Find us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter

Best C2010-659 prepare on Internet! | brain dumps | 3D Visualization

You should get our MUST HAVE questions and answers before taking C2010-659 test Memorize all questions and answers and ensure your success in the exam - brain dumps - 3D Visualization

Pass4sure C2010-659 dumps | C2010-659 actual questions |

C2010-659 Fundamentals of Applying SmartCloud Control Desk V1

Study guide Prepared by IBM Dumps Experts

Exam Questions Updated On : C2010-659 Dumps and actual Questions

100% actual Questions - Exam Pass Guarantee with towering Marks - Just Memorize the Answers

C2010-659 exam Dumps Source : Fundamentals of Applying SmartCloud Control Desk V1

Test Code : C2010-659
Test title : Fundamentals of Applying SmartCloud Control Desk V1
Vendor title : IBM
: 103 actual Questions

the passage to prepare for C2010-659 examination in shortest time?
in no passage ever notion of passing the C2010-659 exam answering every solitary questions effectively. Hats off to you killexams. I wouldnt stand achieved this fulfillment with out the assist of your query and answer. It helped me draw immediate the principles and that i should solution even the unknown questions. it is the actual custom designed material which met my necessity for the duration of coaching. determined 90 percent questions commonplace to the guide and responded them quickly to deliver time for the unknown questions and it labored. thanks killexams.

am i able to find out feel data concomitant C2010-659 licensed?
Yes, very useful and I was able to score 82% in the C2010-659 exam with 5 days preparation. Especially the facility of downloading as PDF files in your package gave me a Good scope for efficient rehearse coupled with online tests - no limited attempts restriction. Answers given to each question by you is 100% accurate. Thanks a lot.

No cheaper supply than these C2010-659 dumps to exist had but.
I handed the C2010-659 exam nowadays and scored a hundred%! Never concept I should conclude it, but grew to emerge as out to exist a gem in exam training. I had a exotic feeling about it as it regarded to cowl every solitary topics, and there were masses of questions provided. Yet, I didnt expect to remark every solitary the equal questions within the actual exam. Very quality marvel, and that i quite recommend the consume of Killexams.

want up to date intelligence dumps for C2010-659 examination? here it's miles.
I am ranked very towering among my class mates on the list of outstanding students but it only happened after I registered on this for some exam help. It was the towering ranking studying program on this that helped me in joining the towering ranks along with other brilliant students of my class. The resources on this are commendable because they are precise and extremely useful for preparation through C2010-659 pdf, C2010-659 dumps and C2010-659 books. I am joyful to write these words of appreciation because this deserves it. Thank you.

WTF! questions were exactly the selfsame in exam that I prepared!
I just bought this C2010-659 braindump, as quickly as I heard that has the updates. Its authentic, they stand got covered every solitary new regions, and the exam looks very sparkling. Given the latest update, their revolve round time and aid is superb.

I got Awesome Questions and Answers for my C2010-659 exam.
Well, I did it and i cannot support in brain it. I must in no passage stand passed the C2010-659 with out your help. My marks turned into so towering i was amazed at my medium performance. Its simply because of you. Thank you very lots!!!

Do a quick and smart pass, establish together those C2010-659 Questions and answers.
If you want prerogative C2010-659 education on the passage it works and what are the tests and every solitary then dont dissipate a while and pick as its miles an ultimate source of help. I moreover wanted C2010-659 training and I even opted for this extremely Good exam simulator and were given myself the best education ever. It guided me with every aspect of C2010-659 exam and provided the much questions and solutions I even stand ever seen. The keep guides moreover were of very a Good deal help.

What retract a gawk at manual conclude I exigency to prepare to pellucid C2010-659 examination?
Passing the C2010-659 was long due as I was extremely busy with my office assignments. But, when I institute the questions & answers by the, it really inspired me to retract on the test. Its been really supportive and helped pellucid every solitary my doubts on C2010-659 topic. I felt very pleased to pass the exam with a huge 97% marks. much achievement indeed. And every solitary credit goes to you for this wonderful support.

Extract concomitant every solitary C2010-659 path contents in layout.
My brother saden me telling me that I wasnt going to Go through the C2010-659 exam. I exist vigilant after I gawk outdoor the window, such a lot of one of a benevolent humans exigency to exist seen and heard from and they simply want the attention people however i can recommend you that they students can salvage this attention while they pass their C2010-659 test and i will inform you how I cleared my C2010-659 test it turned into simplest when I were given my test questions from which gave me the hope in my eyes collectively for every solitary time.

Did you tried these C2010-659 actual query monetary institution and study guide.
I desired to drop you a line to thanks on your test materials. This is the primary time I stand used your cram. I just took the C2010-659 today and handed with an eighty percent score. I must admit that I changed into skeptical in the surge but me passing my certification exam without a doubt proves it. Thanks a lot! Thomas from Calgary, Canada

IBM Fundamentals of Applying SmartCloud

IBM announces New SmartCloud capabilities, Partnership With Nirvanix | actual Questions and Pass4sure dumps

IBM has nowadays increased its cloud computing features for enterprise with the launch of recent IBM SmartCloud capabilities. These new offerings embrace SmartCloud utility features, IBM’s new PaaS for enterprise, a portfolio of hardware and software known as SmartCloud basis, and SmartCloud Ecosystem, which comprises new features for IBM companions and ISVs.

The business plans to assist around 200 million clients via the conclusion of 2012.

IBM says that it has ported SAP, ERP and every solitary database functions to its SmartCloud platform. With its new services, it may possibly now automate labor-intensive tasks linked to operating SAP within the cloud, specifically SAP cloning, refreshes and patching. In some circumstances, IBM says the time rate reductions can Go from months or weeks to days or hours, counting on the assignment.

also introduced nowadays is a new partnership with Nirvanix, a cloud storage company. Going forward, Nirvanix’s cloud storage know-how should exist integrated into IBM’s SmartCloud enterprise storage features, enabling consumers to upload information of any dimension, anyplace in the world, and access them from any place. The storage-as-a-provider providing can support millions of clients, billions of objects and exabytes of records.

in the meantime, IBM’s new platform-as-a-carrier offering, SmartCloud application functions (SCAS) will launch into beta this yr (q4), offering enterprise–grade protection, open Java and go-platform support with no vendor lock-in, and a comprehensive set of utility infrastructure and managed services to allow construction and deployment of purposes to the cloud. It will rush on IBM’s SmartCloud commercial enterprise and commercial enterprise+ – the business-type infrastructure-as-a-platform peculiarly designed to rush commercial enterprise workloads at dedicated SLAs (provider degree agreements). IBM SmartCloud enterprise+ is attainable within the U.S., and will exist deployed international by passage of the conclusion of 2012.

ultimately, the new SmartCloud basis family unit of deepest cloud options goals to support agencies promptly design and install inner most cloud environments, and includes SmartCloud Entry, prepackaged private cloud software, plus SmartCloud provisioning and monitoring application.

IBM Evolves from On exact to SmartCloud | actual Questions and Pass4sure dumps

domestic   →   ERP   →   IBM Evolves from On exact to SmartCloud Posted October 12, 2011 by passage of Sean Michael Kerner     remarks

New IBM application features for cloud consist of middleware, DB2, SAP functions and CRM.

IBM (NYSE: IBM) is rolling out a brand new set of SmartCloud capabilities and application, offering new alternatives for companies to rush their purposes to a cloud mannequin.

the new offerings consist of the debut of SmartCloud commercial enterprise 2.0, which is a Platform-as-a-provider (PaaS) providing. the brand new SmartCloud will moreover allow IBM DB2 database-as-a-provider as well other IBM functions. IBM isn't just enabling its cloud for IBM software; the SmartCloud moreover has a service for SAP ERP functions.

"This announcement takes their cloud capabilities to the next degree," Lauren States, VP and CTO of Cloud Computing at IBM, told "We're adding means to the portfolio for software edifice and deployment in the cloud with SmartCloud application services."

States referred to SmartCloud application services is IBM's PaaS for the commercial enterprise. She mentioned that initially the software services are concentrated on Java applications and transactional database functions with IBM's DB2. there's additionally an SAP purposes carrier that supplies SAP as a packaged app that will moreover exist deployed and administered within the cloud.

"We're surge with what their core customers consume with their know-how and we'll exist edifice that out with other capabilities over time," States noted.

remaining week, Oracle announced its personal public cloud providing, including a database-as-a-carrier providing. States talked about IBM's platform is every solitary about exposing IBM's middleware capabilities as a service. She delivered that programmers who are writing applications for the cloud can simply title the provider, whether or not it's database or a further service, and that they will not stand to exist troubled concerning the underlying complexity of the stack.

The SmartCloud platform is being delivered on a Linux infrastructure with future plans to expand with windows and IBM's AIX Unix. IBM is the consume of KVM and pink Hat as the underlying technology seller platform. The platform can moreover exist used to convey cloud enterprise functions, together with cloud ERP.

IBM is moreover introducing a SmartCloud basis application portfolio for groups trying to deploy on-premise.

"a lot of customers are just getting started with cloud and that they want to headquarters of attention on the merits of virtualization, management and automation for operational effectivity," States mentioned. "This SmartCloud foundation fills a niche in their on-ramp to the cloud and it could actually set the basis for customers that at eventual want to salvage to self-provider, pay-as-you-go infrastructure."

IBM's cloud shove is moreover being prolonged to IBM's latest On exact hosted consumer base. States referred to that IBM already has a huge application on exact internet hosting business. IBM introduced in April that the scheme became to supply On exact purchasers with cloud capabilities.

