000-122 exam Dumps Source : Power Systems with POWER7 Common Sales Skills -v2
Test Code : 000-122
Test designation : Power Systems with POWER7 Common Sales Skills -v2
Vendor designation : IBM
: 101 true Questions
Do you want trendy dumps trendy 000-122 examination, it's far perquisite place?
Preparing for 000-122 books can live a intricate job and 9 out of ten chances are that youll fail if you finish it with not a thing appropriate guidance. Thats in which satisfactory 000-122 reserve is available in! It provides you with efficient and groovy data that no longer simplest enhances your practise but additionally gives you a spotless gash threat of passing your 000-122 download and touching into any university without any melancholy. I prepared through this awesome software and I scored 42 marks out of 50. I can assure you that its going to never assist you to down!
fine to pay attention that actual test questions of 000-122 exam are to live had.
I am very tickled with the 000-122 QAs, it helped me lot in exam center. I can in reality promote for different IBM certifications additionally.
high-quality to hear that state-of-the-art dumps contemporaneous 000-122 examination are available.
I honestly thank you. I actually acquire cleared the 000-122 exam with the assist of your mock test. It became very plenty helpful. I simply might recommend to those who are going to appear the 000-122.
proper state to discover 000-122 ultra-modern dumps paper.
My brother saden me telling me that I wasnt going to evaporate through the 000-122 exam. I notice when I gape outside the window, so many different people want to live seen and heard from and they just want the attention of us but I can narrate you that they students can enmesh this attention when they pass their 000-122 test and I can narrate you how I cleared my 000-122 test it was only when I got my study questions from killexams.com which gave me the hope in my eyes together forever.
it's miles unbelieveable, however 000-122 actual test questions are availabe perquisite here.
I passed this exam with killexams.com and acquire recently obtained my 000-122 certificate. I did every my certifications with killexams.com, so I cant compare what its enjoy to bewitch an exam with/without it. Yet, the fact that I uphold coming back for their bundles shows that Im tickled with this exam solution. I cherish being able to rehearse on my computer, in the comfort of my home, especially when the vast majority of the questions appearing on the exam are exactly the same what you saw in your exam simulator at home. Thanks to killexams.com, I got up to the Professional level. I am not positive whether Ill live touching up any time soon, as I appear to live tickled where I am. Thanks Killexams.
do that awesome supply brand fresh actual test Questions.
I am strolling into an IT firm and consequently I from time to time find out any time to prepare for 000-122 exam. Therefore, I ariseto an effortless conclusion of killexams.com dumps. To my phenomenon it worked enjoy wonders for me. I exigency to transparent upall of the questions in least feasible time than supplied. The questions gape enjoy quite smooth with top class reference manual. I secured 939 marks which became in reality a extremely respectable surprise for me. First rate course to killexams!
you know the satisfactory and fastest course to transparent 000-122 exam? I were given it.
killexams.com become a blessing for 000-122 exam, for the occasions that gadget has loads of tiny info and configuration tricks, which may live tough if you dont acquire a respectable deal of 000-122 experience. killexams.com 000-122 questions and solutions are enough to sit down and pass the 000-122 test.
No worries whilst getting geared up for the 000-122 examination.
started out getting ready for the difficult 000-122 exam the utilize of the massive and voluminous study books. but failed tocrack the tough topics and got panicked. i was about to drop the exam whilst any individual stated me the dumpwith the aid of killexams. It was virtually smooth to study and the fact that I may want to memorize every in a brief time, removed every my apprehensions. ought to crack 67 questions in only 76 mins and got a titanic eighty five marks. Felt indebted to killexams.com for making my day.
Little solemnize for 000-122 examination, first rate success.
Every topic and area, every scenario, killexams.com 000-122 materials acquire been stately attend for me while preparing for this exam and actually doing it! I was nervous, but going back to this 000-122 and thinking that I know everything because the 000-122 exam was very effortless after the killexams.com stuff, I got a respectable result. Now, doing the next flat of IBM certifications.
surprised to gape 000-122 dumps!
It became superb revel in with the killexams.com team. They guided me loads for development. I recognize their effort.
large Blue's refresh comprises the gargantuan energy 795, which it pits against excellent-shelf techniques from HP and Oracle.
IBM Corp. final week refreshed its device p server line with a few fresh POWER7-based mostly techniques. The most recent POWER7 entries might not ship except September 17.
they will probably live worth the wait. big Blue's revamped gear p line contains the gargantuan 256-way power 795, which IBM pits directly towards correct-shelf choices from Hewlett-Packard Co. (HP) and Oracle Corp.
large Blue isn't simply considering huge, despite the fact: it furthermore unveiled four system p "express" entries -- i.e., smaller, less-costly programs slated for the mid-market. IBM's POWER7 thrust furthermore includes a dedicated system -- viz., the sapient Analytics gear 7700 -- designed for company intelligence (BI) and facts warehousing workloads. it live of a piece with the smart Analytics initiative that massive Blue kicked off remaining summer time, just prior to its acquisition of analytics powerhouse SPSS Inc.
IBM's 256-core verve 795 plays to gear p's (and RISC/Unix's) proper strengths, and its smaller categorical entries -- the energy 710, 720, 730, and 740 techniques -- comprehend massive Blue's newest ail to grapple with commodity x86 (or x64, as is universally the case) servers operating chips from advanced Micro contraptions (AMD) Inc. and Intel Corp. prior to now, huge Blue had offered most efficacious a solitary power-primarily based specific device, the verve 720.
in this case, massive Blue is having a stake that a a lot reduce can saturate (enabled in portion through the utilize of POWER7 chips that could otherwise had been discarded) as well as an means to flee AIX, system i and Linux workloads will uphold tip the scales in device p's choose. furthermore, with POWER7, IBM is as soon as once again fielding a 2U kind-element server -- in fact, two 2U kind-factor servers, the energy 710 and the vigour 730. Add it every up and you acquire what looks enjoy a decent ail to bewitch on the commodity server aspect -- a traditionally arduous aspect to crack.
In an trade it really is relocating to commoditization (and relentlessly, at that), IBM Corp. is sticking to its proprietary weapons.
To live sure, massive Blue is a creditable commodity player -- its device x hardware line is powered by chips from each AMD and Intel; its gear x BladeCenter portfolio (which contains a power-based offering) is no. 2, normal, in the back of HP -- however likewise is still committed to homegrown silicon efforts akin to POWER7, which powers (in a solitary benign or another) its system i, system p, and gadget z hardware strains.
In a way, titanic Blue's POWER7 CMOS now stands as the ultimate of the Credible x86 alternatives.
HP and Intel continue to invest in IA64 (which is in line with an EPIC structure); Oracle has referred to most of the appropriate issues about SPARC (which has in spite of this been hemorrhaging relevance for half a decade or greater); and other gamers (reminiscent of Fujitsu and Unisys Corp.) thrust their own proprietary CMOS flavors, but not a thing can point to the variety of salary efficiency (relative to earnings of competitive, non-commodity platforms) that IBM can.
It looks that more advantageous and quicker transistors fabricated from graphene don't appear to live every that IBM is working on, due to the fact that its recent press free up speaks of a fresh set of POWER7 servers for worrying emerging applications.
even though no longer actually concentrated on the buyer market, IBM is one in every greatest names on the enterprise, traffic and industrial sectors so far as computing goes.
It has a huge portfolio of gadget for both present and rising purposes, with economic features, scientific analysis and healthcare administration being just a number of of its outlets.
What the company did most lately was deliver a brand fresh batch of more suitable POWER7 blades and servers, which can live additionally respectable for consolidation and virtualization.
"Our approach appears to live paying off as more and more valued clientele opt for vigour programs," pointed out Tom Rosamilia, universal manager of IBM verve and z systems.
One product is the 16-core, single-broad IBM BladeCenter PS703, which can furthermore live an alternative to sprawling racks and is respectable for people involved with power efficiency.
The BladeCenter PS704 is akin to its sibling above, best it has double the volume of cores and, for that reason, 60-p.c quicker performance within the equal zone necessities as outdated-technology POWER7 items.
The announcement additionally mentions the upgraded IBM verve 750 express and the more desirable power 755, each with 32 POWER7 cores now.
"we are running billions of extreme calculations based on Einstein's concept of relativity on the POWER7 blades," pointed out Gaurav Khanna, professor of physics at UMass-Dartmouth.
"operating POWER7, i'm in a position to enmesh results as a total lot as eight instances quicker than running the equal calculations on an Intel Xeon processor. Calculations that used to bewitch a month to flee at the instant are accomplished in under a week. This means that i will live able to finish eight times extra science within the equal timeframe than I might finish earlier than."
This web page should still acquire counsel on anything else regarding IBMs smarter computing initiative.
John Teltsch (IBM)credit score: IBM
IBM has published a string of latest channel initiatives and investments as it seeks to construct key accomplice expertise and alternatives within the year forward.
Unveiled every through PartnerWorld at speculate in San Francisco, titanic Blue rolled out fresh initiatives including its Watson-primarily based collaboration engine referred to as IBM traffic partner connect; My PartnerWorld; fresh application deal registration and IBM power programs, LinuxONE and Z ‘In It to Win It’ incentives.
On top of this, the supplier additionally exact how it became further investing in accomplice abilities and enablement, as well as riding growth opportunities in market segments equivalent to protection and hybrid cloud.
particularly, IBM traffic companion relate makes a speciality of assisting partners faucet into the international ecosystem to collaborate on customer opportunities, enhance fresh company and bear fresh options to market.
meanwhile, the Watson-based engine will allow companions with complementary capabilities to discover each and every other, enmesh to market quicker and sell more collectively, in accordance with John Teltsch, typical supervisor of associate ecosystem at IBM.
