Exam Questions Updated On :
A2040-403 exam Dumps Source : Assessment: IBM Forms 8.0 - Forms Design and development
Test Code : A2040-403
Test name : Assessment: IBM Forms 8.0 - Forms Design and development
Vendor name : IBM
: 103 existent Questions
it's far virtually first rate luxuriate in to own A2040-403 actual test questions.
I handed this exam with killexams.com and own these days acquired my A2040-403 certificates. I did entire my certifications with killexams.com, so I cant examine what its enjoy to bewitch an exam with/without it. yet, the reality that I preserve coming again for his or her bundles indicates that Im cheerful with this exam solution. i really enjoy being able to exercise on my pc, in theconsolation of my domestic, specifically when the extensive majority of the questions performing at the exam are exactly the identical what you noticed in your trying out engine at domestic. course to killexams.com, I got up to the professionalstage. I am not sure whether or not sick breathe transferring up any time quickly, as I look to breathe contented wherein im. thank you Killexams.
A2040-403 certification exam preparation got to breathe this easy.
Your questions square measure appallingly the identical as existent one. Passed the A2040-403 tests the other day. i would own not done it while not your test homework materials. Various months agene I fizzling that test the essential time I took it. killexams.com and Exam Simulator are a decent thing for me. I finished the test frightfully just this point.
download and attempt out those actual A2040-403 question bank.
I even own seen numerous things publicized adage utilize this and score the exceptional however your items were absolutely high-quality as contrasted with others. I will return quickly to purchase more observe aids. I really needed to bellow a debt of gratitude is in order concerning your astounding A2040-403 test manual. I took the exam this week and completed soundly. Nothing had taught me the thoughts the manner killexams.com Questions & solutions did. I solved 95% questions.
Feeling issue in passing A2040-403 exam? you obtain to breathe kidding!
Just passed the A2040-403 exam with this braindump. I can verify that it is 99% convincing and consists of entire this years updates. I simplest were given 2 query incorrect, so very excited and relieved.
updated and existent examination financial institution today's A2040-403.
When I had taken the selection for going to the exam then I were given a very profitable embolden for my guidance from the killexams.com which gave me the realness and trustworthy practice A2040-403 prep training for the equal. Here, I besides were given the occasion to score myself checked before sentiment assured of performing nicely inside the course of the making ready for A2040-403 and that was a pleasing issue which made me best geared up for the exam which I scored well. Thanks to such matters from the killexams.
can you conform with that every one A2040-403 questions I had own been requested in existent check.
I just required telling you that I own topped in A2040-403 exam. entire the questions on exam table were from killexams. It is said to breathe the genuine helper for me on the A2040-403 exam bench. entire extol of my achievement goes to this guide. This is the actual understanding behind my success. It guided me in the reform course for attempting A2040-403 exam questions. With the embolden of this study stuff I was talented to effort to entire the questions in A2040-403 exam. This study stuff guides a person in the right course and guarantees you 100% accomplishment in exam.
need existent exam questions of A2040-403 exam? download here.
I dont sense on my own a mid tests any longer in light of the fact that i own a stunning observe companion as this killexams.com dumps. i am pretty appreciative to the educators right here for being so first rate and rightly disposed and supporting me in clearing my extraordinarily exam A2040-403. I solved entire questions in exam. This identical path turned into given to me amid my test and it didnt configuration a distinction whether or not it became day or night, entire my questions own been replied.
right here is right source of new dumps, reform answers.
I passed A2040-403 paper Within two weeks,thanks for your excellent QA study materials.Score 96 percent. I am very confident now that I will result better in my remaining 3 Exams and surely employ your practice material and recommend it to my friends. Thank you very much for your noteworthy online exam simulator product.
it's miles incredible to own A2040-403 question bank and study guide.
hello pals! Gotta pass the A2040-403 exam and no time for research Dont worry. i will decipher year cataclysm in case u believe me. I had comparable scenario as time became short. textual content books didnt help. So, I searched for an smooth solution and got one with the killexams. Their questions & answers labored so rightly for me. Helped spotless the principles and mug the hard ones. establish entire questions identical as the manual and scored well. Very helpful stuff, killexams.
down load and attempt out those existent A2040-403 question financial institution.
We entire recognise that clearing the A2040-403 test is a enormous deal. I were given my A2040-403 test cleared that I became so content simply because of killexams.com that gave me 87% marks.
IBM Lotus Wednesday introduced a slew of partners to uphold with its efforts to integrate natural telephony and VoIP with collaboration utility by course of Sametime Unified Telephony Server, which the company stated will ship in July.
IBM's collaboration and voice strategy is to combine the telephony architectures groups already own with Sametime and the leisure of the IBM Lotus collaboration platform, together with Notes/Domino, speedy messaging/presence, gregarious networking, conferencing and messaging utility. The design is to employ open protocols and interfaces.
In his keynote wield Wednesday at the VoiceCon display, Bob Picciano, regular supervisor of IBM collaboration, unveiled the Sametime Unified Telephony Validation application and an inventory of partners.
On the checklist of companions who've validated their wares combine with IBM's open protocols in Sametime Unified Telephony Server (SUT) are Alcatel Lucent, Avaya, Cisco, NEC, Nortel, Mitel and Siemens; media gateway providers Dialogic and web; and better voice high-quality suppliers GN Netcom, Plantronics, Polycom and Psytechnics. Picciano referred to an extra crop of partners can breathe announced within the coming months.
one of the vital partners introduced Wednesday own already been working with IBM on the evolution of Sametime, including Alcatel-Lucent, Avaya, Cisco, Nortel and Siemens.
IBM's integration course is in distinction to ordinary rival Microsoft, which eventually hopes to supplant telephony providers with the aid of re-inventing the PBX in software. And it is different from Cisco, which companions with IBM/Lotus however is taking a greater community strategy to unified communications.
"Our open APIs combine assorted telephony methods, both new VoIP and legacy TDM techniques into the Sametime collaboration atmosphere and industry procedure applications," said Bruce Morse, vice president of UC application for IBM/Lotus.SUT server, unveiled in January, will interpose an structure constructed round two servers that kindhearted a single data center integration factor between the IBM/Lotus ambiance and the telephony world.
SUT's Telephony wield Server offers connections to PBX methods by course of Session Initiation Protocol, and finally in a later edition, to desktop-Supported telephony software interfaces.
The Telephony software server offers an aggregation point for presence facts and APIs for developers building UC-enabled applications.
SUT is a module for the Sametime Server and whereas the July unlock might breathe tagged with the identical eight.0 version number that Sametime has, it can breathe the first unlock of the SUT expertise.
SUT will allow users to score hold of calls by the employ of softphones, and install contact and routing rules in line with vicinity, presence and personal choice. moreover, click-to-name elements let users click on a name and start a voice conversation, IM chat or video convention.
IBM besides announced BM Converged Communications services for Sametime Unified Telephony if you want to provide strategy, evaluation, structure, design, integration and implementation for SUT.
follow John Fontana on Twitter: twitter.com/johnfontana.
This story, "IBM Lining up race at Telephony, VoIP Integration" turned into at the genesis posted with the aid of network World.To touch upon this text and other PCWorld content, consult with their fb page or their Twitter feed.
Researchmoz delivered newest research on "utility Infrastructure Middleware Market Dynamics, trends, Segmentation and occasion assessment 2019-2025 | IBM, Oracle, TIBCO and utility" to its large collection of analysis reports.
This press liberate changed into orginally dispensed by using SBWire
Albany, ny -- (SBWIRE) -- 04/04/2019 -- software Infrastructure Middleware Market file comprises (6 yr Forecast 2019-2025) comprises Overview, classification, industry value, cost, freight and obscene profit. It additionally presents in-intensity insight of the application Infrastructure Middleware trade protecting entire a must own parameters together with, Drivers, Market trends, Market Dynamics, opportunities, competitive landscape, fee and obscene Margin, utility Infrastructure Middleware market share by means of place, New problem Feasibility comparison, evaluation and guidelines on New mission funding.