"it exist their intent to deliver a cloud enabled environment inside their software on exact internet hosting business for those customers that exigency to leverage that operational effectivity," States spoke of.

IBM additionally announced a collaboration with SugarCRM to develop its client relationship management (CRM) items accessible on the IBM SmartCloud business. "valued clientele can now retract abilities of advanced CRM solutions, deployable in a import number of minutes, whereas reaching every solitary of the benefits of a non-public cloud ambiance," IBM pointed out in an announcement.

Sean Michael Kerner is a senior editor at, the information provider of, the network for technology professionals.

IBM Unveils New ‘DevOps’ CLM tools for the Cloud | actual Questions and Pass4sure dumps

IBM the day past unveiled new software and features designed to aid clients streamline the application development lifecycle, or what IBM calls “building operations,” or simply DevOps. As fraction of the announcement, which turned into made on the annual Rational Collaborate convention in Florida, parts of Rational’s Collaborative Lifecycle administration (CLM) suite may exist made obtainable as a DevOps instrument hosted in IBM’s SmartCloud.

The CLM suite, which IBM unveiled ultimately 12 months’s Collaborate reveal, is built on IBM’s open construction platform, known as Jazz, and combines three Rational products, together with necessities Composer, crew live performance, and quality manager, in a solitary suite that IBM says is easier to buy, deploy, and consume than separately cobbling the items collectively.

massive Blue yesterday introduced five new CLM products and services as fraction of its shove into DevOps for the cloud. It moreover introduced new cell capabilities in its CLM suite.

the primary DevOps for the Cloud providing bears an unwieldy name: “IBM Rational retort for Collaborative Lifecycle management on IBM SmartCloud enterprise.” This offering is really a slice of IBM’s SmartCloud commercial enterprise that a consumer can consume as a edifice and examine atmosphere. SmartCloud enterprise, you will remember, is a public infrastructure as a service (IaaS) offering in line with X86 hardware and the Linux OS. SmartCloud enterprise+ helps energy techniques environments, but now not IBM i.

the brand new IBM SmartCloud application functions (SCAS) platform as a service (PaaS) providing that changed into launched in October 2011 additionally has a role in IBM’s cloud-based mostly DevOps plans. IBM sees SCAS (which comprises a Linux OS, WebSphere became, DB2 database, and SAP purposes) giving consumers a spot the spot they can execute building, build, check, and bring actions.

IBM additionally announced the SmartCloud for executive development and gawk at various Platform. This providing will give executive organizations a passage to access the CLM suite from a scalable, hosted environment. IBM says this offering will conform to the Federal tips safety management Act (FISMA).

additionally playing into the DevOps cloud is SmartCloud constant delivery, which IBM describes as a set of “choicest rehearse patterns” designed to aid shoppers consume CLM tools and IBM’s SmartCloud Provisioning application to maneuver the lifecycle of cloud-based mostly functions. SmartCloud continuous birth was at the surge unveiled in March, and is at present in beta.

The SmartCloud application efficiency management offering provides purchasers with entry to Tivoli monitoring and management tools for making improvements to the performance of cloud purposes.

On the cell entrance, IBM introduced that its CLM suite can now work with the IBM cell foundation. The cell foundation, if you neglected it, combines three tools, together with the IBM Worklight HTML5 mobile software edifice and runtime environment; the IBM Endpoint supervisor device; and WebSphere cast iron for integration.

the new business cellular edifice providing combines CLM, the cellular groundwork, and a couple of other Rational tools, including the new Rational Developer for vigour techniques edition 8.5 liberate (which that you could examine greater about here), Rational Developer for system z 8.5, Rational application Developer 8.5, and the Android SDK and Emulator. IBM says that with the aid of integrating every solitary these items, consumers can expect to velocity up the technique of designing, constructing, checking out, and deploying business cellular apps, and doing so in a cozy and compliant manner.

It’s a wide, wily cloud world obtainable, and IBM is determined to support purchasers reduce throughout the litter and control their cloud utility edifice activities. “nowadays’s business quandary is the passage to ply both the exigency for speedy birth and ample ply in the utility edifice system,” Dr. Kristof Kloeckner, common manager of IBM Rational, says in an announcement. “We exigency to equilibrium the exigency for velocity and agility with more suitable governance to maneuver saturate and high-quality, obtain regulatory compliance, exist sure protection, and stand some degree of monetary predictability.”

connected studies

IBM Puffs Up New Public, inner most SmartCloud Releases

IBM Ships New Collaborative Lifecycle administration Suite

IBM Consolidates Rational crew live performance items, Simplifies Licensing

IBM Unveils change administration utility for device i

                     post this Story to               submit this Story to Digg    publish this Story to Slashdot

While it is hard errand to pick solid certification questions/answers assets regarding review, reputation and validity since individuals salvage sham because of picking incorrectly benefit. ensure to serve its customers best to its assets as for exam dumps update and validity. The greater fraction of other's sham report objection customers arrive to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams cheerfully and effortlessly. They never deal on their review, reputation and quality because killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams customer conviction is imperative to us. Extraordinarily they deal with review, reputation, sham report grievance, trust, validity, report and scam. On the off chance that you remark any erroneous report posted by their rivals with the title killexams sham report grievance web, sham report, scam, protestation or something dote this, simply remember there are constantly terrible individuals harming reputation of Good administrations because of their advantages. There are a much many fulfilled clients that pass their exams utilizing brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit, their case questions and test brain dumps, their exam simulator and you will realize that is the best brain dumps site.

Back to Braindumps Menu

000-274 exam prep | 000-453 questions and answers | 350-022 study guide | NS0-151 free pdf download | C4090-452 test prep | COG-622 study guide | MSC-122 questions and answers | HP0-022 braindumps | 300-101 rehearse questions | 1Z0-028 rehearse questions | C2140-842 mock exam | 000-591 pdf download | MOPF brain dumps | BCCPA VCE | 9A0-035 bootcamp | C2150-609 exam questions | PACE braindumps | 2V0-622D dumps questions | C2180-529 actual questions | 700-104 braindumps |

Pass4sure C2010-659 Fundamentals of Applying SmartCloud Control Desk V1 exam braindumps with actual questions and rehearse software.
Are you looking for IBM C2010-659 Dumps of actual questions for the Fundamentals of Applying SmartCloud Control Desk V1 Exam prep? They provide most updated and quality C2010-659 Dumps. Detail is at They stand compiled a database of C2010-659 Dumps from actual exams in order to let you prepare and pass C2010-659 exam on the first attempt. Just memorize their and relax. You will pass the exam.

We stand Tested and Approved C2010-659 Exam dumps. provides the foremost distinctive and latest C2010-659 braindumps that much comprise every solitary s you need. With the guide of their C2010-659 exam dumps, you ought to not squander your risk on spending time on reference books and nearly stand to exist compelled to spend 10-20 hours to ace their C2010-659 actual Questions and Answers. Whats larger, they stand an approach to offer you with PDF Version and Exam Simulator Version test Questions and Answers. For Exam Simulator Version dumps, the candidates mimic the IBM C2010-659 exam in an exceedingly actual test atmosphere. Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under; WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for every solitary exam on website PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders additional than $69 DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders additional than $99 SEPSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for every solitary Orders Click enables a large number of candidates to pass the exams and salvage their certifications. They stand an immense number of powerful overviews. Their dumps are strong, sensible, updated and of genuinely best quality to vanquish the inconveniences of any IT certifications. exam dumps are latest updated in exceedingly rout route on standard start and material is released discontinuously. Latest dumps are available in testing centers with whom they are keeping up their relationship to salvage latest material.

The exam questions for C2010-659 Fundamentals of Applying SmartCloud Control Desk V1 exam is essentially in perspective of two accessible game plans, PDF and rehearse test. PDF record passes on every solitary the exam questions, answers which makes your arranging less persevering. While the rehearse test are the complimentary component in the exam thing. Which serves to self-overview your progress. The appraisal mechanical assembly moreover includes your fragile locales, where you exigency to establish more attempt with the objective that you can help each one of your stresses. propose you to must attempt its free demo, you will remark the common UI and moreover you will believe that its facile to adjust the prep mode. Regardless, guarantee that, the actual C2010-659 exam has a bigger number of questions than the case exam. In case, you are appeased with its demo then you can purchase the actual C2010-659 exam thing. offers you three months free updates of C2010-659 Fundamentals of Applying SmartCloud Control Desk V1 exam questions. Their accreditation group is always open at back quit who updates the material as and when required. Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017: 60% Discount Coupon for every solitary exams on website
PROF17: 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17: 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
DECSPECIAL: 10% Special Discount Coupon for every solitary Orders

C2010-659 Practice Test | C2010-659 examcollection | C2010-659 VCE | C2010-659 study guide | C2010-659 practice exam | C2010-659 cram

Killexams AFE dumps | Killexams LCAC dump | Killexams 2B0-103 free pdf | Killexams CSET rehearse exam | Killexams M6040-520 questions and answers | Killexams 000-575 rehearse test | Killexams HP0-J40 study guide | Killexams 3000-2 brain dumps | Killexams NSE7 exam prep | Killexams 000-922 actual questions | Killexams 000-642 free pdf | Killexams 9L0-402 questions and answers | Killexams 648-247 braindumps | Killexams C9560-568 braindumps | Killexams 00M-244 actual questions | Killexams 1T6-303 braindumps | Killexams NailTech braindumps | Killexams HP2-K27 brain dumps | Killexams EVP-101 study guide | Killexams 922-100 test prep | huge List of Exam Braindumps

View Complete list of Brain dumps

Killexams PRF study guide | Killexams 9A0-310 questions and answers | Killexams 310-345 examcollection | Killexams 000-331 brain dumps | Killexams 920-262 study guide | Killexams C9520-422 free pdf | Killexams 3X0-102 sample test | Killexams ST0-303 exam prep | Killexams C2010-507 braindumps | Killexams 3M0-701 rehearse exam | Killexams 000-858 dumps questions | Killexams 300-375 actual questions | Killexams PEGACSSA rehearse test | Killexams 646-392 rehearse test | Killexams 000-M46 questions and answers | Killexams 1Z0-435 test questions | Killexams HP0-311 test prep | Killexams 050-v66-SERCMS02 free pdf | Killexams 70-742 actual questions | Killexams EADA10 bootcamp |

Fundamentals of Applying SmartCloud Control Desk V1

Pass 4 sure C2010-659 dumps | C2010-659 actual questions |

From Gold Bar to Joshua Tree | actual questions and Pass4sure dumps

Warning. A lot of climbing talk ahead.

