Find us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter

Lastest ASC-090 VCE and examcollection | brain dumps | 3D Visualization

Killexam ASC-090 Exam Simulator is best exam prep tool we take updated Pass4sure Q & A - Pass4sure Brain Dumps - practice questions and exam tips - Tricks in the Exam Simulator - brain dumps - 3D Visualization

Pass4sure ASC-090 dumps | ASC-090 true questions |

ASC-090 ASC IT Compliance 2010

Study usher Prepared by Symantec Dumps Experts ASC-090 Dumps and true Questions

100% true Questions - Exam Pass Guarantee with towering Marks - Just Memorize the Answers

ASC-090 exam Dumps Source : ASC IT Compliance 2010

Test Code : ASC-090
Test appellation : ASC IT Compliance 2010
Vendor appellation : Symantec
: 69 true Questions

discovered those maximum ASC-090 Questions in true pick a Look at that I handed.
If you want towering quality ASC-090 dumps, then is the ultimate selection and your only solution. it provides astonishing and excellent test dumps which I am aphorism with replete confidence. I always thought that ASC-090 dumps are of no uses but proved me wrong as the dumps provided by them were of noteworthy expend and helped me score high. If you are worrying for ASC-090 dumps as well, then you need not to worry and associate killexams.

Take a smart plod to pass ASC-090
I actually possess recommended approximately your gadgets to various companions and partners, and theyre any extremely fulfilled. Much obliged Questions & Answers for enhancing up my profession and assisting me map nicely for my strict checks. Much liked another time. I ought to whisper that I am your greatest fan! I want you to recognize that I cleared my ASC-090 exam these days, contemplating the ASC-090 direction notes I purchased from you. I solved 86/95 questions in the exam. You are the best training issuer.

actual test ASC-090 questions.
I didnt map to expend any brain dumps for my IT certification checks, however being below pressure of the issue of ASC-090 exam, I ordered this package deal. i was inspired by the pleasant of these material, theyre genuinely worth the money, and that i believe that they might value more, that is how noteworthy they may be! I didnt possess any hassle while taking my exam thanks to Killexams. I definitely knew any questions and solutions! I got 97% with only a few days exam education, except having a few toil revel in, which turned into actually useful, too. So sure, is clearly top and distinctly endorsed.

labored difficult on ASC-090 books, however the entirety become in the .
I possess renewed my membership this time for ASC-090 exam. I accept my involvement with is so essential it is not workable surrender by not having a membership. I can just dependence exams for my exam. Just this site can champion me attain my ASC-090 accredition and champion me in getting above 95% marks in the exam. You any are truly making an incredible showing. retain it up!

Where will I find prep material for ASC-090 exam?
After trying several books, I become pretty dissatisfied no longer getting the privilege material. I became searching out a guideline for exam ASC-090 with effortless language and nicely-prepared content. fulfilled my want, as it explained the intricate subjects within the only manner. In the true exam I were given 89%, which was past my expectation. Thank you, for your top class guide-line!

in which can i am getting assist to bypass ASC-090 examination?
It is my delectation to thank you very much for being here for me. I passed my ASC-090 certification with flying colors. Now I am ASC-090 certified.

simply expend those true query bank and success is yours.
I dont taste by myself a mid tests any longer in light of the fact that i possess a heavenly examine colleague as this dumps. I am quite appreciative to the educators privilege right here for being so extraordinary and rightly disposed and assisting me in clearing my distinctly exam ASC-090. I solved any questions in exam. This equal course turned into given to me amid my exams and it didnt bear a incompatibility whether or not or no longer it possess become day or night, any my questions possess been spoke back.

I feel very confident with ASC-090 question bank. questions and answers helped me to recognise what precisely is predicted in the exam ASC-090. I prepared rightly within 10 days of preparation and completed any the questions of exam in 80 minutes. It comprise the topics just fancy exam factor of view and makes you memorize any the subjects effortlessly and correctly. It too helped me to understand a way to control the time to finish the exam before time. it is fine technique.

Weekend Study is enough to pass ASC-090 exam with these questions.
The nice guidance i possess ever skilled. I took many ASC-090 certification tests, but ASC-090 became out to live the easiest one thanks to i possess recently found this internet site and wish I knew approximately it a few years in the past. might possess stored me a number of sleepless nights and gray hair! The ASC-090 exam isnt an smooth one, specificallyits cutting-edge version. but the ASC-090 Q and A includes the trendy questions, daily updates, and those are without a doubtright and legitimate questions. I am satisfied this is bona fide motive I got maximum of them any through my exam. I were given an extremely respectable marks and thank to making ASC-090 exam pressure-loose.

it's far unbelieveable, however ASC-090 true pick a Look at questions are availabe here.
First of any I want to whisper Thanks to you people. I possess cleared ASC-090 Exam by subscribing to your study materials. So I wanted to partake my success on your website. Thank you once again. Thank you very much for your noteworthy support. I possess cleared my ASC-090 with 90%.

Symantec ASC IT Compliance 2010

Symantec (SYMC) Q1 revenue properly Estimates, Revenues Down Y/Y | true Questions and Pass4sure dumps

Symantec corporation SYMC mentioned first-quarter fiscal 2019 non-GAAP revenue of 34 cents per partake that beat the Zacks Consensus appraise of 33 cents. earnings per partake were 33 cents, below ASC 605, during this quarter, flat yr over year.

On a non-GAAP groundwork, Symantec generated revenues of $1.a hundred sixty five billion, which beat the Zacks Consensus appraise of $1.149 billion. beneath ASC 605, the device turned into $1.a hundred seventy five billion, down 5.5% from the 12 months-ago quarter.

starting this quarter, Symantec adopted the novel earnings focus accounting common, ASC 606. The comparisons with the year-ago quarter are in compliance with ASC 505.

The company benefited from stout extend in client Digital security phase. youngsters, lower-than-anticipated commercial enterprise safety implied billings possess been a dampener.

additionally, given this, the company diminished its outlook for fiscal 2019, which raises issues involving its close-time age possibilities.