Get Free PDF For greater Technical Insights @ https://www.researchmoz.us/enquiry.personal home page?class=S&repid=2081251
Middleware is laptop software that provides functions to utility applications beyond these available from the operating equipment. It can breathe described as "application glue".
The growing claim for IoT middleware and the evolving maturity of cloud utility infrastructure are primary factors contributing to the market increase. IBM leads the global software infrastructure and middleware market. Market leaders are losing their share because of the expanding competitors configuration open sources, cloud suppliers, and different challengers. approximately one-third of utility infrastructure and middleware spend comes from minuscule and medium agencies, however they represent well-nigh ninety% of the agencies in many regional markets.
The cloud deployment mode has been expanding its market foundation over the usual on-premise deployment applied sciences with the evolution of cloud infrastructure. modern middleware technological apparatus allow the application to breathe deployed in cloud atmosphere. The contemporaneous cloud utility infrastructure has evolved to present enhanced efficiency and scalability than existing on-premise technologies. The emerging trend towards cloud features and the innovation in internet of issues (IoT) extra assist boost investments in contemporaneous application infrastructure and middleware.
North the united states holds the maximum share of the present application infrastructure and middleware market. Housing many market giants in quite a few industrial verticals, North the us has been dominating the market and is expected to continue its domination right through the forecast period. North the us is experiencing a as soon as-in-a-decade shift on the technological entrance. As hybrid IT has been evolving, most agencies are migrating their infrastructure to the cloud and some continue to maintain crucial services onsite. over the past few years, the variety of business-crucial functions own increased drastically. This has translated into more claim for top-performing solutions as conclusion users prognosticate a seamless adventure.
This document focuses on the global application Infrastructure Middleware popularity, future forecast, growth chance, key market and key avid gamers. The resolve objectives are to current the application Infrastructure Middleware development in u.s., Europe and China.
the key avid gamers lined during this studyIBMOracleTIBCO SoftwareSalesforce.comSAP SEMicrosoftSoftware AGRed HatFujitsuCisco SystemsInformaticaUnisys company
Market section by course of type, the product can breathe fracture up intoCloudOn-premise
Market section by course of application, split intoBFSIIT & TelecommunicationHealthcareRetailGovernmentOthers
vicinity an Enquiry to Their trade knowledgeable @ https://www.researchmoz.us/enquiry.personal home page?classification=E&repid=2081251
Market segment by means of areas/nations, this file coversUnited StatesEuropeChinaJapanSoutheast AsiaIndiaCentral & South the usa
The examine targets of this document are:to research international software Infrastructure Middleware fame, future forecast, boom probability, key market and key gamers.To latest the software Infrastructure Middleware construction in u.s., Europe and China.To strategically profile the key avid gamers and comprehensively resolve their construction design and strategies.To outline, record and forecast the market by using product class, market and key regions.
About ResearchMozResearchMoz is the one cease on-line vacation spot to locate and buy market research studies & industry evaluation. They fulfill your entire research wants spanning throughout industry verticals with their massive assortment of market research experiences. They deliver their capabilities to entire sizes of companies and across entire trade verticals and markets. Their analysis Coordinators own in-depth expertise of reviews as well as publishers and should assist you in making an advised resolution via providing you with independent and abysmal insights on which studies will meet your wants at the premier fee.
For more suggestions Kindly Contact:
ResearchMoz international Pvt. Ltd.
Mr. NachiketState Tower,90 status road,Suite seven hundred,Albany enormous apple - 12207United StatesEmail: email@example.comWebsite @ http://www.researchmoz.us/comply with us on LinkedIn @ http://bit.ly/1TBmnVGFollow us on Blogger @ http://summaryofmarketresearchreports.blogspot.in/
For extra recommendation on this press free up consult with: http://www.sbwire.com/press-releases/utility-infrastructure-middleware-market-dynamics-traits-segmentation-and-possibility-evaluation-2019-2025-ibm-oracle-tibco-and-software-1188814.htm
IBM's CEO, Ginny Rometty. Reuters in the world of speech focus application, 5.1% is nature of a magic number.
agencies that can create utility with error quotes falling in that ballpark are basically matching the capabilities of humans, who leave out roughly 5% of the phrases in a given conversation.
On March 7, IBM introduced it had rotate into the first to home in on that benchmark, having performed a fee of 5.5%. The leap forward signals a large win for synthetic intelligence that may eventually live in smartphones and voice assistants enjoy Siri, Alexa, and Google Assistant.
"The potential to admire speech in addition to people result is a continuing problem, when you esteem that human speech, especially entire the course through spontaneous conversation, is extremely advanced," Julia Hirschberg, a professor of desktop science at Columbia university, advised IBM in an announcement.
Over the ultimate 12 months, IBM has worked to Destroy its former listing of 6.9%. in an effort to lop the error fee by course of essentially 1.5 percent elements, the enterprise great-tuned aspects of its acoustics, which pick on up different sorts of speech.
although experts enjoy Hirschberg bellow machines silent can't pick on up sure nuances of speech, comparable to tone and metaphor, application has made considerable advances in rote transcription. And the exams don't look to breathe feeding machines softballs: within the latest evaluation, application had to determine what people own been announcing in usual contexts, equivalent to buying a car, which own been plagued by stutters, um s, and mumbling.
IBM says the 5.5% declare to fame is in particular valuable in an industry that often cannot conform what humans are in a position to.
"Others in the industry are chasing this milestone alongside us, and a few own these days claimed accomplishing 5.9 p.c as corresponding to human parity," wrote IBM research scientist George Saon.
In 2016, researchers from Microsoft introduced they'd developed a pc that might truly beat people at realizing dialog. The software had an error expense of 6.three%, neatly above IBM's new record.
but given the 5.1% even IBM has set for itself, Saon continued, "we're not popping the champagne yet."
Unquestionably it is hard assignment to pick dependable certification questions/answers assets regarding review, reputation and validity since individuals score sham because of picking incorrectly benefit. Killexams.com ensure to serve its customers best to its assets concerning exam dumps update and validity. The vast majority of other's sham report dissension customers near to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams joyfully and effortlessly. They never trade off on their review, reputation and character on the grounds that killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams customer certainty is imperative to us. Uniquely they deal with killexams.com review, killexams.com reputation, killexams.com sham report objection, killexams.com trust, killexams.com validity, killexams.com report and killexams.com scam. On the off desultory that you observe any unfounded report posted by their rivals with the name killexams sham report grievance web, killexams.com sham report, killexams.com scam, killexams.com protest or something enjoy this, simply recollect there are constantly horrible individuals harming reputation of profitable administrations because of their advantages. There are a huge number of fulfilled clients that pass their exams utilizing killexams.com brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams hone questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit Killexams.com, their specimen questions and test brain dumps, their exam simulator and you will realize that killexams.com is the best brain dumps site.
MOVF test prep | HP0-812 free pdf | P2070-053 brain dumps | 1Z0-511 mock exam | C9510-401 existent questions | ISSAP practice test | FD0-210 questions and answers | 1Z0-883 free pdf download | A2010-573 examcollection | LX0-104 exam prep | HP2-E14 free pdf | MB2-715 cheat sheets | 922-072 cram | 000-671 braindumps | 9A0-318 pdf download | 920-325 braindumps | 920-803 study guide | ICBB existent questions | 3202 practice test | A2010-579 exam prep |
Get high marks in A2040-403 exam with these dumps
killexams.com IBM Certification study guides are setup by IT professionals. Lots of students own been complaining that there are too many questions in so many practice exams and study guides, and they are just tired to afford any more. Seeing killexams.com experts drudgery out this comprehensive version while silent guarantee that entire the scholarship is covered after abysmal research and analysis. Everything is to configuration convenience for candidates on their road to certification.