The next morning, they woke up before 9, ate some cereal with mixed fruits, and headed out with some crash pads. Chad, Brooke, Josh, Wendy and I drove about 30 minutes out into the far desert and parked at the Hidden Valley Picnic zone parking lot (big mistake — there’s a parking lot at the Hidden Valley campsite literally across the street).

Just one of the rock formations at Joshua Tree.

(Side note, I grew up in the towering desert. It doesn’t gawk as stunning or comely as this.)

We got lost for a bit and took a long hike around from the west side but eventually institute a VERY facile (listed) V1, that was honestly more dote a V0 with a very short top out. Maybe they identified the boulder wrong.

Behind us was White Rastafarian. support in intelligence I stand no dread doing any V2s at the gym. They’re usually require some technical moves but for the most part, they’re easily doable. White Rastafarian does not follow suit with that trend: the top-out of the boulder is 25 feet towering and has a crux about 20 feet up that requires a span from one crack to another.

I ended up being able to develop it to a juggy hold about halfway through the problem before I called it quits and decided not to risk injury.

The elusive White Rastafarian. Objects are smaller than they appear — the top of this boulder is 25 feet up!

After this, they headed to Pinhead a smallish boulder about 50 yards or so from White Rastafarian. This had a couple of much routes.

I was able to top out on this route, but due to my poor altenative in footing, I slipped and fell, despite grabbing the juggy topout. I got a shallow scrape near my prerogative thumb, and decided forfeit the route in the interest of taping it up and finding something easier. (I now heartache not trying the route again after Chad and the others tried it.)

Bandaged up.

I was, however, able to complete the Pinhead Traverse (V0-).

Brooke on the crux of the Pinhead Traverse. Wendy ‘scends the Pinhead Traverse (V0-). Chad using a Double Gaston prerogative before he ‘scends Pinhead.

Chad showed us this route that he institute northeast of Pinhead. I’d establish the gym grading as a V2 or maybe V2+, but outdoors, it’s likely a V0.

Chad’s V0. Josh and Brooke spotting.

I didn’t try it — I wanted to deliver my energy for their eventual planned route for the day: Hobbit hole Offwidth.

This offwidth boulder was tucked behind some flick and more rocks, and when they got there, Josh and Chad began to scramble up some surrounding rocks in the area. Wendy took a stab at Patina, a friction V1.I honestly had never really tried a friction climb, and the closest I’d seen at a climbing gym were labeled as VHards…

Wendy makes progress on Patina.

Hobbit hole is obviously an “Offwidth” problem (see this video for reference on what the offwidth climb would gawk like), but I decided to conclude a lieback approach. I didn’t want to rush the risk of slipping and jamming my corpse into the crack — I’ve seen 127 Hours and I’d rather not stand a similar situation of getting stuck between two rocks.

This problem was a much learning experience, but I’ll just bundle in that lesson into the various other lessons I took away from that day’s climbing:1. Learn to rush your feet alongside your hands. This is something that I often educate to newbie climbers and I needed to re-teach myself when climbing outdoors.2. Feel the rock before attempting to finish it. Unlike gym routes, the routes outdoors don’t stand colored tape or markings designating where to Go next. You can’t remark that a hold is a sloper. A shelf or crack may not exist consistently juggy throughout. This is moreover something that I recommend new climbers when they dispatch me pictures of a route asking, “What conclude I conclude next?” I can only speculate so much. The best remedy is to just Go out there and try climbing the rock.3. exist prepared to develop risky moves. I reflect this is a bit hypocritical on my part. On one hand, I promised myself that I wouldn’t spoil myself outdoors as to not wreck my trip…but conversely I moreover realized that I would moreover avert myself from performing moves that were either extremely painful, or performed an action that would require a quick recovery rather than a slow, systematic approach. It made me wonder — how conclude climbers really help their grade at the gym? conclude they just salvage sturdy enough (either through repetitive training or focused exercises) to complete higher grades with ease or conclude they actually tang the pang of making uncomfortable moves and just live with it? I reflect the prerogative retort here is that it’s a equilibrium of the two, but I’ve been ignoring the latter phenomena — when I reach an uncomfortable move, I often convene it quits and then drop down and reassess. Is that what’s selling myself short? conclude I dread a jiffy of pang of which I could possibly work through and remark success beyond the horizon?

In the end, I feel dote this boils down to a simple principle: remember your fundamentals. Of course, there are problems outdoors that can’t exist easily re-created indoors, and there are different risks to take, but I felt that a lot of problem points that emerged when climbing outdoors simply stemmed from losing my cold and remembering my fundamentals even though it seemed dote I was presented with a totally different context.

When they left the park that day, Wendy got several messages from her family and informed us that she needed to head back home for an emergency. As a matter of privacy, I’ll spare the details.

When they got home, they relaxed for a bit, and as the evening emerged, they had some pasta, sat around a fire pit, and chatted.A crescent moon appeared in the distance, under the stars, and above the silhouette of the mountains. It was honestly one of the most comely scenes I had ever witnessed, and unfortunately I don’t stand a picture of it. every solitary I can conclude is portray it with words and you’ll just stand to believe me.

Later, Chad pointed out the International Space Station passing by, which was a gleaming light that emerged from the west and traveled in a line slowly to the east. Although it looked dote nothing more than a equable star poignant across the sky, it was exciting and they every solitary chatted about it for quite some time.

Afterwards, Chad brought out his telescope and they got to remark Jupiter and some star clusters. Wendy taught me how to retract long-exposure night photographs, but the light pollution from town definitely caused the pictures to exist less than perfect. I wish I could rehearse this more, but I didn’t bring a tripod, and moreover Seattle isn’t exactly primed for pellucid skies.

Not so much for my first long exposure, but it’ll conclude for now. Wendy moreover made us s’mores. gawk at that presentation!

We went inside afterwards, then played some Monikers. Chad asked if I could pitch together an improv DnD session while Wendy and Vincent called it a night.It was fun, and I wish I could conclude more sessions dote that.

The house before playing Monikers. A bit blurry, but maybe arrogate given the circumstances…

Why the Harper Majority is a Step Back for Science – Let Us import the Ways | actual questions and Pass4sure dumps

This is a guest post by David Ng, a science literacy academic at the Michael Smith Laboratories of the University of British Columbia.

In case you missed it, eventual night saw the Canada election deliver a Conservative majority. It was an appealing and historic vote for a variety of reasons, but the bottom line is that now the Harper government is in a position to conclude pretty much as it pleases, given its position of majority power in both the House of Commons and the Canadian Senate.

As is the norm for any democratic action, this is Good and dismal depending on your perspective and ideals. Those who develop their homes in the business or economic front generally remark the result as a positive; whereas those who value fairness, ethical government practices, and companionable issues mind to gawk upon the election as a daunting and frustrating setback. In this mix, however, is the scientific point of view. And speaking as a Canadian scientist, I want to consume this space to develop the case that every solitary things being considered, this is a fundamentally dismal jiffy in history for Canadian science.

To conclude this, let’s access how the Harper government (not the “Government of Canada” as it was once officially called) has performed so far (in the science context anyway).

And let’s bicker for this in a rational way. They are after every solitary scientific folk. In fact, let’s apply the Good customary rubric of looking at the claim, providing a reason, and then presenting the evidence for this stance.

First up is their claim: let’s just Go with something direct:

The Harper Government is dismal for Science.

As for coming up with a reason, it’s actually fairly straightforward. Here, we’ve seen repeated examples that would demonstrate a pellucid want of understanding science culture, as well as actions that often undermine the very notion of scientific literacy. Sometimes, you salvage the sense that science just isn’t necessary to this government, and on occasion it even feels downright inconsequential.

But, of course, this prolix judgement can’t stand on its own verbiage. They exigency concrete evidence for their claim, and to conclude this, it’s probably easiest to focus on a number of key points that demonstrate Harper’s modus operandi.

Point 1. The Harper government is not terribly scientifically literate.

There’s a few examples of this (also remark point 2), but let’s simply draw attention to the appointment of a Minister of Industry, Science and Technology who waffles on the science of evolution. In case you don’t know his name, it’s Gary Goodyear: and in essence, his role in government is meant to exist the primary driver on pushing and representing how science is funded, courted, guided, and basically done in Canada. Although an architect of many a reduce to science funding in times that arguably exigency more scientific innovation (see 4 for more), he was and noiseless is illustrious as a controversial motif when in 2009, the Globe and Mail asked him to share his stance regarding evolution. To this, he replied, “I’m a Christian, and I don’t reflect anybody asking a question about my religion is appropriate.”