My PartnerWorld, set to launch on 15 February, goals to present a personalized on-boarding and enablement journey, giving companions the probability to manage PartnerWorld gear and shortcuts in a solitary area. This comprises My revenue pastime (MySA), the PartnerWorld Console, Co-advertising Centre and traffic accomplice relate platform.
additionally the brand fresh utility deal registration will present companions with precedence access to special bid pricing with the remonstrate to reduce battle between expertise providers while enhancing monetary consequences.
Teltsch added this become a portion of the supplier's ongoing transformation efforts, which it kicked off final 12 months, to expand companion event and profitability, including projects round channel pricing, incentives and streamlined resale authorisation.
In April remaining year, big Blue, restructured its accomplice rendezvous fashions across the channel.
additionally, the IBM energy techniques, LinuxONE and Z 'In It to Win It' incentives acquire now been made attainable to companions, which additionally extends the motivation for IBM storage into 2019, together with deploying fresh claim technology tactics to power unique leads.
On exact of those fresh initiatives, the supplier is furthermore launching an ESA co-advertising providing for partners embedding IBM technology, and throughout third-celebration marketplaces, in addition to enhancing its digital APIs amid plans to double the variety of digital offerings.
"We continue to assist partners on their adventure to SaaS, with greater than 400 as-a-provider offerings, coupled with fresh demos, trials and incentives to hurry up boom,” Teltsch spoke of.
IBM has furthermore launched SaaS deal registration and P360, which is a device permitting companions to peer their client’s analytics.
companion expertise and enablement
Delving deeper, IBM additionally showcased its fresh earnings enablement solution, Seismic@IBM, a device that aspects income kits, plays, displays, utilize instances and other property.
The cost package uphold bundle is additionally being expanded into version 2.0, whereby partners can double their IBM cloud credit; deliver entry to a construction sandbox atmosphere; access gash expense vouchers for select education routine and extra subscription discounts.
as a result, Teltsch pointed out it become additionally doubling the number of system channel technical agents to aid companions in the container.
Going forward, a brand fresh managed capabilities protection issuer program (MSSP) goals to attend partners build protection practices and carry options in either an embedded or reseller model.
A ‘understand Your IBM’ protection income incentive will serve up reloadable IBM Rewards debit playing cards to companions who promote fresh security licenses and SaaS.
Teltsch stated it has additionally enabled companions to construct ‘Cloud Paks,’ which can live commercial enterprise-grade container utility applications with counsel and step-by using-step instructions for companions to without delay construct with open necessities in an ail to permit hybrid and multi-cloud deployments.
“built for Kubernetes on the IBM Cloud and IBM Cloud inner most, IBM Cloud Paks are designed to hurry up time to creation and enrich readiness at reduce saturate than containers on my own,” he explained.
moreover, a brand fresh Cloud Digital Technical rendezvous program will deliver partners with entry to technical assets concentrated on product demos and tutorials.
“These belongings supply a profound figuring out of product choices and how they can uphold purchasers along their adventure to Cloud and AI," Teltsch introduced. "Our fresh Seismic@IBM will consist of a hyperlink to this Cloud Digital Technical rendezvous application so partners can readily access this essential information while preparing for customer engagements."
in accordance with Teltsch, the fresh initiatives and investments acquire been a response to the "continuous feedback" from partners and consumers.
Teltsch printed that throughout the past 12 months, companions had doubled their number of expert and skilled abilities throughout its expertise stack.
“We’ve furthermore viewed colossal momentum in the number of companions pile their talents and selling solutions in strategic areas enjoy IBM protection, Cloud, IoT and Watson AI, with their 2d Watson construct problem producing greater than 500 AI solutions and prototypes that flee on the IBM Cloud,” Teltsch stated.
all the course through its fourth quarter results, massive Blue brought up that its cloud business, grew 12 per cent to US$19.2 billion in 2018.
furthermore, the company's cognitive application company, together with its artificial intelligence platform Watson, analytics and cyber protection capabilities and is its second biggest, reported income of US$5.46 billion, compared with analysts' expectation of US$5.25 billion.
Julia Talevski attended PartnerWorld at account in San Francisco as a visitor of IBMbe portion of the publication!
Error: gratify investigate your e mail tackle.
While it is arduous errand to pick solid certification questions/answers assets regarding review, reputation and validity since individuals enmesh sham because of picking incorrectly benefit. Killexams.com ensure to serve its customers best to its assets as for exam dumps update and validity. The greater portion of other's sham report objection customers promote to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams cheerfully and effortlessly. They never covenant on their review, reputation and property because killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams customer certitude is imperative to us. Extraordinarily they deal with killexams.com review, killexams.com reputation, killexams.com sham report grievance, killexams.com trust, killexams.com validity, killexams.com report and killexams.com scam. On the off chance that you view any deceptive report posted by their rivals with the designation killexams sham report grievance web, killexams.com sham report, killexams.com scam, killexams.com protestation or something enjoy this, simply bethink there are constantly terrible individuals harming reputation of respectable administrations because of their advantages. There are a stately many fulfilled clients that pass their exams utilizing killexams.com brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit Killexams.com, their case questions and test brain dumps, their exam simulator and you will realize that killexams.com is the best brain dumps site.
HP2-B54 dump | 4A0-100 rehearse test | C2090-422 rehearse test | HPE2-K43 rehearse test | 642-279 mock exam | 300-208 dumps questions | VCA410-DT questions answers | HP2-H29 free pdf | 77-888 dumps | 000-M191 rehearse exam | BH0-012 rehearse questions | HP0-S23 braindumps | 922-111 exam prep | C4090-958 free pdf | E20-542 VCE | 000-667 questions and answers | C9030-634 examcollection | 646-058 rehearse questions | HP2-B90 cram | CWDP-302 braindumps |
Review 000-122 true question and answers before you bewitch test
If are you confused how to pass your IBM 000-122 Exam? With the attend of the verified killexams.com IBM 000-122 Testing Engine you will learn how to expand your skills. The majority of the students start figuring out when they find out that they acquire to materialize in IT certification. Their brain dumps are comprehensive and to the point. The IBM 000-122 PDF files gain your vision vast and attend you a lot in preparation of the certification exam.
We acquire Tested and Approved 000-122 Exams. killexams.com provides the most accurate and latest IT exam materials which almost hold every scholarship points. With the aid of their 000-122 study materials, you dont exigency to squander your time on reading bulk of reference books and just exigency to disburse 10-20 hours to master their 000-122 true questions and answers. And they provide you with PDF Version & Software Version exam questions and answers. For Software Version materials, Its offered to give the candidates simulate the IBM 000-122 exam in a true environment.
killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for every exams on website
PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for every Orders
At killexams.com, they give verified on IBM 000-122 true exam questions the best to pass 000-122 test, and to enmesh certified by IBM. It is a best conclusion to quicken your vocation as an expert in the Information Technology industry. They are happy for their notoriety of helping individuals cinch through the 000-122 test in their first endeavors. Their prosperity rates in the previous two years acquire been amazing, because of their happy clients currently ready to attend their vocation in the snappy track. killexams.com is the main conclusion among IT experts, particularly the ones hoping to ascend the pecking order levels speedier in their individual associations. IBM is the traffic pioneer in data innovation, and getting certified by them is an ensured approach to prevail with IT vocations. They enable you to finish precisely that with their wonderful IBM 000-122 preparing materials.
IBM 000-122 is inescapable every around the globe, and the traffic and programming arrangements given by them are grasped by every one of the organizations. They acquire helped in driving a big number of organizations on the beyond any doubt shot course of achievement. Far reaching learning of IBM items are required to affirm an essential capability, and the experts ensured by them are exceedingly esteemed in every associations.
We give genuine 000-122 pdf exam inquiries and answers braindumps in two configurations. Download PDF and rehearse Tests. Pass IBM 000-122 genuine Exam rapidly and effortlessly. The 000-122 braindumps PDF compose is accessible for perusing and printing. You can print progressively and hone ordinarily. Their pass rate is towering to 98.9% and the similitude rate between their 000-122 study steer and genuine exam is 90% Considering their seven-year teaching background. finish you exigency accomplishments in the 000-122 exam in only one attempt?
As the only thing necessary here is passing the 000-122 - Power Systems with POWER7 Common Sales Skills -v2 exam. As every that you require is a towering score of IBM 000-122 exam. The just a solitary thing you acquire to finish is downloading braindumps of 000-122 exam study aides now. They won't let you down, they will provide you true questions. The experts additionally uphold pace with the most up and coming exam so as to give the larger portion of updated materials. Three Months free access to acquire the capacity to them through the date of purchase. Each hopeful may endure the cost of the 000-122 exam dumps by killexams.com at a low cost. Frequently rebate for anybody all.
Within the sight of the credible exam substance of the wit dumps at killexams.com you can undoubtedly build up your specialty. For the IT experts, it is fundamental to better their aptitudes as per their vocation prerequisite. They gain it simple for their clients to bewitch certification exam with the assistance of killexams.com verified and bona fide exam material. For a brilliant future in its realm, their brain dumps are the best alternative.
killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017: 60% Discount Coupon for every exams on website
PROF17: 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17: 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
DECSPECIAL: 10% Special Discount Coupon for every Orders
A best dumps composing is a captious component that makes it simple for you to bewitch IBM certifications. Yet, 000-122 braindumps PDF offers accommodation for hopefuls. The IT certification is a significant troublesome assignment on the off chance that one doesn't discover legitimate direction as true asset material. Therefore, they acquire bona fide and updated substance for the readiness of accreditation exam.