Symantec company fee, Consensus and EPS shock

View pictures

Symantec industry enterprise price, Consensus and EPS shock | Symantec enterprise Quote

Let’s argue quarterly effects in details.    

Quarter in detail client safety revenues in the quarter possess been $600 million, reflecting organic extend of 6% from the yr-ago quarter in even forex. however, commercial enterprise safety revenues of $565 million declined 14% from the 12 months-in the past length. enterprise protection implied billings of $453 declined 20% yr over 12 months, adjusted for acquisitions and divestitures.

even so, the enterprise is making the most of built-in Cyber protection Platform, which drives huge cross-sell and up-promote alternatives. in addition, key consumer wins for Cloud Proxy, Cloud access protection broking service, and cloud email offerings possess been a favorable.

The industry shifted its enterprise mannequin to a greater ratable one. within the first quarter, the company cited that eighty two% of industry safety section revenues were ratable.

however, condense size declined to 16.5 months during the quarter from 18.5 months within the preceding quarter.


Symantec reported non-GAAP operating salary of $327 million. under ASC 605, the device was $313 million, which declined 17% from the 12 months-in the past quarter.

Non-GAAP working margin (beneath ASC 605) reduced in size 370 bps to 27%. The decline became because of the divestiture of web site protection and related PKI products in industry protection. in addition, margins for client Digital safety possess been wound with the aid of accelerated product edifice charges and allotted company costs.

below ASC 606, the quarterly determine turned into 28.1%, reflecting $5 million boost in revenues and a $9 million reduce in commission cost because of the novel accounting typical.

stability Sheet & money move    Symantec exited the fiscal first quarter with money, cash equivalents and short-time age investments of $2.324 billion compared with $2.162 billion within the prior quarter. The company ended the quarter with lengthy-term debt of $5.032 billion.

throughout the quarter, Symantec generated working cash flux of $334 million.


administration notes that earnings extend in both industry security and buyer Digital protection segments coupled with cost discount initiatives undertaken privilege through the remains of fiscal yr 2019 can possess a respectable possess an sequel on on operating margin in fiscal 2020.

in particular, the company expects $50 million of restructuring expenses in reference to its map to reduce global head signify number by means of almost 8%.

although, the company anticipates continuation of longer income cycle to negatively influence industry protection revenues. moreover, overseas exchange headwinds possess too been factored into the earnings tips. The cost initiatives can possess partial possess an sequel on on operating margins this fiscal.

on the other hand, the industry remains confident about its complete cloud protection stack, which comprises Cloud Proxy, CASB, and statistics insurance plan, in addition to multi-factor authentication, expected to capitalize from the ease of cloud adoption.

For fiscal 2019, Symantec has decreased its assistance. The industry now expects non-GAAP revenues within the latitude of $four.670-$four.790 billion in comparison with past guided orbit of $four.760-$4.900 billion.

Non-GAAP operating margin is projected to live 30% in comparison with the past projection of 30-32%.

Non-GAAP earnings per partake are expected to live in the latitude of $1.47 to $1.forty seven compared with $1.50-$1.sixty five projected past.

For the 2nd quarter of fiscal 2019, Symantec anticipates non-GAAP revenues in the latitude of $ hundred thirty-$ hundred sixty billion.

Non-GAAP working margin is projected within the latitude of 30%. extra, management estimates salary between 31 cents and 35 cents on a non-GAAP basis.

Zacks Rank & Key Picks

Symantec at the jiffy has a Zacks Rank #three (dangle).

a few more advantageous-ranked shares in the broader expertise sector are YY Inc. YY, Science purposes SAIC and Verint programs VRNT, any wearing a Zacks Rank #1 (strong buy). you can discern the complete checklist of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here.

lengthy-term revenue extend for YY, Science purposes and Verint is projected to live 26.four%, 5% and 10%, respectively.

Will you're making a Fortune on the Shift to electric vehicles?

here's another inventory thought to trust. a noteworthy deal fancy petroleum a hundred and fifty years in the past, lithium vigour may additionally soon tremble the realm, creating millionaires and reshaping geo-politics. quickly electric powered cars (EVs) can live more affordable than gas guzzlers. Some are already accomplishing 265 miles on a single cost.

With battery fees plummeting and charging stations set to multiply, one company stands out because the #1 inventory to buy according to Zacks analysis.

or not it's now not the one you think.

See This Ticker Free >>

Story continues

Symantec (SYMC) Q1 2019 effects - income appellation Transcript | true Questions and Pass4sure dumps

No outcomes discovered, are trying novel key phrase!starting within the first quarter of fiscal yr 2019, Symantec adopted the novel earnings focus accounting regular, ASC 606, under the modified retrospective ... their information insurance map it's helping cl...

Regulatory Compliance Drives Encryption | true Questions and Pass4sure dumps

As facts breaches proceed to rise, U.S.-based mostly corporations are increasingly adopting encryption to cozy their IT infrastructures, and their leading judgement is to conform to privacy and statistics protection regulations, a brand novel study has discovered.

during the past, protecting data and mitigating information breaches drove encryption adoption. This yr, for the primary time, regulatory compliance became the accurate explanation for imposing encryption technologies, according to the Ponemon Institute’s annual “U.S. commercial enterprise Encryption developments file,” which is in its fifth year.

In 2010, 69 percent of the 964 IT and enterprise leaders surveyed observed compliance is their primary driver for encryption, an extend of 5 percent points from the previous year. Mitigating information breaches fell to 2d location, with 63 percent asserting it became a exact driver for encryption adoption: a drop of 4 elements from 2009 and eight features from 2008.

The consequences exhibit the growing to live consciousness that compliance is faultfinding as agencies are attempting to steer clear of post-breach prison noncompliance penalties, in line with the Look at, which become produced at the side of Symantec.

“Compliance is essentially the most crucial judgement of doing encryption, and the PCI [Payment Card Industry] security measure and the a considerable number of situation privateness legal guidelines possess an terrible lot to achieve with it,” says Larry Ponemon, chair and founding father of the Ponemon Institute, a research enterprise in Traverse metropolis, Mich.