We are excited with their supporting people pass the A2040-403 exam in their first attempt. Their prosperity quotes within the preceding 2 years had been utterly glorious, as a consequence of their cheerful shoppers presently able to impel their professions within the speedy tune. killexams.com is the principle convoke amongst IT specialists, notably people who hoping to scale the chain of command stages speedier in their respective associations. killexams.com Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as below; WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for entire tests on web site PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders over $69 DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders additional than $99 SEPSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for entire Orders You ought to score the foremost updated IBM A2040-403 Braindumps with the proper answers, that are ready by killexams.com professionals, permitting the candidates to understand information regarding their A2040-403 exam course within the most, you will not realize A2040-403 product of such character anyplace within the market. Their IBM A2040-403 brain Dumps are given to candidates to score 100% in their test. Their IBM A2040-403 exam dumps are latest within the market, providing you with an occasion to organize for your A2040-403 exam within the right means.
if you are hunting down A2040-403 practice Test containing existent Test Questions, you're at precise locale. killexams.com own accumulated database of questions from Actual Exams keeping up as a top priority the quit objective to empower you to devise and pass your exam on the essential endeavor. entire instructing materials at the site are Up To Date and verified by course for their pros.
killexams.com give latest and updated Pass4sure practice Test with Actual Exam Questions and Answers for new syllabus of IBM A2040-403 Exam. practice their existent Questions and Answers to better your insight and pass your exam with high Marks. They guarantee your prosperity inside the Test Center, securing each one of the subjects of exam and enhance your scholarship of the A2040-403 exam. Pass with no uncertainty with their actual questions.
Our A2040-403 Exam PDF consolidates Complete Pool of Questions and Answers and Dumps verified and certified together with references and clarifications (inmaterial). Their goal to collect the Questions and Answers isn't essentially to pass the exam at first endeavor however Really better Your scholarship roughly the A2040-403 exam references.
A2040-403 exam Questions and Answers are Printable in high character Study guide that you can download for your Computer or some unique machine and begin putting in your A2040-403 exam. Print Complete A2040-403 Study Guide, pass on with you while you are at Vacations or Traveling and luxuriate in your Exam Prep. You can score to updated A2040-403 Exam out of your online record at whatever point.
killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017: 60% Discount Coupon for entire exams on website
PROF17: 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17: 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
DECSPECIAL: 10% Special Discount Coupon for entire Orders
Download your Assessment: IBM Forms 8.0 - Forms Design and development Study guide specifically after purchasing and Start Preparing Your Exam Prep right Now!
A2040-403 Practice Test | A2040-403 examcollection | A2040-403 VCE | A2040-403 study guide | A2040-403 practice exam | A2040-403 cram
Killexams 3103 existent questions | Killexams 000-M93 mock exam | Killexams 920-505 practice Test | Killexams 190-533 exam prep | Killexams 000-748 existent questions | Killexams 00M-241 bootcamp | Killexams 1Z0-434 study guide | Killexams CAT-080 sample test | Killexams HP2-Z31 questions answers | Killexams HPE0-S37 free pdf | Killexams 000-156 dumps | Killexams HP0-787 exam prep | Killexams 000-M236 braindumps | Killexams HP0-M58 brain dumps | Killexams Series-7 study guide | Killexams HP2-N35 questions and answers | Killexams 000-275 dump | Killexams C2010-598 practice test | Killexams 000-746 questions and answers | Killexams LOT-950 practice exam |
Killexams LOT-916 free pdf | Killexams ICTS practice questions | Killexams HP2-E28 practice Test | Killexams HP2-Q01 practice test | Killexams A2040-986 braindumps | Killexams 3X0-204 sample test | Killexams COG-642 free pdf | Killexams NBCC-NCC test prep | Killexams ECDL-ADVANCED practice exam | Killexams 6202-1 pdf download | Killexams MOPF existent questions | Killexams ST0-91W practice questions | Killexams BCP-240 braindumps | Killexams 1T6-215 practice test | Killexams 190-833 study guide | Killexams P9530-039 mock exam | Killexams HH0-200 brain dumps | Killexams HP2-B101 examcollection | Killexams SD0-401 practice test | Killexams 640-803 free pdf download |
(MENAFN - GlobeNewsWire - Nasdaq) itemprop="articleBody">VANCOUVER, British Columbia and JOHANNESBURG, South Africa, April 12, 2019 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (PTM:TSX; PLG:NYSE American) ('Platinum Group' 'PTM' or the 'Company') reports the Company's financial results for the six months ended February 28, 2019 and provides a summary of recent events and outlook. For details of the condensed consolidated interim financial statements for the six months ended February 28, 2019 (the 'Financial Statements') and Management's Discussion and Analysis for the six months ended February 28, 2019 tickle observe the Company's filings on SEDAR ( www.sedar.com ) or on EDGAR ( www.sec.gov ). Shareholders are encouraged to visit the Company's website at www.platinumgroupmetals.net . Shareholders may receive a hard copy of the complete financial Statements from the Company free of freight upon request.
All amounts herein are reported in United States dollars ('USD') unless otherwise specified. The Company holds cash in Canadian dollars, United States dollars and South African Rand. Changes in exchange rates may create variances in the cash holdings or results reported.The Company is focused on completing a Definitive Feasibility Study ('DFS') for the large scale, palladium paramount and bulk mineable Waterberg Project in South Africa (the 'Waterberg Project'). The strong expense outlook for palladium along with DFS optimization drudgery own helped the Company to better estimate the potential mine scale for the Waterberg Project. Optimization drudgery has determined that higher extraction rates for mineralized material are achievable by using tailings as backfill. observe more details below in 'Outlook'.
A technical committee of Waterberg JV Resources Pty Ltd. ('Waterberg JV Co.') is overseeing the DFS with participation from entire partners. A formal Mining right Application has been filed and community consultation is ongoing. Power and water planning for the project is advancing well including drudgery under a regional water co-operation agreement with the Capricorn Municipality and engineering and permitting drudgery with power utility Eskom.Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd. ('Implats') made a strategic investment of $30.0 million in November 2017 to purchase a 15% stake in the Waterberg Project, from which the Company received $17.2 million for its 8.6% project interest sold. Implats may elect to increase its stake to 50.01% by additional share purchases from Japan Oil, Gas and Metals National Corporation ('JOGMEC') for an amount of $34.8 million and a commitment to spend $130 million for development of the Waterberg Project. Implats will besides own a right of first refusal to smelt and refine Waterberg Project concentrate.
Recent EventsPrior to April 2, 2019 common share purchase warrants representing 968,670 shares at a expense of $1.70 each were exercised by holders. Proceeds to the Company totalled $1,646,739. The Company's two largest shareholders exercised approximately 91% of these warrants.
On March 7, 2019, the Company reported the transfer of a 9.755% interest in Waterberg JV Co. to Hanwa Co. Ltd. ('Hanwa') by JOGMEC. Prior to the transfer JOGMEC held a 21.95% interest in the Waterberg Project. Hanwa was the successful bidder in a public tender process for Japanese companies conducted by JOGMEC. Hanwa is a leading Japanese trading company supplying a broad spectrum of products, including steel, non-ferrous metals, metals and alloys, food, petroleum, chemicals, machinery, lumber and many other items, to a diverse orbit of global customers.On January 11, 2019, the Company paid $8.0 million to Liberty Metals & Mining Holdings, LLC ('LMM') in partial settlement of a secured loan facility due to LMM. The amount paid represented net proceeds from the sale of 4.52 million common shares of JSE listed Royal Bafokeng Platinum Ltd. received by the Company in April 2018 upon completion of stage two of the sale of the Maseve Mine.