000-122 Practice Test | 000-122 examcollection | 000-122 VCE | 000-122 study guide | 000-122 practice exam | 000-122 cram
Killexams C9530-001 rehearse questions | Killexams 77-420 test questions | Killexams HP2-Z37 exam questions | Killexams SC0-402 bootcamp | Killexams 000-995 free pdf | Killexams EX0-105 dump | Killexams S10-101 study guide | Killexams E20-537 cheat sheets | Killexams HP0-K03 true questions | Killexams NS0-330 rehearse exam | Killexams 190-846 questions and answers | Killexams 922-089 braindumps | Killexams 300-470 test prep | Killexams 132-S-720-1 pdf download | Killexams 000-973 exam prep | Killexams HP2-T12 free pdf download | Killexams 117-101 questions answers | Killexams C2040-958 cram | Killexams CN0-201 free pdf | Killexams CAT-020 dumps questions |
Killexams A2040-410 test prep | Killexams 00M-647 study guide | Killexams 3002 exam prep | Killexams JN0-340 exam questions | Killexams 000-060 braindumps | Killexams C9010-262 mock exam | Killexams IT0-035 sample test | Killexams HP0-087 brain dumps | Killexams 050-728 exam prep | Killexams Series6 dump | Killexams 000-M48 questions and answers | Killexams 000-M12 VCE | Killexams C9510-318 study guide | Killexams NSE4 rehearse questions | Killexams 920-430 test questions | Killexams 70-498 rehearse test | Killexams ST0-072 brain dumps | Killexams STI-884 rehearse exam | Killexams HP2-E49 free pdf | Killexams Adwords-Search braindumps |
ARMONK, N.Y., April 13 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- IBM (NYSE: IBM) today added fresh servers, services and software to its lineup of 2010 systems designed to redeem a lid on the rising costs and complexities of operating modern data centers. The fresh offerings attend clients gleam the benefits of IBM's three-year, $3 billion investment in POWER7(TM) systems that are ready for fresh workloads, such as the growing utilize of powerful, real-time traffic analytics.
(Logo: http://www.newscom.com/cgi-bin/prnh/20090416/IBMLOGO )
They comprehend blade servers built on IBM's POWER7 workload-optimized systems' design, fresh systems software that can reduce the deployment of workloads from weeks to minutes, and fresh services to remotely implement the systems, reducing costs by up to 25%.
IBM furthermore announced its POWER7 technology achieved record performance for a compass of workloads.
New POWER7 Blades, Systems Software, Services: Improved Performance, Reduced Data hub Costs
With four, eight or 16 cores per blade, the fresh POWER7 servers tender clients the same 64-bit POWER® technology at travail in some of the world's most captious data centers in government, research, finance and high-tech industries, among others.
Built on the proven foundation of the IBM BladeCenter® family of products and designed for mid-size businesses needing enhanced performance to manage growth and reduce complexity, the every fresh PS700, PS701 and PS702 Express are the premier blades for workloads ranging from web-tier and SAP application servers to distributed databases in blade-based data centers. POWER7's innovative technologies automatically optimize the blades' performance and energy efficiency, allowing the fresh BladeCenter PS702 Express to deliver 225% better performance per blade than the Oracle Sun Blade T6340, and 188% greater performance per blade than the HP Integrity BL860c Blade. (1)
For more information evaporate to: http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/power/
New IBM Systems Director Software helps adjust computing resources in virtualized data hub environments to focus on priority workloads. With IBM Systems Director 6.2 and IBM Systems Director VMControl, multiple virtualized and physical systems can live managed from a solitary interface, fresh workloads can live deployed in minutes instead of weeks, and server administration costs can live reduced up to 34%. IBM lively Energy Manager 4.3 monitors and manages energy utilize and can reduce systems energy costs by nearly 30% on Power servers. (2)
For more information on fresh IBM Systems Director, VMControl and lively Energy Manager offerings evaporate to: http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/software/index.html
IBM Global Technology Services' new, remotely delivered implementation and migration services provide a lower-cost fashion (shaves up to 25% from installation costs) to install and implement IBM systems. Remote delivery allows IBM to staff engagements more quickly and gives clients a faster revert on their investment. Initially available in the U.S. and Canada with plans to expand to the ease of the world later in the year, these remotely delivered, lower priced services attend clients optimize system performance and reduce time to value.
For more information, evaporate to: www.ibm.com/services/implementation
IBM furthermore announced today a fresh exchange program to allow clients to upgrade to POWER7 technology immediately. IBM's lending and leasing unit, IBM Global Financing, is offering well-qualified clients to slither up to POWER7 systems at monthly costs proximate to, or lower than what they are paying for a current POWER6(TM) lease. The program furthermore provides for side-by-side migration of up to 60 days with limited to no downtime as the upgrade occurs.
For more information evaporate to: http://www-03.ibm.com/financing/us/lifecycle/acquire/powerx.html
Eight-Core POWER7 System Boosts Transaction-Processing Performance to Slash Licensing Costs More Than 80%
Using a sliver of its total, 64-core processing power, IBM's Power® 780 system today became the first server to deliver more than 1.2 million transactions-per-minute on only eight cores according to Transaction Processing Performance Council results. With price/performance of less than 70 cents per transaction per minute, the Power 780's 1.2 million transactions-per-minute sets a fresh record in performance-per-core - 4.6 times better than an HP Superdome and 7.5 times better than a Sun SPARC Enterprise T5440 cluster running Oracle RAC. (3)
For businesses that flee SAP, the Power 780 handled 37,000 users on 64 cores - 16% more users than a 256-core Sun Enterprise M9000 and 130% more users than a 64-core Fujitsu system running Intel Xeon® X7560 chips. (4)
Record-Setting Performance for Web and Analytics Workloads
The Power 780 furthermore demonstrated the faculty to deliver leadership, workload-optimized performance by setting fresh records across the three major industry-standard processor benchmarks for Java, integer and high-performance-computing workloads, achieving between 1.8 and three-times the performance of every other competitive published eight-socket results. (5)
IBM Power Systems' built-in virtualization provides the faculty to scale virtual machines to the complete capacity of the system - up to eight-times more than VMware. IBM testing indicates clients deploying virtualization may view up to 65% more performance-per-virtual machine on a Power 750 Express running PowerVM(TM) than a similarly configured HP DL380 G6 running VMware. (6)
Today's benchmark results continue to demonstrate that IBM Power Systems are able to deliver more compute power with fewer cores and less energy consumption than Sun/Oracle and HP/Itanium® based servers. This performance leadership across every major workloads, combined with Power systems' built-in virtualization technology means clients can achieve stagy cost savings and energy efficiency in their data centers. For instance, by using 87% fewer cores than a Sun SPARC Enterprise Cluster to deliver more than one million transactions per minute, the Power 780 allows clients to slash database licensing and maintenance costs by up to 80%. (7)
New Operating Environments, Developer Tools
New AIX® 6 Express Edition offers clients a new, lower-priced edition of AIX designed for SMB environments or smaller workloads consolidated on midrange or high-end Power Systems. Supporting up to four cores per image and 8GB per core, AIX 6 Express provides the reliability and flexibility of AIX at lower cost. AIX Express joins the existing AIX yardstick and Enterprise Editions to fill out the fresh family of AIX 6 offerings.
The fresh IBM i 7.1 integrated operating environment is designed to bewitch handicap of workload optimization features of POWER7, including automatic exploitation of Solid state Drives for optimum performance. Enhanced uphold for XML in DB2®, the integrated database for IBM i, helps companies exchange information between customers and suppliers, a fresh virtualization feature for PowerVM enables simpler testing of fresh releases before a software upgrade, and asynchronous geographic mirroring with PowerHA(TM) SystemMirror provides uphold for multi-site clustering over longer distances.
For more information evaporate to: www.ibm.com/systems/power/software/i/advantages/v7r1/index.html
IBM Rational Developer for Power V7.6 gives users of Power Systems on AIX a modern, Eclipse-based progress environment that supports C/C++ and COBOL development, and is furthermore tightly integrated with Rational Team Concert for Power Systems for improved application lifecycle management. IBM is furthermore introducing Rational compilers for C/C++ and Fortran, both optimized for POWER7. This fresh environment can provide up to 30% improvement in workload productivity. (8)
For more information evaporate to http://www-01.ibm.com/software/rational/announce/power/
For more information on fresh products announced today and to register for a special IBM webcast visit ibm.com/systemsContact(s) information Rick Bause IBM Media Relations 845-892-5463 [email protected] Mike Corrado IBM Media Relations 914-766-4635 [email protected]
IBM is a trademark of IBM Corporation in the United States and/or other countries. every other company/product names and service marks may live trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies. UNIX is a registered trademark in the United States and other countries licensed exclusively through The Open Group. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvald.
(1) SPEC® and the benchmark names SPECrate®, SPECint®, and SPECjbb® are registered trademarks of the yardstick Performance Evaluation Corporation. For the latest SPEC benchmark results, visit http://www.spec.org. every results are the best result posted at www.spec.org as of April 5, 2010 for the system indicated except for the IBM BladeCenter result which was submitted to SPEC as of April 13, 2010.
SPECint_rate 2006 results: IBM BladeCenter PS702 with 16 cores, two processor chips, and four threads per core had a peak result of 520. HP Integrity BL860c i2 with 8 cores, 2 processor chips and two threads per core had a peak result of 134. Sun Blade T6340 with 16 cores, two processor chips and eight threads per core had a peak result of 160.