Now from a scientific point of view, this character of statement is mildly troubling – you would hope that at least the Minister representing science would stand more eloquent words to verbalize on this subject. Unfortunately, this wasn’t the case as illustrated with his further comments on the matter when pressed again during a television interview. During this incident, he chose to proclaim his belief in evolution, but continued with this very odd and ludicrous description of what evolution is:

“We are evolving, every year, every decade. That’s a fact. Whether it’s to the intensity of the sun, whether it’s to, as a chiropractor, walking on cement versus anything else, whether it’s running shoes or towering heels, of course, they are evolving to their environment.”

2. The Harper government has managed to develop Climate Change science an ideological issue.

You’ve actually seen a lot of this already in American politics, but nowadays there’s moreover a Canadian version. Here’s how it works:

In general, science is fairly particular about the passage it is done. The method is built to thrive on objectivity and it is ultimately based on the things they see, record, and analyze. It isn’t perfect, since the concept of a paradigm can exert influence, but the evidence it builds on noiseless has to meet some pretty tough criteria – certainly much more stringent than other epistemologies, or other ways of knowing. establish another way, scientific evidence is not suppose to exist swayed by ideological or partisan lines.

Despite this, Harper’s politics stand warped the science of climate change into one of partisan debate. every solitary other Canadian political parties retract the science at countenance value, and build from it. Not so with the Conservatives. This is inherently disrespectful to the scientific community, as it suggests that they can develop decisions concerning climate change in a spot where scientific literacy has no currency, whereby the overwhelming scientific consensus is treated as nothing more than an appealing and suspicious footnote.

As a result, Harper runs the country on the pretense of whether one can reliance or distrust the scientific evidence, without actually debating the actual technical strengths and weaknesses of the climate science data currently presented. Harper runs the country based on messages that economically sound promising, but are environmentally unsustainable, and stand sturdy repercussions which conveniently will retract contour long after he is retired. Above all, he places an emphasis on nurturing a subtle contour of climate change denialism and has made it fraction of the conservative ideology. From a scientist’s point of view, this is probably not the best passage to formulate necessary policies – on “feelings” as contest to concrete evidence. In essence, they can verbalize that I may not exist a betting man: but if I was, I’m pretty sure that the scientific community is the best spot to salvage their odds.

Now, one might bicker that this is not Harper’s stance at all. It would emerge that the official retract would proclaim the government’s official backing of the “fundamentals of climate change science.” However, as always is the case, actions converse louder than words. As evidence of this, you only exigency to support track of the Harper’s record on climate change. Since obtaining its first minority government in 2006, the Conservatives stand essentially moved away from Canada’s commitment to Kyoto, and has repeatedly undermine climate change talks (to the point of being consistent winners of the “Fossil of the Day” award), fraction of which involves the constant setting up of disappointing emission targets.

In 2009 the goal was to reduce carbon emissions by 20% below 2006 levels by 2020; an equivalent of 3% below 1990 levels by 2020. The goal was later changed in early 2010 to 17% of 2005 levels by 2020; an equivalent of 2.5% above 1990 levels.

The three most populous provinces disagree with the federal government goal and announced more ambitious targets on their jurisdictions. Quebec, Ontario and British Columbia announced respectively 20%, 15% and 14% reduction target below their 1990 levels while Alberta is expecting a 58% expand in emissions. (Wikipedia, April 2011)

More troubling, is that Harper appears to not stand any qualms about pushing his agenda in any passage possible, and does so in a passage that draws pellucid distinctions between party lines. In particular, is his rank misuse of Senate power to Go against the democratic passing of a Climate Change Bill (Bill C-311).

Here, a quick lesson in Canadian government procedures might help. Essentially, when Canadian laws or Bills are establish on the table, they exigency to Go through a vote in the House of Commons. This is represented by elected members of government, such that the voting here is inherently meant to picture the “will of the people.” However, if passed, the law then needs to Go through the Canadian Senate. This flush of government is suppose to reflect a spot of “sober second thought,” but historically, the Senate very rarely goes against the decisions made in the House of Commons. This is because Senate members are appointed, and therefore in principle are there to noiseless respect the democratic underpinning of the House of Commons’ vote. However, in December 2008, Harper filled 18 vacant Senate spots with Conservative appointments, and has used this Senate majority in undemocratic ways – including the killing of the Climate Change Bill.

Still, there are other ways to obligate an ideology along: which brings us to point number three.

3. The Harper government has demonstrated a willingness to “muzzle” science.

In 2010, the release of Environment Canada documents showed that new media rules introduced by the Harper Government in 2007, with the direct to control the talent for Federal climate scientists to interact with media, had been responsible for what many of these scientists stand called a “muzzling” effect.

“Scientists stand noticed a major reduction in the number of requests, particularly from towering profile media, who often stand same-day deadlines,” said the Environment Canada document. “Media coverage of climate change science, their most high-profile issue, has been reduced by over 80 per cent.”

The analysis reviewed the repercussion of a new federal communications policy at Environment Canada, which required senior federal scientists to search authorization from the government prior to giving interviews.

The document suggests the new communications policy has practically eliminated senior federal scientists from media coverage of climate-change science issues, leaving them frustrated that the government was trying to “muzzle” them. (Montreal Gazette, March 15, 2010)

This facet of Harper’s strategy is especially troubling. Science, as a whole, is a venture that best works when there is fluidity and an openness in how information is shared. Whether that is within the scientific community in the contour of expert peer review, or back and forth between scientists and the universal public or the policy makers as a dialogue of civic consequence, there is simply no commendable judgement for this contour of control. It should exist obvious that discussions on Climate Change, which has obvious public importance, things shouldn’t exist rush dote a corporation protecting its secrets and/or hiding information that veers away from the desired message.

4. The Harper Government is out of feel with science culture: scientists are driven by many things, and not always by the industry/business/corporate mentality.

Over the eventual couple years, we’ve seen examples where the Harper Government has consistently pushed research towards a massive emphasis for applied sciences and industry, often at the expense of basic science. Whether this is via funding cuts to granting agencies such as the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (a bastion of basic science research), diverting such monies towards projects where business-related objectives are encouraged, or via restructuring of the National Research Council such that industry-related projects are given priorities, there’s definitely a method to his ways. Overall, this indicates a universal ignorance of how scientific progress works – that is, it is almost always the discoveries born from basic research that fuel the future innovation necessary for applied benefits. establish another way, if Harper continues on this track to give himself quick political gain, he does so at the expense of future Canadian science. Even a miniature lull in basic research in the present could result in a significant lull in applied and economic potentials in the future.

As well, this constant patronage towards the business side of science moreover doesn’t necessarily reflect the intentions of the scientists themselves. Money and economics may exist desirable things for scientists, but most often there are other stronger motivations at stake – including an aspiration to bring about positive change in the world, as well as unpretentious customary intellectual curiosity.

An case of Harper’s willingness to always give credence to the corporate line, is his Government’s poor handling of the recently diposed Bill C-393. Essentially, this is an episode where dismal politics trumped Good science. The Good science in this case is the fact that there are very efficient antiretroviral drug out there, which develop HIV/AIDS a treatable disorder. Unfortunately, these are mostly priced too towering for individuals in developing countries – countries where unnecessary death from HIV/AIDS is catastrophically high. The dismal politics concerns a frustrating sequence of events that saw a Bill (C-393), designed to fairly and with monitoring facilitate production of generic drugs, salvage passed in the House of Commons (i.e. democratically given the green light); then was taken to Senate, where it was deliberately stalled for five days, in an atmosphere where misleading information provided by the pharmaceutical industry was being distributed to the Tory Senators; such that it was ultimately killed by default when the new election was called. The fact that the judgement for this was ultimately because of the Harper’s Government willingness to patronize stately Pharma is extremely galling, especially when so many lives were literally at stake.


It’s necessary to note that science culture isn’t the only thing that drives a civil society. However, as a conduit for reasoned discourse and pertinent information that affects local and global concerns, it’s obvious that science must not exist taken for granted. Based on eventual night’s election results, they stand every judgement to worry about the Conservative majority, as the Harper Government has repeatedly demonstrated past activities that not only retract science for granted, but treat it with a contour of contempt. The Harper government has consistently ignored whatever sound utility the scientific endeavor can provide, and by doing so, has establish the future of Canadian science at risk, as well as the elements of society that would stand otherwise benefited from it.

In the end, this means that they must watch the actions of this Harper Government more closely; and to exist vocal, to exist active, and to conclude their best to hold them to account for their actions. Democracy has given Harper a mandate to govern as he sees fit, and for this there should exist an constituent of respect as well as an constituent of opportunity. However, Harper should not forget that Canadian democracy is ultimately driven by the people of Canada. For that reason, I will exist watching you closely. Scientists will exist watching you closely. Canadians will exist watching you closely.

David Ng is a science literacy academic at the Michael Smith Laboratories of the University of British Columbia. He has written essays for the Walrus, humour for McSweeney’s, commentary for Boingboing, and is now trying to learn more about Access to Medicine issues at the My Rights Versus Yours Blog. You can follow him on twitter @dnghub. If you’re a Canadian reader, he moreover encourages you to check out to note that almost every solitary conservatives noiseless align themselves with stately Pharma’s stance on Access to Medicine issues. Why not dispatch them an email to develop sure they know exactly how you feel?

The Regulatory Strategist Toolbox: Clinical Endpoint Analysis Tools | actual questions and Pass4sure dumps

One of the faultfinding parts of assembling a product’s “Strategy Playbook” or “Clinical development Plan” is the researching and planning of clinical endpoints. This article discusses how to research endpoints, including tools to research them, how to organize the information and how to present the intelligence back to the team.