The PCI usual, which requires bank card transaction protection, is the quickest-starting to live judgement for IT organizations to bear expend of encryption. The variety of these surveyed who talked about PCI necessities constituted probably the most influential explanation for using encryption has grown greater than fourfold in the past four years, from 15 % in 2007 to 64 percent in 2010. That’s as a result of failure to comply will wait away from organizations from doing on-line credit card transactions, the anatomize says.

The fitness suggestions Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), continues to live a key driver of encryption. despite the fact, other traditional drivers—the Sarbanes-Oxley and Graham-Leach-Bliley acts—have lowered in significance because agencies possess built-in compliance for these regulations into their generic operations, the examine says.

statistics Breaches on the upward push

normal, the variety of information breaches is expanding, and they're more severe. In 2010, 88 percent of respondents stated they had at the least one violation throughout that 12 months, a 3-point enhance from the previous year.

more notably, 25 % of organizations suggested that that they had experienced five or more data breaches—a three-point boost from 2009. Forty percent of companies surveyed had suffered two to 5 breaches, while 23 p.c had just one breach. The results expose that cyber-attackers continue to target unprotected facts and cell contraptions, the anatomize says.

In other key findings, ninety five % of respondents stated they possess been seemingly or very recumbent to adventure the loss of sensitive or exclusive counsel in the next 12 to 24 months. Of these surveyed, ninety three percent dependence records coverage a vital or very essential Part of their measure risk management efforts, a 13-element boost from 2009.

due to this fact, greater IT agencies are implementing statistics encryption expertise. In complete, eighty four p.c of respondents possess both completely achieved or are in the process of imposing encryption. That’s a two-aspect raise from 2009 and a 5-element boost from 2008.

Ponemon says he expects that encryption adoption will proceed to raise in the coming years as a result of extra americans are working remotely—both from home or on the road—and that they entry information on workstation computer systems and smartphones that might potentially residence dainty or confidential suggestions.

Brian Tokuyoshi, a Symantec advertising supervisor who assisted with the examine, agrees. “They’re dealing with tips about personnel, and they can live carrying that recommendation on a computing device,” he aspects out. “You lose the laptop and it’s a learning breach.”

Spending extra on Encryption

because conserving facts is an ever-higher priority, IT businesses are spending more cash on encryption technologies. Encryption is the quickest-growing earmark in IT budgets, that means that the expertise is strategic and receives dedicated annual funding. The percent of IT agencies that earmark encryption has grown from 57 p.c in 2008 to 69 % in 2010.

probably the most accepted encryption technologies in 2010 were file server encryption (sixty two percent adoption), full-disk encryption (59 p.c) and database encryption (fifty seven %). As for other areas, laptop electronic mail encryption is used by 50 percentof the respondents, while storage networking and USB scintillate pressure encryption are used by means of 19 percent.

Voice over IP and mainframes are the least encrypted technologies. simplest 9 percent of the respondents encrypt IP-based phone calls, and 8 p.c encrypt mainframes.Most businesses encrypt statistics at the halt aspects, the status it touches users, but insurance map for the administrative lower back conclusion is rising, the analyze’s authors wrote. 

Wylie Wong is a freelance creator for Baseline journal.

Obviously it is hard assignment to pick solid certification questions/answers assets concerning review, reputation and validity since individuals win sham because of picking incorrectly benefit. ensure to serve its customers best to its assets concerning exam dumps update and validity. The vast majority of other's sham report objection customers forward to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams cheerfully and effectively. They never trade off on their review, reputation and quality because killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams customer assurance is vital to us. Uniquely they deal with review, reputation, sham report grievance, trust, validity, report and scam. In the event that you discern any unsuitable report posted by their rivals with the appellation killexams sham report grievance web, sham report, scam, dissension or something fancy this, simply recall there are constantly terrible individuals harming reputation of respectable administrations because of their advantages. There are a noteworthy many fulfilled clients that pass their exams utilizing brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams hone questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit, their specimen questions and test brain dumps, their exam simulator and you will realize that is the best brain dumps site.

Back to Braindumps Menu

M2140-649 sample test | 70-630 practice test | 1K0-002 free pdf | EX0-002 test prep | HP3-X12 brain dumps | 1Z0-330 study guide | 000-900 study guide | HP0-751 braindumps | 9A0-395 free pdf | 4H0-004 practice questions | MSC-235 cram | CSSBB VCE | 000-206 questions and answers | 190-735 dump | 000-115 brain dumps | RH033 mock exam | HP0-Y15 braindumps | 4H0-533 braindumps | C9030-634 test prep | 1Z0-478 test questions |

Take a gander at these ASC-090 true question and answers disdainful of their reputation of helping people pass the ASC-090 test in their very first attempts. Their success rates in the past two years possess been absolutely impressive, thanks to their blissful customers who are now able to boost their career in the speedy lane. is the number one selection among IT professionals, especially the ones who are looking to climb up the hierarchy levels faster in their respective organizations. possess its specialists working continuously for the collection of true exam questions of ASC-090. any the pass4sure questions and answers of ASC-090 gathered by their group are looked into and updated by their ASC-090 certification group. They wait associated with the applicants showed up in the ASC-090 test to win their reviews about the ASC-090 test, they accumulate ASC-090 exam tips and traps, their taste about the procedures utilized as a Part of the true ASC-090 exam, the errors they done in the true test and afterward enhance their material as needs be. Click Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for any exams on website
PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for any Orders
When you taste their pass4sure questions and answers, you will feel certain about every one of the themes of test and feel that your learning has been significantly moved forward. These pass4sure questions and answers are not simply practice questions, these are true exam questions and answers that are enough to pass the ASC-090 exam at first attempt. helps a huge orbit of candidates pass the tests and win their certification. They possess a immense wide variety of fruitful reviews. Their dumps are solid, slight, updated and of truly satisfactory noteworthy to overcome the demanding situations of any IT certifications. exam dumps are most recent updated in notably clobber manner on accepted premise and material is discharged every now and then. Most recent dumps are accessible in testing focuses with whom we're retaining up their relationship to win most recent material. Symantec Certification study guides are setup through IT specialists. Most people complaint that there are an extreme orbit of questions in this sort of sizable wide variety of schooling assessments and exam resource, and they may live recently wiped out to manage the cost of any extra. Seeing experts exercise session this far accomplishing rendition at the identical time as still assurance that each one the getting to know is secured after profound studies and exam. Everything is to bear consolation for hopefuls on their road to affirmation.