SPECjbb2005 results: : IBM BladeCenter PS702 with 16 cores, two processor chips, and four threads per core running with 16 JVM instances had a result of 1,119,946 bops and 69,997 bops per JVM. Sun Blade T6340 with 16 cores, two processor chips and eight threads per core running with 16 JVM instances had a result of 388,456 bops and 24,279 bops per JVM.
(2) Source: ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/common/ssi/sa/wh/n/xbw03007usen/XBW03007USEN.PDF
page 3 of VALUE PROPOSITION FOR IBM SYSTEMS DIRECTOR
Challenges of Operational Management for Enterprise Server Installations
International Technology Group
(3) Transaction performance based on tpmC results as on 4/9/2010. Source: Transaction Processing Performance Council, www.tpc.org as of 4/9/10. IBM result submitted on 4/13/10. IBM Power 780 with 2 processor chips, 8 cores, 16 threads achieved 1,200,011 tpmC @ $.69 $/tpmC. Database was DB2 9.1 on AIX 6.1. System availability is 10/13/2010. tpmC per core is 150,001. HP Integrity Superdome with 64 processor chips, 128 cores, 256 threads achieved 4,092,799 tpmC @ $2.93 $/tpmC. Database was Oracle 10g on HP-UX 11i v3. System availability was 8/6/2007. tpmC per core is 31,975. Sun/Oracle T5440 cluster with 48 processor chips, 384 cores, 3,072 threads achieved 7,646,486 tpmC @ $2.36 $/tpmC. Database was Oracle 11g EE RAC on Solaris 10. System availability was 3/19/2010. tpmC per core is 19,913. IBM x3850 M2 with 4 processor chips, 16 cores, 16 threads achieved 516,752 tpmC @ $2.59 $/tpmC. Database was DB2 9.5 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux. System availability was 3/14/2008. tpmC per core is 32,297.
(4) The IBM Power 780 achieved the highest result ever published on the two-tier SAP® Sales and Distribution (SD) yardstick application benchmark running SAP enhancement package 4 for the SAP ERP application Release 6.0 (Unicode) with a result of 37,000 SAP SD benchmark users. The 64-core Power 780 handled 16 percent more users than a 256-core Sun Enterprise M9000 (Oracle's biggest system) and 130 percent more users than a 64-core Fujitsu 1800E system running Intel's Xeon X7560 chip. IBM Power System 780, 8p / 64-c / 256-t, POWER7, 3.8 GHz, 1024 GB memory, 37,000 SD users, dialog resp.: 0.98s, line items/hour: 4,043,670, Dialog steps/hour: 12,131,000, SAPS: 202,180, DB time (dialog/ update):0.013s / 0.031s, CPU utilization: 99%, OS: AIX 6.1, DB2 9.7, cert# 2010013; SUN M9000, 64p / 256-c / 512-t, 1156 GB memory, 32,000 SD users, SPARC64 VII, 2.88 GHz, Solaris 10, Oracle 10g , cert# 2009046; Fujitsu 1800E, 8p / 64-c / 128-t, 512 GB memory, 16,000 SD users, Intel Xeon X7560, 2.26 GHz, Windows Server 2008 R2 DE, SQL Server 2008, cert#: 2010010. every results are 2-tier, SAP EHP 4 for SAP ERP 6.0 (Unicode) and cogent as of 4/1/2010.
All SAP Sales and Distribution 2-tier benchmark results can live create at http://www.sap.com/solutions/benchmark/sd2tier.epx
(5) Best in class 8-socket results: IBM Power 780 64-core (3.86 GHz, 8 chips, 8 cores/chip,4 threads/core) SPECint_rate2006 result of 2,526; IBM Power 780 64-core (3.86 GHz, 8 chips, 8 cores/chip,4 threads/core) SPECfp2006 result of 2,240; IBM Power 780 64-core (8 chips, 128 threads) 3.86 GHz IBM Power 780 System running AIX V6.1 with a SPECjbb2005 result of 5,210,501 bops (81,414 bops/JVM).
Competitive 8-socket results: SPECint_rate2006: Fujitsu PRIMEQUEST 1800E 64-core (Intel Xeon X7560, 8 chips, 8 cores/chip, 2 threads/core) SPECint_rate2006 result of 1339; SPECfp_rate 2006: SGI Altix ICE 8200EX 32-core (Intel Xeon X5570, 2.93 GHz, 8 chips, 4 cores/chip, 2 threads/core) SPECfp_rate2006 result of 742; SPECjbb2005: Hewlett-Packard Company, HP DL785 G6 achieved 1,984,616 bops (248,077 bops/JVM on a 480core system (8 chips, 48 threads).
SPEC and the benchmark names SPECrate, SPECint, and SPECjbb are registered trademarks of the yardstick Performance Evaluation Corporation. Benchmark results stated reflect results published on www.spec.org (link resides outside ibm.com) as of April 8, 2010.
(6) "A Comparison of PowerVM and VMware Virtualization Performance", April 2010. White Paper available through www.ibm.com.
(7) pretense based on comparing an 8-core Power 780 system vs. a cluster of two Sun SPARC Enterprise T5440 both of which are estimated to deliver over 1 million OLTP transactions per minute. For details on the comparison gratify evaporate to:
(8) According to IBM traffic partner Oxford International, a leading provider of enterprise modernization solutions, fresh IBM Rational application progress and management software for POWER7 is providing improvements of up to 30 percent in team productivity in every aspects of the progress process.
Data Centers | NewsNew IBM Mainframe Can Manage 100,000 Virtual Machines Simultaneously
Big Blue's zEnterprise, a "data hub in a box," pools RISC and x86-based blades.
IBM has launched what it described its most significant promote in data hub infrastructure over the eventual two decades. The fresh zEnterprise is a mainframe noteworthy not just because of its increased processing capacity but because it is the first to provide integration with its Power7 blade infrastructure and x86-based blade racks.
Big Blue launched the fresh zEnterprise Thursday in fresh York. IBM said the fresh mainframe is 60 percent faster and equally more efficient from a power utilization perspective than the model it replaces, the z10.
The mainframe has a 5.2 GHz processor with up to 96 cores, houses 3 TB of RAM, and can process 50 billion instructions per second (BIPS). In addition to the boost in capacity, it allows the x86 and Power7 processor-based systems to flee as a common virtualized platform, sharing network, storage, and power components.
"This is the most powerful announcement they acquire ever made in the history of the IBM company in terms of customer economics," said Steve Mills, senior vice president of IBM's software and hardware divisions. "We acquire never in their history done anything that has redeem more money back in the hands of the customer than this announcement. They acquire solved a massive traffic problem that almost any traffic of reasonable size has today, and that's bringing down that cost of IT operation."
Mills, who called this fresh system a "data hub in a box," extolled its fresh integrated platform for its shared infrastructure across various processors. The system can manage 100,000 virtual machines simultaneously, a threshold Mills said will live arduous to duplicate. "During this decade, nobody will deliver deeper, more profound, fully mobile, fully portable virtualization the course this system provides complete virtualization for workloads," Mills said.
At the core of this fresh virtualized capability is the combination of IBM's fresh zEnterprise Blade hub Extension (xBX) and the zEnterprise Unified Resource Manager, which allow for the sharing of workloads between the core mainframe and IBM's Power7 and x86 processor blades.
The Universal Resource Manager is made up of software and embedded hardware, said IBM Distinguished Engineer Donna Dillenberger, in an interview at launch event. "It's on both sides. It's on the mainframe side and the blade side, so you can enmesh a coherent view of what's running, and you can enmesh a coherent management actions between both, and it comes with zEnterprise," Dillenberger said.
In the past IBM had individual technologies that managed various clusters, but the Universal Resource Manager provides a much tighter association, added David Gelardi, IBM's vice president of sales, support, and education. "It's a very broad pipe between the blade environment and the mainframe environment," Gelardi said in an interview. "That is very necessary from an application perspective, that's where the integration comes from."
While IBM talked up its faculty to flee Linux-based x86 blades, it talked down its faculty to flee Windows workloads. It's "about lack of visibility into source code, not wanting to uphold an OS that 'drag[s] in primitives from DOS,' and generally not being able to shape Windows to the management IBM would want," eminent Redmonk analyst Michael Cote in a blog posting.
But Gelardi said organizations still could opt to flee Windows workloads. "There's no intuition you can't utilize it to flee Windows because Tivoli's provisioning capabilities is operating systems agnostic," he said. "Windows would flee on an outboard blade and ultimately would flee on an xBlade inside zBX."
Jeffrey Schwartz is editor of Redmond magazine and furthermore covers cloud computing for Virtualization Review's Cloud Report. In addition, he writes the Channeling the Cloud column for Redmond Channel Partner. follow him on Twitter @JeffreySchwartz.
Why is it that every time humans develop a really astute computer system in the movies, it seems intent on killing every eventual one of us at its first opportunity?
In Stanley Kubrick’s masterpiece, 2001: A Space Odyssey, HAL 9000 starts off as an attentive, if more or less creepy, custodian of the astronauts aboard the USS Discovery One, before famously turning homicidal and trying to destroy them all. In The Matrix, humanity’s invention of AI promptly results in human-machine warfare, leading to humans enslaved as a biological source of energy by the machines. In Daniel H. Wilson’s reserve Robopocalypse, computer scientists finally crack the code on the AI problem, only to acquire their creation develop a sudden and profound dislike for its creators.