On November 16, 2018, the Company filed a National Instrument 43-101 technical report for an updated independent mineral resource estimate for the Waterberg Project. The report, entitled 'Technical Report on the Mineral Resource Update for the Waterberg Project Located in the Bushveld Igneous Complex, South Africa' is dated October 22, 2018 (with the efficacious date of the mineral resources being September 27, 2018) and was prepared by Charles J Muller, B. Sc. (Hons) (Geology), Pr. Sci. Nat., of CJM Consulting (Pty) Ltd. A copy of the report can breathe establish at www.sedar.com , at www.sec.gov and on the Company's website.On October 25, 2018, the Company published an updated independent mineral resource estimate for the Waterberg Project on a 100% basis totalling 26.34 million ounces of platinum, palladium, rhodium and gold (together known as '4E') (242.5 million tonnes at 3.38 g/t 4E comprised of 63.04% palladium, 29.16% platinum, 6.37% gold and 1.43% rhodium), with 6.26 million 4E ounces recognized in the higher assurance Measured category. The updated resource assessment forms the basis for mine design, scheduling and capital cost estimation as share of the DFS. The Waterberg deposit is dominated by palladium and besides contains copper and nickel. Inferred mineral resources are estimated at 7.0 million 4E ounces (66.67 million tonnes at 3.26 g/t 4E). The T zone Measured and Indicated mineral resources increased in grade from 3.88 g/t 4E in 2016 to 4.51 g/t 4E in 2018. entire of the preceding was estimated at a 2.5 g/t 4E cut-off grade, which is the preferred scenario for the project.
On October 10, 2018, the Company announced that a recent Mining right Application for the Waterberg Project had been accepted by South Africa's Department of Mineral Resources. The application is supported by the Company and entire of the Waterberg Project partners including Implats, JOGMEC and Mnombo Wethu Consultants (Pty) Ltd. The process of consultation under the Mineral and Petroleum Resources development Act, 2002 and current Environmental Assessment regulations has commenced. Many public meetings own already been completed. Significant feedback from the meetings has been considered in the DFS designs. Local training and employment are key components of the project to maximize the value of the project for entire stakeholders.
Results For The Six Months Ended February 28, 2019During the six months ended February 28, 2019 the Company incurred a net loss of $9.5 million (February 28, 2018 – net loss of $26.9 million). common and administrative expenses during the six-month term were $2.9 million (February 28, 2018 - $3.1 million), losses on foreign exchange were $0.6 million (February 28, 2018 – $3.2 million) due to the US Dollar increasing in value relative to the Company's functional currency of the Canadian Dollar.
At February 28, 2019, finance income consisting of interest earned and property rental fees in the term amounted to $0.3 million (February 28, 2018 - $0.4 million), while a gain on marketable securities of $0.6 million was recognized in the current term (February 28, 2018 - $Nil). Loss per share for the term amounted to $0.32 as compared to a loss of $1.65 per share for the six months ended February 28, 2018.Accounts receivable at February 28, 2019 totalled $0.2 million (February 28, 2018 - $2.8 million) while accounts payable and accrued liabilities amounted to $3.7 million (February 28, 2018 - $10.8 million). Accounts receivable were comprised of mainly of amounts receivable for value added taxes repayable to the Company in South Africa and amounts due from joint venture partners and related parties. Accounts payable at February 28, 2019 related mostly to ongoing drudgery at the Waterberg Project with the dwindle as compared to February 28, 2018 being primarily due to settlement of payables related to mine closure costs.
Total expenditures on the Waterberg Project, before partner reimbursements, for the six-month term were approximately $5.1 million (February 28, 2018 - $3.9 million). At February 28, 2019, $36 million in accumulated net costs had been capitalized to the Waterberg Project. Total expenditures by entire parties on the property since inception are approximately $67 million.For more information on mineral properties, observe Note 4 of the financial Statements.
OutlookThe Company's key industry objective is to promote the Waterberg Project to development. The Waterberg project is dominated by palladium at a time when palladium supply is estimated to breathe in deficit. Mines with palladium as their primary economic mineral are rare.Waterberg JV Co. is advancing the Waterberg Project to completion of a DFS. The DFS is being managed by Platinum Group and a technical committee with comprehensive input at entire levels from the Waterberg Project partners.
The positive long-term market outlook for platinum group elements and the value increase created by higher extraction per mining even supports the DFS design change to utilize backfill. Backfill utilizes tailings and concrete to fill in mined out stopes to allow the extraction of mineralized material that would otherwise breathe left as uphold pillars. The Company expects that the mining extraction of pillars in the DFS versus the PFS design will own a positive result on tonnes and ounces for reserves. Ancillary benefits comprehend a reduced tailings foot print, as tailings are Put underground in backfill, and increased safety and certainty on the production profile. Two twin declines systems are now planned in the working DFS design rather than three in the PFS design.The DFS owner's team, including representatives from Impala Platinum, own visited Canadian bulk underground mining operations and own worked closely with the independent mining engineering team at Stantec.
As a result of the DFS design optimization described above, additional time and budget are required to complete the DFS. Waterberg JV Co. has approved a change order for Rand 21.5 million (approximately $1.51 million) to fund the required work. The DFS is now targeted for completion in August 2019. The additional time and investment are warranted to achieve the production profile improvements in the DFS that are indicated by the design optimizations described above.An environmental authorization and mining right application are besides being advanced. Public consultation has occurred in a positive climate of mutual respect. Local involvement and personnel training are a key share of the design for a modern, safe, accountable mine operating at world class standards. The DFS team is working with NORCAT, a Sudbury, Canada based global training specialist, to incorporate local skills development into the DFS.
We are besides pleased to report advancement on their co-operation agreement with the Capricorn Municipality for the supply of water to the project and planned increases in water delivery to the local community as a component of the mine plan.The Waterberg JV Co. team is working very well together with value-add contributions coming from entire partners, including senior team members from Impala working with Platinum Group Metals as Manager of the DFS. They recognize forward to the finalization of the DFS.
In the near term, the Company's liquidity will breathe constrained until financing has been obtained to repay and discharge remaining amounts of secured debt and for working capital purposes. The Company remains focussed on completing the Waterberg DFS. At the identical time the Company has started reviewing several new industry opportunities focused on platinum group component metals, including extraction opportunities and potential new uses. The Company will continue to drudgery closely with its major shareholders and lenders. The Company continues to actively assess corporate and strategic alternatives with advisor BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc.
Qualified PersonR. Michael Jones, P.Eng., the Company's President, Chief Executive Officer and a shareholder of the Company, is a non-independent qualified person as defined in National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects and is accountable for preparing the technical information contained in this tidings release. He has verified the data by reviewing the circumstantial information of the geological and engineering staff and independent qualified person reports as well as visiting the Waterberg Project site regularly.
About Platinum Group Metals Ltd.Platinum Group is the operator of the Waterberg Project, a bulk mineable underground palladium deposit in northern South Africa. Waterberg was discovered by the Company and has the potential to breathe a low-cost producer of palladium, platinum, rhodium and gold.