We possess Tested and Approved ASC-090 Exams. offers the most specific and most recent IT exam materials which almost incorporate any exam topics. With the usher of their ASC-090 study materials, you dont need to squander your risk on perusing major Part of reference books and honestly want to parch through 10-20 hours to ace their ASC-090 true questions and answers. Whats greater, they provide you with PDF Version and Software Version exam questions and answers. For Software Version materials, Its presented to present the candidates reenact the Symantec ASC-090 exam in a actual surroundings.

We give free updates. Inside legitimacy duration, if ASC-090 exam materials which you possess received up to date, they will let you know with the aid of email to down load maximum latest variation of . On the off hazard that you dont pass your Symantec ASC IT Compliance 2010 exam, They will give you replete refund. You should ship the scanned reproduction of your ASC-090 exam document card to us. Subsequent to asserting, they will unexpectedly provide you with replete REFUND. Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as beneath;
WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for any tests on internet site
PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders extra than $69
DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $ninety nine
DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for any Orders

In the event which you win ready for the Symantec ASC-090 exam utilising their exam simulator engine. It is something however difficult to succeed for any certifications inside the number one undertaking. You dont want to exploit any dumps or any lax torrent / rapidshare any stuff. They present free demo of every IT Certification Dumps. You can celebrate the interface, question noteworthy and ease of expend of their schooling exams earlier than you select to buy.

ASC-090 Practice Test | ASC-090 examcollection | ASC-090 VCE | ASC-090 study guide | ASC-090 practice exam | ASC-090 cram

Killexams 000-173 test prep | Killexams CWSP-205 free pdf | Killexams A2040-911 practice test | Killexams CUR-009 pdf download | Killexams 310-053 study guide | Killexams 000-N40 free pdf download | Killexams 000-886 braindumps | Killexams C9520-929 sample test | Killexams 312-50v9 test questions | Killexams CTFL-UK true questions | Killexams C2020-635 test prep | Killexams AVA test prep | Killexams 300-209 examcollection | Killexams SBAC study guide | Killexams 000-M228 study guide | Killexams COG-615 brain dumps | Killexams NRA-FPM brain dumps | Killexams 6210 dumps | Killexams 000-M77 braindumps | Killexams 000-M91 braindumps | huge List of Exam Braindumps

View Complete list of Brain dumps

Killexams 000-170 questions and answers | Killexams 920-258 study guide | Killexams 000-879 practice Test | Killexams 98-366 brain dumps | Killexams C2030-136 test prep | Killexams HP0-784 practice test | Killexams 000-330 true questions | Killexams HP0-S11 test prep | Killexams C2020-612 braindumps | Killexams 1Z0-897 sample test | Killexams HP0-311 free pdf | Killexams C9010-030 test questions | Killexams 4H0-004 braindumps | Killexams 190-756 brain dumps | Killexams JK0-019 VCE | Killexams 650-179 pdf download | Killexams C8010-725 practice exam | Killexams COMLEX-USA true questions | Killexams P2065-035 dumps questions | Killexams 1Z0-982 bootcamp |

ASC IT Compliance 2010

Pass 4 certain ASC-090 dumps | ASC-090 true questions |

Re Fauth: A Primer On Ss. 75(1)(A), 92(4.1) And 93(B) Of Alberta's Securities Act | true questions and Pass4sure dumps

The Alberta Securities Commission (ASC) recently released its conclusion in the matter of Re Fauth, finding the respondent, Vernon Ray Fauth (Fauth), in violation of ss. 75(1)(a), 92(4.1) and 93(b) of Alberta's Securities Act, RSA 2000, c S-4 (the Act). The conclusion offers some essential insight on issues regarding limitation periods, illegal dealing, misrepresentations, and fraud under the Act. The conclusion too discusses the expend of hearsay evidence in proceedings before the Commission; specifically, the expend of transcripts of witness interviews conducted by the Alberta Securities Commission Staff (Staff) in the course of their investigation.


Fauth operated a fiscal and estate planning industry through Fauth fiscal Group Ltd. (Fauth Financial), a corporation licensed to sell insurance and mutual funds. Fauth was too involved in a number of other corporations and limited partnerships:

  • Espoir Capital Corporation (Espoir): Espoir was set up to raise funds from the public for re-investment in other opportunities. The investments would then generate the returns to live paid to Espoir investors. Fauth was the founder and sole shareholder, director, officer and signing authority of Espoir.
  • FairWest Energy Corporation (FairWest): FairWest was a publicly-traded oil and gas company listed on the TSC Venture Exchange. Fauth and his son were two of the six FairWest directors. FairWest became insolvent and sought protection under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act in December 2012.
  • Limited Partnerships: Fauth had an interest in and control over a number of other oil and gas entities, including Royalty Investments Limited Partnership (Royalty LP). Royalty LP's generic colleague was AFM Management Inc. (AFM Management), of which Fauth was president, sole director and sole voting shareholder. Royalty LP was described as a "conglomeration of one corporation [AFM Management] and six partnerships". Fauth was involved with and had an interest in any six of these partnerships.
  • From November 2002 through November 2012, Espoir issued approximately $15 million in debentures (Debentures) to over 70 investors in Alberta, British Columbia, and Ontario. In soliciting investments, Espoir distributed one-page summaries to investors and potential investors, describing the kinds of investments that Espoir would make. Although there were minor variations in these summaries over the years, they any represented that Espoir was established to invest in a pool of interest paying investments such as money market, treasury bills, mortgages, GICs and term deposits.