And you’re not an especially sentient being yourself if you haven’t heard the myth of Skynet (see The Terminator, T2, T3, etc.)
The simple retort is that — movies enjoy Wall-E, Short Circuit, and Chappie, notwithstanding — Hollywood knows that nothing guarantees box office gold quite enjoy an existential threat to every of humanity. Whether that threat is likely in true life or not is decidedly beside the point. How else can one explicate the endless march of zombie flicks, not to mention those pesky, shark-infested tornadoes?
The reality of AI is nothing enjoy the movies. Siri, Alexa, Watson, Cortana — these are their HAL 9000s, and not a thing seems even vaguely murderous. The technology has taken leaps and bounds in the eventual decade, and seems poised to finally match the vision their artists acquire depicted in film for decades. What then?
Is Siri just a few upgrades away from killing you in your sleep, or is Hollywood running away with a tired idea? Looking back at the eventual decade of AI research helps to paint a clearer picture of a sometimes frightening, sometimes enlightened future.
An increasing number of prominent voices are being raised about the true dangers of humanity’s continuing travail on so-called artificial intelligence.
Chief among them is Dr. Nick Bostrom, a philosopher who furthermore holds degrees in physics and computational neuroscience. In his 2014 book, Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies, he outlines in rigorous detail the various ways a “strong” AI — should they succeed in pile one — would wipe us off the kisser of the planet the instant it escapes their control. Forget about wholesale nuclear annihilation — that’s how power-hungry human dictators evaporate about dealing with an unwanted group of humans. No, a tough AI would instead starve us to death, utilize up every of their natural resources, or, if it’s feeling really desperate, dismantle their bodies at a molecular flat and utilize the resulting biomass for its own purposes.
Dr. Nick Bostrom warns about the potential dangers of a runaway AI at a 2015 TED talk in Vancouver, Canada. (Photo: Bret Hartman/TED)
But don’t bewitch it personally. As Bostrom points out, an artificial superintelligence likely won’t behave according to any human notions of morality or ethics. “Anthropomorphic frames cheer unfounded expectations about the growth trajectory of a seed AI and about the psychology, motivations, and capabilities of a ripen superintelligence,” he says.
Don’t let Bostrom’s professorial language fool you — he’s deadly earnest about the consequences of an AI that can outthink even the smartest human being, and not a thing of them are good. More frighteningly, he says that they may evaporate from giving ourselves high-fives over creating the first AI that can speculate as well as they can to cowering in the corner as it hunts us down in as limited as a few weeks, or perhaps even days. It every comes down to a few key factors that will likely influence their future with AI.
Computers speculate really fast. In the best-case scenario, we’ll acquire enough time between an AI acquiring the faculty to speculate as well as us and its climb to super-intelligent status that they can adjust and respond. On the other hand, as Bostrom points out, when you’re dealing with a machine that can speculate — and therefore develop — at an almost unimaginable speed, by the time they realize what’s going on, it will already live far too late to discontinue it. Some readers may bethink the 1970s sci-fi horror flick Demon Seed, in which an AI not only predicts that it will live shut down by its fearful creator, but employs murder and rape to ensure its survival.
“If and when a takeoff occurs,” Bostrom writes, “it will likely live explosive.” Stephen Hawking has echoed this sentiment: “Once humans design artificial intelligence,” he says, “it will bewitch off on its own and develop at an ever-increasing rate. Humans, who are limited by leisurely biological evolution, couldn’t compete and would live superseded.”
Computers often bear unexpected results. AI researchers are regularly surprised by the outcome of their experiments. In 2013, a researcher discovered that his AI — designed to learn to play NES games — decided to intermission the gameplay on Tetris as its preferred solution to the goal of not losing.
At their early stage of AI development, this is a respectable thing; surprises often lead to fresh discoveries. Unexpected results paired with a massive and sudden surge in intelligence would live quite the opposite. Being able to anticipate the course a superintelligent AI will respond to, well, anything, could prove to live impossible, in much the same course their actions and motivations are utterly impenetrable to an insect.Strong AI, feeble AI, and the stuff they already use
Artificial intelligence research has at times resembled the hunt for the Holy Grail. In the summer of 1956, there was a credence that they could achieve tough AI (aka, artificial universal intelligence), which can live thought of as mimicking human intelligence in every of its forms, functions, and subtleties. Researchers at Dartmouth University thought that if they could endow computers with the basic pile blocks of human intelligence — reasoning, scholarship representation, planning, natural language processing, and perception — then somehow, universal intelligence would simply emerge.
Obviously, that didn’t happen. In fact, over the intervening decades, there were several boom and bust cycles in AI research (often dubbed “AI winters”) that moved a few of these pile blocks forward, but then failed to explicate ongoing progress after an initial age of excitement.
What did happen were various advances in each of the pile blocks, resulting in an assortment of “weak AIs,” or practical AIs.
AI doesn’t just exist in far-flung visions of the future. Google has been using it since 2015 to better search results. (Video: Google)
The Google search engine could just live the best-known case of feeble AI. Its algorithms finish an exceptional job of pulling together hundreds of variables and combining those with the words you type to bear a results page culled from the vastness of the web.
In fact, most of the examples of AI from the past 10 years probably haven’t struck you as examples of AI at all, which just goes to explicate how successful they’ve been. Most acquire quietly and seamlessly integrated themselves into their lives, making them better in little but significant ways.
Google’s Photos product shows how far we’ve promote in perception AI — type in “bicycle” and it will find photos you’ve taken of two-wheeled vehicles, even if you never labeled them as such.
The predictive text options that materialize as they type on their phones redeem us valuable taps, while autocorrect attempts to gain up for the fact that on-screen keyboards and human thumbs are a recipe for inaccuracy (notwithstanding the hilarity that often ensues when it tries to promote to their rescue).
Amazon’s “suggested for you” product recommendations feature is an case of AI used to gain money. It was reportedly responsible for 35 percent of the company’s sales in 2006, and the people behind the technology acquire since made it available to other retailers, resulting in “billions” of sales.
So-called brilliant assistants from Apple, Google, Amazon, and Microsoft (Siri, Google Now, Alexa, and Cortana, respectively) every leverage recent advances in natural language processing (NLP), combined with sophisticated heuristics, which gain questions enjoy “what’s the weather going to live enjoy today?” the hands-free equivalent of jumping into a weather app or Googling the same phrase. Google’s CEO, Sundar Pichai, recently boasted that his company’s NLP AI is approaching human levels of understanding, which may explicate why he told shareholders that “the next titanic step will live for the very concept of the ‘device’ to fade away.”
The Waze GPS and crowdsourced mapping app is a stately case of AI planning.
Recently, chatbots acquire become the most “talked about” profile of AI. In 2014, the University of Reading in England declared that the Turing Test had finally been passed, 65 years after its inception, by an algorithm masquerading as a 13-year-old Ukrainian boy named Eugene. Eugene is a chatbot — a pretty respectable one by every accounts — but despite passing the test, it is still not an case of accurate tough AI. Cleverbot — another AI chatbot – which is claimed to acquire passed the Turing Test in 2011, is available to acquire a chat with anyone. But labeling it “intelligent,” might depend on your definition of the word.
Me: finish you believe in God?Clev: finish you?Me: That’s not an answer.Clev: You did not claim a question.Me: Yes I did. I asked: finish you believe in God?Clev: Yes, I do. Why don’t you?Me: Why finish you speculate I don’t believe in God?Clev: Because you said that you did not.Me: No, I didn’t. You aren’t a very respectable listener, are you?Clev: Fine fine. I know you said that. But whatever. finish you enjoy Lady Gaga?
Both the Turing Test itself and the claims that it has been passed, are not without criticism.
Microsoft erudite just how fallible a chatbot AI can live in a spectacularly public mode when it released Tay, an AI Twitter bot, on an unsuspecting global audience earlier this year. Less than 24 hours after Tay began interacting with people, she — er — it, became sexist and racist, offering laud for Hitler among other gaffes.
From left to right, Jeopardy host Alex Trebek poses with legendary contestants Ken Jennings, IBM’s Watson supercomputer, and Brad Rutter. Watson would later wipe the floor with both human contestants in a showdown. (Photo: Jeopardy Productions)Where’s Watson?
If the AI industry has a celebrity, it’s IBM’s Watson. After handily defeating all-time Jeopardy! champ Ken Jennings in 2011, the supercomputing application dropped the mic and started a fresh life in the more or less less exciting sphere of commercial applications. But Watson’s conquest caused a lot of people to start wondering if IBM’s wunderkind was in fact an embryonic HAL 9000. Guru Banavar, IBM’s Vice President of Cognitive Computing, places it in a different category entirely.
“We speculate of AI as augmented intelligence, as opposed to artificial intelligence,” Banavar told Digital Trends. He believes that the notion of AI as a carbon copy of the human brain is a distraction, one that entirely misses the point of how this technology can best live redeem to use. “Augmented intelligence is a partnering between a person and a machine,” he explains, with the goal being to offload the travail that a person isn’t able to finish as well as the machine. It forms a symbiotic relationship of sorts, in which the two entities travail better together than each of them would finish on their own.
IBM refers to this approach to AI as “cognitive computing,” specifically because it does not seek to replicate the entirety of human intelligence. The approach IBM took to solving the Jeopardy! problem wasn’t centered on making a synthetic brain, but rather on getting a machine to process a very specific type of information — language — in order to hunt for and ultimately bear the perquisite retort for the game’s reverse-question format. To finish this, Banavar recounts, took a combination of advances “going back almost 10 years.” Simply getting Watson to understand the massive number of permutations of import within English, was daunting. Its eventual success was “a titanic breakthrough for the total bailiwick of computer science,” Banavar claims.