On behalf of the Board ofPlatinum Group Metals Ltd.Frank R. HallamCFO, Corporate Secretary and Director
For further information contact:R. Michael Jones, Presidentor Kris Begic, VP, Corporate DevelopmentPlatinum Group Metals Ltd., VancouverTel: (604) 899-5450 / Toll Free: (866) 899-5450www.platinumgroupmetals.netDisclosure
The Toronto Stock Exchange and the NYSE American own not reviewed and result not accept responsibility for the accuracy or adequacy of this tidings release, which has been prepared by management.This press release contains forward-looking information within the acceptation of Canadian securities laws and forward-looking statements within the acceptation of U.S. securities laws (collectively 'forward-looking statements'). Forward-looking statements are typically identified by words such as: believe, expect, anticipate, intend, estimate, plans, postulate and similar expressions, or are those, which, by their nature, advert to future events. entire statements that are not statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements in this press release include, without limitation, statements regarding the completion of a DFS by approximately July 31, 2019; Waterberg Project's potential to breathe a bulk mineable, low cost, dominantly palladium mine producing platinum and palladium based on a fully mechanized mine plan; the potential for the Company to obtain financing to repay and discharge remaining amounts of secured debt and for working capital purposes; new industry opportunities; and corporate and strategic alternatives. Mineral resource and reserve estimates are besides forward-looking statements because such estimates involve estimates of mineralization that may breathe encountered in the future if a production determination is made, as well as estimates of future costs and values. Although the Company believes the forward-looking statements in this press release are reasonable, it can give no assurance that the expectations and assumptions in such statements will prove to breathe correct. The Company cautions investors that any forward-looking statements by the Company are not guarantees of future results or performance and that actual results may vary materially from those in forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including the Company's inability to generate sufficient cash flux or raise sufficient additional capital to configuration payment on its indebtedness, and to comply with the terms of such indebtedness; additional financing requirements; the Company's credit facility (the 'LMM Facility') with Liberty Metals & Mining Holdings, LLC ('LMM') is, and any new indebtedness may be, secured and the Company has pledged its shares of Platinum Group Metals (RSA) Proprietary Limited ('PTM RSA'), and PTM RSA has pledged its shares of Waterberg JV Resources (Pty) Limited ('Waterberg JV Co.') to Liberty Metals & Mining Holdings, LLC, a subsidiary of LMM, under the LMM Facility, which potentially could result in the loss of the Company's interest in PTM RSA and the Waterberg Project in the event of a default under the LMM Facility or any new secured indebtedness; the Company's history of losses and negative cash flow; the Company's competence to continue as a going concern; the Company's properties may not breathe brought into a status of commercial production; uncertainty of estimated production, development plans and cost estimates for the Waterberg Project; discrepancies between actual and estimated mineral reserves and mineral resources, between actual and estimated development and operating costs, between actual and estimated metallurgical recoveries and between estimated and actual production; fluctuations in the relative values of the U.S. Dollar, the Rand and the Canadian Dollar; volatility in metals prices; the failure of the Company or the other shareholders to fund their pro rata share of funding obligations for the Waterberg Project; any disputes or disagreements with the other shareholders of Waterberg JV Co., Mnombo Wethu Consultants (Pty) Ltd. or Maseve; completion of a DFS for the Waterberg Project is matter to economic analysis requirements; the competence of the Company to retain its key management employees and skilled and experienced personnel; conflicts of interest; litigation or other administrative proceedings brought against the Company; actual or alleged breaches of governance processes or instances of fraud, bribery or corruption; the Company may become matter to the U.S. Investment Company Act; exploration, development and mining risks and the inherently risky nature of the mining industry, and the risk of inadequate insurance or inability to obtain insurance to cover these risks and other risks and uncertainties; property and mineral title risks including defective title to mineral claims or property; changes in national and local government legislation, taxation, controls, regulations and political or economic developments in Canada and South Africa; apparatus shortages and the competence of the Company to acquire necessary access rights and infrastructure for its mineral properties; environmental regulations and the competence to obtain and maintain necessary permits, including environmental authorizations and water employ licences; extreme competition in the mineral exploration industry; delays in obtaining, or a failure to obtain, permits necessary for current or future operations or failures to comply with the terms of such permits; risks of doing industry in South Africa, including but not limited to, labour, economic and political instability and potential changes to and failures to comply with legislation; the Company's common shares may breathe delisted from the NYSE American or the TSX if it cannot maintain or regain compliance with the applicable listing requirements; and other risk factors described in the Company's most recent configuration 20-F annual report, annual information configuration and other filings with the SEC and Canadian securities regulators, which may breathe viewed at www.sec.gov and www.sedar.com, respectively. Proposed changes in the mineral law in South Africa if implemented as proposed would own a material adverse result on the Company's industry and potential interest in projects. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made and, except as may breathe required by applicable securities laws, the Company disclaims any intent or obligation to update any forward- looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or results or otherwise.
Estimates of mineralization and other technical information included herein own been prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ('NI 43-101'). The definitions of proven and probable reserves used in NI 43-101 vary from the definitions in SEC Industry guide 7. Under SEC Industry guide 7 standards, a 'final' or 'bankable' feasibility study is required to report reserves, the three-year historical uninterested expense is used in any reserve or cash flux analysis to designate reserves and the primary environmental analysis or report must breathe filed with the preempt governmental authority. As a result, the reserves reported by the Company in accordance with NI 43-101 may not qualify as 'reserves' under SEC Industry guide 7. In addition, the terms 'mineral resource' and 'measured mineral resource' are defined in and required to breathe disclosed by NI 43-101; however, these terms are not defined terms under SEC Industry guide 7 and historically own not been permitted to breathe used in reports and registration statements filed with the SEC pursuant to SEC Industry guide 7. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves result not own demonstrated economic viability. Investors are cautioned not to assume that any share or entire of the mineral deposits in these categories will ever breathe converted into reserves. Accordingly, descriptions of the Company's mineral deposits in this press release may not breathe comparable to similar information made public by U.S. companies matter to the reporting and disclosure requirements of SEC Industry guide 7.
(EDGAR Online via COMTEX) -- particular 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF financial CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. ("Maxim Integrated" or the "Company" and besides referred to as "we," "our" or "us") disclaims any duty to and undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information relating to existing conditions, future events or otherwise or to release publicly the results of any future revisions it may configuration to forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the episode of unanticipated events, except as required by federal securities laws. Readers are cautioned not to status undue reliance on such statements, which discourse only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on configuration 10-Q. Readers should carefully review future reports and documents that the Company files with or furnishes to the SEC from time to time, such as its Annual Reports on configuration 10-K, its Quarterly Reports on configuration 10-Q, and any Current Reports on configuration 8-K.
Overview of Business
Maxim Integrated is incorporated in the status of Delaware. Maxim Integrated designs, develops, manufactures and markets a broad orbit of linear and mixed-signal integrated circuits, commonly referred to as analog circuits, for a large number of geographically diverse customers. They besides provide a orbit of high-frequency process technologies and capabilities that can breathe used in custom designs. The analog market is fragmented and characterized by many diverse applications, a noteworthy number of product variations and, with respect to many circuit types, relatively long product life cycles. They are a global company with a wafer manufacturing facility in the U.S., testing facilities in the Philippines and Thailand, and sales and circuit design offices around the world. They besides utilize third party foundries for manufacturing of their products. The major end-markets in which their products are sold are the Automotive, Communications and Data Center, Computing, Consumer and Industrial markets.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The methods, estimates, and judgments they employ in applying their most faultfinding accounting policies own a significant repercussion on the results they report in their financial statements. The Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") has defined the most faultfinding accounting policies as the ones that are most valuable to the presentation of their financial condition and results of operations, and that require us to configuration their most difficult and subjective accounting judgments, often as a result of the necessity to configuration estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain. Based on this definition, their most faultfinding accounting policies comprehend revenue recognition, which impacts the recording of net revenues; valuation of inventories, which impacts costs of goods sold and obscene margins; the assessment of recoverability of long-lived assets, which impacts impairment of long-lived assets; assessment of recoverability of intangible assets and goodwill, which impacts impairment of goodwill and intangible assets; accounting for income taxes, which
impacts the income tax provision; and assessment of litigation and contingencies, which impacts charges recorded in cost of goods sold, selling, common and administrative expenses and income taxes. These policies and the estimates and judgments involved are discussed further in the Management's Discussion and Analysis of financial Condition in their Annual Report on configuration 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018. They own other significant accounting policies that either result not generally require estimates and judgments that are as difficult or subjective, or it is less likely that such accounting policies would own a material repercussion on their reported results of operations for a given period.