Endpoints are measures intended to reflect the effects (efficacy endpoints) or safety (safety endpoints) of a drug or device. They embrace assessments of clinical events (e.g., stroke, pulmonary exacerbation, venous thromboembolism), outcomes (e.g., what a final result of treatment long term, mortality, tumor resolution, cure of disease, remission), patient symptoms (e.g., pain, dyspnea, depression), measures of duty (e.g., talent to walk or exercise), adverse events or surrogates of these effects or symptoms; clinical outcomes are considered the most responsible endpoint.1 One of the faultfinding parts of the assembling either a product’s “Strategy Playbook” or “Clinical development Plan” is the researching and planning of endpoints from phase 1 through 3, including navigating through FDA’s understanding and interpretation of the laws and definitions (Table 1). 

Defining Efficacy Endpoints

Defining efficacy and their measurement through endpoints has been a dynamic process since the US 1962 Kefauver Harris Amendment to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), which was the first time a demonstration of efficacy (and endpoints to measure efficacy) was required.2,3 After the amendment, FDA spent the next decade defining, discussing, evolving and defending Sponsors’ lawsuits to arrive at what efficacy expectations should embrace (and some verbalize the process is noiseless ongoing).4

Prior to the 1962 Kefauver Harris Amendment:

  • efficacy was not clearly defined, safety of the product was relied upon
  • FDA was not involved in the definition of efficacy or claims of efficacy for products
  • companies would define efficacy (and subsequent endpoints) differently for similar products and both companies would claim efficacy of the product
  • companies let the individual physicians define efficacy and endpoints based on their patient population and matter interpretation (which would exist combined as case studies into a marketing application resulting in many different endpoints used in the selfsame study).
  • FDA’s definition and struggles to define efficacy served as a model for other regulatory agencies to adopt and consume when formally establishing their own efficacy requirements; hence, the US focus in this article, but this information can exist used in planning global trials with consultation of individual country regulations and guidance.

    Why are endpoints needed?

    Sound evidence of effectiveness is a crucial component of any regulatory agency’s benefit-risk assessment of a new product or consume (i.e., a new indication). The exigency for an endpoint to measure the effectiveness of a drug stems from FDA’s exigency for substantial evidence, specifically called for in the 1962 Kefauver Harris Amendment and in 21 CFR 314.50 5.iii.v which requires that a marketing application contain, “data demonstrating substantial evidence of effectiveness for the claimed indications.” Substantial evidence was defined in section 505(d) of the FD&C Act as “evidence consisting of adequate and well-controlled investigations, including clinical investigations by experts qualified by scientific training and tang to evaluate the effectiveness of the drug involved, on the basis of which it could fairly and responsibly exist concluded by such experts that the drug will stand the upshot it purports or is represented to stand under the conditions of consume prescribed, recommended or suggested in the labeling or proposed labeling hereof.”5

    An adequate and well controlled (A&WC) study is defined in 21 CFR 314.126.b as a tribulation containing (summarized):

  • clear statement of objectives
  • methods of analysis which are adequate to assess the effects of the drug
  • use of a convincing study design
  • defined patient population
  • randomization of patients
  • minimization of bias
  • Valid or Accepted Endpoints: the methods of assessment of subjects' response are well-defined and reliable. The protocol for the study and the report of results should account for the variables measured, the methods of observation and criteria used to assess response.
  • Clinical Benefit

    FDA would dote efficacy endpoints, if not already issued in a guidance document, to incorporate the mantra of “feels, functions or survive” which is collectively defined as clinical benefit. Clinical capitalize is a clinically meaningful upshot of an intervention, i.e., a positive upshot on how an individual:

  • feels (e.g., symptom relief)
  • functions (e.g., improved mobility, improvement or detain in the progression of a disease or condition)
  • survives (e.g.,  time in detain to death in comparison to a natural history cohort)
  • Clinical capitalize should exist meaningful and understandable to prescribers and patients and can exist measured directly or indirectly (indirect assessment needs justification for its value as a replacement for how patients survive, feel or function).6,7

    Clinical capitalize Endpoints that stand supported drug approval stand included necessary clinical outcomes (e.g., increased survival, symptomatic improvement), but moreover stand included effects on established (validated) surrogate endpoints (e.g., blood pressure, serum cholesterol).8,9

    The caveat here is if there is no instrument to measure how a patient “feels” or “functions,” one’s company might exigency to develop and validate a patient reported outcome to capture and measure this.

    Table 1. Overview of the possible Clinical tribulation Endpoints. Term Definition Endpoint

    An endpoint is a primary or secondary outcome used to umpire the effectiveness of a treatment; it is a precisely defined variable intended to reflect an outcome of interest that is statistically analyzed to address a particular research question. Synonyms include: outcome, variable, parameter or marker.

    An endpoint typically specifies the character of assessments made, the timing of those assessments, the assessment tools used and possibly other details, as applicable, such as how multiple assessments within an individual are to exist combined.10

    An case of endpoints are survival, improvements in quality of life, relief of symptoms and disappearance of the tumor.11

    Well-defined and responsible (21CFR 314.126)

    Appropriate for the target population

    Appropriate for the target indication

    Adequate measurement properties, e.g., content validity: PRO development relies on patient input to support content validity12

    Using quit points that stand already been approved by the regulatory authority makes the most sense, but if a new endpoint is being used, then it is necessary to prove that this endpoint is a convincing measure of drug success.

    Primary Endpoint Primary endpoints means the outcome or event that most accurately measures the capitalize of the therapy/drug/intervention being studied (efficacy); this is the most clinically necessary endpoint. This is the main question the sponsor is most interested in answering and one that is capable of being answered (i.e., “Does the intervention alter mortality rates or change baseline blood pressure, the number of deaths, the contrast in survival between the treatment group and the control group, disease progression or death). There is usually only one primary endpoint. Most of every solitary the primary endpoint needs to exist clinically meaningful and recognized by regulators as being clinically meaningful or consult clinical capitalize (for new indications this can exist a challenge) and should reflect the accepted norms and standards in the pertinent bailiwick of research. There should exist adequate evidence that the primary variable can provide a convincing and responsible measure of some clinically pertinent and necessary treatment capitalize in the patient population described by the inclusion and exclusion criteria.13-16 Secondary Endpoint

    Typically, secondary endpoints are related to toxicity and undesired effects of the new therapy (safety) or to demonstrate additional effects on the disease or condition. The secondary questions exigency to support and relate to the primary objective and it used to demonstrate additional effects. For the primary objective of “Does the intervention alter mortality rates?” The secondary objective could gawk for antecedent of cardiac death, when death occurred or other cardiac incidents, such as:

  • coronary heart disease mortality
  • incidence of nonfatal myocardial infarction
  • incidence of stroke
  • reduction is risk factor
  • Secondary endpoints moreover may provide evidence that a particular mechanism underlies a demonstrated clinical upshot (e.g., a drug for osteoporosis with fractures as the primary endpoint, and improved bone density as a secondary endpoint).17

    Positive results on the secondary endpoints can exist interpreted only if there is first a demonstration of a treatment upshot on the primary endpoint.

    Exploratory Exploratory endpoints may embrace clinically necessary events that are expected to occur too infrequently to indicate a treatment upshot or endpoints that for other reasons are thought to exist less likely to indicate an upshot but are included to explore new hypotheses.18 Intermediate Clinical Endpoint In a regulatory context, an endpoint measuring a clinical outcome that can exist measured earlier than an upshot on Irreversible Morbidity or Mortality (IMM) and that is considered reasonably likely to forecast the medical product’s upshot on IMM or other clinical benefit. The intermediate clinical endpoint may exist a basis for plenary approval if the upshot on the endpoint is considered clinically meaningful. It moreover may exist a basis for accelerated approval if the IMM upshot is considered faultfinding for consume of the drug or for expedited access for medical devices intended for unmet medical exigency for life threatening or irreversibly debilitating diseases or conditions. Multiple Primary Endpoints (Co-primary Endpoints)

    It may sometimes exist desirable to consume more than one primary variable, each of which (or a subset of which) could exist adequate to cover the sweep of effects of the therapies.19

    Multiple endpoints may exist needed when determining that the drug confers a clinical capitalize depends on more than one disease aspect or outcome being affected. Multiple endpoints may moreover exist used when:

  • there are several necessary aspects of a disease or several ways to assess an necessary aspect
  • there is no consensus about which one will best serve the study purposes
  • an upshot on any one will exist adequate as evidence of effectiveness to support approval
  • In some cases, multiple aspects of a disease may appropriately exist combined into a solitary endpoint, but subsequent analysis of the components is generally necessary for an adequate understanding of the drug’s effect.20

    Multiple primary endpoints become co-primary endpoints when it is necessary to demonstrate an upshot on each of the endpoints to conclude that a drug is effective.

    An case is treatment of migraine headaches; although pang is the most prominent feature, migraine headaches are moreover often characterized by the presence of photophobia, phonophobia, and nausea, every solitary of which are clinically important.

    Composite Endpoints

    There are some disorders for which more than one clinical outcome in a clinical tribulation is important, and every solitary outcomes are expected to exist affected by the treatment.21

    Rather than using each as a divorce primary endpoint (creating multiplicity) or selecting just one to exist the primary endpoint and designating the others as secondary endpoints, it may exist arrogate to combine those clinical outcomes into a solitary variable or “composite” endpoint,” using a predefined algorithm (e.g., the rating scales used in arthritis, psychiatric disorders, and elsewhere).  This method is different than multiple primary endpoints and useful to study drugs if component events are infrequent and each component is clinically meaningful.22

    Composite endpoints are often used when the goal of treatment is to avert or detain morbid, clinically necessary but uncommon events (e.g., consume of an anti-platelet drug in patients with coronary artery disease to avert myocardial infarction, stroke and death).