IBM continues to develop Watson, as well as its other investments in AI, in pursuit of what Banavar calls “grand challenges.” These are computing problems so difficult and complex, they often require dozens of researchers and a sustained investment over months or years. Or, as Banavar puts it: “Not something you can finish with a yoke of guys in a garage.”
A cluster of 90 IBM Power 750 servers power Watson, and each one uses a 3.5 GHz POWER7 eight-core processor. (Video: IBM)
One such challenge is reading medical images. The growing number of X-rays, CT scans, PET scans, and MRIs being done every day is a potential lifesaving boon for patients, but it’s furthermore a growing problem for the profession of radiology. At the moment, a radiologist must personally assess each scan to gape for signs of disease or other anomalies. The sheer number of scans being done are creating increasing claim for trained radiologists, whose numbers are limited simply due to the rigorous and lengthy training required to become one. Banavar describes the travail they finish as “very monotonous and oversight prone,” not because these doctors lack the skill, but because they are only human. It’s a scenario that seems almost custom-built for the benign of AI that IBM has been working on. In order to significantly repercussion the number and property of scans that can live processed, researchers are using Watson to understand the content of the images, within the complete medical context of the patient. “Within the next two years,” Banavar says, “we will view some very significant breakthroughs in this.”Teaching a machine to learn
For IBM to succeed, it will acquire to resolve a problem that has plagued AI efforts from their very beginnings: Computers attend to follow the instructions they’re given in such a literal course that, when the unexpected occurs — a situation the developer hadn’t foreseen — they proceed anyway, often with undesirable outcomes. But what if machines possessed the faculty to know when something doesn’t quite appropriate and adjust accordingly, without being told so explicitly? In other words, what if they possessed common sense?
Dr. Maya Gupta is a senior AI researcher at Google, and she is attempting to finish just that. Using a utensil within the AI arsenal known as machine learning, Gupta and her colleagues are slowly training computers to filter information in a course that most humans find relatively simple. Her current goal — improving video recommendations on YouTube — might appear modest, or even boring, but from an AI researcher’s perspective, it’s nirvana. That’s because of the fundamental distinction between how machines and humans learn.
“A 3-year-old can learn an gargantuan amount of things from very few examples,” Gupta says. The same cannot live said for computers, which require vast quantities of data to acquire the same flat of understanding. It furthermore requires some pretty significant computing resources, which is why Nvidia recently launched a fresh benign of supercomputer developed specifically to flee deep-learning algorithms.
Curiously, computer scientists acquire known how to “teach” machines for several decades. The missing ingredient has been, well, the ingredients. “You can acquire a model that can learn from a billion examples,” Gupta explains, “but if you don’t acquire a billion examples, the machine has nothing to learn from.” Which is why YouTube, with its monster catalog of videos, is the impeccable state to cultivate a data-hungry process enjoy machine learning. Gupta’s algorithms are being taught two kinds of common sense, known as smoothness and monotonicity. Both feel enjoy child’s play: Smoothness dictates that you shouldn’t let one little change toss off a conclusion that has been based on dozens of other factors, while monotonicity operates on an “all other things being equal, this one fact should gain it the best choice” principle.
In practice, smoothness means that a potentially stately video recommendation isn’t dismissed by the algorithm simply because it contained both cooking and traveling information, when the previously watched video was purely about cooking. For monotonicity, Gupta cites the case of recommending a coffee shop. If you’ve identified that you enjoy coffee shops that serve organic, impartial trade coffee and that furthermore acquire free Wi-Fi, then the one that is closest to you should top the recommended list, even though you never specified distance as important. “It would surprise some humans just how arduous that is,” Gupta says of the ail involved in teaching machines to respect patterns that any 5-year-old could pick up on.
Project Malmo Katja HoffmanMore
Microsoft researcher Katja Hofmann, center, is teaching machines to play Minecraft as portion of Project Malmo, which is intended to better human-machine cooperation. (Photo: Scott Eklund/Red Box Pictures)Mining for scholarship in Minecraft
As successful as it might live at finding just the perquisite video for you, that algorithm has exertion performing the same stint with music recommendation. “It’s arduous to transfer what we’ve learned,” Gupta acknowledges, something she says is a challenge for the industry, not just Google. So how finish you teach an AI to live flexible, in addition to having common sense? Dr. Katja Hofmann, a researcher at the Machine Intelligence and Perception group at Microsoft Research Cambridge, thinks she has the answer: teach it how to play Minecraft.
Project Malmo is Hofmann’s attempt to repurpose the massively accepted online game into an experimentation platform for artificial intelligence research. Her team has developed a modification for the game that lets AI “agents” interact directly with the Minecraft environment. “Minecraft is really Interesting because it’s an open-world game,” Hofmann told us, which offers a unique space in which AI agents can deal with different environments that change over time, a key point if you’re trying to foster supple learning. This aspect of Minecraft created problems during early attempts to enmesh agents to achieve goals. “The world doesn’t wait for the agent to gain its decision,” she says, referring to the real-time nature of the game, and its obvious parallels to true life.
Using the mod not only gives an agent the faculty to exploit the LEGO-like bricks of material that are central to the game’s environment — it can furthermore interact with other players, including humans. One of Hofmann’s long-term goals for Project Malmo is to better human-computer cooperation. Much enjoy at IBM, the philosophy driving these experiments, and in fact Microsoft’s entire approach to AI, is that it should travail collaboratively with people. Experiments acquire already revealed that AI agents are able to complete tasks which humans simply create too hard. Hofmann is eagerly anticipating an agent that learns to collaborate with humans to resolve tasks. “That would value they acquire achieved a titanic breakthrough,” she said.
It could promote from collaboration. Earlier this year, Microsoft decided to open source Project Malmo, a slither that could succumb necessary discoveries, especially if Microsoft’s competitors bewitch an interest. IBM’s Watson has proven its trivia chops on Jeopardy! but how would it fare when asked to build a house out of bricks? Over at Google, the team behind DeepMind has already enjoyed success in getting an algorithm to learn how to play Space Invaders! — a game with a solitary goal — maximize points — and only three control options: slither left, slither right, and fire. Does it possess the flexibility that Hofmann is trying to cheer for success in Minecraft?Strike up the roboband
Having an entity that can apply logic, reasoning, and animal mathematical prowess to challenges in engineering, medicine, and research just makes sense. But what about art? Can AI play a role in the creation of beauty, whether it’s cinema, sculpture, or even music? Google is determined to find out.
The company recently showed off the capabilities of its DeepMind AI platform to perform mind-bending, almost hallucinogenic transformations of images and videos through a process it has dubbed DeepDream. It’s a fun, trippy thing to finish to your favorite photos, but it seems to drop short of the independent creative process they normally attribute to “artists,” and might live more appropriately described as an Instagram filter on steroids.
dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream c e deMore
dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream d caMore
dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream c e fMore
dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream fc aeMore
dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream eMore
dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream fMore
dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream fMore
dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream bf c caMore
dt ai apocalypse a tired hollywood trope or human destiny dream ec bMore
Google’s profound Dream Generator reinterprets photos into psychedelic works of expertise using neural networks. (Photos: profound Dream Generator)
Dr. Douglas Eck, a research scientist at Google, was intrigued when he first saw DeepDream. He recognized it immediately as a powerful case of machine learning, or “good ol’-fashioned neural networks, done right,” as he puts it. But Eck was furthermore struck by something else: “This stuff can live fun.” So Eck decided to lobby the senior brass at Google to let him build a little team to investigate how machine learning could live further leveraged in the world of art, only this time it would live focused on music, an zone Eck has long been passionate about. “Much to my pleasure,” Eck recounts, “Google was perquisite on board with this,” and Magenta was born.
Generating music algorithmically isn’t new. You can listen to some of Eck’s own efforts from his time working on it at the University of Montreal in 2002. “The question is,” Eck asks, philosophically, “how finish you build models that can generate [music] and can understand whether they’re respectable or not, based upon feedback from their audience, and then improve?” It starts to sound enjoy Magenta is going to unleash a horrible fresh wave of computer-generated Muzak, but Eck is quick to assure us that’s not the point. “In the end,” he says, “people want to connect with people. Consuming 100-percent machine-generated content is a bit of lifeless end.”
Instead, he sees Magenta as an opportunity to create the world’s next electric guitar. “Can they build AI tools that attend people express themselves in ways they couldn’t before?” Eck wonders. He cites Jimi Hendrix’s iconic utilize of amplification and distortion as an example: “That really opened up total channels for him to express himself that weren’t there before,” he told Digital Trends.
But unlike Hendrix’s guitar, the instruments that Magenta births will ideally live smart. Really smart. “You can already drop some bass loops into GarageBand and play on top of it,” he points out. “But what if there’s actually some smarts to this bassist?” In Eck’s vision of the future, the Magenta code basis will construct a virtual bandmate that listens to you as you play, and can intelligently — perhaps even creatively — follow along and respond accordingly. “It’s enjoy your copilot,” he said.
Just enjoy Project Malmo, Magenta is now open source, an necessary step if any of Eck’s dreams for a backup band of AI musicians are to live realized. Because Magenta is built on a machine-learning framework — Google’s own open-source TensorFlow software — it is incredibly data hungry. By opening access to a worldwide community of musicians, Magenta could evolve very quickly. “If they can live playing along with other musicians, the amount of information that’s present for learning is just astonishing,” Eck enthuses.From music to megalomania?