    Some of the Debentures were described as "unsecured" (Unsecured Debentures) while the others were described as "secured" (Secured Debentures). The certificate accompanying the latter stated on its puss that it represented a "Secured Debenture". The Unsecured Debentures stated in their preambles that "[t]he Debenture is an unsecured duty of [Espoir] and is specifically subordinated to Senior Indebtedness, as defined herein". "Senior Indebtedness" was defined to comprise any of Espoir's other indebtedness, apart from the Unsecured Debenture itself and any other subordinated indebtedness. Both Debentures too contained a "No Security" clause stipulating that:

    The Holder [i.e., the purchaser] acknowledges that no security interest is granted to the Holder by [Espoir] hereby and the Holder covenants that he shall not hunt to judgement any registration of the Debenture against [Espoir] or its assets in any jurisdiction.

    According to Fauth, the only true differences between Espoir's Unsecured Debentures and its secured Debentures were the interest rate and the date of issue. His evidence was that, despite their names, both had "the same" underlying security: "the assets that were in...Espoir...". The Unsecured Debentures typically offered an interest rate of 10.5% while the Secured Debentures typically offered an interest rate of 8%.

    In addition to the Debentures, Espoir too issued a number of promissory notes (Espoir Notes). Each had been issued in 2012, had a two-year term and paid 8% interest per annum.

    Around 2010, Espoir became unable to repay the Unsecured Debentures as they matured. In response, Fauth began asking the Unsecured Debenture holders to enter into amending agreements, the majority of which reduced the interest rate on those paying 10.5% to 8%, extended the term (usually for a further three years), and changed the timing of interest payments from semi-annually to quarterly.

    By mid-2013, Espoir ceased making interest payments to Debenture holders. Espoir's fiscal records showed that, as of December 31, 2014, it owed its investors over $12.3 million.

    A Notice of Hearing was subsequently issued on May 11, 2016 by the Staff, alleging that Fauth breached statutory prohibitions on engaging in unregistered trading perverse to s. 75(1)(a) of the Act, making a misrepresentation perverse to s. 92(4.1) of the Act and perpetrating a fraud perverse to s. 93(b) of the Act. Twelve witnesses testified at the 12 day hearing before the ASC. These included eight investors, two current members and one former member of the ASC investigative staff and one individual who used to toil with Fauth. Fauth refused to testify, but instead chose to reckon on the transcript of his interview conducted by the Staff during the course of their investigation. The Commission allowed Fauth to file the transcript of his investigatory interview, but took into account that Fauth had not made himself available for cross-examination at the hearing and, thus, it could not directly assess his credibility.

    A recurring theme in the evidence of any eight investor witnesses was that Fauth assured them that their transactions were "secure" and represented low risk. He variously represented to the investors that their money would live used to invest in "real estate", in "[real estate developments] secured against land registered on title", "in mortgages", "in property around Alberta", and in "shopping centres and industry office buildings". Fauth too represented to the various investors that their investment "was about as safe as anything [they] could do", would "be first on title if something happened", and was "a hundred percent property". Fauth expressly represented to one investor that he would not invest his money in FairWest, the investor being watchful of the fiscal woes of FairWest at the time.

    The forensic accounting evidence indicated that between January 1, 2009, and September 30, 2014, $8,453,915.49 was deposited to Espoir's bank account. Of this, $5,851,581.24 was paid in interest and principal to holders of Debentures and Espoir Notes and $2,585,414.87 was paid to non-arm's length parties (including Fauth fiscal and FairWest). The forensic accountant concluded that the funds received by Espoir were generally used for three things: (i) to pay interest and principal owed to Espoir investors; (ii) to capitalize the Fauths through the payment of management fees and transfers to other companies; and (iii) to capitalize entities related to Fauth or over which Fauth had "significant influence". The evidence further suggested that Espoir often loaned money to non-arm's length parties without written loan agreements or any security.

    In terms of the few secured investments/loans Espoir did participate in, the security provided either far-exceeded the debtor's fiscal assets or, in the case of loans to non-arm's length parties, the mortgages were discharged without any payment from the mortgagor. Finally, as of the halt of 2007, Espoir did not hold any third-party mortgages.

    ASC's Analysis

    Based on the evidence before it, ASC found Fauth in violation of ss. 75(1)(a), 92(4.1) and 93(b) of the Act.

    Preliminary Matters

    As a prefatory matter, the ASC had to determine the expend that could live made of transcript evidence of two witnesses who were unable to testify before the ASC. The two witnesses were Espoir investors who were interviewed by the Staff during their investigation. One of these witnesses had passed away, while the other was elderly and too ill at the time of the hearing to testify. Relying on: ss. 29(e) and 29(f) of the Act;1 the relevance of their transcript evidence; the fact that the evidence was given under oath; and the availability for cross-examination of relatives of the two unavailable witnesses,2 the ASC decided to admit the impugned transcripts. The ASC did, however, ascribe less weight to these transcripts as compared to direct evidence of available witnesses.


    From 2002 through December 16, 2014, s. 201 of the Act provided that "[n]o proceedings under this Part [i.e., Part 16 of the Act, Enforcement] shall live commenced in a court or before the [ASC] more than 6 years from the day of the happening of the event that gave ascend to the proceedings." As of December 17, 2014, the section was modified slightly to provide that "[n]o proceedings under this Part shall live commenced in a court or before the [ASC] more than 6 years from the day of the happening of the ultimate event on which the proceeding is based."

    The ASC concluded, quoting Re Dennis, 2005 BCSECCOM 65 at paragraph 37, that "[w]hen a progression of events or transactions in a continuing course of conduct spans a age of time, the 'date of the events', in the ordinary sense of that phrase, can only spell the date of the ultimate event in the progression that allows staff to allege a violation of the legislation...". On this basis, the ASC was satisfied that the misrepresentations and fraud alleged in Re Fauth likewise constituted an ongoing scheme and continued course of conduct.4

    s. 75(1)(a): Fauth Engaged in the industry of Selling Securities Without Being Registered

    Section 75(1)(a) of the Act prohibits anyone from acting as a "dealer" in securities "[u]nless registered in accordance with Alberta securities laws". The ASC began its analysis by noting that in order to find Fauth in violation of s. 75(1)(a) of the Act, it must live demonstrated that: (i) there was a security as defined in the Act; (ii) there was a trade as defined in the Act in relation to that security; (iii) Fauth engaged in or held himself out as engaging in the industry of trading in securities; (iv) Fauth was not registered; and (v) Fauth could not reckon on an exemption from the registration requirement.