Except for the accounting policies and estimates outlined under share I, particular 1. financial Statements - Note 2, there own been no material changes during the six months ended December 29, 2018 to the items that they disclosed as their faultfinding accounting policies and estimates in Management's Discussion and Analysis of financial Condition and Results of Operations in their Annual Report on configuration 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018.RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The following table sets forth sure Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income data expressed as a percentage of net revenues for the periods indicated: Three Months Ended Six Months Ended December 29, December 30, December 29, December 30, 2018 2017 2018 2017 Net revenues 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % Cost of goods sold 35.3 % 34.2 % 33.9 % 34.6 % obscene margin 64.7 % 65.8 % 66.1 % 65.4 % Operating expenses: Research and development 19.1 % 18.6 % 18.3 % 18.7 % Selling, common and administrative 13.5 % 13.7 % 13.1 % 13.3 % Intangible asset amortization 0.1 % 0.2 % 0.1 % 0.2 % Impairment of long-lived assets 0.1 % 0.1 % 0.1 % 0.1 % Severance and restructuring expenses 0.2 % 1.0 % 0.2 % 1.0 % Other operating expenses (income), net - % (0.2 )% - % (0.2 )% Total operating expenses 33.0 % 33.5 % 31.8 % 33.1 % Operating income (loss) 31.6 % 32.3 % 34.3 % 32.2 % Interest and other income (expense), net 0.1 % (0.5 )% - % (0.6 )% Income before provision for income taxes 31.7 % 31.8 % 34.3 % 31.6 % Income tax provision (benefit) 8.8 % 43.8 % 7.2 % 25.0 % Net income (loss) 22.9 % (12.0 )% 27.1 % 6.6 %
The following table shows stock-based compensation included in the components of the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income reported above as a percentage of net revenues for the periods indicated:Three Months Ended Six Months Ended December 29, December 30, December 29, December 30, 2018 2017 2018 2017 Cost of goods sold 0.4 % 0.4 % 0.4 % 0.4 % Research and development 1.7 % 1.6 % 1.6 % 1.5 % Selling, common and administrative 1.6 % 1.4 % 1.5 % 1.3 % 3.7 % 3.4 % 3.5 % 3.2 %
Net revenues were $576.9 million and $622.6 million for the three months ended December 29, 2018 and December 30, 2017, respectively. Revenue from industrial products are down by 14%, mainly due to a decline in shipments of control and automation products. Revenue from communications and data center products are down by 20%, due to generally lower shipments of server, basestation and data center products. Revenue from automotive products are up by 3%, driven by higher claim for auto powertrain, and auto safety and security products. In addition, the dwindle in revenue was partially driven by a one-time incremental $22.0 million of revenue recognized as a result of the sell-in accounting revenue transition during the second quarter of fiscal 2018. Also, the dwindle in revenue was partially driven by the 13-week second quarter of fiscal year 2019 compared to the 14-week second quarter of fiscal year 2018.
Net revenues were $1,215.4 million and $1,198.3 million for the six months ended December 29, 2018 and December 30, 2017, respectively. Revenue from automotive products are up by 8%, driven by higher claim for auto powertrain, and auto safety and security products. Revenue from consumer products are up by 7%, driven by an overall higher claim for cell phones, handheld computers, and wearable consumer products. Revenue from communications and data center products are down by 7% due to generally lower shipments of server and basestation products.
During the three months ended December 29, 2018 and December 30, 2017, approximately 89% and 87% of net revenues, respectively, were derived from customers outside of the United States. While less than 1.0% of their sales are denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars, they enter into foreign currency forward contracts to mitigate their risks on hard commitments and net monetary assets denominated in foreign currencies. The repercussion of changes in foreign exchange rates on their revenue and results of operations for the three months ended December 29, 2018 and December 30, 2017 was immaterial.
Our obscene margin percentages were 64.7% and 65.8% for the three months ended December 29, 2018 and December 30, 2017, respectively. Their obscene margin decreased by 1.1 percentage points, due to higher inventory reserves.
Our obscene margin percentages were 66.1% and 65.4% for the six months ended December 29, 2018 and December 30, 2017, respectively. Their obscene margin increased by 0.7 percentage points, due to lower intangible amortization, and sure one-time events, partially offset by higher inventory reserves.
Research and Development
Research and development expenses were $110.3 million and $115.9 million for the three months ended December 29, 2018 and December 30, 2017, respectively, which represented 19.1% and 18.6% of net revenues for each respective period. The $5.6 million dwindle was due to lower salaries and related personnel expenses.
Research and development expenses were $223.0 million and $224.5 million for the six months ended December 29, 2018 and December 30, 2017, respectively, which represented 18.3% and 18.7% of net revenues for each respective period. The $1.5 million dwindle was due to lower salaries and related personnel expenses.
Selling, common and Administrative
Selling, common and administrative expenses were $77.9 million and $85.3 million for the three months ended December 29, 2018 and December 30, 2017, respectively, which represented 13.5% and 13.7% of net revenues for each respective period. The $7.5 million dwindle was due to lower salaries and related personnel expenses, as well as lower legal expenses.
Selling, common and administrative expenses were $159.4 million and $159.0 million for the six months ended December 29, 2018 and December 30, 2017, respectively, which represented 13.1% and 13.3% of net revenues for each respective period. Selling, common and administrative expenses remained roughly flat year-over-year.
Severance and Restructuring Expenses
Severance and restructuring expenses were $1.2 million and $6.5 million for the three months ended December 29, 2018 and December 30, 2017, respectively, which represented 0.2% and 1.0% of net revenues for each respective period. The $5.3 million dwindle was primarily due to a dwindle in restructuring activities.
Severance and restructuring expenses were $2.2 million and $12.0 million for the six months ended December 29, 2018 and December 30, 2017, respectively, which represented 0.2% and 1.0% of net revenues for each respective period. The $9.8 million dwindle was primarily due to a dwindle in restructuring activities.
Provision for Income Taxes
In the three and six months ended December 29, 2018, the Company recorded an income tax provision of $50.8 million and $87.0 million, respectively, compared to $272.9 million and $299.4 million for the three and six months ended December 30, 2017, respectively. The Company's efficacious tax rate for the three and six months ended December 29, 2018 was 27.8% and 20.9%, respectively, compared to 137.9% and 79.0% for the three and six months ended December 30, 2017, respectively.
On December 22, 2017 legislation, commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "Act"), was enacted. The Act included a one-time tax on accumulated unremitted earnings of their foreign subsidiaries ("Transition Tax"). SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 allowed the employ of provisional amounts (reasonable estimates) if accounting for the income tax effects of the Act was not completed. Provisional amounts must breathe adjusted within a one-year measurement term from the enactment date of the Act. In the second quarter of fiscal year 2018, the Company recorded a discrete $236.9 million provisional Transition Tax charge. During the measurement term the Company gathered additional information and analyzed available guidance to more precisely compute
the amount of the Transition Tax. In the second quarter of fiscal year 2019, the Company completed this drudgery and recorded a discrete $22.1 million measurement term adjustment for the Transition Tax, which increased the Company's efficacious tax rate for the three and six months ended December 29, 2018 by 12.1% and 5.3%, respectively. As of the terminate of the second quarter of fiscal year 2019, the accounting for income tax effects of the Act has been completed.
The Act reduced the federal statutory tax rate from 35% to 21%, efficacious January 1, 2018, which resulted in a fiscal year 2018 federal statutory tax rate of 28.1% for the Company (average of a 35% rate for the first half of fiscal year 2018 and a 21% rate for the second half of fiscal year 2018). The Company's federal statutory tax rate for fiscal year 2019 is 21%. In the second quarter of fiscal year 2018, the Company recorded a $13.7 million discrete freight to remeasure deferred tax assets and liabilities as of the enactment date of the Act to reflect the federal statutory tax rate reductions.
The Act included Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income ("GILTI") provisions, which repercussion the Company in fiscal year 2019. The GILTI provisions effectively matter income earned by the Company's foreign subsidiaries to current U.S. tax at a rate of 10.5%, less foreign tax credits. Under U.S. GAAP the Company can configuration an accounting policy election to recognize deferred taxes for temporary differences expected to repercussion GILTI in future years or provide for tax expense related to GILTI in the year the tax is incurred as a term expense. The Company has elected to handle tax generated by the GILTI provisions as a term expense.
The Company's federal statutory tax rate for fiscal year 2019 is 21%. The Company's efficacious tax rate for the three months ended December 29, 2018 was higher than the statutory rate primarily due to a $22.1 million discrete freight for the Transition Tax, tax generated by the GILTI provisions, and a $4.9 million discrete freight for interest accruals for unrecognized tax benefits, partially offset by earnings of foreign subsidiaries, generated primarily by the Company's international operations managed in Ireland, that were taxed at lower rates.