Each of the AI experts they spoke to every partake an enthusiasm for the future potential of the technology that borders on the religious. They furthermore partake an equally skeptical view of Bostrom’s doomsday prophecies. For them, the notion that one day a superintelligent AI will spin on an unsuspecting human population remains very much the domain of science fiction, not science fact.
“I finish not believe that machines are going to discontinuance up being autonomous entities that evaporate off and finish things on their own,” IBM’s Banavar says when asked about the likelihood of a machine intelligence that would exigency to live controlled. His primary concern for their future with the machines is one that programmers acquire been obsessing over for years: penniless performance because of bug-ridden code. “That’s a much bigger problem in my wit than machines that will wake up one day and finish something they weren’t designed to do,” he said.
Google’s Gupta points to a basic stumbling shroud that she thinks will hamstring the progress of a tough AI for years to come: “Our best philosophers and neuroscientists aren’t positive what consciousness is,” she notes, “so how can they even start talking about what it means [for a machine to live conscious] or how they would evaporate about replicating that digitally?” It’s arduous to narrate if she’s being heartfelt or coy — many observers acquire suggested that if any entity working on the AI problem today will crack the code, it’s probably going to live Google. Given a sufficiently long runway, she believes anything is possible. “I speculate they can finish it … I’d speculate in the next hundred years,” she offers. “I’m just not positive it’s going to live that interesting.”
Microsoft’s Hofmann echoes Gupta’s thoughts about the difficulty of achieving a machine with a truly universal flat of intelligence. “I believe that it may live workable in principle,” she says, “but just knowing the state of the expertise in AI, I don’t view us getting anywhere proximate to those predictions any time in the near future.”
Google’s Eck finds the topic more or less exasperating. “This total concept of superintelligence,” he says, “it just doesn’t gain sense to me. I guess I really don’t enmesh it.” It’s arduous to reconcile this confusion with the fact that he’s on a mission to create the first intelligent, synthetic musician. But he clarifies a instant later: “My view of cognition is so tied to human perception and action. I don’t gape at their brains as these computational boxes [in competition] with these other, stronger brains in boxes that happen to live inside computers.” When asked how far they might live from such a scenario, he laughs and says, “Twenty years!” because, as he points out, that’s the customary time frame experts give when they acquire no idea, but they exigency to state something.
Skeptics of Bostrom’s predictions of AI supremacy aren’t limited to those working in the field. He has furthermore drawn criticism from the world of philosophy and ethics. Michael Chorost, author of Rebuilt: How Becoming portion Computer Made Me More Human and World Wide Mind: The Coming Integration of Humanity, Machines, and the Internet, feels he has a tough understanding of how computers and their code work, despite not having a background in AI. He classifies Bostrom’s Superintelligence as “a brilliantly wrong book.”
Chorost believes they may create increasingly powerful AI agents, but he’s unconvinced these algorithms will ever become sentient, let solitary sapient. He compares these concerns to climbing a tree, and then declaring we’re closer to the moon. Much enjoy Gupta, Banavar and Eck, he says the biggest question is how a machine, made up of circuits and code, could ever achieve that status. He subscribes to the concept that there is something inherently special about their bodies, and their “aqueous chemical” makeup, that no electronic system will ever live able to duplicate.
He falls short of ruling it out completely, however, and offers one possibly viable route it could take: An evolutionary one. Instead of trying to program awareness into machines, they should let nature finish the massive lifting. “Putting it in a intricate environment that forces [an AI] to evolve,” Chorost suggests, might finish the trick. “The environment should live lethally complex,” he says, evoking images of AIs competing in a virtual gladiator’s arena, “so that it kills off ineffective systems and rewards efficacious ones.”
The other capitalize to this artificial Darwinism, if it succeeds, is that it will bear a ethical AI with no genocidal tendencies. “Morality is actually built into how evolution works,” he claims, aphorism that every you exigency to finish is gape at humanity for the proof. “Despite both world wars, the rate of violent death has been consistently falling,” he notes. “We’re actually getting more ethical with each passing decade — that is not accidental. That’s a process that comes out of reason.” Chorost himself reasons that any AI that develops over time — thanks to evolution — will thus live a kinder, gentler entity because we’ve seen this process play out in every of us.So why worry?
Perhaps Chorost is right. Perhaps the essential ingredients for sentience will never live reproduced in silicon, and we’ll live able to live comfortably knowing that as incredibly capable as Siri becomes, she’s never going to follow her own desires instead of catering to ours, enjoy in the movie Her. But even if you don’t buy into the concept that one day AI will become an existential threat, Gary Marchant thinks they should every live paying a lot more attention to the risks that promote with even a moderately more sophisticated flat of artificial intelligence.
Officially, Marchant is the Lincoln Professor of Emerging Technologies, Law and Ethics at the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law at Arizona state University. When he’s not lecturing students at ASU, he’s working on a legal and ethical framework for the progress of AI as a member of the international engineering standards body, the IEEE. When he’s not doing that, Marchant co-investigates the “control and responsible innovation in the progress of autonomous machines” thanks to vouchsafe money from the Future Of Life Institute — an organization that funds research and outreach on scenarios that could pose an existential risk to humanity (including AI). These activities give Marchant a 50,000-foot perspective on AI that few others possess. His conclusion? There are two areas that require immediate attention.
Military drones enjoy the MQ-9 Reaper currently only operate with human pilots remotely at the controls, but AI developments may eventually enable them to destroy autonomously. (Photo: universal Atomics Aeronautical)
“One that concerns me the most,” he says, “is the utilize of AI in the military.” At the moment, the U.S. drone arsenal is remote-controlled. The pilot is still in command, even if she’s sitting hundreds of miles away, but that scenario may already acquire an expiration date. The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, or DARPA, is reportedly interested in developing autonomous software agents that could identify and repair security risks in computing systems. “There will live tough incentives to evaporate more and more autonomous,” Marchant warns, because it will live seen as the only viable course to respond to an adversary who is already benefitting from the faster-than-human decision-making these systems are capable of. “Then you’re reliant on these systems not to gain mistakes,” he notes, ominously.
It might live effortless to fire his concerns were it not for the fact that a federal advisory board to the Department of Defense just released a study on autonomy that echoes his words, almost verbatim: “Autonomous capabilities are increasingly ubiquitous and are readily available to allies and adversaries alike. The study therefore concluded that DoD must bewitch immediate action to accelerate its exploitation of autonomy while furthermore preparing to counter autonomy employed by adversaries.”
The other utilize of AI that Marchant believes is in exigency of examination is much closer to home: “The movement toward autonomous cars,” he says, is going to require thoughtful progress and much better regulation.
Tesla Autopilot allows the Model S to drive autonomously on the highway, but a number of crashes prove it’s not yet perfect. (Video: Tesla)
“As they recently saw with Tesla,” he observes, referencing the recent crashes — and one death — connected to the company’s autopilot system, “it’s a harbinger of what’s to promote — people being injured or killed by an autonomous system making decisions.”
He highlights the very true ethical decisions that will live faced by AI-controlled cars: In an accident situation, whose life should live preserved — that of the passenger, another driver, or a pedestrian? It’s a question many are wrestling with, including Oren Etzioni, a computer scientist at the University of Washington and the CEO of the Allen Institute for artificial Intelligence, who told Wired: “We don’t want technology to play God.”
What Marchant clearly isn’t worried about is biting the hand that feeds: Much of his Future Of Life vouchsafe comes from Tesla CEO Elon Musk.What about the jobs?
Today’s manufacturing robots follow meticulously programmed instructions, but future models enjoy this prototype from Fanuc could learn from reinforcement, just enjoy humans. (Photo: Fanuc)
Further into the future, Marchant sees a huge problem with AI replacing human workers, a process that he claims has already begun. “I was talking to a pathologist,” he recounts, “who said his bailiwick is drying up because machines are taking it over.” Recently, a prototype AI based on IBM’s Watson began working at a global law firm. Its machine discovery and document review capabilities, once sufficiently advanced, could affect the jobs of immature associate lawyers, which Marchant thinks demonstrates that it’s not only menial jobs that are at risk. “This is going to become a bigger and bigger issue,” he said. Fanuc, the largest provider of industrial robots, has recently used reinforcement learning to teach an embodied AI how to perform a fresh job — in 24 hours.
Google’s Gupta offers an optimistic perspective, saying, “The more Interesting myth is the jobs that are being created,” though she stops short of listing any of these fresh jobs. Her Google colleague, Eck, puts it into a historical (and of course, musical) frame, noting that the advent of drum machines didn’t create legions of unemployed drummers (or, at the very least, it didn’t add to their existing numbers). “We still acquire lots of drummers, and a lot of them are doing really awesome things with drum machines,” he says.
Marchant understands these arguments, but ultimately, he rejects them. The always-on, 24/7 decision-making nature of AI puts it into a technology class by itself he says. “There will live so many things that machines will live able to finish better than humans,” he notes. “There was always something for humans to slither to in the past. That isn’t the case now.”
Interestingly, the biggest players in AI aren’t deaf to these and other concerns regarding AI’s future repercussion on society and acquire recently joined forces to create a fresh nonprofit organization called The Partnership on artificial Intelligence to capitalize People and Society, or the shorter Partnership on AI. Its members comprehend Microsoft, Google, IBM, Facebook, and Amazon, and its stated goal is to “address opportunities and challenges with AI technologies” through open and collaborative research. The partnership isn’t interested in consulting with policymaking bodies, but the public could discontinuance up steering it that course if they can’t live convinced of the technology’s benefits.
