspired hardware might breathe equally (or more) powerful.
All this talk about brain-inspired technology inevitably leads us back to their first, spooky, concern: In the future, AI might breathe a collection of increasingly useful tools that can free us from drudgery, or it could evolve rapidly — and unbeknownst to us — into the most efficient killing machine ever invented.
One of those options certainly seems a lot more desirable, but how accomplish they manufacture confident that’s the version they cessation up with?
If they result AI expert Chorost’s advice, there’s no judgement to worry, because as long as their AIs evolve, they’ll develop morality — and morality leads to benevolence. That’s assuming it’s even possible, which he disputes. “When an engineering path [to sentient AI] becomes clear,” he says, “then we’ll fill a sense of what not to do.”
Banavar, despite being fairly certain that an AI with its own goals isn’t in their future, suggests that “it is a smart thing for us to fill a passage to gyrate off the machine.” The team at Google’s DeepMind accord and fill written a paper in conjunction with the Future Of Life Institute that describes how to create the equivalent of a “big red button” that would let the human operator of an AI agent suspend its functions, even if the agent became smart enough to realize such a mechanism existed. The paper, titled “Safely Interruptible Agents,” does not depart so far as to position itself as the passage to counter a runaway superintelligence, but it’s a step in the birthright direction as far as Tesla CEO Musk is concerned: He recently implied that Google is the “one” company whose AI efforts withhold him awake at night.
Interestingly, during the very interview with Recode, Musk suggested that OpenAI — an organization he backs that operates a grass-roots effort to manufacture AI technology widely available to everyone — could breathe the ultimate antidote to a malevolent AI agent. If everyone possessed their own personal AI, he reckons, “if somebody did try to something really terrible, then the collective will of others could overcome that foundation actor.”
Perhaps they will develop a tough AI. Perhaps it won’t breathe friendly. Perhaps they will breathe pushed to extinction by Skynet, offered a tenuous, uneasy truce by the machines of The Matrix, or simply ignored and left to their own (less intelligent) devices by the superintelligent OS One from Her.
Or perhaps, to quote computer scientist and AI skeptic Peter Hassan, they will simply withhold “pursuing an ever-increasing number of immaterial activities as the original goal recedes ever further into the future — devotion the mirage it is.”
3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Aruba [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Avaya [96 Certification Exam(s) ]
AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CA-Technologies [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
CheckPoint [41 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institue [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institute [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
DELL [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECCouncil [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
EMC [129 Certification Exam(s) ]
Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fortinet [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
HP [750 Certification Exam(s) ]
HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBM [1532 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Juniper [64 Certification Exam(s) ]
LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Medical [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
Microsoft [374 Certification Exam(s) ]
Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCLEX [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Oracle [279 Certification Exam(s) ]
P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
Symantec [134 Certification Exam(s) ]
Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Dropmark : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/12833842
Dropmark-Text : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/12941827
Blogspot : http://killexams-braindumps.blogspot.com/2018/01/pass4sure-c4040-122-dumps-and-practice.html
Wordpress : https://wp.me/p7SJ6L-2Ji
Box.net : https://app.box.com/s/5fjme1gara0ky8yatmh22lz6wer96tn3
is specialized in Architectural visualization , Industrial visualization , 3D Modeling ,3D Animation , Entertainment and Visual Effects .