The Company's efficacious tax rate for the six months ended December 29, 2018 was lower than the statutory rate primarily due to earnings of foreign subsidiaries, generated primarily by the Company's international operations managed in Ireland, that were taxed at lower rates, partially offset by a $22.1 million discrete freight for the Transition Tax, tax generated by the GILTI provisions, and a $9.4 million discrete freight for interest accruals for unrecognized tax benefits.
The Company's federal statutory tax rate for fiscal year 2018 was 28.1%. The Company's efficacious tax rate for the three and six months ended December 30, 2017 was higher than the statutory rate primarily due to a $236.9 million discrete provisional freight for the Transition Tax, a $13.7 million discrete freight to remeasure deferred taxes as of the enactment date of the Act, $4.2 million and $8.0 million discrete charges for interest accruals for unrecognized tax benefits in the three and six months ended December 30, 2017, respectively, partially offset by earnings of foreign subsidiaries, generated primarily by the Company's international operations managed in Ireland, that were taxed at lower rates.
At December 29, 2018 and June 30, 2018, their current quarter backlog was approximately $372.3 million and $441.1 million, respectively. In backlog, they comprehend orders with customer request dates within the next three months. As is customary in the semiconductor industry, these orders may breathe canceled in most cases without penalty to customers. Accordingly, they believe that their backlog is not a trustworthy measure of future revenues. entire backlog numbers own been adjusted for estimated future distribution ship and debit pricing adjustments.FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES financial Condition Cash flows were as follows: Six Months Ended December 29, December 30, 2018 2017 (in thousands) Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities $ 431,435 $ 449,580 Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 496,454 (731,186 ) Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities (1,064,633 ) (333,005 ) Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents $ (136,744 ) $ (614,611 )
Cash provided by operating activities is net income adjusted for sure non-cash items and changes in sure assets and liabilities.
Cash provided by operating activities was $431.4 million in the six months ended December 29, 2018, a dwindle of $18.1 million compared with the six months ended December 30, 2017. This dwindle was due to changes in working capital, partially offset by higher net income.
Investing cash flows consist primarily of net investment purchases and maturities, and capital expenditures.
Cash provided by investing activities was $496.5 million for the six months ended December 29, 2018, compared with cash used by investing activities of $731.2 million for the six months ended December 30, 2017, a change of $1,227.6 million. The change was due to lower purchases of and higher proceeds from maturity of available-for-sale securities, in order to provide funds to repay the November 2018 Notes.
Financing cash flows consist primarily of debt issuance, repurchases of common stock, and payment of dividends to stockholders.
Net cash used in financing activities increased by approximately $731.6 million for the six months ended December 29, 2018 compared to the six months ended December 30, 2017. The increase was due to the repayment of the November 2018 Notes and repurchases of their common stock.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of December 29, 2018, their available funds consisted of $2.0 billion in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments. They anticipate that the available funds and cash generated from operations will breathe sufficient to meet cash and working capital requirements, including the anticipated even of capital expenditures, common stock repurchases, debt repayments and dividend payments for at least the next twelve months.
Available Borrowing Resources
We own access to a $350 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility that expires on June 27, 2019. As of December 29, 2018, they had not borrowed any amounts from this credit facility. efficacious January 22, 2019, the Company terminated this revolving credit facility.
As of December 29, 2018, they did not own any material off-balance-sheet arrangements, as defined in particular 303(a)(4)(ii) of SEC Regulation S-K.
Feb 01, 2019
(c) 1995-2019 Cybernet Data Systems, Inc. entire Rights Reserved
Participants were recruited as share of the INMA Project, a multicenter birth cohort study aimed at investigating the result of environmental exposures and diet during pregnancy on fetal and child development in different areas of Spain (17). Cohorts included in this analysis were established in 2003–2008 in the geographical areas of Asturias, Gipuzkoa, Sabadell, and Valencia. A total of 2,644 eligible women (≥16 y, aim to deliver at the reference hospital, competence to communicate in Spanish or the other official language in the region, singleton pregnancy, no assisted conception) were recruited during prenatal visits in the first trimester of pregnancy. Women were followed through pregnancy and children from birth through the fourth year of life. Of the 2,506 children followed through birth, 2,080 (83%) were evaluated at ≥ 4 y. Participants lost to follow-up were characterized by lower scores on most socio-environmental variables and had significantly shorter duration of exclusive breastfeeding in comparison to children silent participating at ≥ 4 y (Supplementary Table S8 online). Final analyses included entire children (N = 1346) born at term (≥ 37 wk) with complete data for any breastfeeding variable, for whom assessment of cognitive development, attention, ADHD symptoms, or autistic traits was available, and for whom for entire covariates were available. Participants who were excluded due to missing data on any confounding variable were younger at testing and their mothers had higher gregarious class compared to the included participants, but they were comparable with breastfeeding duration and on the vast majority of confounding variables (Supplementary Table S9 online). Participating mothers signed an informed consent configuration in each phase, and the ethics committees of the centers involved approved the research protocol.Breastfeeding Assessment
Detailed information about the child’s diet was obtained using interviewer-administered questionnaires with the mothers when children were 6 mo outmoded (Asturias and Sabadell sub-cohorts), 14 mo, and 4 y (all sub-cohorts) (Supplementary design S1 online). “Any breastfeeding” was defined as the child receiving any nature of breast milk feeding, no matter if combined or not with other diets; “predominant breastfeeding”, as the child breastfed only, but allowing supplementations of non-milk liquids, fruit juice, oral rehydration salts solution, drops, and syrup forms of vitamins, minerals, and medicines; and “exclusive” breastfeeding, as the child receiving breast milk only, not allowing other food or drink, not even water, but allowing the infant to receive oral rehydration salts solution, drops and syrups. Information on exclusive breastfeeding was not collected in the Valencia cohort (n = 484, 36.0%).Child Assessment
Cognitive development was assessed using the Spanish version of the McCarthy Scales of Children’s Abilities (MSCA) (18). The MSCA is composed of subtests assessing verbal, perceptive–performance, memory, quantitative, and motor function, and generates a common Cognitive Index (GCI). For each cohort, raw scores from the GCI were centered to a breathe of value of 100, with a yardstick divergence of 15 to compute index scores. entire testing was performed by trained psychologists. Examiners identified children whose tests were of profitable character (n = 1,265), of destitute character (e.g., due to fatigue, illness, etc.; n = 66) and those for whom testing was invalided due to want of collaboration (n = 7). Children with invalid testing were excluded from entire MSCA analyses.
Attention duty was assessed using Conners’ Kiddie Continuous Performance Test (K-CPT), a 7-min computerized test in which children were instructed to press the space-bar when they saw any image on the computer screen, except a ball (19). Omissions (child failing to respond when he/she should), unfounded alarms (child responds when he/she should not) and hit reaction time (mean response time for entire reform hits) were computed and examined separately.
ADHD symptoms were estimated using the ADHD criteria of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (ADHD-DSM-IV) configuration list completed by the child’s classroom teacher (20). ADHD-DSM-IV is an internationally recognized configuration list comprising 18 symptoms and is designed to evaluate attention deficit (9 symptoms) and hyperactivity and impulsivity (9 symptoms) in children. Each symptom is rated using a 4-point scale, i.e., 0 = “not at all”, 1 = “just a little”, 2 = “pretty much”, and 3 = “very much”. Sum of scores was calculated to provide continuous measures of inattention, hyperactivity/impulsivity, and combined ADHD symptoms. ADHD in the clinical orbit was estimated by recording ratings of options 0 and 1 as “symptom absent”, and ratings of 2 and 3 as “symptom present”, and using the DSM-IV criteria for ADHD (≥ 6 symptoms within a single category). Cronbach’s Alpha Coefficient analyses in their sample were >0.89 for entire ADHD-DSM-IVscales, suggesting excellent internal consistency.