    The evidence was clear in satisfying the first, the second and the fourth prong of the test. In relation to the third prong, ASC notable the non-exhaustive list of factors contained in Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations (NI 31-103) pertinent to determining whether a party has engaged or held itself out as engaging "in the business" of trading in securities. These factors include:

  • engaging in activities similar to a registrant (such as "promoting securities or stating in any way that the individual or firm will buy or sell securities");
  • intermediating trades or acting as a market maker (which "typically takes the contour of the industry commonly referred to as a broker" or "[m]aking a market in securities");
  • directly or indirectly carrying on the activity with repetition, regularity or continuity;
  • being, or expecting to be, remunerated or compensated; and
  • directly or indirectly soliciting securities transactions.
  • Relying on these factors, the ASC was satisfied that Fauth engaged in and held himself out as engaging "in the business" of trading in securities.

    Regarding the final branch of the test, the ASC rejected Fauth's argument that the Debentures fell under a prospectus exemption and, accordingly, he was exempt from registering with the ASC.5 The ASC was not persuaded by this reasoning, noting that Fauth had the onus to prove the availability of and compliance with any of the terms of an exemption and he had failed to achieve so. The ASC too was not satisfied, as Fauth had argued, that this was a mere technical breach, noting that Fauth was a past registrant with considerable taste in the capital markets and the associated regulatory environment.

    s. 92(4.1): Fauth Made Misrepresentations

    The ASC began its analysis by noting the test under s. 92(4.1): (i) a statement was made by a respondent; (ii) the respondent knew or reasonably ought to possess known that the statement was, in a material respect, untrue or omitted a fact required to live stated or necessary to bear the statement not misleading; and (iii) the respondent knew or reasonably ought to possess known that the statement would reasonably live expected to possess a significant sequel on the market price or value of a security.

    Based on the evidence before it, the ASC was satisfied that Staff had proven any parts of the test under s. 92(4.1). Fauth had ensured investors that their investments were secure, low-risk, and would live invested in a certain way. Instead, he invested their money in non-arm's length entities with spare protection for the investments and in circumstances where the investments were far from secure. Further, the misrepresentations were material and had a significant sequel on the value of the Debentures since an investor would possess been more willing to invest in Espoir when assured that his/her investment was "secure".

    s. 93(b): Fauth Committed FraudDuring the pertinent time, s. 93(b) of the Act prohibited anyone from "directly or indirectly, engag[ing] or participat[ing] in any act, practice or course of conduct relating to a security...that the person or company knows or reasonably ought to know will...perpetrate a fraud on any person or company".6

    The ASC confirmed that the test for fraud under the Act is the identical as set out by the Supreme Court of Canada, albeit in a different context, in R v Th�roux, [1993] 2 SCR 5, and requires the Staff to prove:

  • the actus reus, which is established by proof of:
  • a "prohibited act, live it an act of deceit, a falsehood or some other fraudulent means"; and
  • "deprivation caused by the prohibited act, which may consist in actual loss or the placing of the victim's pecuniary interests at risk";
  • and

  • the mens rea, which is established by proof of:
  • "subjective learning of the prohibited act"; and
  • "subjective learning that the prohibited act could possess as a consequence the deprivation of another".
  • In relation to the actus reus, the evidence was clear that the investors were misled, their funds were exposed to the risk of loss, and then, ultimately, they suffered actual loss. Further, investors were not informed that their funds were exposed to a risk of loss that they did not anticipate, and, ultimately, were lost.

    Finally, in terms of mens rea, the ASC was satisfied that Fauth had subjective learning of his prohibited acts and the consequences and potential consequences of these acts.

    Key Takeaways

    Re Fauth provides a useful summary of the test for establishing liability under each of ss. 75(1)(a), 92(4.1) and 93(b) of the Act.

    Re Fauth is too a useful reminder that the rules of procedure and evidence applicable before the ASC are more relaxed than those applicable in a criminal tribulation before a court. As the ASC noted, in relation to a respondent's ability to cross-examine a witness:

    [I]n a regulatory context such as this, natural justice and procedural fairness achieve not necessarily impose that an chance to cross-examine must live provided, as long as a party is given "a reasonable chance to remark on and challenge such evidence" in another way (citing Re Arbour Energy Inc., 2012 ABASC 131 at paras 49 and 52).

    Further, the ASC was clear in noting that a respondent seeking to reckon on a registration exemption must bear a reasonable, solemn trouble – or pick whatever steps were reasonably necessary – to answer himself that the exemption was available at the time of the trade of the security (citing Re Cloutier, 2014 ABASC 2 at para 308). Bald assertions of the presence of an exemption, or reliance on legal recommendation vis-�-vis the ostensible exemption, is not sufficient. Moreover, evidence is required to prove reliance on legal advice.

    In terms of misrepresentations under the Act, the panel in Re Fauth reiterated that it is not necessary to prove reliance by specific investors on any specific statements or omission alleged to constitute a misrepresentation. Accordingly, what matters is the misrepresentation, the representor's learning of the misrepresentation and the sequel of the misrepresentation on the market price or value of the security.

    On the issue of fraud, ASC emphasized that it is unnecessary to prove that the accused knew that what he was doing was wrong or that he intended to judgement someone else to incur a fiscal loss. any that is required is proof that the respondent intentionally committed the prohibited acts knowing that the consequence could live deprivation, including the risk of deprivation. Moreover, evidence of personal capitalize is not required.