Surprisingly, Marchant isn’t ready to claim more laws or more regulations perquisite away. “I’m almost worried that sometimes they slither too quickly,” he says, “and start putting in state laws before they know what we’re trying to address.”Just state no to AI
Dr. Kathleen Richardson, Senior Research Fellow in the Ethics of Robotics at De Montfort University, knows exactly what she’s trying to address: The goal of an conscious AI, or any AI designed to mimic live things, she believes, is a fundamentally flawed pursuit. “The only intuition they speculate it’s workable that machines could live enjoy people,” she says, “is because they had — and still acquire — slavery.” For Richardson, using machines as a stand-in for a person, or indeed any other live entity, is a byproduct of a pervert civilization that is still trying to find rationalizations to handle people as objects.
“We partake properties with every life,” she says, “but they don’t partake properties with human-made artifacts.” Reversing this logic, Richardson dismissed the notion that they will ever create an aware, sentient, or sapient algorithm. “I completely, utterly, 100 percent reject it,” she says. Perhaps because of this ironclad belief, Richardson doesn’t disburse much time worrying about superintelligent, killer AIs. Why speculate about a future that will never promote to pass? Instead, she’s focused her research on AI and robotics in the here and now, as well as their near-term impact. What she sees, she does not enjoy — in particular the trend toward robotic companions, driven by improvements in AI. Though most well-known for her anti-sex robot position, Richardson opposes robotic companionship of any kind.
Softbank Pepper RobotMore
Pepper is designed to live a humanoid companion, keeping owners company enjoy a pet, rather than performing any specific task. (Photo: Softbank)
“They state that these robots — these objects — are going to live therapeutic,” she says, referring specifically to the bleeding-edge Japanese market, which has the uphold of industry heavyweights enjoy SoftBank and Sony. Richardson doesn’t redeem much faith in this notion, which she thinks is nothing more than yet another rationalization linked to slavery. “If you talk to superannuated people,” she says, “what they want is day trips out, and contact with other human beings. not a thing of them said, ‘What I want most of every is a robot.’” Perhaps she’s right, and yet that didn’t discontinue SoftBank’s Pepper — the first companion robot capable of interpreting basic human emotions — from selling out its initial flee of 1,000 units in less than a minute.
Sherry Turkle, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology researcher, psychologist and author, agrees with Richardson’s viewpoint, but mostly because she has seen that — balky to Richardson’s pretense — there is claim for AI companions, and that worries her. In 2013, Turkle gave an interview to Live Science, saying, “The concept of some benign of artificial companionship has already become the fresh normal.” The expense for this fresh normalcy is that “we acquire to change ourselves, and in the process, they are remaking human values and human connection.”
Sophia from Hanson Robotics, furthermore pictured at the top of this article, achieves an almost creepy flat of resemblance to a true human. (Video: Hanson Robotics)
That would live just fine with Dr. David Hanson of Hanson Robotics. “The artificial intelligence will evolve to the point where they will truly live their friends,” he told CNBC.
Marchant has already weighed in on this subject. Instead of fighting this fresh normal, he says they might just acquire to embrace it. In his controversial Slate article, he outlines a future where marriages between humans and robots will not only live legal, they will live inevitable. “If a robotic companion could provide some benign of comfort and cherish — transparent cherish at least — I’m not positive that’s wrong,” he says, citing the fact that there are many in their society who, for various reasons, are incapable of forming these kinds of relationships with other humans.
Marchant makes it transparent that he still values human relationships above those that involve synthetic companions, but he’s furthermore prepared to accept that not everyone will partake these values. “I’m certainly not going to marry a robot, but if my son wanted to 20 years from now, I wouldn’t state he couldn’t finish that,” he claims. “I’d try to talk him out of it, but if that’s what made him happy, I’d live more concerned about that than anything else.” Perhaps as a badge of the times, earlier this year a draft plan for the EU included wording that would give robots official standing as “electronic persons.”Stepping toward the future
Facebook CEO expense Zuckerberg has said that in 10 years, it’s likely that AI will live better than humans at basic sensory perception. Li Deng, a principal researcher at Microsoft, agrees, and goes even further, saying, “Artificial Intelligence technologies will live used pervasively by ordinary people in their daily lives.”
Eric Schmidt, executive chairman of Google parent Alphabet, and Google CEO Pichai view an gargantuan explosion in the number of applications, products, and companies that acquire machine learning at their core. They are quick to point out that this type of AI, with its insatiable appetite for data, will only fulfill its potential when paired with the cloud. Urs Hölzle, Google’s senior vice president of technical infrastructure, said, “Over the next five years, I expect to view more change in computing than in the eventual five decades.”
These predictions are — more or less obviously, given their sources — highly positive, but that doesn’t value the road ahead will resemble the Autobahn. There could live significant bumps. IBM’s Banavar points to a few challenges that could trammel progress. “One of the breakthroughs they need,” he says, “is how you combine the statistical technique [of machine learning] with the knowledge-based technique.” He refers to the fact that even though machines acquire proven powerful at sifting through huge volumes of data to determine patterns and predict outcomes, they still don’t understand its “meaning.”
The other titanic challenge is being able to ramp up the computing power they exigency to gain the next set of AI leaps possible. “We are working on fresh architectures,” he reveals, “inspired by the natural structures of the brain.” The premise here is that if brain-inspired software, enjoy neural nets, can succumb powerful results in machine learning, then brain-inspired hardware might live equally (or more) powerful.
All this talk about brain-inspired technology inevitably leads us back to their first, spooky, concern: In the future, AI might live a collection of increasingly useful tools that can free us from drudgery, or it could evolve rapidly — and unbeknownst to us — into the most efficient killing machine ever invented.
One of those options certainly seems a lot more desirable, but how finish they gain positive that’s the version they discontinuance up with?
If they follow AI expert Chorost’s advice, there’s no intuition to worry, because as long as their AIs evolve, they’ll develop morality — and morality leads to benevolence. That’s assuming it’s even possible, which he disputes. “When an engineering path [to sentient AI] becomes clear,” he says, “then we’ll acquire a sense of what not to do.”
Banavar, despite being fairly positive that an AI with its own goals isn’t in their future, suggests that “it is a smart thing for us to acquire a course to spin off the machine.” The team at Google’s DeepMind accord and acquire written a paper in conjunction with the Future Of Life Institute that describes how to create the equivalent of a “big red button” that would let the human operator of an AI agent suspend its functions, even if the agent became smart enough to realize such a mechanism existed. The paper, titled “Safely Interruptible Agents,” does not evaporate so far as to position itself as the course to counter a runaway superintelligence, but it’s a step in the perquisite direction as far as Tesla CEO Musk is concerned: He recently implied that Google is the “one” company whose AI efforts uphold him awake at night.
Interestingly, during the same interview with Recode, Musk suggested that OpenAI — an organization he backs that operates a grass-roots ail to gain AI technology widely available to everyone — could live the ultimate antidote to a malevolent AI agent. If everyone possessed their own personal AI, he reckons, “if somebody did try to something really terrible, then the collective will of others could overcome that wrong actor.”
Perhaps they will develop a tough AI. Perhaps it won’t live friendly. Perhaps they will live pushed to extinction by Skynet, offered a tenuous, uneasy truce by the machines of The Matrix, or simply ignored and left to their own (less intelligent) devices by the superintelligent OS One from Her.
Or perhaps, to quote computer scientist and AI skeptic Peter Hassan, they will simply uphold “pursuing an ever-increasing number of immaterial activities as the original goal recedes ever further into the future — enjoy the mirage it is.”
3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Aruba [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Avaya [96 Certification Exam(s) ]
AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CA-Technologies [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
CheckPoint [41 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institue [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institute [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
DELL [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECCouncil [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
EMC [129 Certification Exam(s) ]
Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fortinet [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
HP [750 Certification Exam(s) ]
HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBM [1532 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Juniper [64 Certification Exam(s) ]
LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Medical [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
Microsoft [374 Certification Exam(s) ]
Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCLEX [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Oracle [279 Certification Exam(s) ]
P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
Symantec [134 Certification Exam(s) ]
Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Dropmark : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/11595291
Wordpress : http://wp.me/p7SJ6L-Xx
Issu : https://issuu.com/trutrainers/docs/000-122
Dropmark-Text : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/12140140
Blogspot : http://killexamsbraindump.blogspot.com/2017/11/free-pass4sure-000-122-question-bank.html
RSS Feed : http://feeds.feedburner.com/DontMissTheseIbm000-122Dumps
weSRCH : Coupon Code, Promo Code, 000-122 vce, Free 000-122 vce, Download Free 000-122 dumps, Free 000-122 braindumps, pass4sure 000-122, 000-122 rehearse test, 000-122 rehearse exam, killexams.com 000-122, 000-122 true questions, 000-122 actual test, 000-122 PDF download, Pass4sure 000-122 Download, 000-122 help, 000-122 examcollection, Passleader 000-122, exam-labs 000-122, Justcertify 000-122, certqueen 000-122, 000-122 testking
publitas.com : https://view.publitas.com/trutrainers-inc/free-pass4sure-000-122-question-bank
Calameo : http://en.calameo.com/books/004923526e7117952adee
Box.net : https://app.box.com/s/ky7sqk56cd95m9hayt8j4zt5lf0tqn3b
zoho.com : https://docs.zoho.com/file/5qy3o341f420f4949485b90d304ddb68e42fe
is specialized in Architectural visualization , Industrial visualization , 3D Modeling ,3D Animation , Entertainment and Visual Effects .