Autistic traits were assessed using the Spanish version of the Childhood Autism Spectrum Test (CAST; formerly Childhood Asperger Syndrome Test) (21). The CAST is a 37-item questionnaire that the evaluator administers to the child’s parents. Each question can breathe scored with 0 (autism-negative response) or 1 point (autism-positive response), except for six questions that are not scored. The maximum practicable score is 31 points. The total number of points was computed to provide a continuous measure of autistic traits. Higher scores betoken more autistic traits. Additionally, a score of 15 has been used as a cut-off to identify children at risk for ASD. Cronbach’s Alpha Coefficient analysis in their sample was of 0.64 for CAST total score.Other Variables
A set of potentially confounding variables was selected a priori based on prior studies of the effects of breastfeeding on child development. Information on parental education, gregarious class, and other socio-demographic characteristics and habits (including maternal age and country of birth, parity, and maternal smoking) were obtained through questionnaires during the first and third trimesters of pregnancy, and when the child was 14 mo and 4 y of age (5). Child custody attendance (yes/no) was assessed at each postnatal visit. Maternal verbal IQ was estimated at the 4-y assessment using the Similarities subtest of the Weschler Adult Intelligence Scales-Third Edition (WAIS-III), a subtest showing strong correlations with the plenary verbal scale (22). Raw scores were converted to an IQ-scale with a breathe of value of 100 and a yardstick divergence of 15, using data from the entire sample. Maternal psychopathology was assessed at the 4-y assessment using the Symptom Checklist – Revised (SCL-90-R), a self-reported questionnaire comprising 90 items which provides a Global Severity Index designed to measure overall psychological distress (23). T-scores > 65 on the Global Severity Index were considered at risk for psychopathology. For the subsample of participants from the Gipuzkoa cohort, character of family context was besides assessed at 2 y using the Etxadi-Gangoiti Scale (EGS), a 127-item interview carried out in the family’s home by psychologists. The EGS provides three subscales (Stimulation of cognitive and linguistic development, Stimulation of gregarious and emotional development, and Organisation of the gregarious context and physical environment) (24).Statistical Analyses
The normality of each variable’s distribution was inspected visually and checked for skewness and kurtosis (normality range: −2.0 to 2.0). Log transformations were conducted on each ADHD-DSM-IV symptom variable and on K-CPT omission errors, since these variables followed log-normal distributions. Associations between breastfeeding duration and MSCA – GCI, K-CPT omission errors, commission errors and hit reaction time, ADHD-DSM-IV Inattention, Hyperactivity, and Total symptoms, and CAST total score were examined using linear regression analyses. Associations with ADHD scores within the clinical orbit and CAST scores in the borderline orbit (yes vs. no) were besides examined using logistic regression analysis. In order to illustrate the extent to which socio-environmental variables accounted for the associations between breastfeeding duration and outcomes, child and assessment covariates were included as a first step in the regression model (minimally-adjusted models), and gregarious and parental covariates were entered as a second step (fully-adjusted models). Because birthweight and maternal age might not breathe linearly associated with child outcomes, several categories of these covariates were created, and those that explained the largest percentages of child outcomes were used in subsequent models. Standardized regression coefficients are reported to facilitate comparisons across developmental domains, and raw regression coefficients are besides reported to facilitate interpretation of the results.
Minimally-adjusted models included the following child variables: age (continuous), sex, cohort (Asturias/Gipuzkoa/Sabadell/Valencia), birthweight (<−1.5 SD/−1.5 – 0 SD/0 – 1.5 SD/> 1.5 SD to the sample mean), and character of assessment (good vs. poor; MSCA analyses only). Fully-adjusted models additionally adjusted for parity (0 vs. ≥1), maternal variables: age (< 25/25–29/30–34/35+ years), education (primary or less/secondary school/university), gregarious class (managers, technicians, and associate professionals/skill manual and other nonmanual workers/semiskilled and unskilled manual workers), country of birth (Spain: yes/no), smoking during pregnancy (yes/no), verbal IQ proxy (continuous), and psychological distress (at risk for psychopathology: yes/no); paternal variables: education and gregarious class (same categories as for maternal variables); and child custody (attending to kindergarten at 18 mo: yes/no). In order to examine whether different associations were observed for “any”, “predominant” and “exclusive” breastfeeding due to sample differences, analyses were rerun including children with available data for entire types of breastfeeding only. To exclude the possibility that any observed result was attributable to differences between breastfed and nonbreastfed children, entire analyses were besides rerun without nonbreastfed children. Significant associations between duration of any breastfeeding and child outcomes were explored further by replacing the continuous breastfeeding duration variable by the following categories: 0 (not breastfed) – 2 mo (used as reference); 2–6 mo; 6–12 mo; > 12 mo. The result of child gender on the relationship between duration of breastfeeding and each outcome was examined using linear regression analyses stratified by sex, and by adding the interaction term to the main regression models. Because character of family context was available for < 20% of the sample, it was not included in the main regression models; nevertheless, because of previous evidence suggesting that character of home environment constitutes a major confounding factor in the relationship between breastfeeding and child development (2), supplemental analyses were conducted in order to examine the repercussion of controlling for EGS scores on the study results, within the subsample from the Gipuzkoa sub-cohort for which this variable was available. In order to maximize sample size, this supplemental set of analyses only controlled for child characteristics in addition to character of family context, which allowed for the inclusion of additional children who had missing data on socio-environmental variables. In order to examine whether the relationship of breastfeeding duration to a given child outcome was independent from its association with other child outcomes that were establish to breathe associated with breastfeeding, entire significant final models were rerun including the other outcomes as covariates. Finally, to evaluate the role of participant loss due to attrition and missing data, main linear regression models for each child outcome with duration of any breastfeeding as a predictor were reconducted using inverse probability weighting (25).
Associations were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05. entire analyses were conducted with IBM SPSS Statistics Version 22.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY).
3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Aruba [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Avaya [101 Certification Exam(s) ]
AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CA-Technologies [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
CheckPoint [43 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institute [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
CyberArk [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
DELL [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECCouncil [22 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
EMC [128 Certification Exam(s) ]
Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fortinet [14 Certification Exam(s) ]
Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
HP [752 Certification Exam(s) ]
HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBM [1533 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Juniper [65 Certification Exam(s) ]
LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Medical [68 Certification Exam(s) ]
Microsoft [375 Certification Exam(s) ]
Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCLEX [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Oracle [282 Certification Exam(s) ]
P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Real Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
Symantec [135 Certification Exam(s) ]
Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Vimeo : https://vimeo.com/240171896
Issu : https://issuu.com/trutrainers/docs/a2040-403
Dropmark : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/11412842
Wordpress : http://wp.me/p7SJ6L-eH
weSRCH : https://www.wesrch.com/business/prpdfBU1HWO000MUVU
Scribd : https://www.scribd.com/document/356764566/Pass4sure-A2040-403-Assessment-IBM-Forms-8-0-Forms-Design-and-Development-exam-braindumps-with-real-questions-and-practice-software
Dropmark-Text : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/12023871
Youtube : https://youtu.be/MPcdGuE1FNA
Blogspot : http://killexams-braindumps.blogspot.com/2017/10/ensure-your-success-with-this-a2040-403.html
RSS Feed : http://feeds.feedburner.com/DontMissTheseIbmA2040-403Dumps
publitas.com : https://view.publitas.com/trutrainers-inc/where-can-i-get-help-to-pass-a2040-403-exam
Google+ : https://plus.google.com/112153555852933435691/posts/gqkADVskEGU?hl=en
Calameo : http://en.calameo.com/account/book#
Box.net : https://app.box.com/s/t53dbffy9q2pra7v5f8o9cpxvo4hkulx
zoho.com : https://docs.zoho.com/file/5bym2a5867cb23aea4ced86d6785d2d42c592
coursehero.com : "Excle"
is specialized in Architectural visualization , Industrial visualization , 3D Modeling ,3D Animation , Entertainment and Visual Effects .