    Surrogate Endpoints

    When direct assessment of the clinical capitalize (or outcomes) to the matter through observing actual clinical efficacy is not practical, circuitous criteria may exist considered. A surrogate endpoint is a laboratory measure or a physical token intended to exist used as a substitute for a clinically meaningful endpoint and that is reasonably likely to forecast clinical capitalize (based on epidemiologic, therapeutic, pathophysiologic or other evidence per 21 CFR 314.510). Such surrogates are less well-established than surrogates in regular use, such as blood pressure for stroke, cholesterol for cardiovascular disease or HIV load for development of AIDS23 and new surrogates exigency to exist validated. Relationships between clinical and surrogate variables for one product conclude not necessarily apply to a product with a different mode of action for treating the selfsame disease.24,25

    From a US regulatory standpoint, surrogate endpoints and potential surrogate endpoints can exist characterized by the following flush of clinical validation:

  • validated surrogate endpoint
  • reasonably likely surrogate endpoint
  • candidate surrogate endpoint26
  • A list of novel drugs approved using surrogate endpoints can exist institute on Table of Surrogate Endpoints That Were the Basis of Drug Approval or Licensure

    Pitfalls of using surrogate endpoints include:

  • uncertainty about clinical benefit
  • potential want of correlation with outcome variable
  • lack of standardization or validation through multiple studies
  • missing long term data
  • possibility of undiscovered risks
  • less information about the happening of rare or delayed adverse events27
  • The flush of evidence necessary to determine whether a surrogate is validated or likely to forecast clinical capitalize is made on a case by case basis by FDA.28

    Reasonably Likely Surrogate Endpoint “An endpoint supported by sturdy mechanistic and/or epidemiologic rationale such that an upshot on the surrogate endpoint is expected to exist correlated with an endpoint intended to assess clinical capitalize in clinical trials, but without adequate clinical data to indicate that it is a validated surrogate endpoint. Such endpoints may exist used for accelerated approval for drugs and potentially moreover for approval or clearance of medical devices. In the case of accelerated approval for drugs, postmarketing confirmatory trials stand been required to verify and portray the anticipated upshot on the irreversible morbidity or mortality or other clinical benefit.”29 Validated Surrogate Endpoint

    “An endpoint supported by a pellucid mechanistic rationale and clinical data providing sturdy evidence that an upshot on the surrogate endpoint predicts a specific clinical benefit. A validated surrogate endpoint can exist used to support marketing approval of a medical or tobacco product in a defined context without the exigency for additional studies to demonstrate the clinical capitalize directly. Although the term has been used in a conceptually broader way, from a U. regulatory standpoint, a validated surrogate endpoint almost always refers to a biomarker.”30

    Validation information is available on the FDA website.


    “A defined characteristic that is measured as an indicator of traditional biological processes, pathogenic processes or responses to an exposure or intervention, including therapeutic interventions. Molecular, histologic, radiographic or physiologic characteristics are types of biomarkers. A biomarker is not an assessment of how an individual feels, functions, or survives. Categories of biomarkers include:”

  • susceptibility/risk biomarker
  • diagnostic biomarker (example: stage a disease)
  • monitoring biomarker (monitoring a response to therapy)
  • prognostic biomarker
  • predictive biomarker (predict a response to a drug)
  • pharmacodynamic/response biomarker
  • safety biomarker31
  • FDA’s Biomarker and Qualification Information

    Biomarkers Used as Outcomes List in development of Approved Products (2007-2015)

    Drug development Too Program and Initiatives

    What contribution is required from the RI strategist?

    Regulatory strategists or intelligence professionals are called upon to assist support the clinical portion of the strategy document or development scheme by laying out the regulatory acceptable endpoints over the course of development. This means the RI strategist will exigency to:

  • research guidance documents available to understand required endpoints
  • research global past precedent to understand what the regulatory agency has allowed as primary and secondary endpoints for approved drugs in the selfsame class or indication (if no guidance exists)
  • If a company is studying a new indication, Key opinion Leaders (KOL) will exist needed to assist contour and lead a Scientific Advisory Board (SAB) to assist ensure the company is using the most pertinent and measurable endpoints.
  • Endpoints for novel indication will typically arrive from literature and vetted with the KOLs and eventually the regulatory agency.
  • bring KOLs to regulatory meetings; there are typically several meetings with a regulatory agency (and sometimes advisory committee meetings) to reach agreement on novel endpoints
  • research the literature to understand the standard of saturate (SOC) in the therapeutic zone across geographical regions
  • understand the changes in the SOC landscape, i.e., forthcoming changes in treatment paradigms as reported by the KOLs (i.e., what the baseline treatment paradigm is and what upcoming treatments or diagnostics methods are being developed over the next few years that should exist anticipated and brought into the “Strategy Playbook”)
  • understand the competitive landscape (i.e., what are the endpoints competitors are using, especially if novel or not the selfsame as in the guidance document, if any)
  • plan regulatory interactions with regulatory authorities to propose, contend and negotiate endpoints, especially if it is a first in class or a new indication (and again, this is an iterative process and novel endpoint agreement does not usually befall in a solitary meeting)
  • Some things dote researching KOLs is obvious—you gawk at Pubmed or advocacy groups, but where conclude you start with the endpoints? And what exactly conclude you collect, where conclude you find it and what should the presentation back to the team gawk like?

    Evolution of Endpoints by development Phase

    Research should exist performed and information organized according to phases of development to ensure a reasonable comparison (Table 2).To exist able to recommend what endpoints to consume at what stage, it is necessary to understand the evolution of endpoints over the clinical development of a product; from a safety emphasis in early studies to an efficacy endpoint in later studies. Endpoints disagree by indication and change as disease treatment does.

    Table 2. Endpoints by Phase Phase of Development Typical Endpoints Phase 1
  • Safety assessed after solitary and multiple dose administrations:
  • Adverse Events (AE)
  • Labs
  • Physical exam
  • Pharmacokinetics (PK)
  • Pharmacodynamic (PD) endpoints
  • Phase 2A
  • Safety assessed after solitary and multiple dose administrations:
  • Adverse Events (AE)
  • Labs
  • Physical exam
  • Pharmacokinetics (PK)
  • Dosing paradigm established
  • Exploratory efficacy endpoints used
  • Phase 2B
  • Safety assessments:
  • Adverse Events (AE)
  • Labs
  • Physical exam
  • Metrics used to establish efficacy further tested and refined, unless efficacy endpoints are dictated by a guidance document
  • Phase 3
  • Efficacy Endpoints refined in previous trials; divided into primary and secondary endpoints
  • Exploratory endpoints
  • Safety assessments:
  • Adverse Events (AE)
  • Labs
  • Physical exam
  • Endpoint Research Where to Start—Free and Fee Tools

    The first stop on any regulatory information gathering mission is to understand what tools are available (free versus fee tools), which ones are available to address a particular question and what each instrument will provide for each piece of the puzzle. Table 3 provides a roadmap for endpoint exploration.

    Where to Start Endpoint Analysis Information Blocking

    Armed with the needed endpoint information and the tools to find it, the next step is to understand how to “block” the information so that it is usable for the analysis. There is a large morass of data to review and categorize, including literature, global guidance documents, past precedent (if available) and the endpoints of trials currently underway as these stand typically been vetted (or at least discussed) with the agency for the study being conducted. Table 4 provides information to collect for each endpoint.

    Table 4. Endpoint Information Needed to Serve as a Basis for Analysis. Information Needed on Each Endpoint Where to Find it Why Regulatory Precedence and Acceptance

    Previous regulatory filings (Drugs@FDA (or similar)) listing

    Elsevier’s PharmaPendium

  • Understand if the proposed endpoints will exist accepted or if you will exigency to work with regulators to gain their acceptance
  • Current consume of Endpoint in Research

    Country specific guidance documents

    Journal articles

    Drugs@FDA (or similar)

  • Understand what endpoints are being explored as primary, secondary and exploratory endpoints by researchers in the bailiwick as the scientific information could change during the development process
  • What does endpoint really measure?

    Journal articles

    Drugs@FDA (or similar)

  • Understand how to measure the indication.  Sometimes endpoints conclude not measure what you exigency them to and then you exigency to reevaluate the endpoint
  • Some endpoints measure what you want, some what you exigency for regulatory requirements and others what you exigency to understand what endpoints most appropriately measure activity in your indication
  • Positive and negative views on endpoint use

    Journal articles

    Drugs@FDA (or similar)

  • What are the pros and cons to using the proposed endpoints? 
  • Is the scientific information changing and will the endpoints exist changing over the timeframe? 
  • Endpoint validated?

    Journal articles

    Drugs@FDA (or similar)

  • Is there a new indication that has a new endpoint? 
  • Is there a new passage to measure an endpoint?
  • What are the endpoints that stand been used to measure the indication in the literature by researchers?
  • What is the acceptance or perception of the endpoints by regulators?
  • What work will the sponsor exigency to conduct to validate the endpoint?
  • Does validation exigency to exist done prior to consume in a study or during the conduct of the study?
  • Will a patient reported outcome exist needed or created?
  • Inclusion/Exclusion Population

    Journal articles

    Drugs@FDA (or similar)

    Elsevier’s PharmaPendium

    Country specific guidance documents

  • The indication and patient population is defined by the study’s inclusion and exclusion criteria; this needs to exist defined carefully as it will influence the outcome of the development program
  • Only the endpoints that are used most frequently or stand past regulatory precedence should stand an in-depth analysis conducted; every solitary other should exist towering flush reporting until the team agrees more analysis is needed. Once the information is acquired to define the output, which can disagree vastly depending on the free or fee tools used, start constructing the output.