    1 Section 29(e) of the Act stipulates that an ASC hearing panel "shall receive that evidence that is pertinent to the matter being heard". Section 29(f) provides that "the laws of evidence applicable to judicial proceedings achieve not apply to a hearing before the ASC". These sections allow the admission of any pertinent evidence, including hearsay, topic to the rules of natural justice and procedural fairness and the ASC's discretion.

    2 These relatives too had invested in Espoir. They had personal learning of the unavailable witnesses investments and interactions with Fauth and gave viva voce evidence before the ASC during the hearing.

    3 The ASC was not required to esteem whether the alleged breaches of s. 75(1)(a) in the Notice of Hearing were limitation barred since these occurred after May 11, 2010 and were therefore within the six-year limitation period.

    4 The ASC too relied on the British Columbia Securities Commission's conclusion in Re Williams, 2016 BCSECCOM 18 in concluding that the misrepresentation and fraud allegations were not statute barred. In Williams, investors loaned money on the representation that it would live "put into safe investments". Instead, the funds were used for other purposes, including payments to earlier investors. The panel in Williams concluded that it was a Ponzi scheme involving ongoing acts of deceit which persisted until the scheme collapsed. Accordingly, it was found to constitute a continuing course of conduct, nobody which was held to live statute-barred.

    5 The Debentures contained language whereby the subscribers, by signing, ostensibly acknowledged that Espoir was a "private issuer" and warranted that they either were family, friends or close industry associates of a "director, senior officer or control person" of Espoir (i.e., Fauth) or were accredited investors. If proven, these facts could possess established that a prospectus and registration exemption was available prior to September 28, 2010. A number of the investors, however, were neither family, friends or close industry associates of Fauth nor accredited investors at the time they purchased their first Unsecured Debenture in July 2006.

    6 Section 93(b) now too prohibits an "attempt to engage or participate in any act, practice or course of conduct relating to a security ...that the person or company knows or reasonably ought to know will...perpetrate a fraud on any person or company".

    About Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP

    Norton Rose Fulbright is a global law firm. They provide the world's preeminent corporations and fiscal institutions with a replete industry law service. They possess 3800 lawyers and other legal staff based in more than 50 cities across Europe, the United States, Canada, Latin America, Asia, Australia, Africa, the Middle East and Central Asia.

    Recognized for their industry focus, they are stout across any the key industry sectors: fiscal institutions; energy; infrastructure, mining and commodities; transport; technology and innovation; and life sciences and healthcare.

    Wherever they are, they operate in accordance with their global industry principles of quality, union and integrity. They aim to provide the highest workable measure of legal service in each of their offices and to maintain that even of quality at every point of contact.

    For more information about Norton Rose Fulbright, discern

    Law around the

    The content of this article is intended to provide a generic usher to the topic matter. Specialist recommendation should live sought about your specific circumstances.

    Facebook IPO fraudster from Calgary sanctioned by ASC | true questions and Pass4sure dumps

    The Alberta Securities Commission. Herald file

    A Calgary man who defrauded investors looking to buy shares in Facebook Inc. has been sanctioned by the Alberta Securities Commission and declared a “serious risk to the investing public.”

    Nelson Peter Bradbury raised more than $1.5 million under investment agreements he sold from approximately January 2010 to March 2013. In some cases, according to a statement of admissions, he falsely told investors he had an inside track on Facebook Inc., and their money would live used to acquire shares in the convivial media giant prior to its initial public offering in May 0f 2012.

     An ASC panel found Bradbury used approximately half of investors’ money to trade in his brokerage accounts, generating considerable losses. He too diverted at least $370,000 of investors’ money for personal use, including “household, grocery, clothing, restaurant, entertainment, vacation and recreational expenses” and “mortgage, tax and utility payments.”

    The panel concluded Bradbury illegally traded and distributed securities, engaged in fraudulent conduct and misled the ASC. The panel ordered that he pay back $370,000 obtained as a result of his non-compliance with Alberta securities laws, pay an administrative penalty of $150,000 and investigation and hearing costs of $13,000, and live topic to an array of permanent market-access bans.

    The panel notable the seriousness of Bradbury’s misconduct, the personal capitalize derived from that misconduct, and his prior history of market misconduct (a 2001 admission of illegally raising money) supported “strong measures of specific and generic deterrence.” It was also convinced Bradbury “is, and will remain, a solemn risk to the investing public unless removed from the capital market forever.” 

    Higher power rates seen in May as ERC approves PSALM’s bid to retrieve ASC | true questions and Pass4sure dumps

    By Lenie Lectura

    Power rates are expected to surge by 6.5 centavos per kilowatt-hour (kWh), or an equivalent of P13 for a household with an average monthly consumption of 200 kWh, every month for six months starting May in Luzon. The identical rate hike will live applied for 36 months in the Visayas and Mindanao.

    The impending rate hike, which will live reflected in the transmission component of an electric bill, was a result of a petition filed by the Power Sector Assets and Liabilities Management Corp. (PSALM) to retrieve P6.9 billion, including taxes, in differential ancillary service charges (ASC) from the National Grid Corp. of the Philippines (NGCP) incurred between March 2008 and October 2009.

    However, the Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC) did not comprise the taxes in its computation when it arrived at a decision. “The commission has approved the recovery scheme for P5.2 billion, exclusive of VAT (value-added Tax),” ERC Chairman Jose Vicente Salazar said in a text message.

    Of the P5.2 billion worth of differential ancillary charges that the commission approved, P1.5 billion must live recovered from the Luzon grid in six months, P1.9 billion in the Visayas in 36 months and P1.8 billion in Mindanao.

    This is lower than what PSALM asked for. The approved recovery age is too longer than what the situation firm stated in its petition.

    “Interest was disallowed. Also, a longer recovery age will apply,” ERC Spokesman Rexie Digos said. “[The] case had been deliberated and the order is forthcoming,” he said.

    The estimated rate repercussion of the approved absolute amount for recovery of P5.2 billion is 6.5 centavos per kWh to the customers, Digos said, adding that the amount would live collected from consumers until the absolute differential amount per grid has been completely recovered.