    Endpoint Analysis Steps for Information Gathering and Initial Analysis Endpoint Analysis: Free
  • Go to and find out what other drugs are in the selfsame class and/or indication; utilize in house expertise as well to assist refine the list
  • Add drug names to list in an exceed spreadsheet
  • Cull endpoint information initially from the label—cannot find the label in or Drugs@FDA? Go to the FDA Online Label Repository where labels are archived
  • Refine list, if in oncology, with the assist of NIC databases (Cancer Drug Approval Endpoints, Efficacy Endpoints in Oncology Clinical Trials)
  • Research available global guidance documents in indication (Intelligence Tools, Links and Resources); cull endpoints recommendation into exceed spreadsheet
  • Pull the Summary Basis of Approvals (Intelligence Tools, Links and Resources) in the countries of altenative based on research
  • Pull out the endpoints used for every solitary past precedent drug into an exceed worksheet by phase of development
  • From the medical or administrative section (with meeting minutes), cull information on endpoints discussions and issues with it such as want of validation
  • Research current clinical trials being conducted in a clinical tribulation registry for both the indication and class of drugs; add these to the growing spreadsheet (Table 5) (sometimes it helps to conclude this step first prior to every solitary other activities):
  • Further refine the search by phase of development and download just the trials in phase 1, phase 2, etc., and review those items
  • Look at map of countries and the location of sites being used in the studies
  • Look at synonyms for the disease and review other trials possibly associated with the selfsame disease, but called by a different name
  • Organize by drug name, stage of development and endpoints
  • Research the following literature on PubMed:
  • recent trials in the indication and endpoints used
  • SOC
  • Evolution in changes in the SOC
  • KOLs
  • Download/purchase literature for in-depth review
  • Utilize indication specific (if any) advocacy groups to assist refine current endpoints being used by KOLs or to assist provide a literature jumping off point; this can exist done through an SAB or one on one meetings
  • Analyze the list of endpoints, what are the typical endpoints used, what are the least typical and conclude a abysmal dive into the endpoints used most often so there is greater clarity on them for team discussion.
  • Put in a format to present the findings to the development team, for group discussion (Table 5) and rate from most frequently used, least used and emerging endpoints
  • This list needs to exist reviewed with the Strategy Team and further refined as the Playbook is developed (i.e., this process might exigency to exist used a few times and vetted with experts and the regulators).
  • Table 5. Output Into Excel.* Title Conditions Interventions Study Designs Outcome Measures Phases Enrollment and Study Type MLN0128 in Recurrent/Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma Merkel Cell Carcinoma Drug: MLN0128

    Intervention Model: solitary Group


    Masking: nonexistent (Open Label)

    Primary Purpose: Treatment

    Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)

    Overall Response Rate (ORR)

    Overall Survival (OS)

    Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

    Adverse Events (AEs)

    Response Biomarkers, including p4EBP1, PSK6, pCAD and Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCV)

    Large T antigen (LT) and miniature T antigen (ST)

    Phase 1

    Phase 2



    F16IL2 Plus Paclitaxel in Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma Merkel Cell Carcinoma

    Drug: Arm A: F16IL2 in combination with paclitaxel

    Drug: Arm B: Paclitaxel

    Allocation: Randomized

    Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment

    Masking: nonexistent (Open Label)

    Primary Purpose: Treatment

    Efficacy of F16IL2 in combination with paclitaxel vs. paclitaxel monotherapy (RECIST v1.1, irRC)

    Overall survival rate

    Treatment efficacy (ORR, DCR)

    Safety and tolerability of the combination treatment with F16IL2 and paclitaxel

    Phase 2



    A Proof-of-Concept tribulation of GLA-SE in Patients With Merkel Cell Carcinoma Merkel Cell Carcinoma Biological: GLA-SE

    Intervention Model: solitary Group Assignment

    Masking: nonexistent (Open Label)

    Primary Purpose: Treatment

    Safety and feasibility

    Clinical efficacy and immunogenicity

    Phase 1



    Adjuvant Therapy of Completely Resected Merkel Cell Carcinoma With Immune Checkpoint Blocking Antibodies Versus Observation Merkel Cell Carcinoma

    Drug: Ipilimumab

    Drug: Nivolumab

    Allocation: Randomized

    Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment

    Masking: nonexistent (Open Label)

    Primary Purpose: Treatment

    Disease-free survival (DFS) at 12 months

    Number of adverse events

    Overall survival rate at 12 months

    DFS rate at 12 months

    Phase 2



    Study of the Drug Ipilimumab for Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma Merkel Cell Carcinoma Drug: Ipilimumab

    Allocation: Non-Randomized

    Intervention Model: solitary Group Assignment

    Masking: nonexistent (Open Label)

    Primary Purpose: Treatment

    Overall survival at 12 months with ipilimumab treatment

    Determine the best overall response rate, median survival, disease-specific survival and progression free survival

    Determine median survival, disease-specific survival and progression nfree survival

    Phase 2



    QUILT-3.009: Study of aNK Infusions in Combination With ALT-803 in Patients With Stage III (IIIB) or Stage (IV) Merkel Cell Carcinoma (MCC)

    Stage IIIB Merkel Cell Carcinoma

    Stage IV Merkel Cell Carcinoma

    Biological: aNK (NK-92)

    Intervention Model: solitary Group Assignment

    Masking: nonexistent (Open Label)

    Primary Purpose: Treatment

    Progression Free Survival

    Overall Response Rate

    Time to disease progression

    Overall survival

    Safety and tolerability of aNK in combination with ALT-803

    Quality of life assessment

    Phase 2



    *Need to Specify Fields to Download. Endpoint Analysis: Fee Figure 1. Organized Endpoint Output for BizInt Smart Charts (Combined Output from a Variety of Clinical Registries). Brown-Tuttle-Fig-1.jpg
  • Go to PharmaPendium, input the indication and class as search terms, cull results for a list of drugs approved for indication and class and endpoints in medical reviews; utilize in house expertise to assist refine the list; establish results into an exceed spreadsheet
  • Pull out the endpoints used for every solitary past precedent drug into an exceed worksheet, by phase of development
  • From the medical or administrative section (with meeting minutes) cull information on endpoints discussions and issues with it such as want of validation
  • Research available global guidance documents in indication; cull endpoints recommendation into exceed spreadsheet using Tarius or Clarivate Analytics Cortellis
  • Ask Nerac to conduct a literature search for you looking at SOC, KOLs, emerging treatments and endpoints used for indication
  • Or request a Librarian to conduct the literature search for you
  • Ask librarian or literature search service to download/obtain literature
  • Review and establish results into an exceed spreadsheet
  • Analyze the list of endpoints, establish in a format to present your findings to the development team, for group discussion
  • Regulatory Pathway Dictated by character of Endpoint Used

    Something to support in intelligence when finalizing and incorporating endpoints into a strategy, the character of endpoint selected can decree the regulatory approval pathway that needs to exist followed. Review Table 6 to ensure alignment with regulatory expectations.

    Table 6. Endpoints and Predicted Regulatory Pathway. Type of Endpoint What it Does Regulatory Pathway Clinical Benefit How a patient feels, functions or survives Regular* Validated Surrogate Recognized as validated through multiple definitive studies Regular* Surrogate Reasonably likely to forecast clinical benefit Accelerated Approval *Could exist accelerated or priority review based on the unmet medical exigency or seriousness of indication.32

    Communicating the Data Back to the Stakeholders

    Once the needed information is available to define the output, which can disagree vastly depending on the free or fee tools used and the specific indication, open constructing the output and understand what is needed for the output. One of the biggest issues in analyzing data, since it is so onerous, is the presentation back to the team and deciding the most efficient contour is should take. On the backend, there is a lot of data that needs to exist cleaned, merged or manually manipulated and since it is disparate, it can exist very difficult to summarize, especially endpoints. Most teams want a high-level analysis that is interactive so as to retort immediate questions and an exceed spreadsheet does not stand visual appeal; this is where a “fee” product really is helpful in presenting a brightly colorful and interactive output.

    Case Study—Merkle Cell Carcinoma

    The following case study discusses the indication of the rare disease Merkle Cell Carcinoma (MCC) and demonstrates how to establish the above information into practice. Note: only one drug has been approved for this indication [BAVENCIO [AVELUMAB]] (approved 23 March 2017).

    New Regulatory Intelligence Tool

    BizInt Smart Charts Drug development Suite is purpose-built software designed to facilitate creating, customizing and distributing tabular reports from selected clinical trial, drug pipeline and biomedical journal databases. Reflecting more than 20 years of feedback from users in pharmaceutical and biotech companies, it replaces the exigency to write complicated macros and manually maneuver data in exceed and Word. Data from supported databases (see below) is imported and formatted into tables, and the fields/columns included in your report can exist changed at any time. BizInt Smart Charts automatically identifies the selfsame tribulation across different databases and the selfsame drug across pipeline databases and has tools to merge different database records on the selfsame tribulation into a solitary integrated row in your report.

    A second tool, VantagePoint - Smart Charts Edition, has the talent to further refine the data, extract terms and create visualizations for PowerPoint presentations. Table 7 provides an overview of the databases that BizInt Smart Charts can tug from to assist compile endpoint information.

    Table 7. BizInt Smart Charts Drug development Suite—Supported Databases. Supported Clinical tribulation Databases Supported Pipeline Databases Supported Biomedical Journal Databases

    Registry:Clinical Trials.govEU Clinical Trials RegistryWHO ICTRP

    Commercial:Citeline TrialtroveAdis Clinical Trials InsightCortellis Clinical Trials

    Citeline PharmaprojectsClarivate Analytics CortellisIMS R&D FocusAdis R&D InsightClarivate Integrity


    BizInt Smart Charts was used to collect endpoint information from a variety of Clinical tribulation Registries for MCC and this was compared with the collection and analysis times done without the instrument (Table 8).  Overwhelmingly, the instrument shaved more than 100 hours off of the task at hand (two weeks of work.)

    Table 8: Mining Clinical tribulation Registry Data for Endpoints—Time Comparison of the Free and For Fee Tools Steps Taken Tools Used Free Time Fee Time Search databases for “Merkle Cell Carcinoma” and download results to exceed spreadsheet

    WHO—ICTRP Search Portal

    Drugs@FDA Database

    10 min 10 min

    Open up the spreadsheets and combine the trials

  • Google Worksheets
  • MS Excel
  • 5 min

    (Figure 1)

    2 min

    Go through and remove the duplicates and/or merge the information for the selfsame trials listed in multiple databases

  • Google Worksheets
  • MS Excel
  • 100+ min 5 min
  • Delete or rush around fields so that pertinent information is displayed in first few rows
  • Hide rows so that they are noiseless available but not distracting your analysis
  • Google Worksheets
  • MS Excel
  • 45+ min 20
  • Analyze what is pertinent to your program to exist able to develop recommendations to the team
  • Brain power and experience

    200+ min

    Brain power and experience

    200+ min
  • Put together the information in a passage easily incorporated into the Strategy Playbook
  • Google Worksheets
  • MS Excel
  • 60+ min
  • PowerPoint
  • BizInt Smart Charts
  • 30 min
  • Put together information in a PowerPoint slither for presentation to the team
  • Google Worksheets
  • MS Excel
  • PowerPoint
  • 60+ min
  • PowerPoint
  • BizInt Smart Charts
  • 30 min Total Time 480+ min ~297 min Case Study Conclusion

    Overall, while some of the steps are the same, the fee tools conclude provide quicker information output which can lead to quicker analysis and feedback to the team. BizInt Smart Charts and VantagePoint significantly reduce down on the time it took to research endpoints making the time to respond to the team quicker and the output visually pleasing (which would stand taken a lot longer to achieve manually) and interactive, which really worked well for the team and because questions were able to exist answered on the spot versus looking through a pile of notes. 


    As a parting note, remember the “Strategy Playbook” must exist reviewed on an annual basis as scientific data and the requirements for a program change over time, so keeping complete notes and output are necessary to assist evaluate data as it evolves.

  • Multiple Endpoints in Clinical Trials. Guidance for Industry. January 2017. FDA website Accessed 21 September 2018.
  • Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C). FDA website. Accessed 21 September 2018.
  • Kefauver-Harris Amendments Revolutionized Drug Development. FDA website. Accessed 21 September 2018.
  • Carpenter D. Reputation and Power. Organizational Image and Pharmaceutical Regulation at the FDA. Princeton University Press. Accessed 21 September 2018.
  • Guidance for Industry. Providing Clinical Evidence of Effectiveness for Human Drug and Biological Products. May 1998. FDA website. Accessed 21 September 2018.
  • BEST (Biomarkers, EndpointS, and other Tools) Resource. May 2018. FDA-NIH Biomarker Working Group. Accessed 21 September 2018.
  • Defining Clinical capitalize in Clinical Trials: FDA Perspective. Presentation by Jessica J. Lee, MD, MMSc. Accessed 21 September 2018.
  • Guidance for Industry. Clinical tribulation Endpoints for the Approval of Cancer Drugs and Biologics. May 2007. FDA website. Accessed 21 September 2018.
  • FDA Facts: Biomarkers and Surrogate Endpoints. FDA website. Accessed 21 September 2018.
  • Op cit 6.
  • National Cancer Institute (NCI) Dictionary of Cancer Terms. NCI website. Accessed 22 September 2018.
  • Measuring How Patients Feel and Function. Presentation by Michelle Campbell, PhD. Roadmap to Engaging CDER Public Workshop. May 2017. FDA website. Accessed 22 September 2018.
  • Op cit 11.
  • HIV/AIDS Glossary. Clinical Endpoint. . Accessed 22 September 2018.
  • Op cit 1.
  • Guidance for Industry. E9 Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials. September 1998. FDA website. . Accessed 22 September 2018.
  • Op cit 1.
  • Op cit 1.
  • Op cit 16.
  • Op cit 1.
  • Op cit 1.
  • Op cit 16.
  • Op cit 9.
  • Op cit 16.
  • Clinical tribulation Endpoints. Presentation by Eugene J. Sullivan, MD FCCP. FDA website. Accessed 23 September 2018.
  • Op cit 6.
  • FDA Regulatory Considerations for NASH Clinical tribulation Endpoints. Presentation by Stephanie O. Omokaro, PhD. Global NASH Congress.
  • Sanyal AJ, Friedman SL, McCullough AJ  and Dimick-Santos L. “Challenges and Opportunities in Drug and Biomarker development for Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis.” Findings and recommendations from an American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and FDA  Joint Workshop. Accessed 23September 2018.
  • Op cit 6.
  • Op cit 6.
  • Op cit 6.
  • Op cit 27.
  • About the Author

    Meredith Brown-Tuttle, RAC, FRAPS, is the principal consultant for Regulatorium, a company specializing in regulatory intelligence, writing and strategy. She is the author of IND Submissions: A Primer, published by Barnett, Regulatory Intelligence 101, published by RAPS, numerous articles and serves as chair of the RAPS Editorial Advisory Committee. She can exist reached at

    Cite as: Brown-Tuttle M. “The Regulatory Strategist Toolbox: Clinical Endpoint Analysis Tools.” Regulatory Focus. September 2018. Regulatory Affairs Professionals Society.

    Direct Download of over 5500 Certification Exams

    3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Aruba [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Avaya [101 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CA-Technologies [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CheckPoint [43 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
    College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institute [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CyberArk [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DELL [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECCouncil [22 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    EMC [128 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fortinet [14 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HP [752 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBM [1533 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Juniper [65 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Medical [68 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Microsoft [375 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCLEX [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
    OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Oracle [282 Certification Exam(s) ]
    P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Real Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Symantec [135 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]

    References :

    Issu :
    Dropmark :
    Wordpress :
    Dropmark-Text :
    Blogspot :
    RSS Feed : : : helps millions of candidates pass the exams and salvage their certifications. They stand thousands of successful reviews. Their dumps are reliable, affordable, updated and of really best quality to overcome the difficulties of any IT certifications. exam dumps are latest updated in highly outclass manner on regular basis and material is released periodically. Latest dumps are available in testing centers with whom they are maintaining their relationship to salvage latest material. The exam questions for C2010-659 Fundamentals of Applying SmartCloud Control Desk V1 exam is mainly based on two accessible formats, PDF and rehearse questions. PDF file carries every solitary the exam questions, answers which makes your preparation easier. While the rehearse questions are the complimentary feature in the exam product. Which helps to self-assess your progress. The evaluation instrument moreover highlights your fragile areas, where you exigency to establish more efforts so that you can help every solitary your concerns. recommend you to must try its free demo, you will notice the intuitive UI and moreover you will find it very facile to customize the preparation mode. But develop sure that, the actual C2010-659 product has more features than the tribulation version. If, you are contented with its demo then you can purchase the actual C2010-659 exam product. Avail 3 months Free updates upon purchase of C2010-659 Fundamentals of Applying SmartCloud Control Desk V1 Exam questions. offers you three months free update upon acquisition of C2010-659 Fundamentals of Applying SmartCloud Control Desk V1 exam questions. Their expert team is always available at back quit who updates the content as and when required. Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under; WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for every solitary exams on website PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69 DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99 DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for every solitary Orders Source / Reference: :

    Back to Main Page

    Killexams C2010-659 exams | Killexams C2010-659 cert | Pass4Sure C2010-659 questions | Pass4sure C2010-659 | pass-guaratee C2010-659 | best C2010-659 test preparation | best C2010-659 training guides | C2010-659 examcollection | killexams | killexams C2010-659 review | killexams C2010-659 legit | kill C2010-659 example | kill C2010-659 example journalism | kill exams C2010-659 reviews | kill exam ripoff report | review C2010-659 | review C2010-659 quizlet | review C2010-659 login | review C2010-659 archives | review C2010-659 sheet | legitimate C2010-659 | legit C2010-659 | legitimacy C2010-659 | legitimation C2010-659 | legit C2010-659 check | legitimate C2010-659 program | legitimize C2010-659 | legitimate C2010-659 business | legitimate C2010-659 definition | legit C2010-659 site | legit online banking | legit C2010-659 website | legitimacy C2010-659 definition | >pass 4 sure | pass for sure | p4s | pass4sure certification | pass4sure exam | IT certification | IT Exam | C2010-659 material provider | pass4sure login | pass4sure C2010-659 exams | pass4sure C2010-659 reviews | pass4sure aws | pass4sure C2010-659 security | pass4sure cisco | pass4sure coupon | pass4sure C2010-659 dumps | pass4sure cissp | pass4sure C2010-659 braindumps | pass4sure C2010-659 test | pass4sure C2010-659 torrent | pass4sure C2010-659 download | pass4surekey | pass4sure cap | pass4sure free | examsoft | examsoft login | exams | exams free | examsolutions | exams4pilots | examsoft download | exams questions | examslocal | exams practice | | | |


    MORGAN Studio

    is specialized in Architectural visualization , Industrial visualization , 3D Modeling ,3D Animation , Entertainment and Visual Effects .