    When sought to remark on how this novel rate adjustment will affect the 5.8 million customers of the Manila Electric Co. (Meralco), Lawrence Fernandez, the utility firm’s head for utility economics, said, “that would live equivalent to around P13 in the bill each month.”

    “If the collection will live spread over six months, then the total amount to live collected would live P78 for a typical household consuming 200 kWh,” Fernandez said in an interview.

    Once the order is out, NGCP will possess to bill the power distribution utilities (DUs) nationwide, including Meralco. Then, the rate repercussion will live reflected after one month in the bills of end-users. The repercussion will mainly live felt as Part of the transmission charge.

    The BusinessMirror reported on Monday that PSALM, in its eight-page application filed with the ERC, wants to retrieve P6,888,065,922.01 worth of ancillary services differential to live collected in a month for Luzon grid and six months in the Visayas and Mindanao grids.

    When broken down, P2 billion will live collected in the Luzon grid; P2.5 billion in the Visayas; and P2.4 in Mindanao, the application stated.

    Salazar, in the identical text message, said the implemented rates in 2008 and 2009 were found to live lower than the approved rates of the ERC, “thus, the difference.”

    In October 2009 the ERC issued a provisional authority (PA) allowing the National Power Corp. (Napocor) to imbue NGCP for the provision of ancillary service, pending approval of the Ancillary Services Procurement Agreement (ASPA) between the Napocor and NGCP.

    A year later, or in March 2010, the ERC made permanent the provisionally approved ASPA rate to live efficacious from the April 2008 billing age (March 26, 2008 to April 25, 2008) until the issuance of the PA on October 12, 2009.

    At the identical time, the ERC directed the Napocor and NGCP to submit additional recoverable ASC differential amount, which is the incompatibility between the ERC-approved AS rate and National Transmission Corp.-calculated AS rate. They were too asked to submit a collection scheme for the April 2008 to October 2009 billing period.

    The Napocor and NGCP both complied.

    The Napocor, in its compliance with manifestation, seeks to retrieve P6,048,276,707.00 in ASC differential amount for the said period. NGCP, meanwhile, stated in its compliance with manifestation that the AS differential amounts to P5,286,853,359.62. The grid operator too submitted its proposed billing and collection scheme of one month for Luzon grid and six months for the Visayas and Mindanao grids.

    Then, in May 2011, the Napocor filed its manifestation and motion for the ERC’s approval of the AS differential amount based on the updated data submitted by NGCP.

    In the said motion, the Napocor notable that the principal AS differential amount of P5,286,853,359.62 now reconciles with the amount submitted by NGCP. Accordingly, in January 2012, the Napocor filed before the ERC a motion to resolve its May 2011 manifestation and motion for the approval of the total AS differential amount of P6,888,065,922.01 composed of the principal AS differential amount, interest and value-added tax.

    By virtue of the asset-debt transfer between the Napocor and PSALM and pursuant to section 49 of Epira, PSALM intervened in the instant proceeding through a petition for intervention in July 2009.

    AS provides essential in maintaining power quality, stability and security of the power grid. They stabilize electricity supply and forestall system-wide blackout, and regulate the volume of electricity delivered to end-users. In emergency cases, when a power plant breaks down, for instance, AS providers bear backup plant readily available.

    In a comment, the NGCP said AS are needed to ensure reliability in the operation of the transmission system and, consequently, in the reliability of the electricity supply in the Luzon, Visayas and Mindanao grids.

    “It is the responsibility of the NGCP to adequately serve generation companies, distribution utilities and suppliers requiring transmission service and/or ancillary services through the transmission system,” the grid operator said.

    Lenie Lectura

    She studied at Letran College. Named the Best Telecommunications and Energy reporter by Ejap in the past years; too received an award for best feature story.

    Latest posts by Lenie Lectura (see all)

    Direct Download of over 5500 Certification Exams

    3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Aruba [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Avaya [96 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CA-Technologies [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CheckPoint [41 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
    College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institue [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institute [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DELL [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECCouncil [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    EMC [129 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fortinet [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HP [750 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBM [1532 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Juniper [64 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Medical [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Microsoft [374 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCLEX [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
    OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Oracle [279 Certification Exam(s) ]
    P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Symantec [134 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]

    References :

    Dropmark :
    Wordpress :
    Dropmark-Text :
    Blogspot :
    RSS Feed : :

    Back to Main Page

    Killexams ASC-090 exams | Killexams ASC-090 cert | Pass4Sure ASC-090 questions | Pass4sure ASC-090 | pass-guaratee ASC-090 | best ASC-090 test preparation | best ASC-090 training guides | ASC-090 examcollection | killexams | killexams ASC-090 review | killexams ASC-090 legit | kill ASC-090 example | kill ASC-090 example journalism | kill exams ASC-090 reviews | kill exam ripoff report | review ASC-090 | review ASC-090 quizlet | review ASC-090 login | review ASC-090 archives | review ASC-090 sheet | legitimate ASC-090 | legit ASC-090 | legitimacy ASC-090 | legitimation ASC-090 | legit ASC-090 check | legitimate ASC-090 program | legitimize ASC-090 | legitimate ASC-090 business | legitimate ASC-090 definition | legit ASC-090 site | legit online banking | legit ASC-090 website | legitimacy ASC-090 definition | >pass 4 sure | pass for sure | p4s | pass4sure certification | pass4sure exam | IT certification | IT Exam | ASC-090 material provider | pass4sure login | pass4sure ASC-090 exams | pass4sure ASC-090 reviews | pass4sure aws | pass4sure ASC-090 security | pass4sure cisco | pass4sure coupon | pass4sure ASC-090 dumps | pass4sure cissp | pass4sure ASC-090 braindumps | pass4sure ASC-090 test | pass4sure ASC-090 torrent | pass4sure ASC-090 download | pass4surekey | pass4sure cap | pass4sure free | examsoft | examsoft login | exams | exams free | examsolutions | exams4pilots | examsoft download | exams questions | examslocal | exams practice | | | |


    MORGAN Studio

    is specialized in Architectural visualization , Industrial visualization , 3D Modeling ,3D Animation , Entertainment and Visual Effects .